Madge Maguire - Mega Thread

@tyga said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1477035) said:
@hugh1954 said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1477029) said:
Do you think that this is all media attempting to fast track outcomes for their own attention seeking spin that the Tigers should come out strongly to rebuff and condemn this behavior or just remain quiet and get on with the review in their own time

No they are being fed by people in the Tigers covering their tracks in the organisation. Like here it’s turned into a sack Madge discussion. Exactly what it’s designed to do. Distract from the ineptitude of people actually running the club.
People are diminishing the brand of the Tigers to cover their back sides and blaming the coach.

It’s not being spun it’s being fed. People can work out who’s playing the games it’s not Madge to a fault he’s straight down the line with most things.

If they are going to sack him do it already the brand damage of letting the media run with this is worse. They need to be sacked immediately.

Im not convinced that it isnt an orchestrated agenda to get Flanagan the job, especially Chammas.
 
@weststigerman said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1477242) said:
@avocadoontoast said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1477231) said:
@telltails said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1477222) said:
@cochise said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1477221) said:
@telltails said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1477191) said:
@pawsandclaws1 said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1477170) said:
@tiger-tragic said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1477169) said:
@pawsandclaws1 said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1477161) said:
@tiger-tragic said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1477158) said:
@pawsandclaws1 said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1477152) said:
@pawsandclaws1 said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1477151) said:
@bagnf05 said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1477037) said:
@tyga said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1477035) said:
@hugh1954 said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1477029) said:
Do you think that this is all media attempting to fast track outcomes for their own attention seeking spin that the Tigers should come out strongly to rebuff and condemn this behavior or just remain quiet and get on with the review in their own time

No they are being fed by people in the Tigers covering their tracks in the organisation. Like here it’s turned into a sack Madge discussion. Exactly what it’s designed to do. Distract from the ineptitude of people actually running the club.
People are diminishing the brand of the Tigers to cover their back sides and blaming the coach.

It’s not being spun it’s being fed. People can work out who’s playing the games it’s not Madge to a fault he’s straight down the line with most things.

If they are going to sack him do it already the brand damage of letting the media run with this is worse. They need to be sacked immediately.

The self interest in our club is astonishing. Blame the bloke whose been here 3 years when we were a massive rabble when he arrived. Nothing to see here!! Did Madge hire Cleary? Fail to retain Cleary? Fail to retain multiple dally m medal winners? Sign Packer, Ballin, Anasta, Reynolds, Mbye? No. The lunatics are free in the asylum.

I'd say self interest is certainly a factor. With the Board apparently divided, with the playing group apparently divided and now the supporter base on this forum divided, Maguire needs to fall on his sword if he cares about the club. He's failed and it's time to go.

We need to start healing and that cannot begin until he has departed.

Oh, good grief ...spare us, please. Start "healing"? Seriously?? When a significant proportion of fans and members are pointing the finger at the CEO/Chair/Board and their incompetence and want Maguire retained?

What you're really saying is that your credibility on here is so dependent on Maguie being punted that you're becoming impatient waiting for it to happen.

The obfuscation is outrageous. Stop deflecting and deal with the issue of Maguire failing.

I don't play the man (or woman) so I won't comment on your last paragraph.

While you don't seem to attribute Club leadership and management as having any influence in Maguire "failing", then you're going to be disappointed in 2022 and beyond with whomever the new coach is as they will be "failing" too if those same structural and leadership issues remain as they are, in my opinion.

Our appalling defence for example is Maguire. Conceding 30 points a game and players not knowing what they are supposed to be doing. We're so passive in defence. He's only had 3 years to "fix it" and you want to give him another 2 years?

We've steadily regressed over the last three years. That is also entirely on Maguire.

It is time for a new coach, new ideas, a much improved defence and some hope for the future.

For two years Maguires squad was hamstrung by players taking up the majority of cap space who contributed squat. No coach can have success where your highest paid players don't contribute.
All week we have been listening to the poor Roosters with so much of their cap on the sideline yet they still fielded a team with Teddy Radley JWH Tupuonia Crichton - and got 42 points put on them. For us to get just two of those players would blow our cap out of the water and yet that is their weak side. Any of those players in our team on any given week would have significantly improved our performance. That is what our club competes against and that impacts on the coach.

Maguire was never going to be able to turn things around on the field for us individually in three years even your man Cleary said it would take 5 or so years.
This year's side is full of inconsistencies because of their youth, inexperience and lack of leadership on the field. They finished where most predicted and based on the rosters of the sides above them you would be hard pressed to find anyone who could argue that we have a better squad.
Maguire has not got results and will be the fall guy but he is not the singular reason for our results this year, and your failure to acknowledge that is tiresome. Add to that the lack of respect our club has shown him in recent days, is a reflection of why this club is in the position we are in and why we are consistently in a holding pattern.

Madge said he could win with the squad he had?

And Luke Brooks has said this is his team.

Then sack Brooks too. Get rid of them both.

We sack Maguire and we're stuck with Brooks. He will have yet another reprieve until at least the end of next season IMO.

Why? They're not linked. The new coach might think he's rubbish.
 
@cochise said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1477234) said:
@telltails said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1477233) said:
@cochise said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1477226) said:
@telltails said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1477222) said:
@cochise said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1477221) said:
@telltails said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1477191) said:
@pawsandclaws1 said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1477170) said:
@tiger-tragic said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1477169) said:
@pawsandclaws1 said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1477161) said:
@tiger-tragic said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1477158) said:
@pawsandclaws1 said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1477152) said:
@pawsandclaws1 said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1477151) said:
@bagnf05 said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1477037) said:
@tyga said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1477035) said:
@hugh1954 said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1477029) said:
Do you think that this is all media attempting to fast track outcomes for their own attention seeking spin that the Tigers should come out strongly to rebuff and condemn this behavior or just remain quiet and get on with the review in their own time

No they are being fed by people in the Tigers covering their tracks in the organisation. Like here it’s turned into a sack Madge discussion. Exactly what it’s designed to do. Distract from the ineptitude of people actually running the club.
People are diminishing the brand of the Tigers to cover their back sides and blaming the coach.

It’s not being spun it’s being fed. People can work out who’s playing the games it’s not Madge to a fault he’s straight down the line with most things.

If they are going to sack him do it already the brand damage of letting the media run with this is worse. They need to be sacked immediately.

The self interest in our club is astonishing. Blame the bloke whose been here 3 years when we were a massive rabble when he arrived. Nothing to see here!! Did Madge hire Cleary? Fail to retain Cleary? Fail to retain multiple dally m medal winners? Sign Packer, Ballin, Anasta, Reynolds, Mbye? No. The lunatics are free in the asylum.

I'd say self interest is certainly a factor. With the Board apparently divided, with the playing group apparently divided and now the supporter base on this forum divided, Maguire needs to fall on his sword if he cares about the club. He's failed and it's time to go.

We need to start healing and that cannot begin until he has departed.

Oh, good grief ...spare us, please. Start "healing"? Seriously?? When a significant proportion of fans and members are pointing the finger at the CEO/Chair/Board and their incompetence and want Maguire retained?

What you're really saying is that your credibility on here is so dependent on Maguie being punted that you're becoming impatient waiting for it to happen.

The obfuscation is outrageous. Stop deflecting and deal with the issue of Maguire failing.

I don't play the man (or woman) so I won't comment on your last paragraph.

While you don't seem to attribute Club leadership and management as having any influence in Maguire "failing", then you're going to be disappointed in 2022 and beyond with whomever the new coach is as they will be "failing" too if those same structural and leadership issues remain as they are, in my opinion.

Our appalling defence for example is Maguire. Conceding 30 points a game and players not knowing what they are supposed to be doing. We're so passive in defence. He's only had 3 years to "fix it" and you want to give him another 2 years?

We've steadily regressed over the last three years. That is also entirely on Maguire.

It is time for a new coach, new ideas, a much improved defence and some hope for the future.

