Josh Reynolds

[Guest]

So basically she did all this for about $5k? If what Reynolds legal team say is true. Seems a bit OTT for minimal financial gain. The fake ultrasound and fake “Baby weight” as claimed by the lawyer will be interesting. Just from a quick google search u can get fake ultrasounds for $10 apparently. Dunno how you can make your stomach expand to the extent they are claiming however.

I wouldn't lose sleep over it. I do feel sorry for Josh but he'll come out of it a stronger and wiser person at the end. Just one of life's mistakes that most of us end up in at one stage or another.

The claim on their side is they can verify the pregnancies if that’s the case then the character assassination angle falls apart

That's only part of it. Josh will come out of this ok.

That kinda seems like the big part of their claim.

Part of the claim - don't read into it too much, again, this information the media have obtained - they don't have access to the full brief of evidence. If you have the time, attend the trial at the Downing Centre - should be interesting as one argument is torn to shreds.

 

[wokesmoke]

So basically she did all this for about $5k? If what Reynolds legal team say is true. Seems a bit OTT for minimal financial gain. The fake ultrasound and fake “Baby weight” as claimed by the lawyer will be interesting. Just from a quick google search u can get fake ultrasounds for $10 apparently. Dunno how you can make your stomach expand to the extent they are claiming however.

I wouldn't lose sleep over it. I do feel sorry for Josh but he'll come out of it a stronger and wiser person at the end. Just one of life's mistakes that most of us end up in at one stage or another.

The claim on their side is they can verify the pregnancies if that’s the case then the character assassination angle falls apart

That's only part of it. Josh will come out of this ok.

That kinda seems like the big part of their claim.

Part of the claim - don't read into it too much, again, this information the media have obtained - they don't have access to the full brief of evidence. If you have the time, attend the trial at the Downing Centre - should be interesting as one argument is torn to shreds.

I’ve read the police fact sheets. I’ve read about Reynolds teams defence As well. Majority of it will be irrelevant. The biggest hurdle is the video. Regardless of her character, all the current claims by Reynolds defence will have little bearing as it’s irrelevant to the night of the incident

 

[Guest]

So basically she did all this for about $5k? If what Reynolds legal team say is true. Seems a bit OTT for minimal financial gain. The fake ultrasound and fake “Baby weight” as claimed by the lawyer will be interesting. Just from a quick google search u can get fake ultrasounds for $10 apparently. Dunno how you can make your stomach expand to the extent they are claiming however.

I wouldn't lose sleep over it. I do feel sorry for Josh but he'll come out of it a stronger and wiser person at the end. Just one of life's mistakes that most of us end up in at one stage or another.

The claim on their side is they can verify the pregnancies if that’s the case then the character assassination angle falls apart

That's only part of it. Josh will come out of this ok.

That kinda seems like the big part of their claim.

Part of the claim - don't read into it too much, again, this information the media have obtained - they don't have access to the full brief of evidence. If you have the time, attend the trial at the Downing Centre - should be interesting as one argument is torn to shreds.

I’ve read the police fact sheets. I’ve read about Reynolds teams defence As well. Majority of it will be irrelevant. The biggest hurdle is the video. Regardless of her character, all the current claims by Reynolds defence will have little bearing as it’s irrelevant to the night of the incident

I don't see the video as being the main issue but again, I'll be interested to see the trial.

 

[JC99]

The video doesn’t prove anything. While yelling at her like that isn’t a good look he doesn’t touch her and it’s right after she busted into his house so obviously he’ll be angry. Nothing in it I think.

 

[Sco77y]

So basically she did all this for about $5k? If what Reynolds legal team say is true. Seems a bit OTT for minimal financial gain. The fake ultrasound and fake “Baby weight” as claimed by the lawyer will be interesting. Just from a quick google search u can get fake ultrasounds for $10 apparently. Dunno how you can make your stomach expand to the extent they are claiming however.

I wouldn't lose sleep over it. I do feel sorry for Josh but he'll come out of it a stronger and wiser person at the end. Just one of life's mistakes that most of us end up in at one stage or another.

The claim on their side is they can verify the pregnancies if that’s the case then the character assassination angle falls apart

That's only part of it. Josh will come out of this ok.

That kinda seems like the big part of their claim.

