jrtiger
Well-known member
although I was expecting far worse, Wests Tigers can't have our highest paid player (or any player for that matter) absuing women like that when we have women as both players and members of staff within the organisation.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
@Tweed_Tiger said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1104571) said:When is he back in court?
@Tigerboy said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1104543) said:@coivtny said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1104538) said:I should stress I haven’t seen the video and really don’t want or need to see it. But, if it’s as reported earlier in this thread I can’t see how the alleged behaviour frees up $750k or whatever JR is on per season. The behaviour as reported is crass and boorish but not criminal in its own right. The other matter before the courts could potentially result in a criminal conviction. Happy to hear I’m wrong but I can’t see how we’re $750k better off at this point.
Agree... stupidity rules the NRL. He may not ever play another game for us but we’ll still be paying his salary that entire time. Thanks Iv... thx a lot
@Demps said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1104520) said:@happy_tiger said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1104519) said:Shouldn't this have it's own thread
It did. Got shut down.
Lets discuss how we'll spend this newly available 750k
@wokesmoke said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1104575) said:@Tigerboy said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1104543) said:@coivtny said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1104538) said:I should stress I haven’t seen the video and really don’t want or need to see it. But, if it’s as reported earlier in this thread I can’t see how the alleged behaviour frees up $750k or whatever JR is on per season. The behaviour as reported is crass and boorish but not criminal in its own right. The other matter before the courts could potentially result in a criminal conviction. Happy to hear I’m wrong but I can’t see how we’re $750k better off at this point.
Agree... stupidity rules the NRL. He may not ever play another game for us but we’ll still be paying his salary that entire time. Thanks Iv... thx a lot
No his contract would be null and void.
@Tigerboy said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1104577) said:@wokesmoke said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1104575) said:@Tigerboy said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1104543) said:@coivtny said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1104538) said:I should stress I haven’t seen the video and really don’t want or need to see it. But, if it’s as reported earlier in this thread I can’t see how the alleged behaviour frees up $750k or whatever JR is on per season. The behaviour as reported is crass and boorish but not criminal in its own right. The other matter before the courts could potentially result in a criminal conviction. Happy to hear I’m wrong but I can’t see how we’re $750k better off at this point.
Agree... stupidity rules the NRL. He may not ever play another game for us but we’ll still be paying his salary that entire time. Thanks Iv... thx a lot
No his contract would be null and void.
Only if guilty on original charge, which is exactly the point I’m making, you need to question and decipher the motive’s behind any choice to release this video publicly and how it hasn’t already surfaced, or what J.R may indeed be hiding in his defence for a day in court!
I won’t comment again as I’m totally uninformed on the actual issue and how this may make it much worse for him. Feelsbadman
@coivtny said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1104579) said:It will be interesting to see how long before WT put a statement up on the website. It usually takes a little time to wordsmith it, pass it by legal and then pass it by the NRL but if it takes too long it's not a good look. Will also be interesting to see whether he's stood down.