Madge Maguire - Mega Thread

Brad Arthur survived a wooden spoon year with a much better roster than ours and and a frustrated supporter base but it also meant moving on the players that were not geling.
 
@geo said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1466997) said:
@the_patriot said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1466993) said:
I'm all in on Sheens. A rookie coach will struggle with the job ahead. It's too big a mess with too many things to fix.

Sheen's for two seasons and coach up the likes of Gardiner or Morris or Farah and kimmorley to take over in a smooth transition.

Only other option is Wayne Bennett but that's a long shot.

Does Sheens want the Job would be the question I would ask...?

A bit revolutionary but I guess the first thing to do would be to ask him lol
 
@jai_donaldson said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1467073) said:
@tony-soprano said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1467057) said:
Thing about sacking madge too his been talking to a lot of juniors and their parents which seem to like him. Unethical to pull the rug on them and say ow here is our new coach hopefully he likes you to.

Problem with madge the nrl side were not playing for him and experience will not come until the young guys are ready who will create the new club culture.

He seems to have invested a lot of time and interest in developing Indigenous pathways as well which he has mentioned a few times. Would be a shame to see that lost.

Exactly
 
@the_patriot said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1467079) said:
@geo said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1466997) said:
@the_patriot said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1466993) said:
I'm all in on Sheens. A rookie coach will struggle with the job ahead. It's too big a mess with too many things to fix.

Sheen's for two seasons and coach up the likes of Gardiner or Morris or Farah and kimmorley to take over in a smooth transition.

Only other option is Wayne Bennett but that's a long shot.

Does Sheens want the Job would be the question I would ask...?

A bit revolutionary but I guess the first thing to do would be to ask him lol

Haha
 
Fittler was dead set awful at the Chooks, but seems to have a very good feel for the game at the moment, and would also have a report with current NSW players.
If he was available do we think he'd be a good fit?
 
@gnr4life said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1467070) said:
@izotope said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1467068) said:
Does anyone actually believe the review is going to change anything.
I think he's gone regardless. I hope they are interviewing candidates now.

When the two morons conducting it should be reviewed themselves, you know the fix is in. The odds aren’t in Madge’s favour.

That's where board need to wake up to themselves.

But pascoes created a nice safety net for himself.
 
@izotope said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1467068) said:
Does anyone actually believe the review is going to change anything.
I think he's gone regardless. I hope they are interviewing candidates now.

Review will find that the thing we have always done is the thing we should continue to do. Some saying about insanity comes to mind.
 
@the_patriot said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1467079) said:
@geo said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1466997) said:
@the_patriot said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1466993) said:
I'm all in on Sheens. A rookie coach will struggle with the job ahead. It's too big a mess with too many things to fix.

Sheen's for two seasons and coach up the likes of Gardiner or Morris or Farah and kimmorley to take over in a smooth transition.

Only other option is Wayne Bennett but that's a long shot.

Does Sheens want the Job would be the question I would ask...?

A bit revolutionary but I guess the first thing to do would be to ask him lol

lol Yeah..but I meant Does he want EVERYTHING that goes with being an NRL coach at Wests Tigers entails..

We did end up in court at the end of his last tenure..
 
@adelaidetiger said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1467084) said:
Fittler was dead set awful at the Chooks, but seems to have a very good feel for the game at the moment, and would also have a report with current NSW players.
If he was available do we think he'd be a good fit?

I think I would be physically sick if that goose was our coach.
 
@851 said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1466590) said:
@tigertownsfs said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1466521) said:
I agree that Madge has to leave in order to allow the club to short circuit the recruitment spiral it’s been in. Above all what is critical is that the next $1.5m we have to spend for 2022 is spent well, it is the most important decision we have made since Cleary left. I feel for Madge, he’s obviously a great person but he really only has himself to blame. If he was improving players his job would not be on the line, the fact that results have gone backwards over the season show we are missing some quality recruits and Madge for whatever reason cannot recruit (players don’t come to a club because the CEO is impressive or they like the GM of football it surely is because they want to be coached).

So if Madge is gone then who?

1) Flanagan and his son? A more modern coach who can possibly attract players and improve the media perception (for a time) but who he questionable morals?

2) ciraldo? A rookie coach who will be thrown to the wolves after the first month if we aren’t winning?

3) **Green? A failed coach who only really succeeded with a future immortal in the halves?**

If the Qld expansion gets delayed (unlikely) then maybe Bennet is available for a few years but other than that the cupboard is pretty bare.

Everyone is quick to write off Green as a dud, and back Madge as a good coach, I don't get it, Madge won a comp in 2014 is a fact, Green won one in 2015 also a fact, both were sacked soon after doing so.
Both had great players at their disposal, but Green got the Cowboys to the grand final in 2017 without Matt Scott gone after round 4 and JT gone after origin, everyone wrote them off after that.
Whilst I don't want Green as coach, I see him as equal or better than Madge on what he has done.

