gallagher
Well-known member
Hoopers right
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
@tiger5150 said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1478109) said:@rihannafan1 said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1478106) said:@gallagher said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1477425) said:@rihannafan1 said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1477420) said:@jirskyr said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1477417) said:@rihannafan1 said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1477413) said:@tiger-ferret said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1476977) said:@rihannafan1 said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1476974) said:@tiger-ferret said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1476953) said:@tony-soprano said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1476951) said:@851 said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1476938) said:@tiger-ferret said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1476931) said:@851 said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1476924) said:@jc99 said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1476900) said:Madge's position is already untenable.... if the board is split on the decision he should go.
A well run club would not proceed with a coach that half the board want gone, he would be gone end of story, but I did say well run club.
So then how do you read the situation if the board is split on who they replace him with?
I read it as they want Ciraldo, but they are wetting their pants with all the bad media and are second guessing what punting Madge will look like in the media.
A well run club would have another coach lined up, maybe they have I don't know, but they would announce Madge is gone and they thank him but are now moving in another direction.
I just can't see how Madge can stay knowing there are half the board or more who want him sacked, it's untenable now
If they want ciraldo they can just sack madge and say their doing their " due process "
And if Ciraldo falls through? As if that wouldn’t make the media.
You mean if Ciraldo backs out of his agreement with the club? There's way too much smoke for there not to be a fire.
He may have signed a heads of agreement…
haha what a farce that Heads of Agreement comment from Lee was.
Not really, it prevented JAC from signing on with someone else for 2021.
Okay but he still didn't sign with us and is still going where he wanted to.
I know I feel all warm and fuzzy knowing the heads of agreement kept JAC at Melbourne for another year.
What an achievement for our club hey?
Some just can't bare to see how garbage our management is mate.
Some can't bear it but @jirskyr certainly can.
This place needs to move away from the personal attacks. On what basis is it necessary to make personal attacks?
@willow said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1478107) said:Sacked to saved in 6 hours: How ‘circus act’ Tigers flipped on Maguire
JAMES HOOPER from Fox Sports
September 21st, 2021 6:23 pm
On Monday morning word went around the Wests Tigers were preparing to read Michael Maguire his last rites as head coach at the club.
An email was sent informing board members about a 4pm meeting and a statement was drafted confirming Madge was no longer to be the Wests Tigers coach.
At 2.30pm Maguire fronted the Wests Tigers football committee charged with determining the fate of the head coach to plead his case via Zoom.
Whatever Maguire said to under pressure CEO Justin Pascoe, chairman Lee Hagipantelis and board members Simon Cook, Rick Wayde and Danny Stapleton, the pitch worked.
Because in the space of six hours Madge went from being out the door at Concord immediately to being the club’s head coach for a fourth straight season.
The 4pm board meeting was then cancelled as the football committee mulled over Maguire’s admission of his own shortcomings and his vision for 2022.
There were promises made about a complete overhaul of the Tigers football department.
By Tuesday morning the club was drafting an entirely different statement confirming Madge had survived the internal football club review and will remain Wests Tigers coach for 2022.
Head of football performance Tim Sheens has since been informed he will move into a football coaching director role sitting on top of the NRL side.
The sole casualty out of the all-encompassing internal review?
Assistant coach Wayne Collins. Yep, “Snoopy” is the only member of the Wests Tigers coaching staff who is gone for 2022. For now.
One of rugby league’s genuine good guys, it says everything about those who sit in the Tigers front office.
In the statement released on Tuesday Pascoe said: “We are firmly committed to building a high performing club. With our strong financial position, increased investment and recent success of our pathways teams, the new centre of excellence and continued work on a South West academy, the arrival of Tim Sheens and his experience in NRL systems, this club is posed to reap the rewards of several years of hard work.”
Firstly, we think he means “poised” to reap – not posed (SIC).
More importantly, Tigers members and fans are fed-up with the model diagrams of the Centre of Excellence and the corporate mumbo jumbo quotes.
