2 weeks as I recallDidn’t he get a suspension for that playing for us?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
2 weeks as I recallDidn’t he get a suspension for that playing for us?
Yes I think it was two weeks but it could have been 1Didn’t he get a suspension for that playing for us?
He got a fine hahahahaha
And the most important part of the Hip drop is landing on the players legsAgain? Isn't that 2 weeks in a row he does a hip drop and he only gets a fine...that was a classic hip drop.
The Knights player was very lucky he didnt sustain an injury. Should have got a week considering its his 3rd charge on that offence in just over 2 years
Yes agree but the most important part is he's not playing for the Tiger's if he was it could be 4 weeksAgain? Isn't that 2 weeks in a row he does a hip drop and he only gets a fine...that was a classic hip drop.
The Knights player was very lucky he didnt sustain an injury. Should have got a week considering its his 3rd charge on that offence in just over 2 years
YesDidn’t he get a suspension for that playing for us?
What grade?Yeo was a skinny kid that debut at centre played wing and fullback before moving to the forwards Galvin will end up in the forwards in 18 months
First grade debut as a centre for PenrithWhat grade?
Prior charges only last 12 months so 2 years ago does not matter. I assume he got the loading from last week but grade 1 the loading is merely a bigger fine rather than a suspension until there is multiple offences of the same nature with a 12 month period.Again? Isn't that 2 weeks in a row he does a hip drop and he only gets a fine...that was a classic hip drop.
The Knights player was very lucky he didnt sustain an injury. Should have got a week considering its his 3rd charge on that offence in just over 2 years
Prior charges only last 12 months so 2 years ago does not matter. I assume he got the loading from last week but grade 1 the loading is merely a bigger fine rather than a suspension until there is multiple offences of the same nature with a 12 month period.
Whilst it was a hip drop not sure what you define as 'classic'. Grade 1 looks appropriate due to minimal force. Galvins legs were on the ground before his hip came down on Crocker's legs. Compare that to Kenny's tackle where his hip makes contact with Iongi's legs before his own legs take some of his body weight.
It changed a few years back to the current system because people were upset about seeing players miss games due to relatively minor (grade 1) infringements. It's one of those topics where the NRL can't win due to the varied opinions of the fans.I understand that the NRL current system cant take into account his first hip drop. However IMO that should change. He has only been charged 3 times but he has come close a few times because he loses the contact early in the tackle. Its an issue with him.
Lattrell got off a high tackle early this year because it was a first offence. Thats laughable and laugh is exactly what the commentators did when they said "Latrell first offence".