Inglis hopefully out.

Why is everyone so up in arms about this tackle, when the board was so quiet weeks ago when JT was taken out in a late, high, dangerous, aggresive, swinging elbow to the jaw? That was the sort of crap that ends careers yet there was no real reaction. Ingliss smashes a bloke and this board goes into overdrive with calls of he should have been sent to his suspension should be for the rest of the regular season.

Is it because people are scared we cant do Souths with him in the side?
 
@stryker said:
Why is everyone so up in arms about this tackle, when the board was so quiet weeks ago when JT was taken out in a late, high, dangerous, aggresive, swinging elbow to the jaw? That was the sort of crap that ends careers yet there was no real reaction. Ingliss smashes a bloke and this board goes into overdrive with calls of he should have been sent to his suspension should be for the rest of the regular season.

Is it because people are scared we cant do Souths with him in the side?
Click to expand...

Possibly SOO envy and hangover Stryker

Seeing it involves both Inglis and Thurston ???
 
LOL, no. The reason is that everyone knew the hit on JT was terrible and that Prior deserved a lengthy stint on the sideline.
They are up in arms about this tackle because some say it was bad and Inglis deserves a lengthy stint on the sidelines and others say no it's not only fine, it's a great tackle.

Personally i'm in the former camp and think if the shoulder charge wants to survive then we must punish those who misuse it, severely. Then players will think about when, where and how they will use a shoulder charge.
To save the shoulder charge as a part of rugby league Inglis needs a suspension.
 
@mtd said:
@LaT said:
How is it clear cut?
"it is not a good hit if you hit the head.. it never is and never will be."
"good hits DONT make contact with the head."

Now you justify a WT player hitting another player in the head.

dwyers initial contact wasnt with the head, it was body and slipped up (because jwh fell).

inglis hit young on initital contac across the face…

its clear cut...

dwyers was a good hit, i understand it contradicts what i said above, but what i meant to say is that good hits dont make initial contact with the head.

so again, its clear as day imo.
Click to expand...
Click to expand...

Mate I love Dwyers hit. I will never forget the feeling of watching him do it and screaming with the crowd around me. It was amazing….

It was also a blatant head high tackle. You can not have it both ways merely because Simmo was a tiger. If Ingliss's was so bad, then so was Dwyers.
 
sorry mate i disagree.. they are 2 completely different scenarios…

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2ILh-w5LPYo

pause it at 0:34....

look at dwyers positioning, how low he gets to make the tackle. he doesnt lead with the shoulder and shoulder only (as inglis did). he has his arms braced to wrap up jwh... then look at how low hargraves has droppped... it was a genuine attempt to make a proper tackle... slight contact may have been made with the head, but at no fault of dwyer... he did everything right...

then go back and look at inglis's hit... he leads with his shoulder and shoulder only.. he has no intention of making a tackle, no intention of wrapping him up. he's trying to smash him.. as a result makes first contact across youngs face with the bicep/shoulder...

again, there is NO WAY that JWH stands up if dwyer hits the head and head only (as inglis did).

they are not the same... no where near similar...
 
@stryker said:
Why is everyone so up in arms about this tackle, when the board was so quiet weeks ago when JT was taken out in a late, high, dangerous, aggresive, swinging elbow to the jaw? That was the sort of crap that ends careers yet there was no real reaction. Ingliss smashes a bloke and this board goes into overdrive with calls of he should have been sent to his suspension should be for the rest of the regular season.

Is it because people are scared we cant do Souths with him in the side?
Click to expand...

Your last sentence hits the nail on the head I think mate
\
\
_Posted using RoarFEED 2012_
 
@mtd said:
what do you mean 'the way i make out'?
check out the image ink posted earlier in the thread:

![](http://home.arcor.de/bananas02/Image1.jpg)

look at youngs face in that 2nd photo, are you kidding me thats not a hit to the head????? his bicep/shoulder is smack bang across the middle of his freakin face!!
Click to expand...

You only have to look at the first frame of the hit to see it was a body check, carelessly executed by the result of frame 2 & 3…

First contact was with the chest... It was NOT a High Shot. It just ended up wrong!
 
It ended up wrong because it started out wrong.
If you lead with your shoulder into someone's head what do you think is going to happen?
There is zero comparison to Dwyers tackle .
Inglis is rubbish.
 
