Josh Reynolds

  • Thread starter Thread starter wokesmoke
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
I once let the ex-Mrs borrow the car one Friday arvo for the weekend .. only for me to see some dude i have never seen before driving my car around and smoking in it at the local shops on Saturday morning .. i casually walked up to the car, knocked on the drivers side window .. he opened and said can i help you .. only for me to grab him by his leather jacket and dragged him halfway out of the window, only for him to start head butting my knee ..!! Whilst this was happening without me knowing the ex-Mrs was behind me attacking the back of my melon with the heel of her stiletto shoe. Within minutes the boys in blue turned up .. my bleed from the back of my head and this dude in my car now sleeping with half of his body halfway out the drivers side window .. anyways the outcome of this was .. I had an AVO put on me by the ex-Mrs .. even though i never touched her and that she attacked me and I needed several stitches to the back of me head .. !! Funny though as the cops said it was for the dude that attacked my knee as I could take it as he stole my car .. hehehe ;-)
 
@avocadoontoast said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114663) said:
@OzLuke said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114626) said:
@Tiger5150 said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113595) said:
@OzLuke said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113541) said:
Say for instance this female has actively tried to get Reynolds arrested/ruin his life etc and it all came out in that conversation that she recorded and heaven forbid he laid his hand on her.....***would he still be seen as the worst guy ever for laying his hands on her*** even though she did her best to screw his life up?

***I don't for one minute condone violence***.....but it is an interesting conversation....did the alleged abuse towards Reynolds trigger him? Would he have done it if he wasn't allegedly so clinically and callously duped?

Just trying to promote conversation.....

A real man would not lay a hand on a woman for any reason or any provocation. There is zero excuse for it, ever, full stop. A weak man assaults a woman, regardless of provocation.

to answer your question, if what this girl has supposedly done could trigger JR to assault her, I guess yes if JR is a weak man and there is no excuse for it.

SMH at what this thread has opened up. Between this thread and the coronavirus thread, we have had a whole new look at our fellow fans.

You ever been spat on by a woman? Assaulted by one through kicking and punching? Had a used tampon or cup of urine thrown at you by a woman? had a knife pulled on you by a woman? That happens you just going to stand there and use your words?

Have you actually had a used tampon or cup of urine thrown at you? Not disputing it but would love to know the circumstances surrounding it!

yes I have and it was highly unpleasant....as well as being spat at, had faeces and vomit thrown......

work related hazards......prison system is a wonderful melting pot. The women had a problem with their current situations after being bail refused and took it out on their nearest correctional officer
 
@Telltails said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114637) said:
@Tiger5150 said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113696) said:
@Sco77y said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113693) said:
@Tiger5150 said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113631) said:
@Sco77y said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113624) said:
@wokesmoke said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113607) said:
This forum don’t wanna convict JR based on hearsay but want to convict the victim based on hear say. And want to justify JR actions based on the hear say. What evidence you do have is the video of JR losing his mind over something seemingly trivial and threatening to give her the business. Forum members are mixing up 2 doffernet issues.

It's not quite hearsay when your own parents are backing up everybody's sentiments, but even if you ignore that, there are likely documents including medical that back those up. Obviously we don't know that 100% for sure, but it really sounds like these do exist and will be presented in court. Let's wait and see..


100% agree on the wait and see, let the court decide, but I think you are conflating two issues. Even if it is not hearsay, even if everything on the Ch9 report is 100% true, it is still possible that JR assaulted her. The fact that she is a mentally ill, vindictive nasty piece of work that has done horrible things to JR, would not absolve him or anyone of assault.

Agree that it's still possible JR has assaulted her, and yes that claim still stands despite what was revealed yesterday. My point is that even so, as far as I'm aware there's no real evidence that he did do it either. But on the other hand, there is almost certainly some evidence that suggests his partner's credibility is non-existent. Therefore the only reasonable conclusion you could make is that he isn't guilty. I'm not saying he isn't, only that it's more likely that he isn't. Or beyond reasonable doubt as they say..


