Jack De Belin

happy_tiger

Well-known member
Couldn't get a poll working but a big part of me thinks the De Belin will win his case against the NRL

And then what are your thoughts on Peter Beattie as he started the new rule change

Simply put I don't believe ( as much as I think De Belin is in the wrong if proven guilty ) that you can't place a rule that is acting after the fact and then premeditate it

It needs to be more like the new sex tapes rule whereas as of this date …..you'll be banned
 
Beattie probably, but I think for whatever reason, Greenberg seems untouchable. He's made enough dodgy decisions to be booted a few times over hasn't he?
 
If he wins he will definitely make these guys look stupid.
If he loses this but is found not guilty of rape they are in for an even bigger World of hurt.
 
![C8388FE8-410D-42BF-B71A-14C5A0D0DE10.jpeg](/assets/uploads/files/1555647900681-c8388fe8-410d-42bf-b71a-14c5a0d0de10.jpeg)
What a crock of 💩 and a disgrace to use this as their defence he and his lawyers should be ashamed of themselves...Doesn’t bode well when you’re using the ploy of redirection does it Jack.👎🤬
 
That is probably the worst excuse i have heard being used to the judge to explain abhorent behaviour.De Belin would be lucky to be considered a halfwit
 
I did the same thing when i was a kid.... whenever i got in trouble i would start shifting the blame and start finger pointing
 
Can you imagine doing what this guy has done and blaming the NRL for not telling you that it was wrong.
 
That will do me .... My God if the court over turn the NRL on this one what has the world become ... So if i was to rob a bank all i would need to say is i was not advised not too... WTF
 
@hsvjones said in [Jack De Belin](/post/1005321) said:
That will do me .... My God if the court over turn the NRL on this one what has the world become ... So if i was to rob a bank all i would need to say is i was not advised not too... WTF

Its not the same thing, if the court over rules this they are not saying that De Belin is innocent, they are saying the NRL can not punish him over allegations!
 
I would not even want him training, nor if he was at WT. Police and state prosecutors believe there is sufficient evidence to go to trial, so I see that as good enough reason for him to be stood down, especially when he continues to be paid.
 
@formerguest said in [Jack De Belin](/post/1005344) said:
I would not even want him training, nor if he was at WT. Police and state prosecutors believe there is sufficient evidence to go to trial, so I see that as good enough reason for him to be stood down, especially when he continues to be paid.

They never get it wrong? We currently have a player playing for us who was convicted of stomping on someones head. De Belin denys any wrongdoing!
 
As do the majority of those charged as the conviction rate compared to actual sexual assualts is very low. If I was one of those lowlifes, just as former friends of mine, I too would plead innocent, though as I respect others, I would not offend in the first place.
 
@formerguest But you don't know that he has offended, he may well be proven to be guilty, but as of right now, he is innocent!
 
Back
Top