JAC

  • Thread starter Thread starter Cobarcats
  • Start date Start date
@TheDaBoss said in [JAC](/post/1249971) said:
@Cultured_Bogan said in [JAC](/post/1249967) said:
@Toowoomba_Tiger said in [JAC](/post/1249956) said:
@Cultured_Bogan said in [JAC](/post/1249948) said:
@Harvey said in [JAC](/post/1249943) said:
@Cultured_Bogan said in [JAC](/post/1249892) said:
@GNR4LIFE said in [JAC](/post/1249890) said:
Seyfarth should buy a lottery ticket.

Thought Seyfarth and Clark were very much the same type of player. Would have hung onto Clark before Seyfarth.

Clark was a better defender, Seyfarth misses/falls off tackles regularly. Both have no impact in attack.

This is why I felt we should have hung onto Clark. They were both bog average in attack but Clark was a better defender and could play longer minutes.

I would have kept Eisenhuth.

Well yes, I'd have kept Matt over both those guys. But if I am picking one over the other, it would have always been Clark. Maybe Madge sees a bigger ceiling in Seyfarth due to his size. Size means nothing without mongrel to go with it.

hopefully seyfarth can aquire some mongrel in the offseason

brooks can mentor him on how to throw a punch

While there's someone in the bin? Not the greatest mentor. I would have BJ for mongrel.
 
@TheDaBoss said in [JAC](/post/1249971) said:
@Cultured_Bogan said in [JAC](/post/1249967) said:
@Toowoomba_Tiger said in [JAC](/post/1249956) said:
@Cultured_Bogan said in [JAC](/post/1249948) said:
@Harvey said in [JAC](/post/1249943) said:
@Cultured_Bogan said in [JAC](/post/1249892) said:
@GNR4LIFE said in [JAC](/post/1249890) said:
Seyfarth should buy a lottery ticket.

Thought Seyfarth and Clark were very much the same type of player. Would have hung onto Clark before Seyfarth.

Clark was a better defender, Seyfarth misses/falls off tackles regularly. Both have no impact in attack.

This is why I felt we should have hung onto Clark. They were both bog average in attack but Clark was a better defender and could play longer minutes.

I would have kept Eisenhuth.

Well yes, I'd have kept Matt over both those guys. But if I am picking one over the other, it would have always been Clark. Maybe Madge sees a bigger ceiling in Seyfarth due to his size. Size means nothing without mongrel to go with it.

hopefully seyfarth can aquire some mongrel in the offseason

brooks can mentor him on how to throw a punch


I always assumed Oli was playing out this season then going to work in the family business.?
 
@Everything-WT said in [JAC](/post/1249979) said:
Shouldn’t this Clark, Seyfarth, Eisenhuth and Packer talk be in a different thread

They’re all garbage. Don’t know what Clark people watched in this forum because the one I saw play for us was terrible, absolutely big for nothing. Talk about the topic
 
@twentyforty said in [JAC](/post/1249974) said:
@TheDaBoss said in [JAC](/post/1249971) said:
@Cultured_Bogan said in [JAC](/post/1249967) said:
@Toowoomba_Tiger said in [JAC](/post/1249956) said:
@Cultured_Bogan said in [JAC](/post/1249948) said:
@Harvey said in [JAC](/post/1249943) said:
@Cultured_Bogan said in [JAC](/post/1249892) said:
@GNR4LIFE said in [JAC](/post/1249890) said:
Seyfarth should buy a lottery ticket.

Thought Seyfarth and Clark were very much the same type of player. Would have hung onto Clark before Seyfarth.

Clark was a better defender, Seyfarth misses/falls off tackles regularly. Both have no impact in attack.

This is why I felt we should have hung onto Clark. They were both bog average in attack but Clark was a better defender and could play longer minutes.

I would have kept Eisenhuth.

Well yes, I'd have kept Matt over both those guys. But if I am picking one over the other, it would have always been Clark. Maybe Madge sees a bigger ceiling in Seyfarth due to his size. Size means nothing without mongrel to go with it.

hopefully seyfarth can aquire some mongrel in the offseason

brooks can mentor him on how to throw a punch


I always assumed Oli was playing out this season then going to work in the family business.?

yea thats what i think has happend
 
I have never claimed to have sources, but I do have a mate at the Dogs who does. He has been in and around their sponsors for ages. He says their new sponsors see themselves as the new Politis....they are very active in recruitment, whining and dining players and agents personally. They brought Burton's family down. They are apparently very slick and popular with players. Run a series of pubs. They want deals done and are very aggressive. Take all of that however you want.
 
@ElleryHanley said in [JAC](/post/1250000) said:
I have never claimed to have sources, but I do have a mate at the Dogs who does. He has been in and around their sponsors for ages. He says their new sponsors see themselves as the new Politis....they are very active in recruitment, whining and dining players and agents personally. They brought Burton's family down. They are apparently very slick and popular with players. Run a series of pubs. They want deals done and are very aggressive. Take all of that however you want.

The new sponsors would be the Pub tycoons Landys.
 