Good point and alternatively people want Morris. Makes zero sense.
 
@oldschooltiger said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1466998) said:
I can't see Bennett being the next coach. If they sack Madge they will throw a rookie coach in there. Because thats all they will be able to afford.

Why is that all they can afford. Club is doing well financially and Bellamy level coaches cost less than a Latrell. IMO if they let Madge go they should just though stupid money at Ciraldo and put your eggs in that basket.
 
@tiger5150 said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1467107) said:
@oldschooltiger said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1466998) said:
I can't see Bennett being the next coach. If they sack Madge they will throw a rookie coach in there. Because thats all they will be able to afford.

Why is that all they can afford. Club is doing well financially and Bellamy level coaches cost less than a Latrell. IMO if they let Madge go they should just though stupid money at Ciraldo and put your eggs in that basket.

Wouldn't they have to pay out Madge for breaking his contract?
 
@tiger5150 said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1467107) said:
@oldschooltiger said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1466998) said:
I can't see Bennett being the next coach. If they sack Madge they will throw a rookie coach in there. Because thats all they will be able to afford.

Why is that all they can afford. Club is doing well financially and Bellamy level coaches cost less than a Latrell. IMO if they let Madge go they should just though stupid money at Ciraldo and put your eggs in that basket.

The leagues clubs are closed. They would have lost alot of money since the lockdown. Which will be cutting into there profits.
 
@tilllindemann said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1467110) said:
@tiger5150 said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1467107) said:
@oldschooltiger said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1466998) said:
I can't see Bennett being the next coach. If they sack Madge they will throw a rookie coach in there. Because thats all they will be able to afford.

Why is that all they can afford. Club is doing well financially and Bellamy level coaches cost less than a Latrell. IMO if they let Madge go they should just though stupid money at Ciraldo and put your eggs in that basket.

Wouldn't they have to pay out Madge for breaking his contract?

I obviously have no knowledge of that, I assume that would be wrapped up in the decision to punt him.
 
@tilllindemann said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1467110) said:
@tiger5150 said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1467107) said:
@oldschooltiger said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1466998) said:
I can't see Bennett being the next coach. If they sack Madge they will throw a rookie coach in there. Because thats all they will be able to afford.

Why is that all they can afford. Club is doing well financially and Bellamy level coaches cost less than a Latrell. IMO if they let Madge go they should just though stupid money at Ciraldo and put your eggs in that basket.

Wouldn't they have to pay out Madge for breaking his contract?

You missed the Chammas clause...

For those at home playing alone who also missed it..

Maguire not the problem: Brooks in cross-hairs as Tigers ask ‘where to now?’
By Michael Chammas
April 12, 2021 — 6.00am

Michael Maguire has a clause in his recently-extended two-year contract that would allow the Wests Tigers to hit the eject button without much of an impact to the bottom line.

It’s the protection mechanism that the club were adamant they needed in case the rumblings around Maguire’s relationship with the players spilled over and left them with no choice but to part ways.
 
@gnr4life said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1467070) said:
@izotope said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1467068) said:
Does anyone actually believe the review is going to change anything.
I think he's gone regardless. I hope they are interviewing candidates now.

When the two morons conducting it should be reviewed themselves, you know the fix is in. The odds aren’t in Madge’s favour.

Certainly don't disagree but life isn't always fair.
Think its better to just take decisive action now. Madge reports to Hartigan, Hartigan to JP, JP to the Board.
When Madge is sacked both Hartigan and JP should be getting their own reviews done as well, hopefully JP can join them
 
@oldschooltiger said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1467112) said:
@tiger5150 said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1467107) said:
@oldschooltiger said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1466998) said:
I can't see Bennett being the next coach. If they sack Madge they will throw a rookie coach in there. Because thats all they will be able to afford.

Why is that all they can afford. Club is doing well financially and Bellamy level coaches cost less than a Latrell. IMO if they let Madge go they should just though stupid money at Ciraldo and put your eggs in that basket.

The leagues clubs are closed. They would have lost alot of money since the lockdown. Which will be cutting into there profits.

Very true and a good point. In 2019 (pre COvid) WA put in $950K which is a lot but less than 10% of revenue.
 
@telltails said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1466857) said:
@tigerpower said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1466854) said:
@pawsandclaws1 said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1466493) said:
@cultured_bogan said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1466489) said:
Hopefully the new coach gives our halfback a fatherly chat about 5th tackle options, short balls at the line to second rowers and his kicking game. It's all been garbage for years.

If Blore doesn't give Brooks a pair of Irish sunglasses over Mad Monday for his efforts on the weekend I'll be surprised.

Or he could just use him as Cleary did.

And get us to ninth again. It would be an absolute disaster if madge is gone and brooks is still here. The ONE common denominator in our last decade of not playing finals football is brooks. If that’s not enough to get rid of him then I give up on this club.

If Brooks is an agitator I agree - for his sake but mostly for ours.

I couldn’t imagine Brooks agitating anything
 
Back
Top