Moses Suli

@ said:
@ said:
What are contracts worth these days??

We've had one mega-tool tank games that was blatantly obvious to everyone so he could transfer to another club, while playing the emotionally damaged card as well. Now we have a teenager who was offered huge dollars before he even played 1st grade (correct me if I'm wrong on that one), who now decides he thinks the grass is greener elsewhere so he'll sleep in the car while his team mates are slugging their guts out to get his own way!

SURELY something can be done where maybe a penalty can be put in place when one party backs out on their deal.

From what I understand the club bent over backwards to accommodate the young fellow, and he still bails!

Hopefully this is all for the better…Rant finished

I agree somewhat, but when clubs are always moving players on to tip at better players or get out of salary cap trouble, we can't bemoan the players when they do the same and want out because it benefits them.

If players want out, they should have to pay a contract breach fee, and the clubs should wear a salary cap penalty (even if they take a bath on the contract payout.)

I suppose if both parties agree, a contract is worth nothing.

But in the case of that "thing" that went to Parra last year, that kind of behavior needs to be outlawed. We are talking about professional sports people here..
 
https://twitter.com/NBWT__/status/958997048790888448
Snippet from a DT article.
 
Win/win for mine.
He was on an outrageous contract worse than the ridiciulous ones Broses were given and delivered little. His only asset was size for his age. He had a long way to go before he earned his dough. Terrible signing that should lead to the dismissal of the moron who drew it up. On the upside, his 'departure' allows us to spend his money on a first grade quality player. So we dont have him infecting the playing group and we have his money.
Like I said, win/win.
 
I don't think we can properly judge this for another 6-12 months. If he doesn't come to anything at Canterbury, or they shop him on, we know we did right. A la BMM.

If he comes good at Canterbury, either the change of scenery / reality check did the job or we have an indicator of WT being unable to properly manage or motivate Suli. A la Andrew Fifita.

I choose to assume at this time we've been diligent and this is the best move. Time may prove otherwise and so be it. But I do applaud the coach being fairly strict about what he expects from players. More than anything, letting players rest on their laurels / get special treatment / be pea-hearts is a hallmark of old regimes.

What I would LOVE is Tigers to sign a big name player really soon, to give some further explanation to why Suli was let go. We rarely seem to do this, rarely move players on and very suddenly make a strong signing afterwards.
 
He had stress fractures in his lower back in 2016 which put him out after 3 games for the season. Pretty sure the ankle injury in 2017 was ligament and repaired. The recurrence of stress fractures I heard about were in his back again.
 
He has gone to the dogs and was a million to one to play for the first 8 weeks. We have done very well.
 
@ said:
@ said:
@ said:
@ said:
Thats a fair enough assumption but this whole notion of not rating and or righting off good players when they leave us is wearing thin with me.
Players will always be transient which is not a big problem if you replace them with better ones or even ones just as good.
If we sign someone who is of equal ability to replace him I will be accept that, but until then, I see this as nothing more than a good decision for the Dogs.

Boo hoo!

Yep - and you keep trying to convince your self its a good thing for the club to lose talented players to other clubs.

No not at all. I don't have to convince myself of anything because Wests Tigers haven't 'lost' anything.
You just don't get it do you? Wests Tigers have gained not lost.
You have this fixation of Suli as some super player. He had talent, bad ankles and a bad attitude to go with it. Reality is, he's a potential player that didn't want to play with WT. Let's just say, he didn't reach his potential.
The club did what they could to turn him around but it didn't work because he didn't care enough to make it happen. Meanwhile back at Concord, a team, Wests Tigers are putting in some big effort for the coming season. While megabucks Suli sleeps in a car.
Get it yet?
Otherwise, keep trying to convince yourself that we've lost something worthwhile.
Good riddance!

NT - I dont have a fixation with Suli. I didnt sign him for 1.3.mill our club did, as the next big thing and we were told as much.
No mention of bad ankles or bad attitude then, in fact quite the opposite a priority during negs with what use to be referred to as the "big 4."-and like many I thought it was very risky.
However, his performances as an 18 year old in the FG showed enough to suggest that there was some validity for doing so. So good move - and last week most would agree he was in our plans for the next couple of years and hopefully beyond..
This week because we discover he is no longer at the club and at another club, we get the wrong attitude explanation and bad ankles and its good riddance and of course a threat to this new culture we are building.
All very well but - the Dogs are prepared to take on the bad attitude and ankles and we are less another young talent. The message I get from our club is give some attitude and the Tigers will release you and someone else will sign you on and we all buy it as developing a better culture.
When and if the club announce a suitable replacement fair enough all good. - but otherwise the inabilty of our club to manage young men with reportedly bad attitudes is just not cutting it for me.anymore especially when just 12 months prior they were prepared to offer a mammoth contract to secure him - Now he will go play with the dogs who are willing to find a place for him without him being a threat to their so called "culture".
The only good outcome is the fact we are reportedly not paying him anything. Thankful for that at least.
 
