innsaneink
Well-known member
Probably Hooper, Rottfeel or Retchie said it for him
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
@cochise said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1497288) said:@clontarfkid said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1497268) said:@avocadoontoast said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1497250) said:@happy_tiger said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1497248) said:Bricks unlikely to re be released to Knights
https://www.msn.com/en-au/sport/other/tigers-unlikely-to-let-brooks-join-knights/ar-AAPSN0b?ocid=ientp
Not sure why. We’re bottom 4 with or without him, better to take that money and sign a player actually worth what he’s on.
We cld find a solution that wld perform equally well for a fraction of the price
A solution that combined with what we are paying him to leave would come in less than what he costs us to keep him?
@tigertownsfs said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1497301) said:@cochise said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1497288) said:@clontarfkid said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1497268) said:@avocadoontoast said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1497250) said:@happy_tiger said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1497248) said:Bricks unlikely to re be released to Knights
https://www.msn.com/en-au/sport/other/tigers-unlikely-to-let-brooks-join-knights/ar-AAPSN0b?ocid=ientp
Not sure why. We’re bottom 4 with or without him, better to take that money and sign a player actually worth what he’s on.
We cld find a solution that wld perform equally well for a fraction of the price
A solution that combined with what we are paying him to leave would come in less than what he costs us to keep him?
Thomsons and brooks are more or less a straight swap. Then bring in Ash Taylor on minimum wage 1 yr contract and we still have $1m to spend.
@cochise said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1497297) said:@clontarfkid said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1497290) said:@cochise said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1497288) said:@clontarfkid said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1497268) said:@avocadoontoast said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1497250) said:@happy_tiger said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1497248) said:Bricks unlikely to re be released to Knights
https://www.msn.com/en-au/sport/other/tigers-unlikely-to-let-brooks-join-knights/ar-AAPSN0b?ocid=ientp
Not sure why. We’re bottom 4 with or without him, better to take that money and sign a player actually worth what he’s on.
We cld find a solution that wld perform equally well for a fraction of the price
A solution that combined with what we are paying him to leave would come in less than what he costs us to keep him?
He says that HE is not happy..so why shld we pay a significant premium for him to leave?
Where di he say that?
@gnr4life said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1497306) said:The Godfather has spoken
@tilllindemann said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1497307) said:@cochise said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1497297) said:@clontarfkid said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1497290) said:@cochise said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1497288) said:@clontarfkid said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1497268) said:@avocadoontoast said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1497250) said:@happy_tiger said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1497248) said:Bricks unlikely to re be released to Knights
https://www.msn.com/en-au/sport/other/tigers-unlikely-to-let-brooks-join-knights/ar-AAPSN0b?ocid=ientp
Not sure why. We’re bottom 4 with or without him, better to take that money and sign a player actually worth what he’s on.
We cld find a solution that wld perform equally well for a fraction of the price
A solution that combined with what we are paying him to leave would come in less than what he costs us to keep him?
He says that HE is not happy..so why shld we pay a significant premium for him to leave?
Where di he say that?
It's been said on his behalf in the media. Nothing stopping him jumping on social media to say it's rubbish. His silence is endorsement. You might expect undermining a coach by BJ Leilua, but it cannot be tolerated by our halfback.
@tilllindemann said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1497307) said:@cochise said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1497297) said:@clontarfkid said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1497290) said:@cochise said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1497288) said:@clontarfkid said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1497268) said:@avocadoontoast said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1497250) said:@happy_tiger said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1497248) said:Bricks unlikely to re be released to Knights
https://www.msn.com/en-au/sport/other/tigers-unlikely-to-let-brooks-join-knights/ar-AAPSN0b?ocid=ientp
Not sure why. We’re bottom 4 with or without him, better to take that money and sign a player actually worth what he’s on.
We cld find a solution that wld perform equally well for a fraction of the price
A solution that combined with what we are paying him to leave would come in less than what he costs us to keep him?
He says that HE is not happy..so why shld we pay a significant premium for him to leave?
Where di he say that?
It's been said on his behalf in the media. Nothing stopping him jumping on social media to say it's rubbish. His silence is endorsement. You might expect undermining a coach by BJ Leilua, but it cannot be tolerated by our halfback.
@cochise said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1497305) said:Club issued a statement from Sheens
Wests Tigers statement on Luke Brooks
Wests Tigers Director of Football Tim Sheens has issued the following statement regarding halfback Luke Brooks.
“Luke Brooks is contracted with Wests Tigers until at least the end of 2023 and, contrary to media speculation, will not be leaving the club.
“Luke is a proud local junior and an extremely talented halfback, who has shown an unquestionable level of commitment to Wests Tigers over a number of years. It is clear that he remains an integral part of the long-term plans of Wests Tigers and, in speaking with him, he too is equally focused and passionate on delivering sustained success for the club.
“Wests Tigers have been definitive on this matter and will continue to reiterate this against any untrue speculation. It is unfair on Luke, his teammates and family, as well as those involved with the club, to raise false conjecture on his future lying away from Wests Tigers when both he and the club are united on delivering success together.