For two years Maguires squad was hamstrung by players taking up the majority of cap space who contributed squat. No coach can have success where your highest paid players don't contribute.
All week we have been listening to the poor Roosters with so much of their cap on the sideline yet they still fielded a team with Teddy Radley JWH Tupuonia Crichton - and got 42 points put on them. For us to get just two of those players would blow our cap out of the water and yet that is their weak side. Any of those players in our team on any given week would have significantly improved our performance. That is what our club competes against and that impacts on the coach.

Maguire was never going to be able to turn things around on the field for us individually in three years even your man Cleary said it would take 5 or so years.
This year's side is full of inconsistencies because of their youth, inexperience and lack of leadership on the field. They finished where most predicted and based on the rosters of the sides above them you would be hard pressed to find anyone who could argue that we have a better squad.
Maguire has not got results and will be the fall guy but he is not the singular reason for our results this year, and your failure to acknowledge that is tiresome. Add to that the lack of respect our club has shown him in recent days, is a reflection of why this club is in the position we are in and why we are consistently in a holding pattern.

Madge said he could win with the squad he had?

And Luke Brooks has said this his team.

So sack them both, that is what happens when people set targets that they don not reach.

There seems to be only one head on the chopping block - yet accountability for continual failure at the club seems to escape some more than others.

Because he needs to be the 1st domino to fall. Hopefully the next coach doesn't need to lie to get the job.

What was the lie?
 
@tiger5150 said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1477243) said:
@tyga said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1477035) said:
@hugh1954 said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1477029) said:
Do you think that this is all media attempting to fast track outcomes for their own attention seeking spin that the Tigers should come out strongly to rebuff and condemn this behavior or just remain quiet and get on with the review in their own time

No they are being fed by people in the Tigers covering their tracks in the organisation. Like here it’s turned into a sack Madge discussion. Exactly what it’s designed to do. Distract from the ineptitude of people actually running the club.
People are diminishing the brand of the Tigers to cover their back sides and blaming the coach.

It’s not being spun it’s being fed. People can work out who’s playing the games it’s not Madge to a fault he’s straight down the line with most things.

If they are going to sack him do it already the brand damage of letting the media run with this is worse. They need to be sacked immediately.

Im not convinced that it isnt an orchestrated agenda to get Flanagan the job, especially Chammas.

Does Flanagan have any support within WT though? I've seen Ciraldo speculated amongst others but outside of news limited I haven't seen Flanagan mentioned at all.
 
@tiger-ferret said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1477245) said:
@cochise said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1477234) said:
@telltails said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1477233) said:
@cochise said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1477226) said:
@telltails said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1477222) said:
@cochise said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1477221) said:
@telltails said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1477191) said:
@pawsandclaws1 said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1477170) said:
@tiger-tragic said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1477169) said:
@pawsandclaws1 said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1477161) said:
@tiger-tragic said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1477158) said:
@pawsandclaws1 said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1477152) said:
@pawsandclaws1 said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1477151) said:
@bagnf05 said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1477037) said:
@tyga said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1477035) said:
@hugh1954 said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1477029) said:
Do you think that this is all media attempting to fast track outcomes for their own attention seeking spin that the Tigers should come out strongly to rebuff and condemn this behavior or just remain quiet and get on with the review in their own time

No they are being fed by people in the Tigers covering their tracks in the organisation. Like here it’s turned into a sack Madge discussion. Exactly what it’s designed to do. Distract from the ineptitude of people actually running the club.
People are diminishing the brand of the Tigers to cover their back sides and blaming the coach.

It’s not being spun it’s being fed. People can work out who’s playing the games it’s not Madge to a fault he’s straight down the line with most things.

If they are going to sack him do it already the brand damage of letting the media run with this is worse. They need to be sacked immediately.

The self interest in our club is astonishing. Blame the bloke whose been here 3 years when we were a massive rabble when he arrived. Nothing to see here!! Did Madge hire Cleary? Fail to retain Cleary? Fail to retain multiple dally m medal winners? Sign Packer, Ballin, Anasta, Reynolds, Mbye? No. The lunatics are free in the asylum.

I'd say self interest is certainly a factor. With the Board apparently divided, with the playing group apparently divided and now the supporter base on this forum divided, Maguire needs to fall on his sword if he cares about the club. He's failed and it's time to go.

We need to start healing and that cannot begin until he has departed.

Oh, good grief ...spare us, please. Start "healing"? Seriously?? When a significant proportion of fans and members are pointing the finger at the CEO/Chair/Board and their incompetence and want Maguire retained?

What you're really saying is that your credibility on here is so dependent on Maguie being punted that you're becoming impatient waiting for it to happen.

The obfuscation is outrageous. Stop deflecting and deal with the issue of Maguire failing.

I don't play the man (or woman) so I won't comment on your last paragraph.

While you don't seem to attribute Club leadership and management as having any influence in Maguire "failing", then you're going to be disappointed in 2022 and beyond with whomever the new coach is as they will be "failing" too if those same structural and leadership issues remain as they are, in my opinion.

Our appalling defence for example is Maguire. Conceding 30 points a game and players not knowing what they are supposed to be doing. We're so passive in defence. He's only had 3 years to "fix it" and you want to give him another 2 years?

We've steadily regressed over the last three years. That is also entirely on Maguire.

It is time for a new coach, new ideas, a much improved defence and some hope for the future.

For two years Maguires squad was hamstrung by players taking up the majority of cap space who contributed squat. No coach can have success where your highest paid players don't contribute.
All week we have been listening to the poor Roosters with so much of their cap on the sideline yet they still fielded a team with Teddy Radley JWH Tupuonia Crichton - and got 42 points put on them. For us to get just two of those players would blow our cap out of the water and yet that is their weak side. Any of those players in our team on any given week would have significantly improved our performance. That is what our club competes against and that impacts on the coach.

Maguire was never going to be able to turn things around on the field for us individually in three years even your man Cleary said it would take 5 or so years.
This year's side is full of inconsistencies because of their youth, inexperience and lack of leadership on the field. They finished where most predicted and based on the rosters of the sides above them you would be hard pressed to find anyone who could argue that we have a better squad.
Maguire has not got results and will be the fall guy but he is not the singular reason for our results this year, and your failure to acknowledge that is tiresome. Add to that the lack of respect our club has shown him in recent days, is a reflection of why this club is in the position we are in and why we are consistently in a holding pattern.

Madge said he could win with the squad he had?

And Luke Brooks has said this his team.

So sack them both, that is what happens when people set targets that they don not reach.

There seems to be only one head on the chopping block - yet accountability for continual failure at the club seems to escape some more than others.

Because he needs to be the 1st domino to fall. Hopefully the next coach doesn't need to lie to get the job.

What was the lie?

That he said he could get the existing roster to finals
 
I just want to state my position here fairly clearly as the absolutes that some madge supporters are speaking is getting to me and causing me to be hyperbolic and arrogant in my posting (that is on me).

I do not believe that Madge is the only problem in the club, the problems are many and complex. The NRL level coaching at this club is not up to standard, our defensive and offensive structure have not been up to standard and are getting worse. We conceded an average of 30 points a game this season, when I watched games I could not see what we were trying to do to win the game, how we were attacking oppositions weaknesses. It was non existent, the way we tried to play did not suit the modern game under the 6 again rules.

Our roster is weak and mentally soft, we need an overall in senior players to better support the youth we have coming through. That has started with Mbye leaving, a few more need to follow.

We have a major issue in the set up of our club at board level, the board is dysfunctional, split, leaks like a sieve and has a real lack of transparency and accountability. This needs to change but it is not an overnight change, it could literally take years. I have ideas to improve in that area but it is not something we can change overnight.

There are however green shoots in our club, the COE and planned Academy in the MacArthur region, the investment in pathways and renewed focus on development. Our lower grade success shows that this strategy is starting to produce, we need to make the right decisions at that level right now though.