During Pascoe’s six-year tenure, Wests Tigers have failed to make the finals every single season.
In the past three years, they’ve gone backwards.
Fans couldn’t care about the off-field success of the business when the on-field results are a road to nowhere.
Sheens, 71, is the great hope of the side to fix the mess.
The first immediate challenge will be trying to intelligently spend the $1.6 million the club still has out of its $9.3 million salary cap for next year.
The Tigers still have four spots available on the club’s NRL roster with the challenge of signing players one of the biggest pitfalls of Maguire’s tenure.
Joe Ofahengaue, James Tamou, BJ Leilua and James Roberts have hardly turned the club’s fortunes around.
Jackson Hastings and Oliver Gildart arrive from the UK Super League shortly but aside from that the Tigers are rolling into 2022 with a roster widely-regarded as simply not up to NRL standard.
Tigers power brokers have guaranteed they will refrain from giving Maguire a six to eight week deadline and will instead push all-in on Madge for next year.
But how would you know what might happen if there’s another 66-16 debacle like what we witnessed against the Melbourne Storm on the Sunshine Coast.
Sheens will be a genius if he can improve the perception of the club amongst the remaining 15 NRL sides.
Because from an outside perspective the Wests Tigers are a complete circus act.
After the last 48 hours, all that’s remaining is for the club to bring out the bearded lady.
@tigerbuck63 said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1478007) said:@needaname said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1477945) said:Since this is the thread for all things relevant to change I found reading these two articles back to back from 1 year apart interesting.
Quotes from Garry Jack in both.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.foxsports.com.au/nrl/nrl-premiership/wests-tigers-should-be-sydneys-nrl-giants-but-theyre-lightweights-because-of-this-flawed-strategy/news-story/08444b481dbd01e8e53c4be36f4420d5
https://www.foxsports.com.au/nrl/nrl-premiership/nrl-2021-michael-maguire-wests-tigers-review-coach-board-meeting-justin-pascoe-reaction-latest-news-updates/news-story/be69adca51d9a291e56a68c3e691bdd6
Yes could not agree more with Gary Jack.
Personally it was a 50/50 call, i was at the final game this season and we have no leaders in the team nor a game plan.
I put that down to Madge and his selection policy in maintaining non performing players???
If the club has back him i have too, i do know on a plus side he cares about the club and wants to see it prosper and he does does work tirelessly at this task.
So attention should focus on Pascoe now as he signs off on players contracts and think he should go as someone needs to be held accountable for 2021 if not Madge.
@willow said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1478107) said:In the statement released on Tuesday Pascoe said: “We are firmly committed to building a high performing club. With our strong financial position, increased investment and recent success of our pathways teams, the new centre of excellence and continued work on a South West academy, the arrival of Tim Sheens and his experience in NRL systems, this club is posed to reap the rewards of several years of hard work.”
Firstly, we think he means “poised” to reap – not posed (SIC).
@tigerjunior4 said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1478111) said:@tiger5150 said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1478077) said:@tigerjunior4 said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1477993) said:@cochise said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1477960) said:@tigerjunior4 said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1477957) said:@cochise said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1477929) said:@tigerjunior4 said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1477928) said:I’ve just read the SMH report and what struck me as weird was the concern from the board that there needed to be greater connection between the club and the football department.
From the chairs and CEO’s previous communication, it seems the separation between the football department and club was intentional given Pascoe and the board has no football intelligence. I remember at the start of this review the chair laying the blame on the football department and going to painstaking lengths to praise the financial performance of the front office. It’s hypocritical bs that the board have laid the blame at Madge’s feet for the org structure and delineation of duties and responsibilities and that’s coming from someone who wanted Madge gone.