“I have known Luke for a long time and am continually impressed by the way that he carries himself both on and off the field. I look forward to working with him again to give the proud Members of this club the performances and results they deserve.”
@cochise said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1497311) said:@tilllindemann said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1497307) said:@cochise said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1497297) said:@clontarfkid said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1497290) said:@cochise said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1497288) said:@clontarfkid said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1497268) said:@avocadoontoast said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1497250) said:@happy_tiger said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1497248) said:Bricks unlikely to re be released to Knights
https://www.msn.com/en-au/sport/other/tigers-unlikely-to-let-brooks-join-knights/ar-AAPSN0b?ocid=ientp
Not sure why. We’re bottom 4 with or without him, better to take that money and sign a player actually worth what he’s on.
We cld find a solution that wld perform equally well for a fraction of the price
A solution that combined with what we are paying him to leave would come in less than what he costs us to keep him?
He says that HE is not happy..so why shld we pay a significant premium for him to leave?
Where di he say that?
It's been said on his behalf in the media. Nothing stopping him jumping on social media to say it's rubbish. His silence is endorsement. You might expect undermining a coach by BJ Leilua, but it cannot be tolerated by our halfback.
What I have heard is there are members of Luke's family that would like him to move on but Luke himself wants to stay.
@tilllindemann said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1497313) said:@cochise said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1497311) said:@tilllindemann said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1497307) said:@cochise said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1497297) said:@clontarfkid said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1497290) said:@cochise said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1497288) said:@clontarfkid said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1497268) said:@avocadoontoast said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1497250) said:@happy_tiger said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1497248) said:Bricks unlikely to re be released to Knights
https://www.msn.com/en-au/sport/other/tigers-unlikely-to-let-brooks-join-knights/ar-AAPSN0b?ocid=ientp
Not sure why. We’re bottom 4 with or without him, better to take that money and sign a player actually worth what he’s on.
We cld find a solution that wld perform equally well for a fraction of the price
A solution that combined with what we are paying him to leave would come in less than what he costs us to keep him?
He says that HE is not happy..so why shld we pay a significant premium for him to leave?
Where di he say that?
It's been said on his behalf in the media. Nothing stopping him jumping on social media to say it's rubbish. His silence is endorsement. You might expect undermining a coach by BJ Leilua, but it cannot be tolerated by our halfback.
What I have heard is there are members of Luke's family that would like him to move on but Luke himself wants to stay.
If he wants to stay he needs to publicly back the coach. I've never been in the 'hate Brooks' club, but man am I sick of players undermining the coach/club.
@gnr4life said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1497310) said:@tilllindemann said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1497307) said:@cochise said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1497297) said:@clontarfkid said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1497290) said:@cochise said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1497288) said:@clontarfkid said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1497268) said:@avocadoontoast said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1497250) said:@happy_tiger said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1497248) said:Bricks unlikely to re be released to Knights
https://www.msn.com/en-au/sport/other/tigers-unlikely-to-let-brooks-join-knights/ar-AAPSN0b?ocid=ientp
Not sure why. We’re bottom 4 with or without him, better to take that money and sign a player actually worth what he’s on.
We cld find a solution that wld perform equally well for a fraction of the price
A solution that combined with what we are paying him to leave would come in less than what he costs us to keep him?
He says that HE is not happy..so why shld we pay a significant premium for him to leave?
Where di he say that?
It's been said on his behalf in the media. Nothing stopping him jumping on social media to say it's rubbish. His silence is endorsement. You might expect undermining a coach by BJ Leilua, but it cannot be tolerated by our halfback.
I think the post two above yours should put your claims to bed.
@gnr4life said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1497315) said:@tilllindemann said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1497313) said:@cochise said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1497311) said:@tilllindemann said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1497307) said:@cochise said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1497297) said:@clontarfkid said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1497290) said:@cochise said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1497288) said:@clontarfkid said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1497268) said:@avocadoontoast said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1497250) said:@happy_tiger said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1497248) said:Bricks unlikely to re be released to Knights
https://www.msn.com/en-au/sport/other/tigers-unlikely-to-let-brooks-join-knights/ar-AAPSN0b?ocid=ientp
Not sure why. We’re bottom 4 with or without him, better to take that money and sign a player actually worth what he’s on.
We cld find a solution that wld perform equally well for a fraction of the price
A solution that combined with what we are paying him to leave would come in less than what he costs us to keep him?
He says that HE is not happy..so why shld we pay a significant premium for him to leave?
Where di he say that?
It's been said on his behalf in the media. Nothing stopping him jumping on social media to say it's rubbish. His silence is endorsement. You might expect undermining a coach by BJ Leilua, but it cannot be tolerated by our halfback.
What I have heard is there are members of Luke's family that would like him to move on but Luke himself wants to stay.
If he wants to stay he needs to publicly back the coach. I've never been in the 'hate Brooks' club, but man am I sick of players undermining the coach/club.
What’s backing the coach publicly going to accomplish. There was a time Farah backed JT, which was clearly rubbish. Anything that is said publicly carries little weight.