@ElleryHanley said in [JAC](/post/1250000) said:
I have never claimed to have sources, but I do have a mate at the Dogs who does. He has been in and around their sponsors for ages. He says their new sponsors see themselves as the new Politis....they are very active in recruitment, whining and dining players and agents personally. They brought Burton's family down. They are apparently very slick and popular with players. Run a series of pubs. They want deals done and are very aggressive. Take all of that however you want.

The Laundy's it's been well talked about. They have got truckloads.
 
@yeahcaz said in [JAC](/post/1249985) said:
@Everything-WT said in [JAC](/post/1249979) said:
Shouldn’t this Clark, Seyfarth, Eisenhuth and Packer talk be in a different thread

They’re all garbage. Don’t know what Clark people watched in this forum because the one I saw play for us was terrible, absolutely big for nothing. Talk about the topic


We aren’t replacing him with anyone better. Not everyone in the 30 will be stars.
 
Maybe the Dogs are offering DWZ as a trade. I like POMs info and I am sure it’s true but I get the feeling the Dogs will spend what they have to...to get some class. Things like the salary cap will not hold them back
 
Landys have plenty, if only we could have got Merriton to tip in for some TPA but nrl has an issue with that. Think Burton will be at the Dogs for sure unfortunately
 
@Jedi_Tiger said in [JAC](/post/1250009) said:
Good point about DWZ to dogs as a trade for JAC it is a kind of like for like ... we are screwed if that offer is on the table


I agree taht DWZ would be a better trade, but I dont think it is any coincidence that the JAC interviews started confirming he was leaving after George Jennings signed with the Storm. Its not like for like but I think Storm have settled on a replacement.
 
@Telltails said in [JAC](/post/1250003) said:
@ElleryHanley said in [JAC](/post/1250000) said:
I have never claimed to have sources, but I do have a mate at the Dogs who does. He has been in and around their sponsors for ages. He says their new sponsors see themselves as the new Politis....they are very active in recruitment, whining and dining players and agents personally. They brought Burton's family down. They are apparently very slick and popular with players. Run a series of pubs. They want deals done and are very aggressive. Take all of that however you want.

The Laundy's it's been well talked about. They have got truckloads.

Seems they are prepared to use it...

Just what the NRL needs...new Politis!
 
@ElleryHanley said in [JAC](/post/1250013) said:
@Telltails said in [JAC](/post/1250003) said:
@ElleryHanley said in [JAC](/post/1250000) said:
I have never claimed to have sources, but I do have a mate at the Dogs who does. He has been in and around their sponsors for ages. He says their new sponsors see themselves as the new Politis....they are very active in recruitment, whining and dining players and agents personally. They brought Burton's family down. They are apparently very slick and popular with players. Run a series of pubs. They want deals done and are very aggressive. Take all of that however you want.

The Laundy's it's been well talked about. They have got truckloads.

Seems they are prepared to use it...

Just what the NRL needs...new Politis!


Actions speak louder than words. Laundy also said he would walk if they got rid of Lynn Anderson.......they did and he didnt.
 
@Tiger5150 said in [JAC](/post/1250011) said:
@Jedi_Tiger said in [JAC](/post/1250009) said:
Good point about DWZ to dogs as a trade for JAC it is a kind of like for like ... we are screwed if that offer is on the table


I agree taht DWZ would be a better trade, but I dont think it is any coincidence that the JAC interviews started confirming he was leaving after George Jennings signed with the Storm. Its not like for like but I think Storm have settled on a replacement.

Give George Jennings an off season with Belly and he will be flying next season on the wing.. He has a great record of turning average players into stars.
 
@ElleryHanley said in [JAC](/post/1250013) said:
@Telltails said in [JAC](/post/1250003) said:
@ElleryHanley said in [JAC](/post/1250000) said:
I have never claimed to have sources, but I do have a mate at the Dogs who does. He has been in and around their sponsors for ages. He says their new sponsors see themselves as the new Politis....they are very active in recruitment, whining and dining players and agents personally. They brought Burton's family down. They are apparently very slick and popular with players. Run a series of pubs. They want deals done and are very aggressive. Take all of that however you want.

The Laundy's it's been well talked about. They have got truckloads.

Seems they are prepared to use it...

Just what the NRL needs...new Politis!

From all reports has already been shaking things up at board level - hence the recent shake up. They will definitely have an influence on the Bulldogs recruitment.
 
@Telltails said in [JAC](/post/1250016) said:
@ElleryHanley said in [JAC](/post/1250013) said:
@Telltails said in [JAC](/post/1250003) said:
@ElleryHanley said in [JAC](/post/1250000) said:
I have never claimed to have sources, but I do have a mate at the Dogs who does. He has been in and around their sponsors for ages. He says their new sponsors see themselves as the new Politis....they are very active in recruitment, whining and dining players and agents personally. They brought Burton's family down. They are apparently very slick and popular with players. Run a series of pubs. They want deals done and are very aggressive. Take all of that however you want.

The Laundy's it's been well talked about. They have got truckloads.

Seems they are prepared to use it...

Just what the NRL needs...new Politis!

From all reports has already been shaking things up at board level - hence the recent shake up. They will definitely have an influence on the Bulldogs recruitment.


Laundy was the one responsibly for putting the old board in. He threatened to leave if they got rid of Lynn Anderson
 

Latest posts

Members online

Back
Top