And where exactly were the quotation marks identifying which words were actually his? Oh wait, there weren't any quotation marks as it was a load of crap spun by some intern at rlw.
I'm sure Blocker may have mentioned something in passing to someone about having doubts over whether someone like Idris can come back and re-gain his rep form. That's quite different to what that gossip segment said though!
I was under the impression he wrote the piece, hence why there are no quotation marks and the fact his name is at the bottom, implying he's the author.
If they weren't said by him, I'm sure he can inform RLW and they can retract the article and issue an apology to Blocker then.
No, the piece was seemingly written by "Staff writers". Again with the shoddy quality of 'journalism' who knows. but you don't say something's written by a group of people if in fact is was direct from a well-known person.
Even if they retract it's too late as the headings and talk are already out there. Again, he probably did say something about Idris potentially struggling, that's not unreasonable at all. It's the paraphrasing by interns which is the issue
