Live Game thread *spoilers

[Spud_Murphy]

What do you guys think about this

If a game goes to extra time
A committee yet to be formed can overturn a decision they Deem to be wrong or unfair and award the two points on offer be split amongst both teams
Therefore giving one point to each team
This allows for a fair decision
Lets not forget that the refs are under extreme pressure to make a decision on the spot and this is not always the right decision
But the new committee can overturn the decision if they review the origianal decision and deem it to be wrong
I don't think any rugby league fan would disagree to this If they are being honest
The committee would have the advantage of reviewing the footage over and over
Golden point needs to be scrutinised
I believe this would be a fair way and the only way to make the correct decision
What do you think

I have an even better idea, let's piss Golden Point off altogether and go back to ending the game in a draw. If two teams are level after 80 minutes then they both deserve a point each, imo. It's a no brainer really, worked fine for about…..ah let me see.....90 bloody years or so!

 

[05TIGZ]

What do you guys think about this

If a game goes to extra time
A committee yet to be formed can overturn a decision they Deem to be wrong or unfair and award the two points on offer be split amongst both teams
Therefore giving one point to each team
This allows for a fair decision
Lets not forget that the refs are under extreme pressure to make a decision on the spot and this is not always the right decision
But the new committee can overturn the decision if they review the origianal decision and deem it to be wrong
I don't think any rugby league fan would disagree to this If they are being honest
The committee would have the advantage of reviewing the footage over and over
Golden point needs to be scrutinised
I believe this would be a fair way and the only way to make the correct decision
What do you think

I reckon If the game is tied up each team gets a point each and you play extra time for an extra point. They love extra time for tv so it isn’t going anywhere.

 

[hobbo]

What do you guys think about this

If a game goes to extra time
A committee yet to be formed can overturn a decision they Deem to be wrong or unfair and award the two points on offer be split amongst both teams
Therefore giving one point to each team
This allows for a fair decision
Lets not forget that the refs are under extreme pressure to make a decision on the spot and this is not always the right decision
But the new committee can overturn the decision if they review the origianal decision and deem it to be wrong
I don't think any rugby league fan would disagree to this If they are being honest
The committee would have the advantage of reviewing the footage over and over
Golden point needs to be scrutinised
I believe this would be a fair way and the only way to make the correct decision
What do you think

To complicated ….
Just piss of golden point all together

 

[innsaneink]

What do you guys think about this

If a game goes to extra time
A committee yet to be formed can overturn a decision they Deem to be wrong or unfair and award the two points on offer be split amongst both teams
Therefore giving one point to each team
This allows for a fair decision
Lets not forget that the refs are under extreme pressure to make a decision on the spot and this is not always the right decision
But the new committee can overturn the decision if they review the origianal decision and deem it to be wrong
I don't think any rugby league fan would disagree to this If they are being honest
The committee would have the advantage of reviewing the footage over and over
Golden point needs to be scrutinised
I believe this would be a fair way and the only way to make the correct decision
What do you think

I have an even better idea, let's piss Golden Point off altogether and go back to ending the game in a draw. If two teams are level after 80 minutes then they both deserve a point each, imo. It's a no brainer really, worked fine for about…..ah let me see.....90 bloody years or so!

Sounds good and logical to me

 

[AL The Tiger]

only saw one try in the game…. not sure which game you were watching.

You don't win many games scoring one try… But hey we scored more than them so everything must be ok huh?
Pull you head out

That is generally how you win games

Yeah, like tonight….oh wait.

"generally"

if it weren't for the goal post and ashley klein

 

[GNR4LIFE]

You don't win many games scoring one try… But hey we scored more than them so everything must be ok huh?
Pull you head out

That is generally how you win games

Yeah, like tonight….oh wait.

We beat the 2 premiership favourites. Should have beaten another top team. Shown defence and resilience that hasn’t been seen in this team for years and it seems some people on here are upset about it.

