larrycorowa
New member
Utai was serviceable but became increasingly fragile and a liability under the high ball.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
@jirskyr said:@Geo. said:@jirskyr said:@innsaneink said:18 will be a massive effort for us and would be sufficient.
Last 12 years the average points conceded per game for the Top 8:
22.12 (2005), 19.96, 18.70, 17.66, 18.55, 19.73, 16.14, 17.92, 16.79, 17.36, 17.25, 17.49 (2016).
In the same period, the points conceded per game of the 8th placed side: 26.33 (Manly 2005), 22.88, 21.13, 20.04, 19.92, 22.71, 19.83, 20.92, 21.29, 21.08, 23.08, 20.70 (Titans 2016).
Can you do Minor Premiers…?
Yup
19.00 (2005 Eels), 16.83 (Storm), 11.54 (Storm), 11.75 (Storm), 13.71 (Saints), 12.46 (Saints), 12.83 (Storm), 15.38 (Dogs), 13.54 (Roosters), 16.04 (Roosters), 12.50 (Roosters), 12.58 (2016 Storm)
\
\
Shows us a few things - on average the average points conceded for the top 8 sides, and consistently for the minor premiers, decreased rapidly between 2005-2007\. Also that the MPs are normally 3-5 points better per game conceded than the Top 8 average - but that's less than a converted try.
@happy tiger said:@jirskyr said:@Geo. said:@jirskyr said:Last 12 years the average points conceded per game for the Top 8:
22.12 (2005), 19.96, 18.70, 17.66, 18.55, 19.73, 16.14, 17.92, 16.79, 17.36, 17.25, 17.49 (2016).
In the same period, the points conceded per game of the 8th placed side: 26.33 (Manly 2005), 22.88, 21.13, 20.04, 19.92, 22.71, 19.83, 20.92, 21.29, 21.08, 23.08, 20.70 (Titans 2016).
Can you do Minor Premiers…?
Yup
19.00 (2005 Eels), 16.83 (Storm), 11.54 (Storm), 11.75 (Storm), 13.71 (Saints), 12.46 (Saints), 12.83 (Storm), 15.38 (Dogs), 13.54 (Roosters), 16.04 (Roosters), 12.50 (Roosters), 12.58 (2016 Storm)
\
\
Shows us a few things - on average the average points conceded for the top 8 sides, and consistently for the minor premiers, decreased rapidly between 2005-2007\. Also that the MPs are normally 3-5 points better per game conceded than the Top 8 average - but that's less than a converted try.
Also shows us that Geo is clutching at straws
Reckon the points difference from first to 8th could be 4-5 points
We need to become a consistent Top 8 and then a Top 4 side before winning minor premierships and premierships
We learnt absolutely nothing as a club after 2005 , we had some many positives as a club yet failed continually for the next 5 seasons
@Balmain Boy said:$200k base is still too high really imo. For a guy who's been out of the game for a fair while with attitude problems and a major injury it's still a fair risk.
Would have thought a lower base and a higher match bonus would have been more in line with our cap situation.
@Bones said:@Balmain Boy said:$200k base is still too high really imo. For a guy who's been out of the game for a fair while with attitude problems and a major injury it's still a fair risk.
Would have thought a lower base and a higher match bonus would have been more in line with our cap situation.
Problem with that is if he plays well we leave ourselves in a position where he may not be able to play due to cap issues. At least this way we know what the damage is up front.
@jirskyr said:Also, bearing in mind that Tigers win 43.67% of all matches (current to mid 2016, I didn't update back half of the year), that win rate doubles when we concede 16 or less points in a game. In other words, we have won 109/128 (85.16%) of games where we've conceded 16 points or less. We are 30/30 when conceding 6 points or less.
@happy tiger said:@jirskyr said:Also, bearing in mind that Tigers win 43.67% of all matches (current to mid 2016, I didn't update back half of the year), that win rate doubles when we concede 16 or less points in a game. In other words, we have won 109/128 (85.16%) of games where we've conceded 16 points or less. We are 30/30 when conceding 6 points or less.
Jirskyr I just love your stats man , they usually always prove so many points
See Steve , please tell me that attack is more important than defence after reading these points
@happy tiger said:@jirskyr said:@Geo. said:@jirskyr said:Last 12 years the average points conceded per game for the Top 8:
22.12 (2005), 19.96, 18.70, 17.66, 18.55, 19.73, 16.14, 17.92, 16.79, 17.36, 17.25, 17.49 (2016).