No question his ex partner appears to have zero credibility. I disagree that the only reasonable conclusion is he isnt guilty. As TrueTiger and others here have made the point that her behaviour may have been the motive and trigger for assault. Agree if it is a he said/she said situation, she is shot.

Still curious how/why as reported Reynolds turned himself in.

According to the reported story Reynolds went to police to report his story about her - probably suspecting he was a victim of fraud. It was then she retaliated with a DV accusation and the video emerged making it public knowledge.

Maybe I am different from others ...but I attended every scan and every appointment with the Gyno with both kids
 
Witness account reported by the Illawarra Mercury but not it appears major outlets.

"The women with the players had all walked off beforehand and they were all cursing on the way out of the door saying 'He does this all the time,'" he said.
 
@happy_tiger said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114675) said:
@Telltails said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114637) said:
@Tiger5150 said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113696) said:
@Sco77y said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113693) said:
@Tiger5150 said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113631) said:
@Sco77y said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113624) said:
@wokesmoke said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113607) said:
This forum don’t wanna convict JR based on hearsay but want to convict the victim based on hear say. And want to justify JR actions based on the hear say. What evidence you do have is the video of JR losing his mind over something seemingly trivial and threatening to give her the business. Forum members are mixing up 2 doffernet issues.

It's not quite hearsay when your own parents are backing up everybody's sentiments, but even if you ignore that, there are likely documents including medical that back those up. Obviously we don't know that 100% for sure, but it really sounds like these do exist and will be presented in court. Let's wait and see..


100% agree on the wait and see, let the court decide, but I think you are conflating two issues. Even if it is not hearsay, even if everything on the Ch9 report is 100% true, it is still possible that JR assaulted her. The fact that she is a mentally ill, vindictive nasty piece of work that has done horrible things to JR, would not absolve him or anyone of assault.

Agree that it's still possible JR has assaulted her, and yes that claim still stands despite what was revealed yesterday. My point is that even so, as far as I'm aware there's no real evidence that he did do it either. But on the other hand, there is almost certainly some evidence that suggests his partner's credibility is non-existent. Therefore the only reasonable conclusion you could make is that he isn't guilty. I'm not saying he isn't, only that it's more likely that he isn't. Or beyond reasonable doubt as they say..


No question his ex partner appears to have zero credibility. I disagree that the only reasonable conclusion is he isnt guilty. As TrueTiger and others here have made the point that her behaviour may have been the motive and trigger for assault. Agree if it is a he said/she said situation, she is shot.

Still curious how/why as reported Reynolds turned himself in.

According to the reported story Reynolds went to police to report his story about her - probably suspecting he was a victim of fraud. It was then she retaliated with a DV accusation and the video emerged making it public knowledge.

Maybe I am different from others ...

I think you clearly are ;-)

>but I attended every scan and every appointment with the Gyno with both kids

But not because of this...
 
@tigerballs said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114575) said:
@Strongee said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114573) said:
@Tiger_Steve said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114565) said:
@Strongee said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114550) said:
@wokesmoke said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114536) said:
@Strongee said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114530) said:
@wokesmoke said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114515) said:
@JoshColeman99 said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114510) said:
The video doesn’t prove anything. While yelling at her like that isn’t a good look he doesn’t touch her and it’s right after she busted into his house so obviously he’ll be angry. Nothing in it I think.

I don’t even know where to start with this. But hopefully you don’t have a missus or a daughter if you think that this is a normal way to interact

Mate , you keep saying this and no one replied because people do have daughters. And if my daughter has done what this girl has done and the worst thing that happened is him swear at her , and tell her to gtfo , Then I would consider that a lucky escape .
You sound like a huge snowflake. If that language is enough for you to drop your bundle than I don't know what to say.
This , even at its worst , is a bruised arm and a few bad words and hurt feelings . Now the fact that her whole accusation has question marks , throws the whole thing into question .
Yet you still double down on some , weird notion of chivalry.


If you were dating my daughter Or mother or sister (theoretically) and u called her a C word and threatened to assault her, Id chin you.