I’m sure you would love for me to be running them down. Sorry to disappoint.

 

[Spud_Murphy]

What do you guys think about this

If a game goes to extra time
A committee yet to be formed can overturn a decision they Deem to be wrong or unfair and award the two points on offer be split amongst both teams
Therefore giving one point to each team
This allows for a fair decision
Lets not forget that the refs are under extreme pressure to make a decision on the spot and this is not always the right decision
But the new committee can overturn the decision if they review the origianal decision and deem it to be wrong
I don't think any rugby league fan would disagree to this If they are being honest
The committee would have the advantage of reviewing the footage over and over
Golden point needs to be scrutinised
I believe this would be a fair way and the only way to make the correct decision
What do you think

I have an even better idea, let's piss Golden Point off altogether and go back to ending the game in a draw. If two teams are level after 80 minutes then they both deserve a point each, imo. It's a no brainer really, worked fine for about…..ah let me see.....90 bloody years or so!

Sounds good and logical to me

Indeed, If only the NRL would show some logic :brick:

 

[Cairnstigers]

What do you guys think about this

If a game goes to extra time
A committee yet to be formed can overturn a decision they Deem to be wrong or unfair and award the two points on offer be split amongst both teams
Therefore giving one point to each team
This allows for a fair decision
Lets not forget that the refs are under extreme pressure to make a decision on the spot and this is not always the right decision
But the new committee can overturn the decision if they review the origianal decision and deem it to be wrong
I don't think any rugby league fan would disagree to this If they are being honest
The committee would have the advantage of reviewing the footage over and over
Golden point needs to be scrutinised
I believe this would be a fair way and the only way to make the correct decision
What do you think

I reckon If the game is tied up each team gets a point each and you play extra time for an extra point. They love extra time for tv so it isn’t going anywhere.

I don't mind this idea
At least we don't fall behind by losing two points and it gives the eventual winner an extra point for effort
But in saying that the decision that cost us the same must be ruled to be correct in the 1st place

 

[innsaneink]

Stupid idea.. you can't have three comp points for some games and two points for others.
The entire comp is uneven and unfair enough as it is.

 

[05TIGZ]

Stupid idea.. you can't have three comp points for some games and two points for others.
The entire comp is uneven and unfair enough as it is.

What’s stupid about my idea stupid. Once again it’s my opinion and it’s a forum. Or we only allowed to have ideas that suit you.

 

[GNR4LIFE]

Stupid idea.. you can't have three comp points for some games and two points for others.
The entire comp is uneven and unfair enough as it is.

I think it’s just the thought process of a demoralised supporter. Take the emotion out of it and I would doubt anyone would believe it to be a good idea.

 

[05TIGZ]

Stupid idea.. you can't have three comp points for some games and two points for others.
The entire comp is uneven and unfair enough as it is.

I think it’s just the thought process of a demoralised supporter. Take the emotion out of it and I would doubt anyone would believe it to be a good idea.

Why isn’t it a good idea. Your guaranteed one point for drawing and you keep playing for the chance to win another. Or do I have to run my ideas and opinions with you and your boyfriend.

 

[GNR4LIFE]

Stupid idea.. you can't have three comp points for some games and two points for others.
The entire comp is uneven and unfair enough as it is.

I think it’s just the thought process of a demoralised supporter. Take the emotion out of it and I would doubt anyone would believe it to be a good idea.

Why isn’t it a good idea. Your guaranteed one point for drawing and you keep playing for the chance to win another. Or do I have to run my ideas and opinions with you and your boyfriend.

Already been explained why it isn’t a good idea.

 

[Cairnstigers]

Stupid idea.. you can't have three comp points for some games and two points for others.
The entire comp is uneven and unfair enough as it is.

