JAC

  • Thread starter Thread starter Cobarcats
  • Start date Start date
@Aesopian said in [JAC](/post/1254495) said:
@insideman said in [JAC](/post/1254493) said:
Benji Marshal has signed with the Roosters

Get ready for 12 months of Benchie comparing the Rorters organisation to us on primetime Fox League once a week...

Will be painful :face_with_head_bandage: :face_with_head_bandage:

is Benchie to roosters fair dinkum wow
Que the bad press an unprofessional nature of wests tigers from the media
 
@Tigercrb said in [JAC](/post/1254426) said:
@OldMagpie said in [JAC](/post/1254394) said:
https://www.smh.com.au/sport/nrl/freddy-disillusioned-wests-tigers-couldn-t-find-a-spot-for-papenhuyzen-20201027-p5696q.html

Hey Freddy,

You forgot to mention that storm were shopping paps to every club in the Comp without success at the start of the season.

You also forgot that ado car was a South's junior, moved to the sharks, then was given his debut by the tigers. He was offered a contract by the tigers to stay. Was not "let" go

Tedesco was also offered a huge contract to stay, but he chose to jump onto a successful team rather than try to build one.

Nathan Brown was let go, but has bounced around a few clubs and only now selected for reps. And he is in the squad at this stage, he has hardly been a main stay for rep teams since he left the tigers.

How was fittlers retention, recruitment and development when he was coach of the roosters? He didn't last very long at the club that doesn't develop, only buys players.

Seriously Freddy, stick to the mung beans and yoga mate. You have already proven you can't run a club team top to bottom.
Just concentrate on picking the 30 best players for 3 games a year. No salary cap etc to worry about.

Seriously, he is becoming Gus Jr.

He gets like this sometimes on TV too. Easiest solution would be to offer him a role with the club, as he knows so much about how to fix the problem.
 
@TonyTiger said in [JAC](/post/1254471) said:
@Tiger5150 said in [JAC](/post/1254464) said:
@OzLuke said in [JAC](/post/1254460) said:
@Tiger5150 said in [JAC](/post/1254456) said:
@twentyforty said in [JAC](/post/1254433) said:
Appears to be a few positive pollyannas on here. And that’s ok, but at least come up with some honest disclosure for your attitude.
We hear nothing from the club, I suppose because they have nothing. How about those pollyannas stop ***trying to ridicule fans who are simply hanging out for some good news,*** asking to be swayed by some tiny indication that the club has decided to develop as a professional organisation.

Im not a positive pollyanna, Im as disappointed as anyone else with our lack of success, but it doesnt get in the way of the truth for me.

As you said, we have heard NOTHING from the club at all in regards to JAC negotiations. After the Latrell experience, I would think everyone would welcome that.

But in the absence of news from the club, the ***negative nellies*** here simply make stuff up and that is not helpful in a discussion. I have read here that management has "fumbled" the JAC discussion (despite the fact we ahve heard nothing and know nothing), we are a laughing stock (despite the fact that Souffs and Bulldogs are in the same boat as us and many more imagined woes that have no basis in truth.

Myself and many others here have pointed out that significantly increased revenue, stabilised board structure, elimination of debt, increases year on year for membership, massive increases in sponsorship, appointing sponsor as chairman, Appointing twin premiership winning coach, cutting deadwood from coaching staff, establishment of the COE, signing Aus Schoolboys half and hooker, getting the Grant loan over the line, picking players on form and dropping high profile players regardless of profile and paypacket. signing of Tamou, LL, Blore, Stef, Douiehi.......are ALL very positive indications of the direction we are going, but you would be excused for not hearing it over the WHAAAAAAA WHAAAAAA WHAAAAAA

but we couldn't even sign curtis rona.....😉


Not yet.....but only negative nellies give up that easy, us positive pollyanna's havent lost hope.
Give yourself a kiss in front of the mirror tonight, you’ve mentioned “negative nellies” twice in as many minutes.

Lighten up Francis
 
@Tigercrb said in [JAC](/post/1254426) said:
@OldMagpie said in [JAC](/post/1254394) said:
https://www.smh.com.au/sport/nrl/freddy-disillusioned-wests-tigers-couldn-t-find-a-spot-for-papenhuyzen-20201027-p5696q.html

Hey Freddy,

You forgot to mention that storm were shopping paps to every club in the Comp without success at the start of the season.