Lol really ? I'd like to see you try.That's absolutely ridiculous.
A. Thier relationship is none of your business, unless abuse is involved.
B. Especially with the type of language used in Aus (eg. A C bomb can be used as a term of endearment ), having a fight where that type of language is used , considering the circumstances, most reasonable people would say , yea fair enough.
C. Anybody who would openly threaten to belt someone, without considering the whole context , based on a short video , is a joke. I believe you would try to put one on my chin , but find that's about all you would be doing .
Your a joke.

Talks big on an anonymous forum. Real tough guy

Meh. I just find the hypocrisy ridiculous. He's saying he's against violence by saying he's going to enact violence for revenge . I get his point of view , just comes across as an idealism we all had when we were 18. Until we all had arguments , where you're called everything and even had things thrown at you, and your idealism starts to be replaced by reality . He's clearly never had a psycho the ex girlfriend .

I once saw a girl sneak up behind a bouncer who was taking a bloke outside and belt him in the back of the head with her high heels. Opened him up. He swung round and put one right on her bean. It wasn't nice but everyone at the time thought "yeah, fair enough".

Once saw a Judge Judy episode and she said "you act like a man , you get treated like a man "

You should never hit a woman ...but it's open season on her husband , boyfriend , brother etc
 
@pawsandclaws1 said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114676) said:
Witness account reported by the Illawarra Mercury but not it appears major outlets.

"The women with the players had all walked off beforehand and they were all cursing on the way out of the door saying 'He does this all the time,'" he said.


????Context?
 
@happy_tiger said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114675) said:
@Telltails said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114637) said:
@Tiger5150 said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113696) said:
@Sco77y said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113693) said:
@Tiger5150 said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113631) said:
@Sco77y said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113624) said:
@wokesmoke said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113607) said:
This forum don’t wanna convict JR based on hearsay but want to convict the victim based on hear say. And want to justify JR actions based on the hear say. What evidence you do have is the video of JR losing his mind over something seemingly trivial and threatening to give her the business. Forum members are mixing up 2 doffernet issues.

It's not quite hearsay when your own parents are backing up everybody's sentiments, but even if you ignore that, there are likely documents including medical that back those up. Obviously we don't know that 100% for sure, but it really sounds like these do exist and will be presented in court. Let's wait and see..


100% agree on the wait and see, let the court decide, but I think you are conflating two issues. Even if it is not hearsay, even if everything on the Ch9 report is 100% true, it is still possible that JR assaulted her. The fact that she is a mentally ill, vindictive nasty piece of work that has done horrible things to JR, would not absolve him or anyone of assault.

Agree that it's still possible JR has assaulted her, and yes that claim still stands despite what was revealed yesterday. My point is that even so, as far as I'm aware there's no real evidence that he did do it either. But on the other hand, there is almost certainly some evidence that suggests his partner's credibility is non-existent. Therefore the only reasonable conclusion you could make is that he isn't guilty. I'm not saying he isn't, only that it's more likely that he isn't. Or beyond reasonable doubt as they say..


No question his ex partner appears to have zero credibility. I disagree that the only reasonable conclusion is he isnt guilty. As TrueTiger and others here have made the point that her behaviour may have been the motive and trigger for assault. Agree if it is a he said/she said situation, she is shot.

Still curious how/why as reported Reynolds turned himself in.

According to the reported story Reynolds went to police to report his story about her - probably suspecting he was a victim of fraud. It was then she retaliated with a DV accusation and the video emerged making it public knowledge.

Maybe I am different from others ...but I attended every scan and every appointment with the Gyno with both kids

Me too.
 
@Tiger5150 said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114678) said:
@happy_tiger said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114675) said:
@Telltails said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114637) said:
@Tiger5150 said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113696) said:
@Sco77y said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113693) said:
@Tiger5150 said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113631) said:
@Sco77y said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113624) said:
@wokesmoke said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113607) said:
This forum don’t wanna convict JR based on hearsay but want to convict the victim based on hear say. And want to justify JR actions based on the hear say. What evidence you do have is the video of JR losing his mind over something seemingly trivial and threatening to give her the business. Forum members are mixing up 2 doffernet issues.

