Madge and Pascoe

@mccarry2 said in [Madge and Pascoe](/post/1356038) said:
@851 said in [Madge and Pascoe](/post/1356037) said:
@gallagher said in [Madge and Pascoe](/post/1356027) said:
@curaeus said in [Madge and Pascoe](/post/1356023) said:
@crucible said in [Madge and Pascoe](/post/1356004) said:
Pascoe has turned the financial and administrative performance of the club around and when he took over we were broke. He didn't hire Madge, the Board did. Recruitment is Hartigan's responsibility. People on here just make crap up. How did Pascoe loose Tedesco as one clown on here suggests? How did he create the Cleary situation? He didn't. There should be an IQ Test to join this forum, that way we could reduce the Ignorance Factor by 90%.

As I understood it, Pascoe's main job was to get the joint shipshape financially (it wasn't when he took over) and to ensure the organisation's long term financial viability. I believe he's done exactly that especially with his work on getting the COE off the ground. Merely signing off as CEO on player deals promoted by the football department that ultimately turn out to be flops is hardly Pascoe's fault.

I put up a quote from him saying he was the lead negotiator in trying to re-sign Teddy.
We can't just clear him of responsibly of anything
the club fails at.
Why did he get credit for growing memberships? Shouldn't the membership dept get accolade?




I put up a quote last week from Pascoe where he said he took responsibly for losing Teddy as he was the lead negotiator.


I saw Teddy getting interviewed a few weeks ago,, he was asked about leaving us, he said the reason he left was they put a deadline on signing, and he wanted to see about a few things first. He actually said, believe it or not, if they hadn’t put a deadline on it, he probably would of stayed

I don’t believe Teddy for ONE SECOND. I know from a very good Roosters source he had already agreed to terms well before that. My source aside, there were tonnes of people saying the same thing.


The guy is a liar. Just because a guy can play footy doesn't make him a good person. He isn't Hayne but he isn't someone you can trust at all.
 
@pawsandclaws1 said in [Madge and Pascoe](/post/1356040) said:
@mike said in [Madge and Pascoe](/post/1356039) said:
@mccarry2 said in [Madge and Pascoe](/post/1356038) said:
@851 said in [Madge and Pascoe](/post/1356037) said:
@gallagher said in [Madge and Pascoe](/post/1356027) said:
@curaeus said in [Madge and Pascoe](/post/1356023) said:
@crucible said in [Madge and Pascoe](/post/1356004) said:
Pascoe has turned the financial and administrative performance of the club around and when he took over we were broke. He didn't hire Madge, the Board did. Recruitment is Hartigan's responsibility. People on here just make crap up. How did Pascoe loose Tedesco as one clown on here suggests? How did he create the Cleary situation? He didn't. There should be an IQ Test to join this forum, that way we could reduce the Ignorance Factor by 90%.

As I understood it, Pascoe's main job was to get the joint shipshape financially (it wasn't when he took over) and to ensure the organisation's long term financial viability. I believe he's done exactly that especially with his work on getting the COE off the ground. Merely signing off as CEO on player deals promoted by the football department that ultimately turn out to be flops is hardly Pascoe's fault.

I put up a quote from him saying he was the lead negotiator in trying to re-sign Teddy.
We can't just clear him of responsibly of anything
the club fails at.
Why did he get credit for growing memberships? Shouldn't the membership dept get accolade?




I put up a quote last week from Pascoe where he said he took responsibly for losing Teddy as he was the lead negotiator.


I saw Teddy getting interviewed a few weeks ago,, he was asked about leaving us, he said the reason he left was they put a deadline on signing, and he wanted to see about a few things first. He actually said, believe it or not, if they hadn’t put a deadline on it, he probably would of stayed

I don’t believe Teddy for ONE SECOND. I know from a very good Roosters source he had already agreed to terms well before that. My source aside, there were tonnes of people saying the same thing.

Me either. Dragged it out as long as possible so he could get the deal done with the Roosters

And double whammy lost Papenhuyzen who I believe to be a better player.

I'd much rather Papenhuyzen here than the rorters fullback.
 
@gallagher said in [Madge and Pascoe](/post/1356027) said:
@curaeus said in [Madge and Pascoe](/post/1356023) said:
@crucible said in [Madge and Pascoe](/post/1356004) said:
Pascoe has turned the financial and administrative performance of the club around and when he took over we were broke. He didn't hire Madge, the Board did. Recruitment is Hartigan's responsibility. People on here just make crap up. How did Pascoe loose Tedesco as one clown on here suggests? How did he create the Cleary situation? He didn't. There should be an IQ Test to join this forum, that way we could reduce the Ignorance Factor by 90%.