You also forgot that ado car was a South's junior, moved to the sharks, then was given his debut by the tigers. He was offered a contract by the tigers to stay. Was not "let" go

Tedesco was also offered a huge contract to stay, but he chose to jump onto a successful team rather than try to build one.

Nathan Brown was let go, but has bounced around a few clubs and only now selected for reps. And he is in the squad at this stage, he has hardly been a main stay for rep teams since he left the tigers.

How was fittlers retention, recruitment and development when he was coach of the roosters? He didn't last very long at the club that doesn't develop, only buys players.

Seriously Freddy, stick to the mung beans and yoga mate. You have already proven you can't run a club team top to bottom.
Just concentrate on picking the 30 best players for 3 games a year. No salary cap etc to worry about.

Seriously, he is becoming Gus Jr.

It may be a vision he had while passed out on the median strip in front of Glebe police station.

That was some time after he was let go by the panthers.
 
@tiger05premier said in [JAC](/post/1254535) said:
@insideman said in [JAC](/post/1251029) said:
JAC will be announced after the Grand Final with the Tigers. Also Edene Gebbie is on our radar and I think he has agreed to join.

So what day is this getting announced?

Today?

Tomorrow?

Never?
probably a better choice would be between:

1) distant future;
2) never, never;
3) unknown; :angry:
 
@Jedi_Tiger said in [JAC](/post/1254540) said:
@OldMagpie said in [JAC](/post/1254394) said:
https://www.smh.com.au/sport/nrl/freddy-disillusioned-wests-tigers-couldn-t-find-a-spot-for-papenhuyzen-20201027-p5696q.html

Not SMH ... thank you Freddy

Seems like Freddy spends a bit of his time reading this forum.
 
@GNR4LIFE said in [JAC](/post/1254220) said:
@cochise said in [JAC](/post/1254215) said:
@GNR4LIFE said in [JAC](/post/1254214) said:
@cochise said in [JAC](/post/1254212) said:
@GNR4LIFE said in [JAC](/post/1254211) said:
If we want him bad enough, we can officially offer him a truckload for 2022 next week. With Packer and Reynolds time being up, we have room for at least one marquee signing. It’s all about being able to secure him for 2022 first and foremost. Then it’s about getting his release, which will follow once he’s been announced. It makes it different to the LM saga. We have more leverage this time round.

I don't think it is enough mate.

Don’t think what’s enough?

Our leverage

You don’t think 1.5 million that we can officially offer next week is good leverage?

He is a great winger, has blinding speed etc. etc.

He is NOT worth anything like 1.5 million in my opinion.

Unless you are talking over 2-3 years GNR.
 
@Russell said in [JAC](/post/1254595) said:
@GNR4LIFE said in [JAC](/post/1254220) said:
@cochise said in [JAC](/post/1254215) said:
@GNR4LIFE said in [JAC](/post/1254214) said:
@cochise said in [JAC](/post/1254212) said:
@GNR4LIFE said in [JAC](/post/1254211) said:
If we want him bad enough, we can officially offer him a truckload for 2022 next week. With Packer and Reynolds time being up, we have room for at least one marquee signing. It’s all about being able to secure him for 2022 first and foremost. Then it’s about getting his release, which will follow once he’s been announced. It makes it different to the LM saga. We have more leverage this time round.

I don't think it is enough mate.

Don’t think what’s enough?

Our leverage

You don’t think 1.5 million that we can officially offer next week is good leverage?

He is a great winger, has blinding speed etc. etc.

He is NOT worth anything like 1.5 million in my opinion.

Unless you are talking over 2-3 years GNR.

I was talking about the money we’d have to spend. Money isn’t an issue. I definitely wouldn’t offer that much to JAC. Tedesco however....
 
@GNR4LIFE said in [JAC](/post/1254600) said:
@Russell said in [JAC](/post/1254595) said:
@GNR4LIFE said in [JAC](/post/1254220) said:
@cochise said in [JAC](/post/1254215) said:
@GNR4LIFE said in [JAC](/post/1254214) said:
@cochise said in [JAC](/post/1254212) said:
@GNR4LIFE said in [JAC](/post/1254211) said:
If we want him bad enough, we can officially offer him a truckload for 2022 next week. With Packer and Reynolds time being up, we have room for at least one marquee signing. It’s all about being able to secure him for 2022 first and foremost. Then it’s about getting his release, which will follow once he’s been announced. It makes it different to the LM saga. We have more leverage this time round.

I don't think it is enough mate.