It's not quite hearsay when your own parents are backing up everybody's sentiments, but even if you ignore that, there are likely documents including medical that back those up. Obviously we don't know that 100% for sure, but it really sounds like these do exist and will be presented in court. Let's wait and see..


100% agree on the wait and see, let the court decide, but I think you are conflating two issues. Even if it is not hearsay, even if everything on the Ch9 report is 100% true, it is still possible that JR assaulted her. The fact that she is a mentally ill, vindictive nasty piece of work that has done horrible things to JR, would not absolve him or anyone of assault.

Agree that it's still possible JR has assaulted her, and yes that claim still stands despite what was revealed yesterday. My point is that even so, as far as I'm aware there's no real evidence that he did do it either. But on the other hand, there is almost certainly some evidence that suggests his partner's credibility is non-existent. Therefore the only reasonable conclusion you could make is that he isn't guilty. I'm not saying he isn't, only that it's more likely that he isn't. Or beyond reasonable doubt as they say..


No question his ex partner appears to have zero credibility. I disagree that the only reasonable conclusion is he isnt guilty. As TrueTiger and others here have made the point that her behaviour may have been the motive and trigger for assault. Agree if it is a he said/she said situation, she is shot.

Still curious how/why as reported Reynolds turned himself in.

According to the reported story Reynolds went to police to report his story about her - probably suspecting he was a victim of fraud. It was then she retaliated with a DV accusation and the video emerged making it public knowledge.

Maybe I am different from others ...

I think you clearly are ;-)

>but I attended every scan and every appointment with the Gyno with both kids

But not because of this...

Yeah that would be pretty true 5150 ...pretty sure the bloke upstairs laughed after he broke my mold
 
@OzLuke said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114674) said:
@avocadoontoast said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114663) said:
@OzLuke said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114626) said:
@Tiger5150 said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113595) said:
@OzLuke said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113541) said:
Say for instance this female has actively tried to get Reynolds arrested/ruin his life etc and it all came out in that conversation that she recorded and heaven forbid he laid his hand on her.....***would he still be seen as the worst guy ever for laying his hands on her*** even though she did her best to screw his life up?

***I don't for one minute condone violence***.....but it is an interesting conversation....did the alleged abuse towards Reynolds trigger him? Would he have done it if he wasn't allegedly so clinically and callously duped?

Just trying to promote conversation.....

A real man would not lay a hand on a woman for any reason or any provocation. There is zero excuse for it, ever, full stop. A weak man assaults a woman, regardless of provocation.

to answer your question, if what this girl has supposedly done could trigger JR to assault her, I guess yes if JR is a weak man and there is no excuse for it.

SMH at what this thread has opened up. Between this thread and the coronavirus thread, we have had a whole new look at our fellow fans.

You ever been spat on by a woman? Assaulted by one through kicking and punching? Had a used tampon or cup of urine thrown at you by a woman? had a knife pulled on you by a woman? That happens you just going to stand there and use your words?

Have you actually had a used tampon or cup of urine thrown at you? Not disputing it but would love to know the circumstances surrounding it!

yes I have and it was highly unpleasant....as well as being spat at, had faeces and vomit thrown......

work related hazards......prison system is a wonderful melting pot. The women had a problem with their current situations after being bail refused and took it out on their nearest correctional officer

Crikey, sounds awful. I think faeces is the worst. If someone chucked their actual poo at me it would take me quite a while to get over it.
 
@avocadoontoast said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114683) said:
@OzLuke said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114674) said:
@avocadoontoast said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114663) said:
@OzLuke said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114626) said:
@Tiger5150 said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113595) said:
@OzLuke said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113541) said:
Say for instance this female has actively tried to get Reynolds arrested/ruin his life etc and it all came out in that conversation that she recorded and heaven forbid he laid his hand on her.....***would he still be seen as the worst guy ever for laying his hands on her*** even though she did her best to screw his life up?

***I don't for one minute condone violence***.....but it is an interesting conversation....did the alleged abuse towards Reynolds trigger him? Would he have done it if he wasn't allegedly so clinically and callously duped?

Just trying to promote conversation.....