This is just one example of mixed messaging and diabolical communication from the club. I remember when Taylor got sacked, the club refused to acknowledge he was the wrong choice (clearly he was), the Pangai Jnr situation was embarrassing and unprofessional and yesterday’s cancelled board meeting was just a train wreck from start to finish. Communication may seem like a minor detail but poor communication creates uncertainty and an unstable working environment. It makes us seem outwardly unprofessional and chaotic, and degrades our integrity. Also it points to deeper issues of a lack of strategic direction both on and off the field.
Sorry for the long-winded rant guys I’ve just never been more disappointed and ashamed of the club.
Why was the cancelled board meeting embarrassing?
I find it embarrassing because it was a knee-jerk reaction to media reports and another back-flip by the club. It makes the board look spineless and indecisive because they can’t make a decision and allow that decision to be scrutinised. No matter what field you’re in any decision will likely be criticised but that doesn’t mean you shouldn’t be decisive. It just means that you should have the rationale and evidence to augment any decisions/stance. This seems lost on the board.
Madge presented to the Football committee yesterday and the board decided to think on it over night, it doesn't mean there was a backflip.
I felt the board lost their nerve after criticism from the media. I get the board needed to consider Madge’s response but I can’t see how Madge’s response would have differed that greatly to the commentary/feedback he gave during the review process.
Based on?
Doesnt Occams Razor and the known facts all point towards the board/club actually doing things properly?
Doing things right like missing the finals the past ten years? Can you point to anything the board is actually doing right?
@tigerjunior4 said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1478113) said:@tiger5150 said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1478060) said:@tigerjunior4 said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1477928) said:I’ve just read the SMH report and what struck me as weird was the concern from the board that there needed to be greater connection between the club and the football department.
From the chairs and CEO’s previous communication, it seems the separation between the football department and club was intentional given Pascoe and the board has no football intelligence. I remember at the start of this review the chair laying the blame on the football department and going to painstaking lengths to praise the financial performance of the front office. It’s hypocritical bs that the board have laid the blame at Madge’s feet for the org structure and delineation of duties and responsibilities and that’s coming from someone who wanted Madge gone.
This is just one example of mixed messaging and diabolical communication from the club. I remember when Taylor got sacked, the club refused to acknowledge he was the wrong choice (clearly he was), the Pangai Jnr situation was embarrassing and unprofessional and yesterday’s cancelled board meeting was just a train wreck from start to finish. Communication may seem like a minor detail but poor communication creates uncertainty and an unstable working environment. It makes us seem outwardly unprofessional and chaotic, and degrades our integrity. Also it points to deeper issues of a lack of strategic direction both on and off the field.
Sorry for the long-winded rant guys I’ve just never been more disappointed and ashamed of the club.
It has been written by Michael Chammas, the same guy who has been running an agenda against Madge for months and lying for a week.
Doesn’t change the inconsistent stances and messages coming out of the club.
@needaname said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1478119) said:I also enjoyed reading the NRL economists article back then and have heard him say similar regarding the benefit of plenty of growth in a squad compared to plenty of experience.
@jirskyr said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1478122) said:@willow said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1478107) said:In the statement released on Tuesday Pascoe said: “We are firmly committed to building a high performing club. With our strong financial position, increased investment and recent success of our pathways teams, the new centre of excellence and continued work on a South West academy, the arrival of Tim Sheens and his experience in NRL systems, this club is posed to reap the rewards of several years of hard work.”
Firstly, we think he means “poised” to reap – not posed (SIC).
Clear enough then that the official Tigers word goes through the SMH and no official comments are provided to Pooper and Fox, because he's quoting off the official statement that everyone received.
Where does Pooper get off calling out someone else's typos? I imagine Pascoe doesn't have an editor to catch all his mistakes like Pooper does. What a scumbag dope.
@willow said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1478120) said:“He has been kept in the dark all along re: developments with Michael Maguire, ‘Snoopy’ Collins the assistant and they’ve appointed him with all his experience and he wasn’t part of the decision… I find it outrageous.”