A lot of the change we need to make is going to take time, potentially years for some of. An area we can make a change right now is the poor coaching at the NRL level, that doesn't mean that other changes are not needed. It is just something that is seriously wrong at the club that we can act on now.
 
@cochise said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1477234) said:
@telltails said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1477233) said:
@cochise said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1477226) said:
@telltails said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1477222) said:
@cochise said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1477221) said:
@telltails said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1477191) said:
@pawsandclaws1 said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1477170) said:
@tiger-tragic said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1477169) said:
@pawsandclaws1 said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1477161) said:
@tiger-tragic said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1477158) said:
@pawsandclaws1 said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1477152) said:
@pawsandclaws1 said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1477151) said:
@bagnf05 said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1477037) said:
@tyga said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1477035) said:
@hugh1954 said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1477029) said:
Do you think that this is all media attempting to fast track outcomes for their own attention seeking spin that the Tigers should come out strongly to rebuff and condemn this behavior or just remain quiet and get on with the review in their own time

No they are being fed by people in the Tigers covering their tracks in the organisation. Like here it’s turned into a sack Madge discussion. Exactly what it’s designed to do. Distract from the ineptitude of people actually running the club.
People are diminishing the brand of the Tigers to cover their back sides and blaming the coach.

It’s not being spun it’s being fed. People can work out who’s playing the games it’s not Madge to a fault he’s straight down the line with most things.

If they are going to sack him do it already the brand damage of letting the media run with this is worse. They need to be sacked immediately.

The self interest in our club is astonishing. Blame the bloke whose been here 3 years when we were a massive rabble when he arrived. Nothing to see here!! Did Madge hire Cleary? Fail to retain Cleary? Fail to retain multiple dally m medal winners? Sign Packer, Ballin, Anasta, Reynolds, Mbye? No. The lunatics are free in the asylum.

I'd say self interest is certainly a factor. With the Board apparently divided, with the playing group apparently divided and now the supporter base on this forum divided, Maguire needs to fall on his sword if he cares about the club. He's failed and it's time to go.

We need to start healing and that cannot begin until he has departed.

Oh, good grief ...spare us, please. Start "healing"? Seriously?? When a significant proportion of fans and members are pointing the finger at the CEO/Chair/Board and their incompetence and want Maguire retained?

What you're really saying is that your credibility on here is so dependent on Maguie being punted that you're becoming impatient waiting for it to happen.

The obfuscation is outrageous. Stop deflecting and deal with the issue of Maguire failing.

I don't play the man (or woman) so I won't comment on your last paragraph.

While you don't seem to attribute Club leadership and management as having any influence in Maguire "failing", then you're going to be disappointed in 2022 and beyond with whomever the new coach is as they will be "failing" too if those same structural and leadership issues remain as they are, in my opinion.

Our appalling defence for example is Maguire. Conceding 30 points a game and players not knowing what they are supposed to be doing. We're so passive in defence. He's only had 3 years to "fix it" and you want to give him another 2 years?

We've steadily regressed over the last three years. That is also entirely on Maguire.

It is time for a new coach, new ideas, a much improved defence and some hope for the future.

For two years Maguires squad was hamstrung by players taking up the majority of cap space who contributed squat. No coach can have success where your highest paid players don't contribute.
All week we have been listening to the poor Roosters with so much of their cap on the sideline yet they still fielded a team with Teddy Radley JWH Tupuonia Crichton - and got 42 points put on them. For us to get just two of those players would blow our cap out of the water and yet that is their weak side. Any of those players in our team on any given week would have significantly improved our performance. That is what our club competes against and that impacts on the coach.

Maguire was never going to be able to turn things around on the field for us individually in three years even your man Cleary said it would take 5 or so years.
This year's side is full of inconsistencies because of their youth, inexperience and lack of leadership on the field. They finished where most predicted and based on the rosters of the sides above them you would be hard pressed to find anyone who could argue that we have a better squad.
Maguire has not got results and will be the fall guy but he is not the singular reason for our results this year, and your failure to acknowledge that is tiresome. Add to that the lack of respect our club has shown him in recent days, is a reflection of why this club is in the position we are in and why we are consistently in a holding pattern.

Madge said he could win with the squad he had?

And Luke Brooks has said this his team.

So sack them both, that is what happens when people set targets that they don not reach.

There seems to be only one head on the chopping block - yet accountability for continual failure at the club seems to escape some more than others.

Because he needs to be the 1st domino to fall. Hopefully the next coach doesn't need to lie to get the job.

He didn't lie he did win games. They finished ninth with the squad that he inherited. It was when he tried to recruit players to address the deficiencies, and correct the cap problems left by the previous coach, that the barriers became evident that this club has in attracting quality. His results are impacted by that as much as the team is when competing against more talented squads.
If you are measuring failure over a three year period the first domino should have fallen before Maguire.
 
@tiger-ferret said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1477245) said:
@cochise said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1477234) said:
@telltails said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1477233) said:
@cochise said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1477226) said:
@telltails said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1477222) said:
@cochise said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1477221) said:
@telltails said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1477191) said:
@pawsandclaws1 said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1477170) said:
@tiger-tragic said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1477169) said:
@pawsandclaws1 said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1477161) said:
@tiger-tragic said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1477158) said:
@pawsandclaws1 said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1477152) said:
@pawsandclaws1 said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1477151) said:
@bagnf05 said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1477037) said:
@tyga said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1477035) said:
@hugh1954 said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1477029) said:
Do you think that this is all media attempting to fast track outcomes for their own attention seeking spin that the Tigers should come out strongly to rebuff and condemn this behavior or just remain quiet and get on with the review in their own time

No they are being fed by people in the Tigers covering their tracks in the organisation. Like here it’s turned into a sack Madge discussion. Exactly what it’s designed to do. Distract from the ineptitude of people actually running the club.
People are diminishing the brand of the Tigers to cover their back sides and blaming the coach.

It’s not being spun it’s being fed. People can work out who’s playing the games it’s not Madge to a fault he’s straight down the line with most things.

If they are going to sack him do it already the brand damage of letting the media run with this is worse. They need to be sacked immediately.

The self interest in our club is astonishing. Blame the bloke whose been here 3 years when we were a massive rabble when he arrived. Nothing to see here!! Did Madge hire Cleary? Fail to retain Cleary? Fail to retain multiple dally m medal winners? Sign Packer, Ballin, Anasta, Reynolds, Mbye? No. The lunatics are free in the asylum.

I'd say self interest is certainly a factor. With the Board apparently divided, with the playing group apparently divided and now the supporter base on this forum divided, Maguire needs to fall on his sword if he cares about the club. He's failed and it's time to go.

We need to start healing and that cannot begin until he has departed.

Oh, good grief ...spare us, please. Start "healing"? Seriously?? When a significant proportion of fans and members are pointing the finger at the CEO/Chair/Board and their incompetence and want Maguire retained?

What you're really saying is that your credibility on here is so dependent on Maguie being punted that you're becoming impatient waiting for it to happen.

The obfuscation is outrageous. Stop deflecting and deal with the issue of Maguire failing.

I don't play the man (or woman) so I won't comment on your last paragraph.

While you don't seem to attribute Club leadership and management as having any influence in Maguire "failing", then you're going to be disappointed in 2022 and beyond with whomever the new coach is as they will be "failing" too if those same structural and leadership issues remain as they are, in my opinion.

Our appalling defence for example is Maguire. Conceding 30 points a game and players not knowing what they are supposed to be doing. We're so passive in defence. He's only had 3 years to "fix it" and you want to give him another 2 years?

We've steadily regressed over the last three years. That is also entirely on Maguire.

It is time for a new coach, new ideas, a much improved defence and some hope for the future.