A real man would not lay a hand on a woman for any reason or any provocation. There is zero excuse for it, ever, full stop. A weak man assaults a woman, regardless of provocation.

to answer your question, if what this girl has supposedly done could trigger JR to assault her, I guess yes if JR is a weak man and there is no excuse for it.

SMH at what this thread has opened up. Between this thread and the coronavirus thread, we have had a whole new look at our fellow fans.

You ever been spat on by a woman? Assaulted by one through kicking and punching? Had a used tampon or cup of urine thrown at you by a woman? had a knife pulled on you by a woman? That happens you just going to stand there and use your words?

Have you actually had a used tampon or cup of urine thrown at you? Not disputing it but would love to know the circumstances surrounding it!

yes I have and it was highly unpleasant....as well as being spat at, had faeces and vomit thrown......

work related hazards......prison system is a wonderful melting pot. The women had a problem with their current situations after being bail refused and took it out on their nearest correctional officer

Crikey, sounds awful. I think faeces is the worst. If someone chucked their actual poo at me it would take me quite a while to get over it.

It's all well and good to have standards about not hitting women....domestic violence is the worst.....but sometimes people act like absolute animals and you need to protect yourself. Think I'm gonna stand there while some female throws her used feminine hygiene products at me??? Think again
 
@willow said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114658) said:
@Tcat said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114640) said:
What an ugly situation to be in. I honestly don't know how id deal with it. Id like to think id be calm, but hey we all have our breaking points and if JRs allegations about this woman are true, then wow. This is manipulation at its best and is up there with physical domestic violence. This behaviour toward JR will leave scars you can't see. Hopefully the courts can deal with it asap so both parties can move on with their lives. No winners here unfortunately.

April will roll around soon enough, Josh will have his day in court and that will be the end of it.

It's never the end of it
Trust me
I was married now divorced and let's just say my ex went to extraordinary lengths to hurt me financially and mentally
8 years after Divorce and property settlement which was all stamped and approved by the courts, I was still slugged with a $12,000 bill due to closure of a business which was mine through settlement
If I closed the business one year later I would not have had a bill of $12,000
I won't go into full detail but all I can say is if was ripped of
I could have gone to court to fight it but I would have had to engage solicitors, take time off work and the extra stress fighting it while she had legal aid
Also I had a good case but no guarantee of winning
It was disgraceful but I just had to move on for my own health
I also had to get court orders in place to stop the social media abuse and the orders are still in place today
The Judge, a lady judge could not believe some of the things I have to endure on social media and threats that were made against me and my new wife
See you can print these things out and use them as evidence
It can destroy lives believe me
Luckily I am strong mentally
If you have done nothing wrong then you can get through these things
Sometimes I think I was sent to this earth to test a man's resolve
And I have been tested

Josh will get through this if he has a clear conscience
The other party will get found out which is what is happening now
Life goes on
Onwards and upwards I say
 
@Tiger5150 said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114680) said:
@pawsandclaws1 said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114676) said:
Witness account reported by the Illawarra Mercury but not it appears major outlets.

"The women with the players had all walked off beforehand and they were all cursing on the way out of the door saying 'He does this all the time,'" he said.


????Context?

My bad. Northies incident 2018 abusing a female staff member and other staff. Interestingly, the Illawarra Mercury includes eye witness accounts other papers don't seem

https://www.illawarramercury.com.au/story/4809756/leagues-3m-man-to-face-court-over-alleged-drunken-incident/?cs=2452o
 
@happy_tiger said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114675) said:
@Telltails said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114637) said:
@Tiger5150 said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113696) said:
@Sco77y said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113693) said:
@Tiger5150 said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113631) said:
@Sco77y said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113624) said:
@wokesmoke said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113607) said:
This forum don’t wanna convict JR based on hearsay but want to convict the victim based on hear say. And want to justify JR actions based on the hear say. What evidence you do have is the video of JR losing his mind over something seemingly trivial and threatening to give her the business. Forum members are mixing up 2 doffernet issues.