Part of the claim - don't read into it too much, again, this information the media have obtained - they don't have access to the full brief of evidence. If you have the time, attend the trial at the Downing Centre - should be interesting as one argument is torn to shreds.

I’ve read the police fact sheets. I’ve read about Reynolds teams defence As well. Majority of it will be irrelevant. The biggest hurdle is the video. Regardless of her character, all the current claims by Reynolds defence will have little bearing as it’s irrelevant to the night of the incident

It is relevant to the night of the incident because it casts doubt over whether the night of the incident existed to begin with.

 

[wokesmoke]

The video doesn’t prove anything. While yelling at her like that isn’t a good look he doesn’t touch her and it’s right after she busted into his house so obviously he’ll be angry. Nothing in it I think.

I don’t even know where to start with this. But hopefully you don’t have a missus or a daughter if you think that this is a normal way to interact

 

[wokesmoke]

So basically she did all this for about $5k? If what Reynolds legal team say is true. Seems a bit OTT for minimal financial gain. The fake ultrasound and fake “Baby weight” as claimed by the lawyer will be interesting. Just from a quick google search u can get fake ultrasounds for $10 apparently. Dunno how you can make your stomach expand to the extent they are claiming however.

I wouldn't lose sleep over it. I do feel sorry for Josh but he'll come out of it a stronger and wiser person at the end. Just one of life's mistakes that most of us end up in at one stage or another.

The claim on their side is they can verify the pregnancies if that’s the case then the character assassination angle falls apart

That's only part of it. Josh will come out of this ok.

That kinda seems like the big part of their claim.

Part of the claim - don't read into it too much, again, this information the media have obtained - they don't have access to the full brief of evidence. If you have the time, attend the trial at the Downing Centre - should be interesting as one argument is torn to shreds.

I’ve read the police fact sheets. I’ve read about Reynolds teams defence As well. Majority of it will be irrelevant. The biggest hurdle is the video. Regardless of her character, all the current claims by Reynolds defence will have little bearing as it’s irrelevant to the night of the incident

It is relevant to the night of the incident because it casts doubt over whether the night of the incident existed to begin with.

Literally a video, or is that fake as well

 

[Sco77y]

So basically she did all this for about $5k? If what Reynolds legal team say is true. Seems a bit OTT for minimal financial gain. The fake ultrasound and fake “Baby weight” as claimed by the lawyer will be interesting. Just from a quick google search u can get fake ultrasounds for $10 apparently. Dunno how you can make your stomach expand to the extent they are claiming however.

I wouldn't lose sleep over it. I do feel sorry for Josh but he'll come out of it a stronger and wiser person at the end. Just one of life's mistakes that most of us end up in at one stage or another.

The claim on their side is they can verify the pregnancies if that’s the case then the character assassination angle falls apart

That's only part of it. Josh will come out of this ok.

That kinda seems like the big part of their claim.

Part of the claim - don't read into it too much, again, this information the media have obtained - they don't have access to the full brief of evidence. If you have the time, attend the trial at the Downing Centre - should be interesting as one argument is torn to shreds.

I’ve read the police fact sheets. I’ve read about Reynolds teams defence As well. Majority of it will be irrelevant. The biggest hurdle is the video. Regardless of her character, all the current claims by Reynolds defence will have little bearing as it’s irrelevant to the night of the incident

It is relevant to the night of the incident because it casts doubt over whether the night of the incident existed to begin with.

Literally a video, or is that fake as well

That isn’t a video of the incident. Is he being charged for yelling and swearing?

 

[hobbo1]

So basically she did all this for about $5k? If what Reynolds legal team say is true. Seems a bit OTT for minimal financial gain. The fake ultrasound and fake “Baby weight” as claimed by the lawyer will be interesting. Just from a quick google search u can get fake ultrasounds for $10 apparently. Dunno how you can make your stomach expand to the extent they are claiming however.

I wouldn't lose sleep over it. I do feel sorry for Josh but he'll come out of it a stronger and wiser person at the end. Just one of life's mistakes that most of us end up in at one stage or another.

The claim on their side is they can verify the pregnancies if that’s the case then the character assassination angle falls apart

That's only part of it. Josh will come out of this ok.

That kinda seems like the big part of their claim.