For two years Maguires squad was hamstrung by players taking up the majority of cap space who contributed squat. No coach can have success where your highest paid players don't contribute.
All week we have been listening to the poor Roosters with so much of their cap on the sideline yet they still fielded a team with Teddy Radley JWH Tupuonia Crichton - and got 42 points put on them. For us to get just two of those players would blow our cap out of the water and yet that is their weak side. Any of those players in our team on any given week would have significantly improved our performance. That is what our club competes against and that impacts on the coach.

Maguire was never going to be able to turn things around on the field for us individually in three years even your man Cleary said it would take 5 or so years.
This year's side is full of inconsistencies because of their youth, inexperience and lack of leadership on the field. They finished where most predicted and based on the rosters of the sides above them you would be hard pressed to find anyone who could argue that we have a better squad.
Maguire has not got results and will be the fall guy but he is not the singular reason for our results this year, and your failure to acknowledge that is tiresome. Add to that the lack of respect our club has shown him in recent days, is a reflection of why this club is in the position we are in and why we are consistently in a holding pattern.

Madge said he could win with the squad he had?

And Luke Brooks has said this his team.

So sack them both, that is what happens when people set targets that they don not reach.

There seems to be only one head on the chopping block - yet accountability for continual failure at the club seems to escape some more than others.

Because he needs to be the 1st domino to fall. Hopefully the next coach doesn't need to lie to get the job.

What was the lie?

He said he could get the squad to the finals and according to a lot of people on here everyone would say that, knowing its not true to get the job.
 
@yeahcaz said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1477138) said:
Madge can not stay, simple as that. You can quote past glories or examples all you like but their all anomalies in this instance. Arthur for example at parra, took over when they were wooden spooners, started very slow his first 2-3 years and now they’re a consistent top 6 team. In those troubling years the team improved, we haven’t at all. For the 1000th time, we’ve gone backwards. To not sack him now would be an even more cowardly move by this incompetent board and would just be a bloody cop out to the media and supposed sooking members who won’t renew if Madge is sacked. Big bloody whoop, the club will continue on regardless. Madge is not the only person to blame but he is definitely part and it’s time to bite the bullet.

For me its defence. Very early in the development of this squad, there were obvious specific weaknesses in our defence. Incredibly obvious and they have been discussed to death here. Those same deficiences remain and if anything have got worse. That for me is the death knell for Madge.

Yes our roster is not strong enough to contend for top 4 but defence IS coachable, especially these specific issues and they havent been.
 
@avocadoontoast said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1477244) said:
@weststigerman said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1477242) said:
@avocadoontoast said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1477231) said:
@telltails said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1477222) said:
@cochise said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1477221) said:
@telltails said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1477191) said:
@pawsandclaws1 said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1477170) said:
@tiger-tragic said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1477169) said:
@pawsandclaws1 said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1477161) said:
@tiger-tragic said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1477158) said:
@pawsandclaws1 said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1477152) said:
@pawsandclaws1 said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1477151) said:
@bagnf05 said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1477037) said:
@tyga said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1477035) said:
@hugh1954 said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1477029) said:
Do you think that this is all media attempting to fast track outcomes for their own attention seeking spin that the Tigers should come out strongly to rebuff and condemn this behavior or just remain quiet and get on with the review in their own time

No they are being fed by people in the Tigers covering their tracks in the organisation. Like here it’s turned into a sack Madge discussion. Exactly what it’s designed to do. Distract from the ineptitude of people actually running the club.
People are diminishing the brand of the Tigers to cover their back sides and blaming the coach.

It’s not being spun it’s being fed. People can work out who’s playing the games it’s not Madge to a fault he’s straight down the line with most things.

If they are going to sack him do it already the brand damage of letting the media run with this is worse. They need to be sacked immediately.

The self interest in our club is astonishing. Blame the bloke whose been here 3 years when we were a massive rabble when he arrived. Nothing to see here!! Did Madge hire Cleary? Fail to retain Cleary? Fail to retain multiple dally m medal winners? Sign Packer, Ballin, Anasta, Reynolds, Mbye? No. The lunatics are free in the asylum.

I'd say self interest is certainly a factor. With the Board apparently divided, with the playing group apparently divided and now the supporter base on this forum divided, Maguire needs to fall on his sword if he cares about the club. He's failed and it's time to go.

We need to start healing and that cannot begin until he has departed.

Oh, good grief ...spare us, please. Start "healing"? Seriously?? When a significant proportion of fans and members are pointing the finger at the CEO/Chair/Board and their incompetence and want Maguire retained?

What you're really saying is that your credibility on here is so dependent on Maguie being punted that you're becoming impatient waiting for it to happen.

The obfuscation is outrageous. Stop deflecting and deal with the issue of Maguire failing.

I don't play the man (or woman) so I won't comment on your last paragraph.

While you don't seem to attribute Club leadership and management as having any influence in Maguire "failing", then you're going to be disappointed in 2022 and beyond with whomever the new coach is as they will be "failing" too if those same structural and leadership issues remain as they are, in my opinion.

Our appalling defence for example is Maguire. Conceding 30 points a game and players not knowing what they are supposed to be doing. We're so passive in defence. He's only had 3 years to "fix it" and you want to give him another 2 years?

We've steadily regressed over the last three years. That is also entirely on Maguire.

It is time for a new coach, new ideas, a much improved defence and some hope for the future.

For two years Maguires squad was hamstrung by players taking up the majority of cap space who contributed squat. No coach can have success where your highest paid players don't contribute.
All week we have been listening to the poor Roosters with so much of their cap on the sideline yet they still fielded a team with Teddy Radley JWH Tupuonia Crichton - and got 42 points put on them. For us to get just two of those players would blow our cap out of the water and yet that is their weak side. Any of those players in our team on any given week would have significantly improved our performance. That is what our club competes against and that impacts on the coach.

Maguire was never going to be able to turn things around on the field for us individually in three years even your man Cleary said it would take 5 or so years.
This year's side is full of inconsistencies because of their youth, inexperience and lack of leadership on the field. They finished where most predicted and based on the rosters of the sides above them you would be hard pressed to find anyone who could argue that we have a better squad.
Maguire has not got results and will be the fall guy but he is not the singular reason for our results this year, and your failure to acknowledge that is tiresome. Add to that the lack of respect our club has shown him in recent days, is a reflection of why this club is in the position we are in and why we are consistently in a holding pattern.

Madge said he could win with the squad he had?

And Luke Brooks has said this is his team.

Then sack Brooks too. Get rid of them both.

We sack Maguire and we're stuck with Brooks. He will have yet another reprieve until at least the end of next season IMO.

Why? They're not linked. The new coach might think he's rubbish.

Potter, JT, Ivan, and Madge have all tried to fix him. He's on a big contract so he's hard to move. The odds are another coach will try and do the same.
 
@weststigerman said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1477253) said:
@avocadoontoast said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1477244) said:
@weststigerman said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1477242) said:
@avocadoontoast said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1477231) said:
@telltails said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1477222) said:
@cochise said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1477221) said:
@telltails said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1477191) said:
@pawsandclaws1 said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1477170) said:
@tiger-tragic said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1477169) said:
@pawsandclaws1 said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1477161) said:
@tiger-tragic said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1477158) said:
@pawsandclaws1 said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1477152) said:
@pawsandclaws1 said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1477151) said:
@bagnf05 said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1477037) said:
@tyga said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1477035) said:
@hugh1954 said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1477029) said:
Do you think that this is all media attempting to fast track outcomes for their own attention seeking spin that the Tigers should come out strongly to rebuff and condemn this behavior or just remain quiet and get on with the review in their own time

No they are being fed by people in the Tigers covering their tracks in the organisation. Like here it’s turned into a sack Madge discussion. Exactly what it’s designed to do. Distract from the ineptitude of people actually running the club.
People are diminishing the brand of the Tigers to cover their back sides and blaming the coach.

It’s not being spun it’s being fed. People can work out who’s playing the games it’s not Madge to a fault he’s straight down the line with most things.