@Tiger Watto said:
@mtd said:
what do you mean 'the way i make out'?
check out the image ink posted earlier in the thread:
![](http://home.arcor.de/bananas02/Image1.jpg)
look at youngs face in that 2nd photo, are you kidding me thats not a hit to the head????? his bicep/shoulder is smack bang across the middle of his freakin face!!

You only have to look at the first frame of the hit to see it was a body check, carelessly executed by the result of frame 2 & 3…

First contact was with the chest... It was NOT a High Shot. It just ended up wrong!
Click to expand...
Click to expand...

I'm with you. Give up explaining, some people will never get it. Good hit.
\
\
_Posted using RoarFEED 2012_
 
Where in any photo does his shoulder hit Young's chest?
His arm hits his chest - his shoulder was never going to miss his head.
You guys need make an appointment at OPSM.
 
@Tiger Watto said:
@mtd said:
what do you mean 'the way i make out'?
check out the image ink posted earlier in the thread:

![](http://home.arcor.de/bananas02/Image1.jpg)

look at youngs face in that 2nd photo, are you kidding me thats not a hit to the head????? his bicep/shoulder is smack bang across the middle of his freakin face!!

You only have to look at the first frame of the hit to see it was a body check, carelessly executed by the result of frame 2 & 3…

First contact was with the chest... It was NOT a High Shot. It just ended up wrong!
Click to expand...
Click to expand...

you and ink is missing the point - and that pic confirms it beautifully - thanks ink. :mrgreen:

It's not the fact that it was _first_ contact with the head.

It's that there was dangerous contact to the head at all - irrespective of first impact - there always was going to be contact with the head. Dean young wasn't going anywhere - so you can't argue out of it that way like Kasiano did.

Thats the careless part - the part where Inglis made ZERO attempt to protect Dean youngs head before, during and after the fact - that's why I think Inglis is a grub - he made a calculated decision here.

it will effect his grading somewhat, and it's why he wont get a 4-5wk suspension - he'll get 2-3 max - but he will get something - as he bloody should.
 
@stryker said:
We're not the ones saying Ingliss is rubbish….maybe you need OPSM lol.
Click to expand...

Never said he wasn't a talented player stryker - the tackle was rubbish and he is rubbish.
More and more dirty stuff coming into his game.
Throw in the fact he hits women (to save them from themselves :crazy ) , is a traitor , **plus** he plays for Souths and you are certainly looking at rubbish.
 
Personal attacks towards players will not be tolerated. Keep this thread clean and on topic or it will close.
 
I have no doubt he will get 1-2 weeks… The careless part ensures that.

I dont think it was a shoulder charge. From my expereince, a shoulder charge at speed will put GI out of the next play (if there is one) and that is not the correct option. You only need to watch previous video of GI to realise what he was attempting, but many here just dont like the guy so they want to believe what channel nine/fox tells them.

I definately dont want these types of plays taken out of RL... Unfortunately, some go wrong!
 
I think he should get 2-3 weeks. He was fired up and let aggression get in the way of technique, that's one of the reasons it was reckless.

In any case, it is clear that the landscape is changing in the way tackles will be viewed. The rules will be strengthened to further protect ANY contact with the head, and to give the ball carrier further protection. Hits like GI's, Kasiano's, Graham's, Myles and even Dwyers, won't be tolerated.

Tackling techniques will need to be more carefully drilled so the shoulder gets much lower and the onus will almost entirely be on tacklers. There is more and more evidence coming to light about the long-term effects of head injury and the NRL will be keen to respond to it and show the public and parents that they care for player welfare.

The writing is on the wall people.
 
@Tiger Watto said:
@mtd said:
what do you mean 'the way i make out'?
check out the image ink posted earlier in the thread:

![](http://home.arcor.de/bananas02/Image1.jpg)

look at youngs face in that 2nd photo, are you kidding me thats not a hit to the head????? his bicep/shoulder is smack bang across the middle of his freakin face!!

You only have to look at the first frame of the hit to see it was a body check, carelessly executed by the result of frame 2 & 3…

First contact was with the chest... It was NOT a High Shot. It just ended up wrong!
Click to expand...
Click to expand...

body check hahahaha come on mate.. calling it a body check is like saying a car ran over a fire hydrant when infact it went on to smash through the front of a store knocking a shopkeeper to the ground…

look at the 2nd photo.... it is smack bang across his face...

inglis didnt slip up... young didnt fall..

inglis got it horribly wrong... and he will pay for it with a number of weeks on the sideline...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Members online

Total: 924 (members: 19, guests: 905)
Back
Top