BAGNF05
Well-known member
@pawsandclaws1 said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1468564) said:@bagnf05 said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1468563) said:@pawsandclaws1 said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1468559) said:@bagnf05 said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1468549) said:@pawsandclaws1 said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1468515) said:@pawsandclaws1 said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1468495) said:@bagnf05 said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1468491) said:@pawsandclaws1 said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1468490) said:@bagnf05 said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1468487) said:@pawsandclaws1 said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1468486) said:@bagnf05 said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1468484) said:@pawsandclaws1 said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1468483) said:@bagnf05 said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1468482) said:@pawsandclaws1 said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1468479) said:@bagnf05 said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1468473) said:@pawsandclaws1 said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1468461) said:The most pain less option is to exercise the mechanism the club apparently has written into Maguire's contract extension (as reported by Chammas). If true, the WTs were aware of concerns about Maguire's relationships with players since April 21. These concerns were serious enough to have that mechanism included (and thankfully it was written into his extension). Perhaps our Chairman and CEO are on top of this matter? It certainly seems that way.
If only they put clauses into the contracts of former high paid recruits that said they had to contribute something (anything) to the club. They’re on top of nothing but constant failure.
How can you write that? The Club acted and inserted this clause to protect it from a huge payout. It appears a very sensible course of action.
Coach wasn’t the problem before and while it may seem that way to you, its not now. No coach has been given an NRL quality roster by the WT administration since 2011-12.
This dates back to Apr 21. Obviously the Club considered what they knew to be serious enough to include a clause in his contract extension. Smoke, fire, form.
Players get their nose out of joint when you tell them they are not good enough. Wow big surprise. I thought Madge came here to fix the place.
This is not about the players. The Club made the decision to include this mechanism in the contract extension as reported by Chammas.
What mechanisms? Did it say, we expect you to win with a bottom 4 roster or we can sack you and replace you with another poor sucker.
It's the mechanism to end his contract with minor pain in terms of payout as reported by Chammas.
Copy and paste it into our playing contracts and we’ve actually solved a problem.
deleted
Cancel culture too. What a surprise
No mate, the article to which I referred is posted on this Forum by a moderator in a separate thread. I am just a supporter like you. It is too heated at present and it is easy to lose sight of the fact we are all WTs supporters.
Sorry mate, I agree. This joint is pretty toxic.
I feel strongly that this is a time for major major change so I won’t hold back on my opinion
I respect we each have different opinions. I just hope it works out for WTs.
If Pascoe delivers success to Wests Tigers I will pay for a decent hair cut