If they are going to sack him do it already the brand damage of letting the media run with this is worse. They need to be sacked immediately.

The self interest in our club is astonishing. Blame the bloke whose been here 3 years when we were a massive rabble when he arrived. Nothing to see here!! Did Madge hire Cleary? Fail to retain Cleary? Fail to retain multiple dally m medal winners? Sign Packer, Ballin, Anasta, Reynolds, Mbye? No. The lunatics are free in the asylum.

I'd say self interest is certainly a factor. With the Board apparently divided, with the playing group apparently divided and now the supporter base on this forum divided, Maguire needs to fall on his sword if he cares about the club. He's failed and it's time to go.

We need to start healing and that cannot begin until he has departed.

Oh, good grief ...spare us, please. Start "healing"? Seriously?? When a significant proportion of fans and members are pointing the finger at the CEO/Chair/Board and their incompetence and want Maguire retained?

What you're really saying is that your credibility on here is so dependent on Maguie being punted that you're becoming impatient waiting for it to happen.

The obfuscation is outrageous. Stop deflecting and deal with the issue of Maguire failing.

I don't play the man (or woman) so I won't comment on your last paragraph.

While you don't seem to attribute Club leadership and management as having any influence in Maguire "failing", then you're going to be disappointed in 2022 and beyond with whomever the new coach is as they will be "failing" too if those same structural and leadership issues remain as they are, in my opinion.

Our appalling defence for example is Maguire. Conceding 30 points a game and players not knowing what they are supposed to be doing. We're so passive in defence. He's only had 3 years to "fix it" and you want to give him another 2 years?

We've steadily regressed over the last three years. That is also entirely on Maguire.

It is time for a new coach, new ideas, a much improved defence and some hope for the future.

For two years Maguires squad was hamstrung by players taking up the majority of cap space who contributed squat. No coach can have success where your highest paid players don't contribute.
All week we have been listening to the poor Roosters with so much of their cap on the sideline yet they still fielded a team with Teddy Radley JWH Tupuonia Crichton - and got 42 points put on them. For us to get just two of those players would blow our cap out of the water and yet that is their weak side. Any of those players in our team on any given week would have significantly improved our performance. That is what our club competes against and that impacts on the coach.

Maguire was never going to be able to turn things around on the field for us individually in three years even your man Cleary said it would take 5 or so years.
This year's side is full of inconsistencies because of their youth, inexperience and lack of leadership on the field. They finished where most predicted and based on the rosters of the sides above them you would be hard pressed to find anyone who could argue that we have a better squad.
Maguire has not got results and will be the fall guy but he is not the singular reason for our results this year, and your failure to acknowledge that is tiresome. Add to that the lack of respect our club has shown him in recent days, is a reflection of why this club is in the position we are in and why we are consistently in a holding pattern.

Madge said he could win with the squad he had?

And Luke Brooks has said this is his team.

Then sack Brooks too. Get rid of them both.

We sack Maguire and we're stuck with Brooks. He will have yet another reprieve until at least the end of next season IMO.

Why? They're not linked. The new coach might think he's rubbish.

Potter, JT, Ivan, and Madge have all tried to fix him. He's on a big contract so he's hard to move. The odds are another coach will try and do the same.

Madge shouldn't have signed him to a 5 year deal.
 
@avocadoontoast said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1477247) said:
@tiger-ferret said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1477245) said:
@cochise said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1477234) said:
@telltails said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1477233) said:
@cochise said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1477226) said:
@telltails said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1477222) said:
@cochise said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1477221) said:
@telltails said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1477191) said:
@pawsandclaws1 said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1477170) said:
@tiger-tragic said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1477169) said:
@pawsandclaws1 said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1477161) said:
@tiger-tragic said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1477158) said:
@pawsandclaws1 said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1477152) said:
@pawsandclaws1 said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1477151) said:
@bagnf05 said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1477037) said:
@tyga said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1477035) said:
@hugh1954 said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1477029) said:
Do you think that this is all media attempting to fast track outcomes for their own attention seeking spin that the Tigers should come out strongly to rebuff and condemn this behavior or just remain quiet and get on with the review in their own time

No they are being fed by people in the Tigers covering their tracks in the organisation. Like here it’s turned into a sack Madge discussion. Exactly what it’s designed to do. Distract from the ineptitude of people actually running the club.
People are diminishing the brand of the Tigers to cover their back sides and blaming the coach.

It’s not being spun it’s being fed. People can work out who’s playing the games it’s not Madge to a fault he’s straight down the line with most things.

If they are going to sack him do it already the brand damage of letting the media run with this is worse. They need to be sacked immediately.

The self interest in our club is astonishing. Blame the bloke whose been here 3 years when we were a massive rabble when he arrived. Nothing to see here!! Did Madge hire Cleary? Fail to retain Cleary? Fail to retain multiple dally m medal winners? Sign Packer, Ballin, Anasta, Reynolds, Mbye? No. The lunatics are free in the asylum.

I'd say self interest is certainly a factor. With the Board apparently divided, with the playing group apparently divided and now the supporter base on this forum divided, Maguire needs to fall on his sword if he cares about the club. He's failed and it's time to go.

We need to start healing and that cannot begin until he has departed.

Oh, good grief ...spare us, please. Start "healing"? Seriously?? When a significant proportion of fans and members are pointing the finger at the CEO/Chair/Board and their incompetence and want Maguire retained?

What you're really saying is that your credibility on here is so dependent on Maguie being punted that you're becoming impatient waiting for it to happen.

The obfuscation is outrageous. Stop deflecting and deal with the issue of Maguire failing.

I don't play the man (or woman) so I won't comment on your last paragraph.

While you don't seem to attribute Club leadership and management as having any influence in Maguire "failing", then you're going to be disappointed in 2022 and beyond with whomever the new coach is as they will be "failing" too if those same structural and leadership issues remain as they are, in my opinion.

Our appalling defence for example is Maguire. Conceding 30 points a game and players not knowing what they are supposed to be doing. We're so passive in defence. He's only had 3 years to "fix it" and you want to give him another 2 years?

We've steadily regressed over the last three years. That is also entirely on Maguire.

It is time for a new coach, new ideas, a much improved defence and some hope for the future.

For two years Maguires squad was hamstrung by players taking up the majority of cap space who contributed squat. No coach can have success where your highest paid players don't contribute.
All week we have been listening to the poor Roosters with so much of their cap on the sideline yet they still fielded a team with Teddy Radley JWH Tupuonia Crichton - and got 42 points put on them. For us to get just two of those players would blow our cap out of the water and yet that is their weak side. Any of those players in our team on any given week would have significantly improved our performance. That is what our club competes against and that impacts on the coach.

Maguire was never going to be able to turn things around on the field for us individually in three years even your man Cleary said it would take 5 or so years.
This year's side is full of inconsistencies because of their youth, inexperience and lack of leadership on the field. They finished where most predicted and based on the rosters of the sides above them you would be hard pressed to find anyone who could argue that we have a better squad.
Maguire has not got results and will be the fall guy but he is not the singular reason for our results this year, and your failure to acknowledge that is tiresome. Add to that the lack of respect our club has shown him in recent days, is a reflection of why this club is in the position we are in and why we are consistently in a holding pattern.

Madge said he could win with the squad he had?

And Luke Brooks has said this his team.

So sack them both, that is what happens when people set targets that they don not reach.

There seems to be only one head on the chopping block - yet accountability for continual failure at the club seems to escape some more than others.

Because he needs to be the 1st domino to fall. Hopefully the next coach doesn't need to lie to get the job.

What was the lie?

That he said he could get the existing roster to finals

IMO having belief in yourself and a bunch of young athletes, so called professionals, however ignorant or ill placed, is hardly lying.
 
I understand there is a lot at play in this decision but I reckon the Board needs to show some backbone in backing in Madge. He has been all about the future, fixing the player contract mess & setting us for long-term success. Fans & media get so fixated on the 'now' but should be looking at where we are heading.