Don’t think what’s enough?

Our leverage

You don’t think 1.5 million that we can officially offer next week is good leverage?

He is a great winger, has blinding speed etc. etc.

He is NOT worth anything like 1.5 million in my opinion.

Unless you are talking over 2-3 years GNR.

I was talking about the money we’d have to spend. Money isn’t an issue. I definitely wouldn’t offer that much to JAC. Tedesco however....

Understand the JAC position (read your following post after I responded) however Teddy 1.1 max (however he knocked that back last time I believe).
 
@Russell said in [JAC](/post/1254605) said:
@GNR4LIFE said in [JAC](/post/1254600) said:
@Russell said in [JAC](/post/1254595) said:
@GNR4LIFE said in [JAC](/post/1254220) said:
@cochise said in [JAC](/post/1254215) said:
@GNR4LIFE said in [JAC](/post/1254214) said:
@cochise said in [JAC](/post/1254212) said:
@GNR4LIFE said in [JAC](/post/1254211) said:
If we want him bad enough, we can officially offer him a truckload for 2022 next week. With Packer and Reynolds time being up, we have room for at least one marquee signing. It’s all about being able to secure him for 2022 first and foremost. Then it’s about getting his release, which will follow once he’s been announced. It makes it different to the LM saga. We have more leverage this time round.

I don't think it is enough mate.

Don’t think what’s enough?

Our leverage

You don’t think 1.5 million that we can officially offer next week is good leverage?

He is a great winger, has blinding speed etc. etc.

He is NOT worth anything like 1.5 million in my opinion.

Unless you are talking over 2-3 years GNR.

I was talking about the money we’d have to spend. Money isn’t an issue. I definitely wouldn’t offer that much to JAC. Tedesco however....

Understand the JAC position (read your following post after I responded) however Teddy 1.1 max (however he knocked that back last time I believe).

Even the Roosters offer is/was apparently 1.2m a year for 5 years. Plus benefits of course. Though who knows.
 
@JD-Tiger said in [JAC](/post/1254608) said:
@Russell said in [JAC](/post/1254605) said:
@GNR4LIFE said in [JAC](/post/1254600) said:
@Russell said in [JAC](/post/1254595) said:
@GNR4LIFE said in [JAC](/post/1254220) said:
@cochise said in [JAC](/post/1254215) said:
@GNR4LIFE said in [JAC](/post/1254214) said:
@cochise said in [JAC](/post/1254212) said:
@GNR4LIFE said in [JAC](/post/1254211) said:
If we want him bad enough, we can officially offer him a truckload for 2022 next week. With Packer and Reynolds time being up, we have room for at least one marquee signing. It’s all about being able to secure him for 2022 first and foremost. Then it’s about getting his release, which will follow once he’s been announced. It makes it different to the LM saga. We have more leverage this time round.

I don't think it is enough mate.

Don’t think what’s enough?

Our leverage

You don’t think 1.5 million that we can officially offer next week is good leverage?

He is a great winger, has blinding speed etc. etc.

He is NOT worth anything like 1.5 million in my opinion.

Unless you are talking over 2-3 years GNR.

I was talking about the money we’d have to spend. Money isn’t an issue. I definitely wouldn’t offer that much to JAC. Tedesco however....

Understand the JAC position (read your following post after I responded) however Teddy 1.1 max (however he knocked that back last time I believe).

Even the Roosters offer is/was apparently 1.2m a year for 5 years. Plus benefits of course. Though who knows.

Wasn’t it 3yrs but he wants 5. Now there in talks with sualli I’m sure he will accept less?
 
@Red88_Tiger said in [JAC](/post/1254611) said:
@JD-Tiger said in [JAC](/post/1254608) said:
@Russell said in [JAC](/post/1254605) said:
@GNR4LIFE said in [JAC](/post/1254600) said:
@Russell said in [JAC](/post/1254595) said:
@GNR4LIFE said in [JAC](/post/1254220) said:
@cochise said in [JAC](/post/1254215) said:
@GNR4LIFE said in [JAC](/post/1254214) said:
@cochise said in [JAC](/post/1254212) said:
@GNR4LIFE said in [JAC](/post/1254211) said:
If we want him bad enough, we can officially offer him a truckload for 2022 next week. With Packer and Reynolds time being up, we have room for at least one marquee signing. It’s all about being able to secure him for 2022 first and foremost. Then it’s about getting his release, which will follow once he’s been announced. It makes it different to the LM saga. We have more leverage this time round.