As I understood it, Pascoe's main job was to get the joint shipshape financially (it wasn't when he took over) and to ensure the organisation's long term financial viability. I believe he's done exactly that especially with his work on getting the COE off the ground. Merely signing off as CEO on player deals promoted by the football department that ultimately turn out to be flops is hardly Pascoe's fault.

I put up a quote from him saying he was the lead negotiator in trying to re-sign Teddy.
We can't just clear him of responsibly of anything
the club fails at.
Why did he get credit for growing memberships? Shouldn't the membership dept get accolade?




I put up a quote last week from Pascoe where he said he took responsibly for losing Teddy as he was the lead negotiator.

Always thought Cleary was the one who pulled the plug on the Teddy negotiations whatever Pascoe's input may or may not have been. That said, I reckon Teddy was just going through the motions anyway and had already decided to leave. The membership department would come under Pascoe's management responsibility.
 
@earl said in [Madge and Pascoe](/post/1356044) said:
@pawsandclaws1 said in [Madge and Pascoe](/post/1356040) said:
@mike said in [Madge and Pascoe](/post/1356039) said:
@mccarry2 said in [Madge and Pascoe](/post/1356038) said:
@851 said in [Madge and Pascoe](/post/1356037) said:
@gallagher said in [Madge and Pascoe](/post/1356027) said:
@curaeus said in [Madge and Pascoe](/post/1356023) said:
@crucible said in [Madge and Pascoe](/post/1356004) said:
Pascoe has turned the financial and administrative performance of the club around and when he took over we were broke. He didn't hire Madge, the Board did. Recruitment is Hartigan's responsibility. People on here just make crap up. How did Pascoe loose Tedesco as one clown on here suggests? How did he create the Cleary situation? He didn't. There should be an IQ Test to join this forum, that way we could reduce the Ignorance Factor by 90%.

As I understood it, Pascoe's main job was to get the joint shipshape financially (it wasn't when he took over) and to ensure the organisation's long term financial viability. I believe he's done exactly that especially with his work on getting the COE off the ground. Merely signing off as CEO on player deals promoted by the football department that ultimately turn out to be flops is hardly Pascoe's fault.

I put up a quote from him saying he was the lead negotiator in trying to re-sign Teddy.
We can't just clear him of responsibly of anything
the club fails at.
Why did he get credit for growing memberships? Shouldn't the membership dept get accolade?




I put up a quote last week from Pascoe where he said he took responsibly for losing Teddy as he was the lead negotiator.


I saw Teddy getting interviewed a few weeks ago,, he was asked about leaving us, he said the reason he left was they put a deadline on signing, and he wanted to see about a few things first. He actually said, believe it or not, if they hadn’t put a deadline on it, he probably would of stayed

I don’t believe Teddy for ONE SECOND. I know from a very good Roosters source he had already agreed to terms well before that. My source aside, there were tonnes of people saying the same thing.

Me either. Dragged it out as long as possible so he could get the deal done with the Roosters

And double whammy lost Papenhuyzen who I believe to be a better player.

I'd much rather Papenhuyzen here than the rorters fullback.

Same here.
 
@earl said in [Madge and Pascoe](/post/1356043) said:
@mccarry2 said in [Madge and Pascoe](/post/1356038) said:
@851 said in [Madge and Pascoe](/post/1356037) said:
@gallagher said in [Madge and Pascoe](/post/1356027) said:
@curaeus said in [Madge and Pascoe](/post/1356023) said:
@crucible said in [Madge and Pascoe](/post/1356004) said:
Pascoe has turned the financial and administrative performance of the club around and when he took over we were broke. He didn't hire Madge, the Board did. Recruitment is Hartigan's responsibility. People on here just make crap up. How did Pascoe loose Tedesco as one clown on here suggests? How did he create the Cleary situation? He didn't. There should be an IQ Test to join this forum, that way we could reduce the Ignorance Factor by 90%.

As I understood it, Pascoe's main job was to get the joint shipshape financially (it wasn't when he took over) and to ensure the organisation's long term financial viability. I believe he's done exactly that especially with his work on getting the COE off the ground. Merely signing off as CEO on player deals promoted by the football department that ultimately turn out to be flops is hardly Pascoe's fault.