Suli going is the best thing to happen in this situation. Cleary doesn't have time to cater to players having a whinge and not putting in. We need some success this season and it will only come if we have the right attitude as a team. One bad egg can really make the place toxic and I'm glad he's gone - it also sends a message to the other guys. We're here to help, but only if you'll accept it.

The NRL is littered with stories like this one…just glad we weren't desperate enough to have to keep him. Finally we have the luxury of some depth.

If we sign a top class player because of this, we'll be in a better position than we are now.
 
Exactly so. As I said earlier, the mistake WT made was signing him for too much too soon. As for attitude, Cleary showed him the door. Getting rid of him was not a mistake.
 
I don't care what kind of potential Suli has. Cleary and Pascoe have drawn a clear line in the sand and set a precedent for the other players. That will be far more valuable than Suli's potential.
 
Lets not forget he was punted from parra as well early on, before they had a change of heart, and other clubs were circling…it was a panicky signing...but hes been punted before
 
The Tigers up until this stage like it or lump have always been a stepping stone for these over privileged kids with entitlements.
Suli said so himself in one of the articles.
The bulldogs contract was there at the time and he signed with us. His words “it was a better opportunity at the time with the Tigers” translate that to Tim Simona just got dumped and I have a first grade spot available that no one will contest me for. When does he drop the ball? As soon as we announce some more senior signings and all of a sudden he needs a change of scenery to betterment his career.
Now I have my theory that Suli has already been paid a large part of his 1.3 sallary in his first year in order for us to fit more into the bus this year, but that is only an assumption. But if true it would explain the reason he would no longer need the Tigers and the fact the Bulldogs hierarchy are boasting that they’ve signed up the kid for half the money we signed him for….
I’m not so confident we didn’t walk away from this without some sort of cost.
Anyway. Cleary being a lesser fan of up and comers and more proven players I’d expect this to be the last time we pay overs just to keep a kid that believes his already made it.
This was the one bidding war we shouldn’t of got into.
Do we have an administration problem with managing problem child’s.
Yes.
But until we are seen as a destination and not a hop for these kids we are not going to win that battle.
Do the power clubs have better systems in place for managing such players?
Potentially, but you’ve got to remember the other teams have the draw of the players actually wanting to REPRESENT the club, not just play football for them and that is the big difference between us and the big players at the moment.
 
@ said:
@ said:
@ said:
@ said:
Boo hoo!

Yep - and you keep trying to convince your self its a good thing for the club to lose talented players to other clubs.

No not at all. I don't have to convince myself of anything because Wests Tigers haven't 'lost' anything.
You just don't get it do you? Wests Tigers have gained not lost.
You have this fixation of Suli as some super player. He had talent, bad ankles and a bad attitude to go with it. Reality is, he's a potential player that didn't want to play with WT. Let's just say, he didn't reach his potential.
The club did what they could to turn him around but it didn't work because he didn't care enough to make it happen. Meanwhile back at Concord, a team, Wests Tigers are putting in some big effort for the coming season. While megabucks Suli sleeps in a car.
Get it yet?
Otherwise, keep trying to convince yourself that we've lost something worthwhile.
Good riddance!

NT - I dont have a fixation with Suli. I didnt sign him for 1.3.mill our club did, as the next big thing and we were told as much.
No mention of bad ankles or bad attitude then, in fact quite the opposite a priority during negs with what use to be referred to as the "big 4."-and like many I thought it was very risky.
However, his performances as an 18 year old in the FG showed enough to suggest that there was some validity for doing so. So good move - and last week most would agree he was in our plans for the next couple of years and hopefully beyond..
This week because we discover he is no longer at the club and at another club, we get the wrong attitude explanation and bad ankles and its good riddance and of course a threat to this new culture we are building.
All very well but - the Dogs are prepared to take on the bad attitude and ankles and we are less another young talent. The message I get from our club is give some attitude and the Tigers will release you and someone else will sign you on and we all buy it as developing a better culture.
When and if the club announce a suitable replacement fair enough all good. - but otherwise the inabilty of our club to manage young men with reportedly bad attitudes is just not cutting it for me.anymore especially when just 12 months prior they were prepared to offer a mammoth contract to secure him - **Now he will go play with the dogs who are willing to find a place for him without him being a threat to their so called "culture".**
The only good outcome is the fact we are reportedly not paying him anything. Thankful for that at least.

