If you had no issues with him being a dud signing why do you keep defending it? Your comparing idris who is 26yrs old and was healthy when he came to us and would have most likely done a medical. To signing a 32yr old who had done his knee and was unwanted by his club. Blind freddy could have told you it was a bad signing. 2 years later and 63 minutes of football tells you thats the case. It doesnt matter who signed him. JT is gone, stop trying to defend his legacy as you keep bringing his name up. The farah train left a long time ago and it also seems you havent moved on from him. Doesnt matter who signed him and who he replaced, dud signing full stop.
Mate, you got banned for having a complete meltdown about JT after he was sacked, so its a bit rich pointing the finger at others for still bringing him up. And i'm not defending him being a dud signing, you seem to conveniently overlook the part where i said he was just that. I do feel the need to defend him as a person though as people have a personal vandetta against him because he was a pawn in the game. Don't try and deny it. I've never seen a player at our club get injured and some react with joy. Maybe it isn't because they don't like him personally, maybe they are just taking satisfaction out of being proven right, which in itself is a bit sad to be hoping a guy gets injured so it can justify your point.
What other player has played 63 minutes in 2 years. Its stating facts. Why would anyone have a personal vendetta against him. He is a dud signing , but you try to justify it by saying he is a top bloke. Name 1 person who has a personal vendetta against him? Sounds like your imagination .
What are you reading, i'm not justifying anything. I'm saying that most who are calling him a dud signing seem to have something personal against him. As for who they are, almost everyone who is pro-Farah and anti-JT. Anyway, this is going to go round in circles. Enjoy your weekend.