It's not quite hearsay when your own parents are backing up everybody's sentiments, but even if you ignore that, there are likely documents including medical that back those up. Obviously we don't know that 100% for sure, but it really sounds like these do exist and will be presented in court. Let's wait and see..


100% agree on the wait and see, let the court decide, but I think you are conflating two issues. Even if it is not hearsay, even if everything on the Ch9 report is 100% true, it is still possible that JR assaulted her. The fact that she is a mentally ill, vindictive nasty piece of work that has done horrible things to JR, would not absolve him or anyone of assault.

Agree that it's still possible JR has assaulted her, and yes that claim still stands despite what was revealed yesterday. My point is that even so, as far as I'm aware there's no real evidence that he did do it either. But on the other hand, there is almost certainly some evidence that suggests his partner's credibility is non-existent. Therefore the only reasonable conclusion you could make is that he isn't guilty. I'm not saying he isn't, only that it's more likely that he isn't. Or beyond reasonable doubt as they say..


No question his ex partner appears to have zero credibility. I disagree that the only reasonable conclusion is he isnt guilty. As TrueTiger and others here have made the point that her behaviour may have been the motive and trigger for assault. Agree if it is a he said/she said situation, she is shot.

Still curious how/why as reported Reynolds turned himself in.

According to the reported story Reynolds went to police to report his story about her - probably suspecting he was a victim of fraud. It was then she retaliated with a DV accusation and the video emerged making it public knowledge.

Maybe I am different from others ...but I attended every scan and every appointment with the Gyno with both kids

The first time he was informed three months after they got together one night in Melbourne - there may not have been any opportunity for him to attend another ultrasound if she then miscarried - but that pregnancy appears to be catalyst that cemented the relationship and then the following pregnancy and what ever else transpired there after- if you believe Reynolds account of events.
 
@Telltails said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114688) said:
@happy_tiger said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114675) said:
@Telltails said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114637) said:
@Tiger5150 said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113696) said:
@Sco77y said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113693) said:
@Tiger5150 said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113631) said:
@Sco77y said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113624) said:
@wokesmoke said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113607) said:
This forum don’t wanna convict JR based on hearsay but want to convict the victim based on hear say. And want to justify JR actions based on the hear say. What evidence you do have is the video of JR losing his mind over something seemingly trivial and threatening to give her the business. Forum members are mixing up 2 doffernet issues.

It's not quite hearsay when your own parents are backing up everybody's sentiments, but even if you ignore that, there are likely documents including medical that back those up. Obviously we don't know that 100% for sure, but it really sounds like these do exist and will be presented in court. Let's wait and see..


100% agree on the wait and see, let the court decide, but I think you are conflating two issues. Even if it is not hearsay, even if everything on the Ch9 report is 100% true, it is still possible that JR assaulted her. The fact that she is a mentally ill, vindictive nasty piece of work that has done horrible things to JR, would not absolve him or anyone of assault.

Agree that it's still possible JR has assaulted her, and yes that claim still stands despite what was revealed yesterday. My point is that even so, as far as I'm aware there's no real evidence that he did do it either. But on the other hand, there is almost certainly some evidence that suggests his partner's credibility is non-existent. Therefore the only reasonable conclusion you could make is that he isn't guilty. I'm not saying he isn't, only that it's more likely that he isn't. Or beyond reasonable doubt as they say..


No question his ex partner appears to have zero credibility. I disagree that the only reasonable conclusion is he isnt guilty. As TrueTiger and others here have made the point that her behaviour may have been the motive and trigger for assault. Agree if it is a he said/she said situation, she is shot.

Still curious how/why as reported Reynolds turned himself in.

According to the reported story Reynolds went to police to report his story about her - probably suspecting he was a victim of fraud. It was then she retaliated with a DV accusation and the video emerged making it public knowledge.

Maybe I am different from others ...but I attended every scan and every appointment with the Gyno with both kids

The first time he was informed three months after they got together one night in Melbourne - there may not have been any opportunity for him to attend another ultrasound if she then miscarried - but that pregnancy appears to be catalyst that cemented the relationship and then the following pregnancy and what ever else transpired there after- if you believe Reynolds account of events.