I don't think it is enough mate.

Don’t think what’s enough?

Our leverage

You don’t think 1.5 million that we can officially offer next week is good leverage?

He is a great winger, has blinding speed etc. etc.

He is NOT worth anything like 1.5 million in my opinion.

Unless you are talking over 2-3 years GNR.

I was talking about the money we’d have to spend. Money isn’t an issue. I definitely wouldn’t offer that much to JAC. Tedesco however....

Understand the JAC position (read your following post after I responded) however Teddy 1.1 max (however he knocked that back last time I believe).

Even the Roosters offer is/was apparently 1.2m a year for 5 years. Plus benefits of course. Though who knows.

Wasn’t it 3yrs but he wants 5. Now there in talks with sualli I’m sure he will accept less?

Could be, I thought I read somewhere 6 million over 5 years, but it didn't make sense as if they're offering that what was his problem with signing?

You're probably right, that figure was probably what he was asking for, not what Roosters were paying.

But gee, if the offer's over a million a year for 3 years, he'd be mad not to take it.
 
@JD-Tiger said in [JAC](/post/1254613) said:
@Red88_Tiger said in [JAC](/post/1254611) said:
@JD-Tiger said in [JAC](/post/1254608) said:
@Russell said in [JAC](/post/1254605) said:
@GNR4LIFE said in [JAC](/post/1254600) said:
@Russell said in [JAC](/post/1254595) said:
@GNR4LIFE said in [JAC](/post/1254220) said:
@cochise said in [JAC](/post/1254215) said:
@GNR4LIFE said in [JAC](/post/1254214) said:
@cochise said in [JAC](/post/1254212) said:
@GNR4LIFE said in [JAC](/post/1254211) said:
If we want him bad enough, we can officially offer him a truckload for 2022 next week. With Packer and Reynolds time being up, we have room for at least one marquee signing. It’s all about being able to secure him for 2022 first and foremost. Then it’s about getting his release, which will follow once he’s been announced. It makes it different to the LM saga. We have more leverage this time round.

I don't think it is enough mate.

Don’t think what’s enough?

Our leverage

You don’t think 1.5 million that we can officially offer next week is good leverage?

He is a great winger, has blinding speed etc. etc.

He is NOT worth anything like 1.5 million in my opinion.

Unless you are talking over 2-3 years GNR.

I was talking about the money we’d have to spend. Money isn’t an issue. I definitely wouldn’t offer that much to JAC. Tedesco however....

Understand the JAC position (read your following post after I responded) however Teddy 1.1 max (however he knocked that back last time I believe).

Even the Roosters offer is/was apparently 1.2m a year for 5 years. Plus benefits of course. Though who knows.

Wasn’t it 3yrs but he wants 5. Now there in talks with sualli I’m sure he will accept less?

Could be, I thought I read somewhere 6 million over 5 years, but it didn't make sense as if they're offering that what was his problem with signing?

You're probably right, that figure was probably what he was asking for, not what Roosters were paying.

But gee, if the offer's over a million a year for 3 years, he'd be mad not to take it.

Probably needs to get some golf dates booked in first
 
@Tiger5150 said in [JAC](/post/1254456) said:
@twentyforty said in [JAC](/post/1254433) said:
Appears to be a few positive pollyannas on here. And that’s ok, but at least come up with some honest disclosure for your attitude.
We hear nothing from the club, I suppose because they have nothing. How about those pollyannas stop ***trying to ridicule fans who are simply hanging out for some good news,*** asking to be swayed by some tiny indication that the club has decided to develop as a professional organisation.

Im not a positive pollyanna, Im as disappointed as anyone else with our lack of success, but it doesnt get in the way of the truth for me.

As you said, we have heard NOTHING from the club at all in regards to JAC negotiations. After the Latrell experience, I would think everyone would welcome that.

But in the absence of news from the club, the ***negative nellies*** here simply make stuff up and that is not helpful in a discussion. I have read here that management has "fumbled" the JAC discussion (despite the fact we ahve heard nothing and know nothing), we are a laughing stock (despite the fact that Souffs and Bulldogs are in the same boat as us and many more imagined woes that have no basis in truth.