I put up a quote from him saying he was the lead negotiator in trying to re-sign Teddy.
We can't just clear him of responsibly of anything
the club fails at.
Why did he get credit for growing memberships? Shouldn't the membership dept get accolade?




I put up a quote last week from Pascoe where he said he took responsibly for losing Teddy as he was the lead negotiator.


I saw Teddy getting interviewed a few weeks ago,, he was asked about leaving us, he said the reason he left was they put a deadline on signing, and he wanted to see about a few things first. He actually said, believe it or not, if they hadn’t put a deadline on it, he probably would of stayed

I don’t believe Teddy for ONE SECOND. I know from a very good Roosters source he had already agreed to terms well before that. My source aside, there were tonnes of people saying the same thing.


The guy is a liar. Just because a guy can play footy doesn't make him a good person. He isn't Hayne but he isn't someone you can trust at all.

Teddy had friends in Moses and Woods...none of them had any intentions of signing with the WT, they strung us along and in the process we lost Paps
 
@mike said in [Madge and Pascoe](/post/1356034) said:
Years ago and different processes have been in place for a long time now.




I hope thats right @mike .
Just responding to the IQ brigade in regards to Teddy.
 
@earl said in [Madge and Pascoe](/post/1356043) said:
@mccarry2 said in [Madge and Pascoe](/post/1356038) said:
@851 said in [Madge and Pascoe](/post/1356037) said:
@gallagher said in [Madge and Pascoe](/post/1356027) said:
@curaeus said in [Madge and Pascoe](/post/1356023) said:
@crucible said in [Madge and Pascoe](/post/1356004) said:
Pascoe has turned the financial and administrative performance of the club around and when he took over we were broke. He didn't hire Madge, the Board did. Recruitment is Hartigan's responsibility. People on here just make crap up. How did Pascoe loose Tedesco as one clown on here suggests? How did he create the Cleary situation? He didn't. There should be an IQ Test to join this forum, that way we could reduce the Ignorance Factor by 90%.

As I understood it, Pascoe's main job was to get the joint shipshape financially (it wasn't when he took over) and to ensure the organisation's long term financial viability. I believe he's done exactly that especially with his work on getting the COE off the ground. Merely signing off as CEO on player deals promoted by the football department that ultimately turn out to be flops is hardly Pascoe's fault.

I put up a quote from him saying he was the lead negotiator in trying to re-sign Teddy.
We can't just clear him of responsibly of anything
the club fails at.
Why did he get credit for growing memberships? Shouldn't the membership dept get accolade?




I put up a quote last week from Pascoe where he said he took responsibly for losing Teddy as he was the lead negotiator.


I saw Teddy getting interviewed a few weeks ago,, he was asked about leaving us, he said the reason he left was they put a deadline on signing, and he wanted to see about a few things first. He actually said, believe it or not, if they hadn’t put a deadline on it, he probably would of stayed

I don’t believe Teddy for ONE SECOND. I know from a very good Roosters source he had already agreed to terms well before that. My source aside, there were tonnes of people saying the same thing.


The guy is a liar. Just because a guy can play footy doesn't make him a good person. He isn't Hayne but he isn't someone you can trust at all.

Totally agree.
 
@tigerap said in [Madge and Pascoe](/post/1356050) said:
@earl said in [Madge and Pascoe](/post/1356043) said:
@mccarry2 said in [Madge and Pascoe](/post/1356038) said:
@851 said in [Madge and Pascoe](/post/1356037) said:
@gallagher said in [Madge and Pascoe](/post/1356027) said:
@curaeus said in [Madge and Pascoe](/post/1356023) said:
@crucible said in [Madge and Pascoe](/post/1356004) said:
Pascoe has turned the financial and administrative performance of the club around and when he took over we were broke. He didn't hire Madge, the Board did. Recruitment is Hartigan's responsibility. People on here just make crap up. How did Pascoe loose Tedesco as one clown on here suggests? How did he create the Cleary situation? He didn't. There should be an IQ Test to join this forum, that way we could reduce the Ignorance Factor by 90%.

As I understood it, Pascoe's main job was to get the joint shipshape financially (it wasn't when he took over) and to ensure the organisation's long term financial viability. I believe he's done exactly that especially with his work on getting the COE off the ground. Merely signing off as CEO on player deals promoted by the football department that ultimately turn out to be flops is hardly Pascoe's fault.