1) Look at our Jersey Flegg result this season (and the potential Panthers-like era we could have if we keep these mates together)
2) Look at our recent junior recruitment (Simpkin, Saukurus, Fautimaus etc)
3) Look at our junior stars coming through (Solomone Saukuru, Brandon Tumeth, Justin Matamua to name a few)
4) Look at our good buys in recent seasons (Utoikamanu, Blore, Doeuhi, Laurie, Maumolo, Tuilagi, Simpkins)

To me our team has only a few key parts of the puzzle to assemble (2-3 players with leadership, experience, intensity & aggression in forward pack & halves; some x-factor with strong defence in the backline; and some good assistant coaching support for Madge). We have Sheens, Hastings, Gildart coming in which can all be positives.

Don't get sucked in by the media's focus on headlines & creating disunity.

We need to stay true & let Madge see out his contract. Otherwise the vicious circle starts again!
 
@tiger-ferret said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1477257) said:
@avocadoontoast said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1477247) said:
@tiger-ferret said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1477245) said:
@cochise said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1477234) said:
@telltails said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1477233) said:
@cochise said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1477226) said:
@telltails said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1477222) said:
@cochise said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1477221) said:
@telltails said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1477191) said:
@pawsandclaws1 said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1477170) said:
@tiger-tragic said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1477169) said:
@pawsandclaws1 said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1477161) said:
@tiger-tragic said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1477158) said:
@pawsandclaws1 said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1477152) said:
@pawsandclaws1 said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1477151) said:
@bagnf05 said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1477037) said:
@tyga said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1477035) said:
@hugh1954 said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1477029) said:
Do you think that this is all media attempting to fast track outcomes for their own attention seeking spin that the Tigers should come out strongly to rebuff and condemn this behavior or just remain quiet and get on with the review in their own time

No they are being fed by people in the Tigers covering their tracks in the organisation. Like here it’s turned into a sack Madge discussion. Exactly what it’s designed to do. Distract from the ineptitude of people actually running the club.
People are diminishing the brand of the Tigers to cover their back sides and blaming the coach.

It’s not being spun it’s being fed. People can work out who’s playing the games it’s not Madge to a fault he’s straight down the line with most things.

If they are going to sack him do it already the brand damage of letting the media run with this is worse. They need to be sacked immediately.

The self interest in our club is astonishing. Blame the bloke whose been here 3 years when we were a massive rabble when he arrived. Nothing to see here!! Did Madge hire Cleary? Fail to retain Cleary? Fail to retain multiple dally m medal winners? Sign Packer, Ballin, Anasta, Reynolds, Mbye? No. The lunatics are free in the asylum.

I'd say self interest is certainly a factor. With the Board apparently divided, with the playing group apparently divided and now the supporter base on this forum divided, Maguire needs to fall on his sword if he cares about the club. He's failed and it's time to go.

We need to start healing and that cannot begin until he has departed.

Oh, good grief ...spare us, please. Start "healing"? Seriously?? When a significant proportion of fans and members are pointing the finger at the CEO/Chair/Board and their incompetence and want Maguire retained?

What you're really saying is that your credibility on here is so dependent on Maguie being punted that you're becoming impatient waiting for it to happen.

The obfuscation is outrageous. Stop deflecting and deal with the issue of Maguire failing.

I don't play the man (or woman) so I won't comment on your last paragraph.

While you don't seem to attribute Club leadership and management as having any influence in Maguire "failing", then you're going to be disappointed in 2022 and beyond with whomever the new coach is as they will be "failing" too if those same structural and leadership issues remain as they are, in my opinion.

Our appalling defence for example is Maguire. Conceding 30 points a game and players not knowing what they are supposed to be doing. We're so passive in defence. He's only had 3 years to "fix it" and you want to give him another 2 years?

We've steadily regressed over the last three years. That is also entirely on Maguire.

It is time for a new coach, new ideas, a much improved defence and some hope for the future.

For two years Maguires squad was hamstrung by players taking up the majority of cap space who contributed squat. No coach can have success where your highest paid players don't contribute.
All week we have been listening to the poor Roosters with so much of their cap on the sideline yet they still fielded a team with Teddy Radley JWH Tupuonia Crichton - and got 42 points put on them. For us to get just two of those players would blow our cap out of the water and yet that is their weak side. Any of those players in our team on any given week would have significantly improved our performance. That is what our club competes against and that impacts on the coach.

Maguire was never going to be able to turn things around on the field for us individually in three years even your man Cleary said it would take 5 or so years.
This year's side is full of inconsistencies because of their youth, inexperience and lack of leadership on the field. They finished where most predicted and based on the rosters of the sides above them you would be hard pressed to find anyone who could argue that we have a better squad.
Maguire has not got results and will be the fall guy but he is not the singular reason for our results this year, and your failure to acknowledge that is tiresome. Add to that the lack of respect our club has shown him in recent days, is a reflection of why this club is in the position we are in and why we are consistently in a holding pattern.

Madge said he could win with the squad he had?

And Luke Brooks has said this his team.

So sack them both, that is what happens when people set targets that they don not reach.

There seems to be only one head on the chopping block - yet accountability for continual failure at the club seems to escape some more than others.

Because he needs to be the 1st domino to fall. Hopefully the next coach doesn't need to lie to get the job.

What was the lie?

That he said he could get the existing roster to finals

IMO having belief in yourself and a bunch of young athletes, so called professionals, however ignorant or ill placed, is hardly lying.

But he's changed that narrative. For the first two years he said he could get the club to finals. Now this year when he got under pressure he came out with the "not my roster" line.
 
@weststigerman said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1477253) said:
@avocadoontoast said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1477244) said:
@weststigerman said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1477242) said:
@avocadoontoast said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1477231) said:
@telltails said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1477222) said:
@cochise said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1477221) said:
@telltails said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1477191) said:
@pawsandclaws1 said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1477170) said:
@tiger-tragic said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1477169) said:
@pawsandclaws1 said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1477161) said:
@tiger-tragic said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1477158) said:
@pawsandclaws1 said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1477152) said:
@pawsandclaws1 said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1477151) said:
@bagnf05 said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1477037) said:
@tyga said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1477035) said:
@hugh1954 said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1477029) said:
Do you think that this is all media attempting to fast track outcomes for their own attention seeking spin that the Tigers should come out strongly to rebuff and condemn this behavior or just remain quiet and get on with the review in their own time

No they are being fed by people in the Tigers covering their tracks in the organisation. Like here it’s turned into a sack Madge discussion. Exactly what it’s designed to do. Distract from the ineptitude of people actually running the club.
People are diminishing the brand of the Tigers to cover their back sides and blaming the coach.

It’s not being spun it’s being fed. People can work out who’s playing the games it’s not Madge to a fault he’s straight down the line with most things.

If they are going to sack him do it already the brand damage of letting the media run with this is worse. They need to be sacked immediately.

The self interest in our club is astonishing. Blame the bloke whose been here 3 years when we were a massive rabble when he arrived. Nothing to see here!! Did Madge hire Cleary? Fail to retain Cleary? Fail to retain multiple dally m medal winners? Sign Packer, Ballin, Anasta, Reynolds, Mbye? No. The lunatics are free in the asylum.

I'd say self interest is certainly a factor. With the Board apparently divided, with the playing group apparently divided and now the supporter base on this forum divided, Maguire needs to fall on his sword if he cares about the club. He's failed and it's time to go.

We need to start healing and that cannot begin until he has departed.

Oh, good grief ...spare us, please. Start "healing"? Seriously?? When a significant proportion of fans and members are pointing the finger at the CEO/Chair/Board and their incompetence and want Maguire retained?

What you're really saying is that your credibility on here is so dependent on Maguie being punted that you're becoming impatient waiting for it to happen.

The obfuscation is outrageous. Stop deflecting and deal with the issue of Maguire failing.