@willow said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1478120) said:‘Outrageous’: Buzz reveals Tigers ‘kept Sheens in the dark’ over Madge call
Staff Writers from Fox Sports
September 21st, 2021 7:13 pm
After Michael Maguire was spared the axe on Tuesday, The Daily Telegraph’s Phil Rothfield has revealed incoming football guru Tim Sheens wasn’t consulted on the decision to keep ‘Madge’ in post.
Maguire was given a reprieve by the club on Tuesday after 48 hours of fevered speculation that he was about to be given the sack by the joint venture club.
The Tigers hierarchy released a statement saying they were willing to give Maguire to turn the club around.
But speaking on NRL360 on Fox League, Rothfield said Sheens had not be asked for his view on Maguire’s future.
“This is what I find quite stunning,” Rothfield said.
“He was originally employed as a consultant.
“Then their review came along and he was promoted to be director of coaching.
“When they did that Zoom meeting and he wasn’t part of it.
“He has been kept in the dark all along re: developments with Michael Maguire, ‘Snoopy’ Collins the assistant and they’ve appointed him with all his experience and he wasn’t part of the decision… I find it outrageous.”
Rothfield’s Daily Telegraph colleague, Paul Kent, said that the club were beginning to work out that the issues at the club didn’t lie solely with Maguire.
“There’s no single answer to what’s wrong at the club,” Kent said.
“It’s not just one person, the club is realising that.
“Every coach who has been there has been slaughtered by the club except for Ivan Cleary who walked out on them. None of them have coached since, they’ve all been reduced to minor roles here or there.
“There’s a smell around the club and that it’s not just Michael Maguire. Their recruitment problems are not just the coach, it’s the club.
“Everybody – and this happens at smaller clubs – in a bid to help each other out is helping out in other areas.
“When one area starts to not fire, in recruitment for example, because they can’t attract big talent, Michael Maguire has to get involved in negotiations.
“He’s been distracted and this is happening right throughout the club.”
@eyeofthetiger-0 said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1478072) said:@willow said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1478044) said:Time will tell whether the line drawn in the sand was the right one. I'm glad a decision has at least been made, but I'm very dubious whether the changes the WT will implement across its football department will result in improved performances.
I still don't think Madge is the right guy to get the most of this squad - unless there is some miraculous (and I mean that in every sense of the word) change in attitude next season, we're bringing home the spoon. New assistant coaches may provide some benefit, but I think the board, and the entire structure of the board needs to change.
The bigger issues of recruitment rest with Madge and Hartigan, and I'm far from convinced we're going to improve in this regard. I still don't think we've hit rock bottom yet, and that worries me.
With Sheens onboard and In a more hands on role, no more excuses For Madge. If no improvement next year, especially after the first couple of rounds, he is sacked. He has no more excuses.
@jirskyr said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1478128) said:@needaname said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1478119) said:I also enjoyed reading the NRL economists article back then and have heard him say similar regarding the benefit of plenty of growth in a squad compared to plenty of experience.
I'm sorry Ramy Haidar is a Class-A dope. His articles are trash, his arguments are superficial and I've heard him on podcasts and it's banal.
@geo said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1478129) said:@jirskyr said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1478122) said:@willow said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1478107) said:In the statement released on Tuesday Pascoe said: “We are firmly committed to building a high performing club. With our strong financial position, increased investment and recent success of our pathways teams, the new centre of excellence and continued work on a South West academy, the arrival of Tim Sheens and his experience in NRL systems, this club is posed to reap the rewards of several years of hard work.”
Firstly, we think he means “poised” to reap – not posed (SIC).
Clear enough then that the official Tigers word goes through the SMH and no official comments are provided to Pooper and Fox, because he's quoting off the official statement that everyone received.
Where does Pooper get off calling out someone else's typos? I imagine Pascoe doesn't have an editor to catch all his mistakes like Pooper does. What a scumbag dope.
I'm still trying to work out who Phil Kent is from Poopers article yesterday..