In the same period, the points conceded per game of the 8th placed side: 26.33 (Manly 2005), 22.88, 21.13, 20.04, 19.92, 22.71, 19.83, 20.92, 21.29, 21.08, 23.08, 20.70 (Titans 2016).
Can you do Minor Premiers…?
Yup
19.00 (2005 Eels), 16.83 (Storm), 11.54 (Storm), 11.75 (Storm), 13.71 (Saints), 12.46 (Saints), 12.83 (Storm), 15.38 (Dogs), 13.54 (Roosters), 16.04 (Roosters), 12.50 (Roosters), 12.58 (2016 Storm)
\
\
Shows us a few things - on average the average points conceded for the top 8 sides, and consistently for the minor premiers, decreased rapidly between 2005-2007\. Also that the MPs are normally 3-5 points better per game conceded than the Top 8 average - but that's less than a converted try.
Also shows us that Geo is clutching at straws
Reckon the points difference from first to 8th could be 4-5 points
We need to become a consistent Top 8 and then a Top 4 side before winning minor premierships and premierships
We learnt absolutely nothing as a club after 2005 , we had some many positives as a club yet failed continually for the next 5 seasons
@stevetiger said:@happy tiger said:@jirskyr said:Also, bearing in mind that Tigers win 43.67% of all matches (current to mid 2016, I didn't update back half of the year), that win rate doubles when we concede 16 or less points in a game. In other words, we have won 109/128 (85.16%) of games where we've conceded 16 points or less. We are 30/30 when conceding 6 points or less.
Jirskyr I just love your stats man , they usually always prove so many points
See Steve , please tell me that attack is more important than defence after reading these points
Let's see the attack stats. I also don't state that one is more important than the other. I have tried to explain to the slower people on here that a dud attack makes it harder to defend and win games. They feed into each other.
When we were playing dumb Taylor ball how many games did we win again ?
@Geo. said:@happy tiger said:@jirskyr said:@Geo. said:Can you do Minor Premiers…?
Yup
19.00 (2005 Eels), 16.83 (Storm), 11.54 (Storm), 11.75 (Storm), 13.71 (Saints), 12.46 (Saints), 12.83 (Storm), 15.38 (Dogs), 13.54 (Roosters), 16.04 (Roosters), 12.50 (Roosters), 12.58 (2016 Storm)
\
\
Shows us a few things - on average the average points conceded for the top 8 sides, and consistently for the minor premiers, decreased rapidly between 2005-2007\. Also that the MPs are normally 3-5 points better per game conceded than the Top 8 average - but that's less than a converted try.
Also shows us that Geo is clutching at straws
Reckon the points difference from first to 8th could be 4-5 points
We need to become a consistent Top 8 and then a Top 4 side before winning minor premierships and premierships
We learnt absolutely nothing as a club after 2005 , we had some many positives as a club yet failed continually for the next 5 seasons
Gee you set a low bar….You can settle for Top 8...Me.. Minor Premiers every year ...as highlighted above conceding around 12-15 ppg will achieve that more often than not...
@Geo. said:The defence rests…
steve will find a way tho...
@stevetiger said:@Geo. said:The defence rests…
steve will find a way tho...
All the top teams had better attack. The defence does rest.
Sometimes I want to be wrong on here. Just to change things up.
@stevetiger said:@Geo. said:The defence rests…
steve will find a way tho...
All the top teams had better attack. The defence does rest.
Sometimes I want to be wrong on here. Just to change things up.
@Masterton said:@stevetiger said:@Geo. said:The defence rests…
steve will find a way tho...
All the top teams had better attack. The defence does rest.
Sometimes I want to be wrong on here. Just to change things up.
At this point, I can't tell if you're genuinely deluded or just playing along for fun. I lean towards deluded.
@Tbone said:@Masterton said:@stevetiger said:@Geo. said:The defence rests…
steve will find a way tho...
All the top teams had better attack. The defence does rest.
Sometimes I want to be wrong on here. Just to change things up.
At this point, I can't tell if you're genuinely deluded or just playing along for fun. I lean towards deluded.
Started out serious but when normal people (like you) can't believe how dumb he is he pretends he's trolling.