Viking Warrior
Well-known member
Doesn't Brydens sponsor the roosters as well
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
@Spud_Murphy said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1089636) said:@avocadoontoast said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1089628) said:Uncle Nick doing everything he can to help us here...
Tigers boss: If Latrell's serious about switch, we'll re-open negotiations
DECEMBER 11, 2019
Brad Walter
Wests Tigers chairman Lee Hagipantelis believes Latrell Mitchell has the opportunity to be part of an exciting new era at the club and confirmed his Sydney Roosters counterpart Nick Politis was supportive of the out-of-favour star moving to Concord.
With Politis and Roosters coach Trent Robinson, according to a NewsCorp report, telling Mitchell on Tuesday that there was no longer the salary cap space to extend his contract after he expressed as desire in an NRL.com interview to remain with the back-to-back premiers, the 22-year-old needs to find a new club.
The Tigers had been the early favourites but withdrew their offer, understood to be valued at almost $1 million per season, after he did not act on it quickly and continued to gauge interest from other clubs.
However, the Tigers made it clear they were prepared to re-open negotiations and Hagipantelis said on Wednesday they were still interested if Mitchell showed a desire to join the club.
"We are actively in the market considering a number of options that are available to us and if Latrell is to be one of those options he is more than welcome to reach out to us," Hagipantelis said.
"At the moment I don’t think we are under any particular pressure, we have got a really talented and healthy roster but it is an active player market at the moment and we want to make sure we are a competitor in that market."
Despite the Tigers announcing that they had withdrawn their offer two weeks ago, Hagipantelis said he had remained in contact with Politis about Mitchell’s future at the Roosters, where he remains contracted for next season.
The Roosters have indicated they would release Mitchell for the 2020 Telstra Premiership and Hagipantelis believes Politis would support him joining the Tigers.
"I have spoken to Nick Politis and I don’t have any doubt about that, I am sure the Nick would be supportive of that," Hagipantelis said.
"Nick has been incredibly transparent throughout this process. He has called me chairman to chairman as a professional courtesy, which I am very appreciative of, and kept us informed.
"Nick has not involved himself in any sort of discussions or negotiations or anything of that kind. It was simply as a professional courtesy to inform me of what the Roosters' position was."
Crazy mad all this and still he won't sign! I'd love to have Mitchell onboard here, I mean in all honesty who wouldn't? However, I must admit with the way it's all been playing out, the whole process is leaving a bad taste in my mouth. We have two very influential blokes in cahoots trying to push a player in a direction he clearly doesn't want to go, despite the big money carrot dangling in front of him! It's like trying to put a cat in a carrier to take it to the vet - if anyone has ever tried it, you'll know what I mean.
@Tiger_Steve said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1089655) said:@avocadoontoast said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1089628) said:This:
“We are actively in the market considering a number of options that are available to us and if Latrell is to be one of those options he is more than welcome to reach out to us,” Hagipantelis said.
So, who are these other supposed options? Billy Britten?
@happy_tiger said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1089704) said:@hsvjones said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1089701) said:Where are these guys that said
we have a meeting with LM early this week ?
WTF signing to be announced ?
Coach Scores ?
Am i missing something or has our recruitment team got very tight and not whispers...
Surely someone has something solid for us to get to sleep tonight :face_with_rolling_eyes: :face_with_rolling_eyes:
Lee was telling everyone he is besties with Politis , does that count ??
@trentrunciman said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1089639) said:@Nelson said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1089634) said:@Strongee said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1089629) said:@avocadoontoast said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1089627) said:@Strongee said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1089626) said:Is getting gagai and Johnston really that bad though
Yes.
Ok . Why ? They're good footballers. Better than we have now . Im not being smart , I'm just curious . Is it they're not good footballers ? Or they're over priced ? In which case then at what price would they not be ?
I don't really rate Johnston. He's fast in open space but that's about the most he offers. He has scored a lot of tries on the end of the Rabbitohs back line but I feel like we've stung by someone else who did something similar recently...
Essentially a winger manufactured into a fullback. Much like our fullback.
@Moh said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1089696) said:Love having uncle Nick on our side, sounds like even the Roosters want him here more than anywhere else. **Repaying us for Teddy.**
@Earl said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1089687) said:I have a mate who is friends with Latrell and he reckons that Latrell really wants to come to the Tigers but the Tigers haven't been offering the same as other clubs are. Latrell apparently said that the Tigers were always the first option for him.
@Spud_Murphy said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1089719) said:@Moh said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1089696) said:Love having uncle Nick on our side, sounds like even the Roosters want him here more than anywhere else. **Repaying us for Teddy.**
That would indicate that they actually had a heart! More likely they feel sorry for us lol
@TYGA said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1089725) said:The article was orchestrated. I think Mitchell’s options dried up and his last play was to go back to the Roosters and door was shut. Sounds to me Nick was doing him a favour and called the Tigers to help him out. If the article is correct the deal is done this week. I have no knowledge on this just a guess.
@TYGA said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1089725) said:The article was orchestrated. I think Mitchell’s options dried up and his last play was to go back to the Roosters and door was shut. Sounds to me Nick was doing him a favour and called the Tigers to help him out. If the article is correct the deal is done this week. I have no knowledge on this just a guess.
@Roar_Power said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1089728) said:Biggest problem here is that we are Latrell's 'last resort'.
@Strongee said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1089626) said:Is getting gagai and Johnston really that bad though ? If it comes to that , that is ! They both are very good footballers , and would definitely walk into our backline.
People are calling it the booby prize , but in a vacuum excusing LM , would you have taken them at half price for example ? At the moment the tigers should be in the "upgrade where ever possible " game .
Sometimes it's a big signing, most other times it's a slow , arduous process , that's usually murky to the point of appearing like a backward step .
When we set out this off season it was about improving the team . Matteson is definitely a backward step from last year , however I feel him being so hated , would have lead to a net loss next year with him in the team.
But apart from that , it's low risk high upside signings , which improve them team.
I think we win no matter what is my point .
We get LM , sweet !
We get the other 2 subsidised , sweet ! Improvement should be the name of the game
@swag_tiger said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1089689) said:@Earl said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1089687) said:I have a mate who is friends with Latrell and he reckons that Latrell really wants to come to the Tigers but the Tigers haven't been offering the same as other clubs are. Latrell apparently said that the Tigers were always the first option for him.
We are offering him almost 1 million a season. Don't see how other clubs are offering more.
@Geo said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1089705) said:@hsvjones said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1089701) said:Where are these guys that said
we have a meeting with LM early this week ?
WTF signing to be announced ?
Coach Scores ?
Am i missing something or has our recruitment team got very tight and not whispers...
Surely someone has something solid for us to get to sleep tonight :face_with_rolling_eyes: :face_with_rolling_eyes:
Don't believe anything unless it's official from the Club..
@Spud_Murphy said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1089719) said:@Moh said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1089696) said:Love having uncle Nick on our side, sounds like even the Roosters want him here more than anywhere else. **Repaying us for Teddy.**
That would indicate that they actually had a heart! More likely they feel sorry for us lol