Myself and many others here have pointed out that significantly increased revenue, stabilised board structure, elimination of debt, increases year on year for membership, massive increases in sponsorship, appointing sponsor as chairman, Appointing twin premiership winning coach, cutting deadwood from coaching staff, establishment of the COE, signing Aus Schoolboys half and hooker, getting the Grant loan over the line, picking players on form and dropping high profile players regardless of profile and paypacket. signing of Tamou, LL, Blore, Stef, Douiehi.......are ALL very positive indications of the direction we are going, but you would be excused for not hearing it over the WHAAAAAAA WHAAAAAA WHAAAAAA

Interesting that you should go on the defensive at the mention of "positive pollyanna" ? You assumed that my post was directed toward you?
**"it doesn't get in the way of truth for me"**
A PP lives in no other reality but his dream world.

Another example of a PP.. makes up things to fit the dream world view.

Please show me where I stated as you say..
**"As you said, we have heard NOTHING from the club at all in regards to JAC negotiations."**
In fact I would never say such a thing because I believe that all NRL contracts are written "commercial in confidence."
Which is why I don't believe any of the claims made by those who are in the so called know.

Here's what I actually stated.. **"We hear nothing from the club, I suppose because they have nothing."**

Now I'm not asking for Justin Pascoe to have the courage of Don Quixote nor even have the same level of conviction or penchant for bold and ambitious goals as Benny Gale, but for gods sake.. give us something?
A true leader will have a vision..
**what is our vision?**
A true leader will inspire others to share that vision.. and not limit that sharing to an inner circle.
**where are we going?**
A true leader will know the direction..
**how are we going to get there?**
A true leader will negotiate anything..
I could go on, but I would be more than happy with that.
Put it out there Justin and go for it mate!
If you fall over get up and keep going, you'll have the fans on your side. JUST DO IT!!!
 
@twentyforty said in [JAC](/post/1254619) said:
@Tiger5150 said in [JAC](/post/1254456) said:
@twentyforty said in [JAC](/post/1254433) said:
Appears to be a few positive pollyannas on here. And that’s ok, but at least come up with some honest disclosure for your attitude.
We hear nothing from the club, I suppose because they have nothing. How about those pollyannas stop ***trying to ridicule fans who are simply hanging out for some good news,*** asking to be swayed by some tiny indication that the club has decided to develop as a professional organisation.

Im not a positive pollyanna, Im as disappointed as anyone else with our lack of success, but it doesnt get in the way of the truth for me.

As you said, we have heard NOTHING from the club at all in regards to JAC negotiations. After the Latrell experience, I would think everyone would welcome that.

But in the absence of news from the club, the ***negative nellies*** here simply make stuff up and that is not helpful in a discussion. I have read here that management has "fumbled" the JAC discussion (despite the fact we ahve heard nothing and know nothing), we are a laughing stock (despite the fact that Souffs and Bulldogs are in the same boat as us and many more imagined woes that have no basis in truth.

Myself and many others here have pointed out that significantly increased revenue, stabilised board structure, elimination of debt, increases year on year for membership, massive increases in sponsorship, appointing sponsor as chairman, Appointing twin premiership winning coach, cutting deadwood from coaching staff, establishment of the COE, signing Aus Schoolboys half and hooker, getting the Grant loan over the line, picking players on form and dropping high profile players regardless of profile and paypacket. signing of Tamou, LL, Blore, Stef, Douiehi.......are ALL very positive indications of the direction we are going, but you would be excused for not hearing it over the WHAAAAAAA WHAAAAAA WHAAAAAA

Interesting that you should go on the defensive at the mention of "positive pollyanna" ? You assumed that my post was directed toward you?
**"it doesn't get in the way of truth for me"**
A PP lives in no other reality but his dream world.

Another example of a PP.. makes up things to fit the dream world view.

Please show me where I stated as you say..
**"As you said, we have heard NOTHING from the club at all in regards to JAC negotiations."**
In fact I would never say such a thing because I believe that all NRL contracts are written "commercial in confidence."
Which is why I don't believe any of the claims made by those who are in the so called know.

Here's what I actually stated.. **"We hear nothing from the club, I suppose because they have nothing."**

Now I'm not asking for Justin Pascoe to have the courage of Don Quixote nor even have the same level of conviction or penchant for bold and ambitious goals as Benny Gale, but for gods sake.. give us something?
A true leader will have a vision..
**what is our vision?**
A true leader will inspire others to share that vision.. and not limit that sharing to an inner circle.
**where are we going?**
A true leader will know the direction..
**how are we going to get there?**
A true leader will negotiate anything..
I could go on, but I would be more than happy with that.
Put it out there Justin and go for it mate!
If you fall over get up and keep going, you'll have the fans on your side. JUST DO IT!!!