I don't play the man (or woman) so I won't comment on your last paragraph.

While you don't seem to attribute Club leadership and management as having any influence in Maguire "failing", then you're going to be disappointed in 2022 and beyond with whomever the new coach is as they will be "failing" too if those same structural and leadership issues remain as they are, in my opinion.

Our appalling defence for example is Maguire. Conceding 30 points a game and players not knowing what they are supposed to be doing. We're so passive in defence. He's only had 3 years to "fix it" and you want to give him another 2 years?

We've steadily regressed over the last three years. That is also entirely on Maguire.

It is time for a new coach, new ideas, a much improved defence and some hope for the future.

For two years Maguires squad was hamstrung by players taking up the majority of cap space who contributed squat. No coach can have success where your highest paid players don't contribute.
All week we have been listening to the poor Roosters with so much of their cap on the sideline yet they still fielded a team with Teddy Radley JWH Tupuonia Crichton - and got 42 points put on them. For us to get just two of those players would blow our cap out of the water and yet that is their weak side. Any of those players in our team on any given week would have significantly improved our performance. That is what our club competes against and that impacts on the coach.

Maguire was never going to be able to turn things around on the field for us individually in three years even your man Cleary said it would take 5 or so years.
This year's side is full of inconsistencies because of their youth, inexperience and lack of leadership on the field. They finished where most predicted and based on the rosters of the sides above them you would be hard pressed to find anyone who could argue that we have a better squad.
Maguire has not got results and will be the fall guy but he is not the singular reason for our results this year, and your failure to acknowledge that is tiresome. Add to that the lack of respect our club has shown him in recent days, is a reflection of why this club is in the position we are in and why we are consistently in a holding pattern.

Madge said he could win with the squad he had?

And Luke Brooks has said this is his team.

Then sack Brooks too. Get rid of them both.

We sack Maguire and we're stuck with Brooks. He will have yet another reprieve until at least the end of next season IMO.

Why? They're not linked. The new coach might think he's rubbish.

Potter, JT, Ivan, and Madge have all tried to fix him. He's on a big contract so he's hard to move. The odds are another coach will try and do the same.

Potter and Taylor could not coach
Cleary had Brooks halfvack of the year
Brooks needs a coach
Madge is not it
Hopefully Sheens can assist Brooks in some capacity and also get Andrew or Mathew Johns in to provide some coaching , it has worked ok with Moses
 
@avocadoontoast said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1477246) said:
@tiger5150 said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1477243) said:
@tyga said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1477035) said:
@hugh1954 said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1477029) said:
Do you think that this is all media attempting to fast track outcomes for their own attention seeking spin that the Tigers should come out strongly to rebuff and condemn this behavior or just remain quiet and get on with the review in their own time

No they are being fed by people in the Tigers covering their tracks in the organisation. Like here it’s turned into a sack Madge discussion. Exactly what it’s designed to do. Distract from the ineptitude of people actually running the club.
People are diminishing the brand of the Tigers to cover their back sides and blaming the coach.

It’s not being spun it’s being fed. People can work out who’s playing the games it’s not Madge to a fault he’s straight down the line with most things.

If they are going to sack him do it already the brand damage of letting the media run with this is worse. They need to be sacked immediately.

Im not convinced that it isnt an orchestrated agenda to get Flanagan the job, especially Chammas.

Does Flanagan have any support within WT though? I've seen Ciraldo speculated amongst others but outside of news limited I haven't seen Flanagan mentioned at all.

I definitely haven't seen much in the way of support for Flanno though obviously have no inside source. The fact he's available, experienced and on record saying he's open to the idea of coaching again suggests he'd be linked to the job even if by coincidence and media speculation. Tbh his name hasn't really been mentioned with much more than a whisper so far, even in here.
 
@tiger-ferret said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1477257) said:
@avocadoontoast said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1477247) said:
@tiger-ferret said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1477245) said:
@cochise said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1477234) said:
@telltails said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1477233) said:
@cochise said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1477226) said:
@telltails said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1477222) said:
@cochise said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1477221) said:
@telltails said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1477191) said:
@pawsandclaws1 said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1477170) said:
@tiger-tragic said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1477169) said:
@pawsandclaws1 said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1477161) said:
@tiger-tragic said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1477158) said:
@pawsandclaws1 said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1477152) said:
@pawsandclaws1 said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1477151) said:
@bagnf05 said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1477037) said:
@tyga said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1477035) said:
@hugh1954 said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1477029) said:
Do you think that this is all media attempting to fast track outcomes for their own attention seeking spin that the Tigers should come out strongly to rebuff and condemn this behavior or just remain quiet and get on with the review in their own time

No they are being fed by people in the Tigers covering their tracks in the organisation. Like here it’s turned into a sack Madge discussion. Exactly what it’s designed to do. Distract from the ineptitude of people actually running the club.
People are diminishing the brand of the Tigers to cover their back sides and blaming the coach.

It’s not being spun it’s being fed. People can work out who’s playing the games it’s not Madge to a fault he’s straight down the line with most things.

If they are going to sack him do it already the brand damage of letting the media run with this is worse. They need to be sacked immediately.

The self interest in our club is astonishing. Blame the bloke whose been here 3 years when we were a massive rabble when he arrived. Nothing to see here!! Did Madge hire Cleary? Fail to retain Cleary? Fail to retain multiple dally m medal winners? Sign Packer, Ballin, Anasta, Reynolds, Mbye? No. The lunatics are free in the asylum.

I'd say self interest is certainly a factor. With the Board apparently divided, with the playing group apparently divided and now the supporter base on this forum divided, Maguire needs to fall on his sword if he cares about the club. He's failed and it's time to go.

We need to start healing and that cannot begin until he has departed.

Oh, good grief ...spare us, please. Start "healing"? Seriously?? When a significant proportion of fans and members are pointing the finger at the CEO/Chair/Board and their incompetence and want Maguire retained?

What you're really saying is that your credibility on here is so dependent on Maguie being punted that you're becoming impatient waiting for it to happen.

The obfuscation is outrageous. Stop deflecting and deal with the issue of Maguire failing.

I don't play the man (or woman) so I won't comment on your last paragraph.

While you don't seem to attribute Club leadership and management as having any influence in Maguire "failing", then you're going to be disappointed in 2022 and beyond with whomever the new coach is as they will be "failing" too if those same structural and leadership issues remain as they are, in my opinion.

Our appalling defence for example is Maguire. Conceding 30 points a game and players not knowing what they are supposed to be doing. We're so passive in defence. He's only had 3 years to "fix it" and you want to give him another 2 years?

We've steadily regressed over the last three years. That is also entirely on Maguire.

It is time for a new coach, new ideas, a much improved defence and some hope for the future.

For two years Maguires squad was hamstrung by players taking up the majority of cap space who contributed squat. No coach can have success where your highest paid players don't contribute.
All week we have been listening to the poor Roosters with so much of their cap on the sideline yet they still fielded a team with Teddy Radley JWH Tupuonia Crichton - and got 42 points put on them. For us to get just two of those players would blow our cap out of the water and yet that is their weak side. Any of those players in our team on any given week would have significantly improved our performance. That is what our club competes against and that impacts on the coach.

Maguire was never going to be able to turn things around on the field for us individually in three years even your man Cleary said it would take 5 or so years.
This year's side is full of inconsistencies because of their youth, inexperience and lack of leadership on the field. They finished where most predicted and based on the rosters of the sides above them you would be hard pressed to find anyone who could argue that we have a better squad.
Maguire has not got results and will be the fall guy but he is not the singular reason for our results this year, and your failure to acknowledge that is tiresome. Add to that the lack of respect our club has shown him in recent days, is a reflection of why this club is in the position we are in and why we are consistently in a holding pattern.

Madge said he could win with the squad he had?

And Luke Brooks has said this his team.

So sack them both, that is what happens when people set targets that they don not reach.

