Michael jackson

Have read heaps of poor content in threads on here before, but this one takes the cake. 120 odd posts and close to a century of crap.
 
@cochise & myself are long time forum-sparing partners & mates. We've chatted directly before the Michael Jackson saga, we've been chatting tonight, we're on the same page DP. No dramas
 
@Dan_Blanco said:
@cochise & myself are long time forum-sparing partners & mates. We’ve chatted directly before the Michael Jackson saga, we’ve been chatting tonight, we’re on the same page DP. No dramas

Agreed, we are 100% all good. We don't always agree, but that is what makes forums fun and interesting!
 
While he clearly had mental issues, i don’t think he was a child molester. He didn’t help his cause by promoting the fact he shared his bed with children, as innocent as it might have been intended to be. He was his own worst enemy at times, bringing his troubles on himself. He really was Peter Pan. He never grew up.
 
Who would of thought

I guessed this subject would be as easy as ABC or even 123

I was wrong

What annoys me in all this is you have to question parents who let their kids stay at a persons place who is single and doesn't have kids of his own and isn't family
 
@GNR4LIFE said:
he shared his bed with children, as innocent as it might have been intended to be. He was his own worst enemy at times, bringing his troubles

Quote for truth eh…
Sums up how I feel.
 
So if a 45yo average joe shared his bed with children would be OK as innocent as it might be…OK
 
Everyone clearly stated and agrees the situation was odd.
Unexplainable even.

If it's questionable it's not OK.
 
No one was condoning it 🙄

I clearly stated he had mental issues and sharing his bed with children was problematic.
 
Sharing his bed with children not his own ,is not problematic.
In NSW, its likely to be illegal.I think you would find Family and Community Affairs would see this as child abuse as defined by the legislation.
Yes I know it was in LA not NSW.
Child Abuse does not necessarily involve molestation. Just by way of example, an attack on the mother is deemed to be an attack on the child even if the child was not injured. Just saying…....
 
I think he thought it was innocent…
and others thought it was unacceptable - how we all feel also.
so they decided to exploit it for $$ and through mud on his name.

as we all know... mud sticks.
the guy essentially ruined his own career.
 
I wouldn't let my kids do that, no way. But MJ himself thought it was okay, hence why he got into so much trouble, as he (probably) just kept doing it and didn't understand why he was getting into trouble.
 
I find it difficult to believe he was so naive. I also find it incredulous that a bunch of parents allowed it to happen by default. They should have to face the music (no pun intended).
 
The parents I hope knew it wasn't true, and just wanted the cash of settlements. Either that or they believed he was innocent.
 
The parents were, at best, negligent. There is no way on this planet I'd let either of my kids stay with a single male overnight, even if it is someone I know reasonably well. Jacko/Sicko
 

Members online

Back
Top