Maybe this is just me .....but with the possibility of AIDS , Hep C , and every possible known STD protection is probably a good idea ..especially when you are a sportsperson

We even have terms for people that pull stunts like this ...gold diggers

Common sense just goes out the window when the wrong brain takes over
 
@happy_tiger said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114690) said:
@Telltails said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114688) said:
@happy_tiger said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114675) said:
@Telltails said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114637) said:
@Tiger5150 said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113696) said:
@Sco77y said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113693) said:
@Tiger5150 said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113631) said:
@Sco77y said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113624) said:
@wokesmoke said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1113607) said:
This forum don’t wanna convict JR based on hearsay but want to convict the victim based on hear say. And want to justify JR actions based on the hear say. What evidence you do have is the video of JR losing his mind over something seemingly trivial and threatening to give her the business. Forum members are mixing up 2 doffernet issues.

It's not quite hearsay when your own parents are backing up everybody's sentiments, but even if you ignore that, there are likely documents including medical that back those up. Obviously we don't know that 100% for sure, but it really sounds like these do exist and will be presented in court. Let's wait and see..


100% agree on the wait and see, let the court decide, but I think you are conflating two issues. Even if it is not hearsay, even if everything on the Ch9 report is 100% true, it is still possible that JR assaulted her. The fact that she is a mentally ill, vindictive nasty piece of work that has done horrible things to JR, would not absolve him or anyone of assault.

Agree that it's still possible JR has assaulted her, and yes that claim still stands despite what was revealed yesterday. My point is that even so, as far as I'm aware there's no real evidence that he did do it either. But on the other hand, there is almost certainly some evidence that suggests his partner's credibility is non-existent. Therefore the only reasonable conclusion you could make is that he isn't guilty. I'm not saying he isn't, only that it's more likely that he isn't. Or beyond reasonable doubt as they say..


No question his ex partner appears to have zero credibility. I disagree that the only reasonable conclusion is he isnt guilty. As TrueTiger and others here have made the point that her behaviour may have been the motive and trigger for assault. Agree if it is a he said/she said situation, she is shot.

Still curious how/why as reported Reynolds turned himself in.

According to the reported story Reynolds went to police to report his story about her - probably suspecting he was a victim of fraud. It was then she retaliated with a DV accusation and the video emerged making it public knowledge.

Maybe I am different from others ...but I attended every scan and every appointment with the Gyno with both kids

The first time he was informed three months after they got together one night in Melbourne - there may not have been any opportunity for him to attend another ultrasound if she then miscarried - but that pregnancy appears to be catalyst that cemented the relationship and then the following pregnancy and what ever else transpired there after- if you believe Reynolds account of events.

Maybe this is just me .....but with the possibility of AIDS , Hep C , and every possible known STD protection is probably a good idea ..especially when you are a sportsperson

We even have terms for people that pull stunts like this ...gold diggers

Common sense just goes out the window when the wrong brain takes over

Yep.
 
@Cairnstigers said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114685) said:
@willow said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114658) said:
@Tcat said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114640) said:
What an ugly situation to be in. I honestly don't know how id deal with it. Id like to think id be calm, but hey we all have our breaking points and if JRs allegations about this woman are true, then wow. This is manipulation at its best and is up there with physical domestic violence. This behaviour toward JR will leave scars you can't see. Hopefully the courts can deal with it asap so both parties can move on with their lives. No winners here unfortunately.

April will roll around soon enough, Josh will have his day in court and that will be the end of it.

It's never the end of it
Trust me
I was married now divorced and let's just say my ex went to extraordinary lengths to hurt me financially and mentally
8 years after Divorce and property settlement which was all stamped and approved by the courts, I was still slugged with a $12,000 bill due to closure of a business which was mine through settlement
If I closed the business one year later I would not have had a bill of $12,000
I won't go into full detail but all I can say is if was ripped of
I could have gone to court to fight it but I would have had to engage solicitors, take time off work and the extra stress fighting it while she had legal aid
Also I had a good case but no guarantee of winning
It was disgraceful but I just had to move on for my own health
I also had to get court orders in place to stop the social media abuse and the orders are still in place today
The Judge, a lady judge could not believe some of the things I have to endure on social media and threats that were made against me and my new wife
See you can print these things out and use them as evidence
It can destroy lives believe me
Luckily I am strong mentally
If you have done nothing wrong then you can get through these things
Sometimes I think I was sent to this earth to test a man's resolve
And I have been tested

Josh will get through this if he has a clear conscience
The other party will get found out which is what is happening now
Life goes on
Onwards and upwards I say

Yeah my brother had a shocker as well ....her last question as the divorce was signed was when will the mortgage of the house be paid off ...