There seems to be only one head on the chopping block - yet accountability for continual failure at the club seems to escape some more than others.

Because he needs to be the 1st domino to fall. Hopefully the next coach doesn't need to lie to get the job.

What was the lie?

That he said he could get the existing roster to finals

IMO having belief in yourself and a bunch of young athletes, so called professionals, however ignorant or ill placed, is hardly lying.

I don't think he was lying, my post was in response to people saying he just said that to get the job and didn't believe it.

I think he stated a goal and failed to reach it.
 
@blackwhitegold said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1477258) said:
I understand there is a lot at play in this decision but I reckon the Board needs to show some backbone in backing in Madge. He has been all about the future, fixing the player contract mess & setting us for long-term success. Fans & media get so fixated on the 'now' but should be looking at where we are heading.

1) Look at our Jersey Flegg result this season (and the potential Panthers-like era we could have if we keep these mates together)
2) Look at our recent junior recruitment (Simpkin, Saukurus, Fautimaus etc)
3) Look at our junior stars coming through (Solomone Saukuru, Brandon Tumeth, Justin Matamua to name a few)
4) Look at our good buys in recent seasons (Utoikamanu, Blore, Doeuhi, Laurie, Maumolo, Tuilagi, Simpkins)

To me our team has only a few key parts of the puzzle to assemble (2-3 players with leadership, experience, intensity & aggression in forward pack & halves; some x-factor with strong defence in the backline; and some good assistant coaching support for Madge). We have Sheens, Hastings, Gildart coming in which can all be positives.

Don't get sucked in by the media's focus on headlines & creating disunity.

We need to stay true & let Madge see out his contract. Otherwise the vicious circle starts again!

Keeping Madge for 2 more years will destroy the club to the point of no return. We need someone who can attract players, coach well or preferably both. His last 5 seasons have proven he can't coach in the modern game.
 
@blackwhitegold said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1477258) said:
I understand there is a lot at play in this decision but I reckon the Board needs to show some backbone in backing in Madge. He has been all about the future, fixing the player contract mess & setting us for long-term success. Fans & media get so fixated on the 'now' but should be looking at where we are heading.

1) Look at our Jersey Flegg result this season (and the potential Panthers-like era we could have if we keep these mates together)
2) Look at our recent junior recruitment (Simpkin, Saukurus, Fautimaus etc)
3) Look at our junior stars coming through (Solomone Saukuru, Brandon Tumeth, Justin Matamua to name a few)
4) Look at our good buys in recent seasons (Utoikamanu, Blore, Doeuhi, Laurie, Maumolo, Tuilagi, Simpkins)

To me our team has only a few key parts of the puzzle to assemble (2-3 players with leadership, experience, intensity & aggression in forward pack & halves; some x-factor with strong defence in the backline; and some good assistant coaching support for Madge). We have Sheens, Hastings, Gildart coming in which can all be positives.

Don't get sucked in by the media's focus on headlines & creating disunity.

We need to stay true & let Madge see out his contract. Otherwise the vicious circle starts again!

Your reasons are actually my reasons for moving him on, we have some green shoots, but I don't think Madge is the right person to take advantage of that.
 
@jedi_tiger said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1477261) said:
@weststigerman said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1477253) said:
@avocadoontoast said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1477244) said:
@weststigerman said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1477242) said:
@avocadoontoast said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1477231) said:
@telltails said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1477222) said:
@cochise said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1477221) said:
@telltails said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1477191) said:
@pawsandclaws1 said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1477170) said:
@tiger-tragic said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1477169) said:
@pawsandclaws1 said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1477161) said:
@tiger-tragic said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1477158) said:
@pawsandclaws1 said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1477152) said:
@pawsandclaws1 said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1477151) said:
@bagnf05 said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1477037) said:
@tyga said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1477035) said:
@hugh1954 said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1477029) said:
Do you think that this is all media attempting to fast track outcomes for their own attention seeking spin that the Tigers should come out strongly to rebuff and condemn this behavior or just remain quiet and get on with the review in their own time

No they are being fed by people in the Tigers covering their tracks in the organisation. Like here it’s turned into a sack Madge discussion. Exactly what it’s designed to do. Distract from the ineptitude of people actually running the club.
People are diminishing the brand of the Tigers to cover their back sides and blaming the coach.

It’s not being spun it’s being fed. People can work out who’s playing the games it’s not Madge to a fault he’s straight down the line with most things.

If they are going to sack him do it already the brand damage of letting the media run with this is worse. They need to be sacked immediately.

The self interest in our club is astonishing. Blame the bloke whose been here 3 years when we were a massive rabble when he arrived. Nothing to see here!! Did Madge hire Cleary? Fail to retain Cleary? Fail to retain multiple dally m medal winners? Sign Packer, Ballin, Anasta, Reynolds, Mbye? No. The lunatics are free in the asylum.

I'd say self interest is certainly a factor. With the Board apparently divided, with the playing group apparently divided and now the supporter base on this forum divided, Maguire needs to fall on his sword if he cares about the club. He's failed and it's time to go.

We need to start healing and that cannot begin until he has departed.

Oh, good grief ...spare us, please. Start "healing"? Seriously?? When a significant proportion of fans and members are pointing the finger at the CEO/Chair/Board and their incompetence and want Maguire retained?

What you're really saying is that your credibility on here is so dependent on Maguie being punted that you're becoming impatient waiting for it to happen.

The obfuscation is outrageous. Stop deflecting and deal with the issue of Maguire failing.

I don't play the man (or woman) so I won't comment on your last paragraph.

While you don't seem to attribute Club leadership and management as having any influence in Maguire "failing", then you're going to be disappointed in 2022 and beyond with whomever the new coach is as they will be "failing" too if those same structural and leadership issues remain as they are, in my opinion.

Our appalling defence for example is Maguire. Conceding 30 points a game and players not knowing what they are supposed to be doing. We're so passive in defence. He's only had 3 years to "fix it" and you want to give him another 2 years?

We've steadily regressed over the last three years. That is also entirely on Maguire.

It is time for a new coach, new ideas, a much improved defence and some hope for the future.

For two years Maguires squad was hamstrung by players taking up the majority of cap space who contributed squat. No coach can have success where your highest paid players don't contribute.
All week we have been listening to the poor Roosters with so much of their cap on the sideline yet they still fielded a team with Teddy Radley JWH Tupuonia Crichton - and got 42 points put on them. For us to get just two of those players would blow our cap out of the water and yet that is their weak side. Any of those players in our team on any given week would have significantly improved our performance. That is what our club competes against and that impacts on the coach.

Maguire was never going to be able to turn things around on the field for us individually in three years even your man Cleary said it would take 5 or so years.
This year's side is full of inconsistencies because of their youth, inexperience and lack of leadership on the field. They finished where most predicted and based on the rosters of the sides above them you would be hard pressed to find anyone who could argue that we have a better squad.
Maguire has not got results and will be the fall guy but he is not the singular reason for our results this year, and your failure to acknowledge that is tiresome. Add to that the lack of respect our club has shown him in recent days, is a reflection of why this club is in the position we are in and why we are consistently in a holding pattern.

Madge said he could win with the squad he had?

And Luke Brooks has said this is his team.

Then sack Brooks too. Get rid of them both.

We sack Maguire and we're stuck with Brooks. He will have yet another reprieve until at least the end of next season IMO.

Why? They're not linked. The new coach might think he's rubbish.

Potter, JT, Ivan, and Madge have all tried to fix him. He's on a big contract so he's hard to move. The odds are another coach will try and do the same.

Potter and Taylor could not coach
Cleary had Brooks halfvack of the year
Brooks needs a coach
Madge is not it
Hopefully Sheens can assist Brooks in some capacity and also get Andrew or Mathew Johns in to provide some coaching , it has worked ok with Moses

Moses is and always has been an Alpha. No coach will change Brooks's mentality. Ever.
 

Latest posts

Members online

Back
Top