I put up a quote from him saying he was the lead negotiator in trying to re-sign Teddy.
We can't just clear him of responsibly of anything
the club fails at.
Why did he get credit for growing memberships? Shouldn't the membership dept get accolade?




I put up a quote last week from Pascoe where he said he took responsibly for losing Teddy as he was the lead negotiator.


I saw Teddy getting interviewed a few weeks ago,, he was asked about leaving us, he said the reason he left was they put a deadline on signing, and he wanted to see about a few things first. He actually said, believe it or not, if they hadn’t put a deadline on it, he probably would of stayed

I don’t believe Teddy for ONE SECOND. I know from a very good Roosters source he had already agreed to terms well before that. My source aside, there were tonnes of people saying the same thing.


The guy is a liar. Just because a guy can play footy doesn't make him a good person. He isn't Hayne but he isn't someone you can trust at all.

Teddy had friends in Moses and Woods...none of them had any intentions of signing with the WT, they strung us along and in the process we lost Paps

Sounds like the lead negotiator was played for a fool.
 
Hi Tiger 5150,

I am a gay male that played rugby league at reasonably high levels. I love the Tigers and your passion. I for one love Luke Brooks and think he is a champion, but I wonder where your loyalties lie based on your posts here and elsewhere? Do you care to explain? Why have you accused users of abuse or collusion or worse? Those are allegations the moderators must suspend your account for and introduce and immediate investigation. I shall be instigating an information request of the forum as they are as responsible as you and in this day and age, not hard to find or prosecute.

Sydney (Lawyer)
MR
 
@sydtigerfb said in [Madge and Pascoe](/post/1357396) said:
Hi Tiger 5150,

I am a gay male that played rugby league at reasonably high levels. I love the Tigers and your passion. I for one love Luke Brooks and think he is a champion, but I wonder where your loyalties lie based on your posts here and elsewhere? Do you care to explain? Why have you accused users of abuse or collusion or worse? Those are allegations the moderators must suspend your account for and introduce and immediate investigation. I shall be instigating an information request of the forum as they are as responsible as you and in this day and age, not hard to find or prosecute.

Sydney (Lawyer)
MR

You have posted this twice now. Knock it off.
 
@sydtigerfb said in [Madge and Pascoe](/post/1357396) said:
Hi Tiger 5150,

I am a gay male that played rugby league at reasonably high levels. I love the Tigers and your passion. I for one love Luke Brooks and think he is a champion, but I wonder where your loyalties lie based on your posts here and elsewhere? Do you care to explain? Why have you accused users of abuse or collusion or worse? Those are allegations the moderators must suspend your account for and introduce and immediate investigation. I shall be instigating an information request of the forum as they are as responsible as you and in this day and age, not hard to find or prosecute.

Sydney (Lawyer)
MR

Are you sure you’re a lawyer and not a merchant banker?
 
@earl said in [Madge and Pascoe](/post/1356043) said:
@mccarry2 said in [Madge and Pascoe](/post/1356038) said:
@851 said in [Madge and Pascoe](/post/1356037) said:
@gallagher said in [Madge and Pascoe](/post/1356027) said:
@curaeus said in [Madge and Pascoe](/post/1356023) said:
@crucible said in [Madge and Pascoe](/post/1356004) said:
Pascoe has turned the financial and administrative performance of the club around and when he took over we were broke. He didn't hire Madge, the Board did. Recruitment is Hartigan's responsibility. People on here just make crap up. How did Pascoe loose Tedesco as one clown on here suggests? How did he create the Cleary situation? He didn't. There should be an IQ Test to join this forum, that way we could reduce the Ignorance Factor by 90%.

As I understood it, Pascoe's main job was to get the joint shipshape financially (it wasn't when he took over) and to ensure the organisation's long term financial viability. I believe he's done exactly that especially with his work on getting the COE off the ground. Merely signing off as CEO on player deals promoted by the football department that ultimately turn out to be flops is hardly Pascoe's fault.

I put up a quote from him saying he was the lead negotiator in trying to re-sign Teddy.
We can't just clear him of responsibly of anything
the club fails at.
Why did he get credit for growing memberships? Shouldn't the membership dept get accolade?




I put up a quote last week from Pascoe where he said he took responsibly for losing Teddy as he was the lead negotiator.