Part of the claim - don't read into it too much, again, this information the media have obtained - they don't have access to the full brief of evidence. If you have the time, attend the trial at the Downing Centre - should be interesting as one argument is torn to shreds.

I’ve read the police fact sheets. I’ve read about Reynolds teams defence As well. Majority of it will be irrelevant. The biggest hurdle is the video. Regardless of her character, all the current claims by Reynolds defence will have little bearing as it’s irrelevant to the night of the incident

It is relevant to the night of the incident because it casts doubt over whether the night of the incident existed to begin with.

Literally a video, or is that fake as well

Are you Matthew McConaughey?

 

[wokesmoke]

So basically she did all this for about $5k? If what Reynolds legal team say is true. Seems a bit OTT for minimal financial gain. The fake ultrasound and fake “Baby weight” as claimed by the lawyer will be interesting. Just from a quick google search u can get fake ultrasounds for $10 apparently. Dunno how you can make your stomach expand to the extent they are claiming however.

I wouldn't lose sleep over it. I do feel sorry for Josh but he'll come out of it a stronger and wiser person at the end. Just one of life's mistakes that most of us end up in at one stage or another.

The claim on their side is they can verify the pregnancies if that’s the case then the character assassination angle falls apart

That's only part of it. Josh will come out of this ok.

That kinda seems like the big part of their claim.

Part of the claim - don't read into it too much, again, this information the media have obtained - they don't have access to the full brief of evidence. If you have the time, attend the trial at the Downing Centre - should be interesting as one argument is torn to shreds.

I’ve read the police fact sheets. I’ve read about Reynolds teams defence As well. Majority of it will be irrelevant. The biggest hurdle is the video. Regardless of her character, all the current claims by Reynolds defence will have little bearing as it’s irrelevant to the night of the incident

It is relevant to the night of the incident because it casts doubt over whether the night of the incident existed to begin with.

Literally a video, or is that fake as well

That isn’t a video of the incident. Is he being charged for yelling and swearing?

That’s not the entire video released.

 

[JC99]

The video doesn’t prove anything. While yelling at her like that isn’t a good look he doesn’t touch her and it’s right after she busted into his house so obviously he’ll be angry. Nothing in it I think.

I don’t even know where to start with this. But hopefully you don’t have a missus or a daughter if you think that this is a normal way to interact

Like I said, it’s not a great look for him yelling and swearing, but it’s not illegal. By all accounts she’s busted into his house AND nicked his phone. MAYBE you can get an intimidation charge but considering the circumstances I doubt it.

 

[Tiger5150]

So basically she did all this for about $5k? If what Reynolds legal team say is true. Seems a bit OTT for minimal financial gain. The fake ultrasound and fake “Baby weight” as claimed by the lawyer will be interesting. Just from a quick google search u can get fake ultrasounds for $10 apparently. Dunno how you can make your stomach expand to the extent they are claiming however.

I wouldn't lose sleep over it. I do feel sorry for Josh but he'll come out of it a stronger and wiser person at the end. Just one of life's mistakes that most of us end up in at one stage or another.

The claim on their side is they can verify the pregnancies if that’s the case then the character assassination angle falls apart

That's only part of it. Josh will come out of this ok.

That kinda seems like the big part of their claim.

Part of the claim - don't read into it too much, again, this information the media have obtained - they don't have access to the full brief of evidence. If you have the time, attend the trial at the Downing Centre - should be interesting as one argument is torn to shreds.

I’ve read the police fact sheets. I’ve read about Reynolds teams defence As well. Majority of it will be irrelevant. The biggest hurdle is the video. Regardless of her character, all the current claims by Reynolds defence will have little bearing as it’s irrelevant to the night of the incident

It is relevant to the night of the incident because it casts doubt over whether the night of the incident existed to begin with.

Literally a video, or is that fake as well

That isn’t a video of the incident. Is he being charged for yelling and swearing?

That’s not the entire video released.

Personally Ive never really cared about you making stuff up wrt signings as I find it humourous and entertaining.

you pretending to know more than you do about this case however is not cool and dangerous when peoples reputations are at stake.

You do not know for fact that its the same night or video, I also doubt you have read the police sheets (point us to where they are available.)