But you can have 1 point each after extra time if there is no clear winner
Is that correct
So how is this any different or fairer for that matter
It is about trying to get the fairest and correct outcome for both teams
A refs wrong decision should not advantage or disadvantage any team
Especially in extra time when both teams have put in for 80 minutes of pure effart
One person in the middle deciding if we take away a 2 points or zero points
If a player fronts the duediscery over a possible illegal tackle ruled on by a refferee on the field then
Why can't that same duediscery also look at an outcome based on a refferies decision on the field in the same game
If it's good for the goose it's good for the gander
Tigers lost two because of a bad call
We may still have won or lost but that decision finalized the result

 

[guyofthetiger]

Didn’t we lose another close game to the Broncos due to the ref at Campbelltown 2-3 Years back?

 

[Cairnstigers]

Stupid idea.. you can't have three comp points for some games and two points for others.
The entire comp is uneven and unfair enough as it is.

I think it’s just the thought process of a demoralised supporter. Take the emotion out of it and I would doubt anyone would believe it to be a good idea.

Why isn’t it a good idea. Your guaranteed one point for drawing and you keep playing for the chance to win another. Or do I have to run my ideas and opinions with you and your boyfriend.

It's late but
:roll

 

[cktiger]

Very simple … we were robbed.

 

[GNR4LIFE]

Stupid idea.. you can't have three comp points for some games and two points for others.
The entire comp is uneven and unfair enough as it is.

But you can have 1 point each after extra time if there is no clear winner
Is that correct
So how is this any different or fairer for that matter
It is about trying to get the fairest and correct outcome for both teams
A refs wrong decision should not advantage or disadvantage any team
Especially in extra time when both teams have put in for 80 minutes of pure effart
One person in the middle deciding if we take away a 2 points or zero points
If a player fronts the duediscery over a possible illegal tackle ruled on by a refferee on the field then
Why can't that same duediscery also look at an outcome based on a refferies decision on the field in the same game
If it's good for the goose it's good for the gander
Tigers lost two because of a bad call
We may still have won or lost but that decision finalized the result

Take the emotion out of it, then re-examine it.

 

[Cairnstigers]

Stupid idea.. you can't have three comp points for some games and two points for others.
The entire comp is uneven and unfair enough as it is.

I think it’s just the thought process of a demoralised supporter. Take the emotion out of it and I would doubt anyone would believe it to be a good idea.

Is that write
I watch every game on TV and I hate bad or wrong decisions no matter what teams are playing
Even if it's Manly playing
I want fair decisions for all supporters
Do you think the penalty Brisbane got was the write decision
I don't
I thought bird scored and I called it
The bunker made a wrong call in my opinion
If it happens in the 80 minutes I can handle that
What a don't like is wrong decision after the 80 minute mark
You just need to watch the interviews after the game to see that
No one wants to win or lose a game like that
If the Tigers won like that I can honestly say it was wrong
If the duediscery split the points ofter a review of the game and it was the right decision I could handle that
Thats my opinion on the matter
But it won't make any difference to the result
Horse racing can overturn and decide a winner If they is a review
So why can't the nrl

 

[Cairnstigers]

Stupid idea.. you can't have three comp points for some games and two points for others.
The entire comp is uneven and unfair enough as it is.

I think it’s just the thought process of a demoralised supporter. Take the emotion out of it and I would doubt anyone would believe it to be a good idea.

Is that write
I watch every game on TV and I hate bad or wrong decisions no matter what teams are playing
Even if it's Manly playing
I want fair decisions for all supporters
Do you think the penalty Brisbane got was the right decision
I don't
I thought bird scored and I called it
The bunker made a wrong call in my opinion
If it happens in the 80 minutes I can handle that
What a don't like is wrong decision after the 80 minute mark
You just need to watch the interviews after the game to see that
No one wants to win or lose a game like that
If the Tigers won like that I can honestly say it was wrong
If the duediscery split the points ofter a review of the game and it was the right decision I could handle that
Thats my opinion on the matter
But it won't make any difference to the result
Horse racing can overturn and decide a winner If they is a review
So why can't the nrl