@cochise said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1473528) said:
@bagnf05 said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1473527) said:
@gcfan said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1473518) said:
@cochise said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1473462) said:
@magpies1963 said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1473456) said:
@cochise said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1472408) said:
@coivtny said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1472402) said:
@cochise said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1472394) said:
@coivtny said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1472352) said:
@cochise said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1472298) said:
@magpies1963 said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1472297) said:
@cochise said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1472283) said:
@magpies1963 said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1472279) said:
@cochise said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1472215) said:
@tony-soprano said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1472200) said:
@snake said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1472196) said:
@dwight-schrute said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1472187) said:
Very good news that Sheens will be the head coach with Maguire as the figurehead coach.
Congratulations to the club. With Sheens heading the coaching I have hope again.
Well done to Maguire for accepting the demotion to figurehead. it can't be easy.
We should all now get behind Sheens and the club and move into our improving future.
Wow that’s a winning move from the club if that’s the case ,Sheens head coach .. Maguire figurehead coach ? the new position created by the review board to cover everyone’s failures .
Well I suppose it’s like 6 home grounds now the board are collecting coaches you do not want to pay one out so you employ another only at the Tigers ??
We still need to get pascoe, Lee and hartigan away from first grade recruitment.
Hartigan needs to have final say on recruitment, with a little guidance from Sheens.
And surely with guidance from Madge as well Cochise.
He is the Head Coach, so surely he gets a say in who he feels he can best work with.
Should be the other way in my opinion.
Why?
I am more talking about as a mentor, I am happy for Madge and Sheens to have input into recruitment decisions, but strongly believe the final decision should rest with Hartigan.
Genuine question. How does that work with the concept of a coach's accountability? I wouldn't want to be accountable if I didn't have final say on my team.
There are not many sports in the world where coaches have final say over the roster.
OK, agree to disagree. From previous posts I believe you are a CEO and I was for 15 years before retiring. In my role I would only accept accountability if I chose my team. You can't do it from day one because there are incumbents but, over time, I chose and shaped my team to produce the best outcomes for my organisation.
A coach is not a ceo though. I am not happy to have the future of the team in the hands of the person that is in the most transitional position in the organisation, a position that is often reliant on short term success, a position that requires no qualifications in financial management. The coach is employed to coach the team, I am happy for him to have input into the roster and who he would like to sign, but after that it is someone else role to manage the squad. I want the team built for the next 10 years and not to maximise the chances of the coach getting an extension. Many coaches sell the future for short term success when handed the keys to a club.
I feel you are being a bit over dramatic when you say "many coaches [your referring to Madge obviously] **sell the future** for short term success **when handed the keys to a club"**.
No one is going to hand Madge the keys. Not you, not me, no one.
I don't think I am being over dramatic, there are plenty of examples of coaches putting clubs in bad financial positions in their attempt to achieve short term success, including at this club. You need to remember that a coach's position is usually dependent on short term success.
therein lies the problem though. KPI’s that aren't aligned in any organisation never deliver the required result. If you have the GM of football with Long term goals and the coach with short term goals you get a mixed outcome. Perhaps the WT are aligned behind closed doors and that’s why Madge may not be punted as they know the long term is what’s required.
If true then Lee needs to stop going on about how great our roster is and how WT have underachieved so much. Madge started to change the narrative around patience and young guys this year but Lee has come in and gone no thanks.
There definitely is a long term strategy in place, that for the most part is working. The issue has been trying to supplement that strategy to gain short term success as well, we have gambled in that area and the gambles have not paid off. The positive is that there has not been a negative impact of the long term strategy.
I agree. I know I bang on about Penrith but I regularly look at things without my Black White and Gold glasses on. So I’m often looking at patterns at rival clubs to see what they do well and don’t do well.
And in terms of Penrith I feel it is a great team of which to compare our standings two.
Both teams had success in 2010.
Penrith however went backwards quickly coming 12th following year whereas in 2011 we made the top 4. Penrith brought in Gus mid year at first I believe as a consultant whom quickly reported that they have the wrong coach in the side for success. Later Elliot sacked and the rebuild began. Ivan was signed to start in 2013 and Penrith were set to have Georgalis caretaker for the 2012 year. However Warriors pushed Ivan out and they were able to start their rebuild in 2012.
At the time despite the great success in 2010 Penrith like the Tigers were still considered the little fish in the large pond. Parramatta, Bulldogs had a much larger support base and higher profile. Penrith knew they needed to improve. We on the other hand.
2012 for us was a year of infighting in the playing group and the staffing.
And it ended in us sacking our most experienced head of our football department and employing a rookie coach but despite of that we finished 2012 just shy of the finals.
We may of not been as much of a perceived basket case as Penrith on the field with the Panthers moving on 3 high profile juniors, recruiting quite literally a bus of recruits to start 2013 and finishing 2012 a couple of wins short of spoon.
Penrith were starting to make inroads off the field but we were still in front in terms of on field success.
From 2013 the fortunes on the field started to reverse but off the field we were slipping away in comparison at a rate of knots.
2013: Penrith 10th, we are 15th
2014: Penrith 4th, we are 13th
2015: Penrith 11th, we are 15th
2016: Penrith 6th, we are 9th
2017: Penrith 7th, we are 14th
2018: Penrith 5th, we are 9th
2019: Penrith 10, we are 9th
2020: Penrith 1st, we are 11th
2021: Penrith 2nd, we are 13th.
This is an article interview I found about Gus at the Panthers mid 2015.
Worth a read.
https://www.foxsports.com.au/nrl/phil-gould-reveals-plan-to-quit-role-as-penrith-panthers-general-manager/news-story/c927ac0d6d72e9f42cdab6c643f11100?device=MOBILE&editiondata=none&from=public_rss&fromakamai=true&pt=none&wpa=BB44D82C3D7223D393F2AE47579FB5EA6791ABE4