And amazingly enough (shock horror ) she went after him with some of the vilest crap you could imagine

My other brothers ex and 2 blokes and teh daughters last year showed up ay my elderly father and step Mum's place 4 days after he died from cancer demanding their kids share of the will ... they'd already got 20 k each ......they wanted the money that was paying for his funeral

People ...greed...money
 
@happy_tiger said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114696) said:
@Cairnstigers said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114685) said:
@willow said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114658) said:
@Tcat said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114640) said:
What an ugly situation to be in. I honestly don't know how id deal with it. Id like to think id be calm, but hey we all have our breaking points and if JRs allegations about this woman are true, then wow. This is manipulation at its best and is up there with physical domestic violence. This behaviour toward JR will leave scars you can't see. Hopefully the courts can deal with it asap so both parties can move on with their lives. No winners here unfortunately.

April will roll around soon enough, Josh will have his day in court and that will be the end of it.

It's never the end of it
Trust me
I was married now divorced and let's just say my ex went to extraordinary lengths to hurt me financially and mentally
8 years after Divorce and property settlement which was all stamped and approved by the courts, I was still slugged with a $12,000 bill due to closure of a business which was mine through settlement
If I closed the business one year later I would not have had a bill of $12,000
I won't go into full detail but all I can say is if was ripped of
I could have gone to court to fight it but I would have had to engage solicitors, take time off work and the extra stress fighting it while she had legal aid
Also I had a good case but no guarantee of winning
It was disgraceful but I just had to move on for my own health
I also had to get court orders in place to stop the social media abuse and the orders are still in place today
The Judge, a lady judge could not believe some of the things I have to endure on social media and threats that were made against me and my new wife
See you can print these things out and use them as evidence
It can destroy lives believe me
Luckily I am strong mentally
If you have done nothing wrong then you can get through these things
Sometimes I think I was sent to this earth to test a man's resolve
And I have been tested

Josh will get through this if he has a clear conscience
The other party will get found out which is what is happening now
Life goes on
Onwards and upwards I say

Yeah my brother had a shocker as well ....her last question as the divorce was signed was when will the mortgage of the house be paid off ...

And amazingly enough (shock horror ) she went after him with some of the vilest crap you could imagine

My other brothers ex and 2 blokes and teh daughters last year showed up ay my elderly father and step Mum's place 4 days after he died from cancer demanding their kids share of the will ... they'd already got 20 k each ......they wanted the money that was paying for his funeral

People ...greed...money

Unfortunately my neighbor is executor of his partner. Same thing having to deal her ex.
I find it really sad. Not even in the ground yet
 
http://www.msn.com/en-au/sport/rugby-league/comment-josh-reynolds-highlights-the-complex-nature-of-sporting-fandom/ar-BBZLH1w?ocid=ientp
 
@pawsandclaws1 said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114687) said:
@Tiger5150 said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114680) said:
@pawsandclaws1 said in [Josh Reynolds](/post/1114676) said:
Witness account reported by the Illawarra Mercury but not it appears major outlets.

"The women with the players had all walked off beforehand and they were all cursing on the way out of the door saying 'He does this all the time,'" he said.


????Context?

My bad. Northies incident 2018 abusing a female staff member and other staff. Interestingly, the Illawarra Mercury includes eye witness accounts other papers don't seem

https://www.illawarramercury.com.au/story/4809756/leagues-3m-man-to-face-court-over-alleged-drunken-incident/?cs=2452o

Wasn't this found to be fake news?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Staff online

Back
Top