 

[wokesmoke]

So basically she did all this for about $5k? If what Reynolds legal team say is true. Seems a bit OTT for minimal financial gain. The fake ultrasound and fake “Baby weight” as claimed by the lawyer will be interesting. Just from a quick google search u can get fake ultrasounds for $10 apparently. Dunno how you can make your stomach expand to the extent they are claiming however.

I wouldn't lose sleep over it. I do feel sorry for Josh but he'll come out of it a stronger and wiser person at the end. Just one of life's mistakes that most of us end up in at one stage or another.

The claim on their side is they can verify the pregnancies if that’s the case then the character assassination angle falls apart

That's only part of it. Josh will come out of this ok.

That kinda seems like the big part of their claim.

Part of the claim - don't read into it too much, again, this information the media have obtained - they don't have access to the full brief of evidence. If you have the time, attend the trial at the Downing Centre - should be interesting as one argument is torn to shreds.

I’ve read the police fact sheets. I’ve read about Reynolds teams defence As well. Majority of it will be irrelevant. The biggest hurdle is the video. Regardless of her character, all the current claims by Reynolds defence will have little bearing as it’s irrelevant to the night of the incident

It is relevant to the night of the incident because it casts doubt over whether the night of the incident existed to begin with.

Literally a video, or is that fake as well

That isn’t a video of the incident. Is he being charged for yelling and swearing?

That’s not the entire video released.


Personally Ive never really cared about you making stuff up wrt signings as I find it humourous and entertaining.

you pretending to know more than you do about this case however is not cool and dangerous when peoples reputations are at stake.

You do not know for fact that its the same night or video, I also doubt you have read the police sheets (point us to where they are available.)

Pays to have friends in that industry

 

[Tiger5150]

So basically she did all this for about $5k? If what Reynolds legal team say is true. Seems a bit OTT for minimal financial gain. The fake ultrasound and fake “Baby weight” as claimed by the lawyer will be interesting. Just from a quick google search u can get fake ultrasounds for $10 apparently. Dunno how you can make your stomach expand to the extent they are claiming however.

I wouldn't lose sleep over it. I do feel sorry for Josh but he'll come out of it a stronger and wiser person at the end. Just one of life's mistakes that most of us end up in at one stage or another.

The claim on their side is they can verify the pregnancies if that’s the case then the character assassination angle falls apart

That's only part of it. Josh will come out of this ok.

That kinda seems like the big part of their claim.

Part of the claim - don't read into it too much, again, this information the media have obtained - they don't have access to the full brief of evidence. If you have the time, attend the trial at the Downing Centre - should be interesting as one argument is torn to shreds.

I’ve read the police fact sheets. I’ve read about Reynolds teams defence As well. Majority of it will be irrelevant. The biggest hurdle is the video. Regardless of her character, all the current claims by Reynolds defence will have little bearing as it’s irrelevant to the night of the incident

It is relevant to the night of the incident because it casts doubt over whether the night of the incident existed to begin with.

Literally a video, or is that fake as well

That isn’t a video of the incident. Is he being charged for yelling and swearing?

That’s not the entire video released.


Personally Ive never really cared about you making stuff up wrt signings as I find it humourous and entertaining.

you pretending to know more than you do about this case however is not cool and dangerous when peoples reputations are at stake.

You do not know for fact that its the same night or video, I also doubt you have read the police sheets (point us to where they are available.)

Pays to have friends in that industry

You are either the best connected person in Sydney or the biggest BS artist. All evidence so far points one way (LM didnt sign, neither did JAC and we didnt get JR off the cap).

 

[wokesmoke]

The video doesn’t prove anything. While yelling at her like that isn’t a good look he doesn’t touch her and it’s right after she busted into his house so obviously he’ll be angry. Nothing in it I think.

I don’t even know where to start with this. But hopefully you don’t have a missus or a daughter if you think that this is a normal way to interact

Like I said, it’s not a great look for him yelling and swearing, but it’s not illegal. By all accounts she’s busted into his house AND nicked his phone. MAYBE you can get an intimidation charge but considering the circumstances I doubt it.

They lived together. If she didn’t she would of been charged with trespassing yeah? Entering a premise with our consent etc.he went to police of his own accord and was subsequently charged.