I saw Teddy getting interviewed a few weeks ago,, he was asked about leaving us, he said the reason he left was they put a deadline on signing, and he wanted to see about a few things first. He actually said, believe it or not, if they hadn’t put a deadline on it, he probably would of stayed

I don’t believe Teddy for ONE SECOND. I know from a very good Roosters source he had already agreed to terms well before that. My source aside, there were tonnes of people saying the same thing.


The guy is a liar. Just because a guy can play footy doesn't make him a good person. He isn't Hayne but he isn't someone you can trust at all.

More a Cleary type. Look at how he backflipped onthe Raiders, to then stab us in the back after we helped him through his major injuries.
 
I spoke to Teddy @ an A - Mart signing day just after he said he wasn't going to the Raiders, he said he couldn't go as he loved the Tigers, Liar Liar pants on fire.
 
I retract any reasonable statement I've made. Sack them all, turn concord into a quarry, move to South Africa as Perth is too close and we have fans there suffering enough.
 
@trippa101 said in [Madge and Pascoe](/post/1355853) said:
Hey guys, just wondering if anyone has heard anything similar to what i'm about to share.

Was speaking to a mate of mine today, late 40s, successful businessman etc (just highlighting to provide some context of credibility - take it what you will), he used to play for Parra back in the day, is good mates with Mark O'Neil (buckets) and a lot of the old tigers players because he grew up in Balmain.

Anyway he told me today that he had heard, it was supposed to come out in the media this week about the fractured relationship between Madge and Pascoe, and that Madge thinks Pascoe is hopeless.

Anyway my only intention is to see if anyone else had heard something similar. I'm not saying that its true. But my mate is a solid guy.

Above my status within the Club.
Pascoe well unsure what his KPI's are but being Financial is certainly one to tick off.
Madge well needs to work on team's D and avoid the spoon this season.
 
@851 said in [Madge and Pascoe](/post/1356037) said:
@gallagher said in [Madge and Pascoe](/post/1356027) said:
@curaeus said in [Madge and Pascoe](/post/1356023) said:
@crucible said in [Madge and Pascoe](/post/1356004) said:
Pascoe has turned the financial and administrative performance of the club around and when he took over we were broke. He didn't hire Madge, the Board did. Recruitment is Hartigan's responsibility. People on here just make crap up. How did Pascoe loose Tedesco as one clown on here suggests? How did he create the Cleary situation? He didn't. There should be an IQ Test to join this forum, that way we could reduce the Ignorance Factor by 90%.

As I understood it, Pascoe's main job was to get the joint shipshape financially (it wasn't when he took over) and to ensure the organisation's long term financial viability. I believe he's done exactly that especially with his work on getting the COE off the ground. Merely signing off as CEO on player deals promoted by the football department that ultimately turn out to be flops is hardly Pascoe's fault.

I put up a quote from him saying he was the lead negotiator in trying to re-sign Teddy.
We can't just clear him of responsibly of anything
the club fails at.
Why did he get credit for growing memberships? Shouldn't the membership dept get accolade?




I put up a quote last week from Pascoe where he said he took responsibly for losing Teddy as he was the lead negotiator.


I saw Teddy getting interviewed a few weeks ago,, he was asked about leaving us, he said the reason he left was they put a deadline on signing, and he wanted to see about a few things first. He actually said, believe it or not, if they hadn’t put a deadline on it, he probably would of stayed

What rubbish. Deadlines arent required if you really want to stay. Go in and get the job done mate, why were you dragging your heels?

Answer was he was just squeezing those last offers out of Bulldogs and Roosters. Those comments seem to forget Bulldogs thought they had Tedesco over the line before Roosters ponied up?
 
Yeah teddy didn't want to stay. He is just saying those things to come across as the nice guy who didn't have a choice. If he wanted to stay he would have. He didn't.
 
@tiger-tragic said in [Madge and Pascoe](/post/1356019) said:
@crucible said in [Madge and Pascoe](/post/1356004) said:
Pascoe has turned the financial and administrative performance of the club around and when he took over we were broke. He didn't hire Madge, the Board did. Recruitment is Hartigan's responsibility. People on here just make crap up. How did Pascoe loose Tedesco as one clown on here suggests? How did he create the Cleary situation? He didn't. There should be an IQ Test to join this forum, that way we could reduce the Ignorance Factor by 90%.

I like the idea of reducing the IQ-challenged people on here. Maybe just start by banning those who can't tell the difference between "loose" and "lose"? Clown, indeed.

Ah, so the clown must have looked in the mirror !!!! You are on occasions loose with your facts.
 

Latest posts

Staff online

Back
Top