Great words about leadership.
 
@Strongee said in [JAC](/post/1254509) said:
@Tiger5150 said in [JAC](/post/1254391) said:
@Strongee said in [JAC](/post/1254385) said:
@fibrodreaming said in [JAC](/post/1254340) said:
@tiga4eva said in [JAC](/post/1254332) said:
@Tiger5150 said in [JAC](/post/1254104) said:
@fibrodreaming said in [JAC](/post/1254103) said:
@2005magic said in [JAC](/post/1254081) said:
Seems giving them time only works against us. Take it or leave it with a set withdraw of offer date. In the interim continue looking for good players stuck behind better players at their existing club.

I don't understand this POV in relation to JAC.

Hi is not legally able to sign anything until 1 November, and even then he is only able to sign for 2022.

Apparently we and his management have agreed to terms.

So what is the point of threatening to withdraw the offer before he is legally able to sign it?


Because we are a laughing stock apparently. No idea why we are supposedly a laughing stock but the other clubs chasing him are not. No one has signed him yet. Some fans have self esteem issues I think.


And some are happy to miss the Semis 9 year in a row. Were all different.

Can you give me their names please ?

Apparently defending an administration and regime that is clearly improving the club as a whole , from the ground up , means you’re happy the team has been losing for 9 years . If you are having a tantrum and advocating for everyone to be sacked , because sporting organisations who sack everyone continuously , arnt the very definition of a sporting basket case , then that attitude is the way to go


People like you are the EXACT reason we are a laughing stock........This club will NEVER be a success until ALL of our toys are out of the cot!

Lol what a load of absolute rubbish . The facts are , teams that lack continuity do not win ...ever . The last one I can remember is the early Abrohimovich Chelsea sides , when they bought a premiership . And now all the money in the world won’t change the fact that continuity and purchases that fit into a system , are the only recipe for success.
Firing you’re first grade coach every 2 years when they are just starting to get the system underneath to move and recruit the players that best fit that system , is to confirm mediocrity .
That’s where we are at . The players have been recruited underneath , we are trying to recruit the right ones at the top .
But Koori kids don’t come here . I don’t know why . Maybe it’s just because we are directly competing against Souths , maybe we have a reputation that doesn’t sit right with the indigenous boys I don’t know . But I’ve always wondered why .
Cause throwing the baby out with the bath water has worked before right . It definitely worked with the big 4 leaving . Definitely worked when Farah did it to potter . Also really worked when we all got the poos at sheens , including the players . It’s also worked at the dogs , the Titans , the broncos , twice in 3 years , the warriors , and that’s just 1 competition. It’s worked for the Browns in NFL , the West Sydney wanderers since poppa left , Chelsea despite all the money they spend . I could literally pick a team who behave like this in every competition in the world , because there’s always one petulant impatient owner ,or , group of supporters who just don’t get it .


Relax mate, get your sarcasm meter recallibrated. I agree with you.
 
@innsaneink said in [JAC](/post/1254441) said:
@Tigercrb said in [JAC](/post/1254426) said:
@OldMagpie said in [JAC](/post/1254394) said:
https://www.smh.com.au/sport/nrl/freddy-disillusioned-wests-tigers-couldn-t-find-a-spot-for-papenhuyzen-20201027-p5696q.html

Hey Freddy,

You forgot to mention that storm were shopping paps to every club in the Comp without success at the start of the season.

You also forgot that ado car was a South's junior, moved to the sharks, then was given his debut by the tigers. He was offered a contract by the tigers to stay. Was not "let" go

Tedesco was also offered a huge contract to stay, but he chose to jump onto a successful team rather than try to build one.

Nathan Brown was let go, but has bounced around a few clubs and only now selected for reps. And he is in the squad at this stage, he has hardly been a main stay for rep teams since he left the tigers.

How was fittlers retention, recruitment and development when he was coach of the roosters? He didn't last very long at the club that doesn't develop, only buys players.

Seriously Freddy, stick to the mung beans and yoga mate. You have already proven you can't run a club team top to bottom.
Just concentrate on picking the 30 best players for 3 games a year. No salary cap etc to worry about.

Seriously, he is becoming Gus Jr.

Truth hurts eh?

Trouble is INK - it is not the truth.

Don't let the truth get in the way of a controversial comment though.
 
Back
Top