 

[hobbo1]

So basically she did all this for about $5k? If what Reynolds legal team say is true. Seems a bit OTT for minimal financial gain. The fake ultrasound and fake “Baby weight” as claimed by the lawyer will be interesting. Just from a quick google search u can get fake ultrasounds for $10 apparently. Dunno how you can make your stomach expand to the extent they are claiming however.

I wouldn't lose sleep over it. I do feel sorry for Josh but he'll come out of it a stronger and wiser person at the end. Just one of life's mistakes that most of us end up in at one stage or another.

The claim on their side is they can verify the pregnancies if that’s the case then the character assassination angle falls apart

That's only part of it. Josh will come out of this ok.

That kinda seems like the big part of their claim.

Part of the claim - don't read into it too much, again, this information the media have obtained - they don't have access to the full brief of evidence. If you have the time, attend the trial at the Downing Centre - should be interesting as one argument is torn to shreds.

I’ve read the police fact sheets. I’ve read about Reynolds teams defence As well. Majority of it will be irrelevant. The biggest hurdle is the video. Regardless of her character, all the current claims by Reynolds defence will have little bearing as it’s irrelevant to the night of the incident

It is relevant to the night of the incident because it casts doubt over whether the night of the incident existed to begin with.

Literally a video, or is that fake as well

That isn’t a video of the incident. Is he being charged for yelling and swearing?

That’s not the entire video released.


Personally Ive never really cared about you making stuff up wrt signings as I find it humourous and entertaining.

you pretending to know more than you do about this case however is not cool and dangerous when peoples reputations are at stake.

You do not know for fact that its the same night or video, I also doubt you have read the police sheets (point us to where they are available.)

Pays to have friends in that industry

They mustn’t like you too much !
I’d say your more of a pest than there friends ..

 

[Tiger5150]

The video doesn’t prove anything. While yelling at her like that isn’t a good look he doesn’t touch her and it’s right after she busted into his house so obviously he’ll be angry. Nothing in it I think.

I don’t even know where to start with this. But hopefully you don’t have a missus or a daughter if you think that this is a normal way to interact

Like I said, it’s not a great look for him yelling and swearing, but it’s not illegal. By all accounts she’s busted into his house AND nicked his phone. MAYBE you can get an intimidation charge but considering the circumstances I doubt it.

They lived together. If she didn’t she would of been charged with trespassing yeah? Entering a premise with our consent etc.he went to police of his own accord and was subsequently charged.

Ok big guy, youve read the police sheets, details.

 

[Deleted member 3518]

The video doesn’t prove anything. While yelling at her like that isn’t a good look he doesn’t touch her and it’s right after she busted into his house so obviously he’ll be angry. Nothing in it I think.

I don’t even know where to start with this. But hopefully you don’t have a missus or a daughter if you think that this is a normal way to interact

Mate , you keep saying this and no one replied because people do have daughters. And if my daughter has done what this girl has done and the worst thing that happened is him swear at her , and tell her to gtfo , Then I would consider that a lucky escape .
You sound like a huge snowflake. If that language is enough for you to drop your bundle than I don't know what to say.
This , even at its worst , is a bruised arm and a few bad words and hurt feelings . Now the fact that her whole accusation has question marks , throws the whole thing into question .
Yet you still double down on some , weird notion of chivalry.

 

[Guest]

The video doesn’t prove anything. While yelling at her like that isn’t a good look he doesn’t touch her and it’s right after she busted into his house so obviously he’ll be angry. Nothing in it I think.

I don’t even know where to start with this. But hopefully you don’t have a missus or a daughter if you think that this is a normal way to interact

Like I said, it’s not a great look for him yelling and swearing, but it’s not illegal. By all accounts she’s busted into his house AND nicked his phone. MAYBE you can get an intimidation charge but considering the circumstances I doubt it.

They lived together. If she didn’t she would of been charged with trespassing yeah? Entering a premise with our consent etc.he went to police of his own accord and was subsequently charged.

On the provision that Josh made a formal complaint to the Police of course. Like I said, one side of this argument will be torn to shreds in court.

 

[JD Tiger]

The video doesn’t prove anything. While yelling at her like that isn’t a good look he doesn’t touch her and it’s right after she busted into his house so obviously he’ll be angry. Nothing in it I think.

I don’t even know where to start with this. But hopefully you don’t have a missus or a daughter if you think that this is a normal way to interact

To someone uninvited appearing within your house?