Maybe, just maybe, the culture at the Dogs fits Suli and Suli fits their culture, so that he is no threat!
Who was the main person behind the signing of Suli to the Wests Tigers about eighteen months ago?
Where does he work now?
I say, like most others I read on this Forum, well done by the Club and what a refreshing change to have the Club "in charge" and not some petulant young man.
 
Not sure if this is directly linked to Moses Suli but here is the Cleary article.

Tigers coach Ivan Cleary opens up about Moses Suli and club’s new culture
Paul Crawley, The Daily Telegraph
February 1, 2018 7:49pm
Subscriber only
IVAN Cleary has no regrets about Moses Suli’s stunning exit off the Wests Tigers bus, declaring “we did our best but in the end I guess you can only lead a horse to water”.

In the wake of the talented 19-year-old’s switch to Canterbury, Cleary has opened up to The Daily Telegraph about why Suli just didn’t fit the new culture he is driving.

Cleary also spoke about the challenge ahead for Luke Brooks with Josh Reynolds and Benji Marshall looking over his shoulder, while admitting Tui Lolohea is no guarantee of owning the No 1 jumper.

SULI’S EXIT
For years the Tigers have had problems relating to players playing by their own rules and undermining the coach but those days are gone.

Cleary didn’t want to go over what happened in the past but was direct about how it would be going forward.

“I can only say what is happening now,” Cleary said.

“We certainly have a set of standards and a level of respect that is necessary for what we are trying to build and the team we are trying to create and what all the others players here are doing in terms of creating a standard.”

He said Suli’s exit was a “long time coming to be honest”.

“We did our best but in the end I guess you can only lead a horse to water,” he said.

“This was not a one off.

“I won’t go into detail but I will be very clear that we did everything we could.

“That was in conjunction with his manager and his family.

“But in the end it just didn’t work out.

“I hope he finds what he is looking for.”

NEW HOPE
That aside, Cleary said the pre-season had been “really enjoyable” with a stack of new faces helping to create a whole new vibe.

Reynolds, Marshall, Russell Packer, Ben Matulino, Cleary said you just couldn’t fault any of their attitudes.
\
\
New Wests Tigers recruit Josh Reynolds. Pic, Sam Ruttyn
“We have a lot of new players,” he said.

“The reality of that is it is going to take a bit of time for that to gel but they have all come here with a good attitude and they have trained hard.

“I guess your window of measurement comes when you are playing games so hopefully we can see that sort of stuff on the field.”

Cleary is still to announce who will replace Aaron Woods as captain and it sounds like that responsibility could be shared.

“Well, there is more to it than meets the eye, put it that way,” he joked.

“I don’t want to make a big deal about it but we will announce what we will do shortly.

“The truth is nothing has been announced to the group yet.”

NO PROMISES
Cleary is also keeping an open mind about several positions, including who takes James Tedesco’s spot.

Asked if Lolohea had the fullback spotted locked up, he responded: “There is a lot of positions that I honestly haven’t settled on.
\
\
“The team that gets picked for the first round may not necessarily be the same that ends up being our best team by the end of the year.
Clearly is keeping an open mind on who replaces James Tedesco.
“It is fair to say that position (fullback) is one of those.

“It is very competitive and we have genuine depth.

“One of the first things I noticed when I got here last year is that we didn’t have (depth).

“Some players don’t necessarily want people breathing down their necks but it is actually good for them.

“And if you do get injuries hopefully it is not going to derail you.”

BROOKS, ‘GRUB’ & BENJI
There is plenty of expectation to see how Brooks goes this year with the experience of Reynolds and Marshall to call on.

“The goal for Luke is just to do his job for the team each week,” Cleary said.

“His role as a halfback is to control our team.

“He has certainly got ability.

“That is undoubted.

“Like many young halves they go from junior football into senior football and it is a totally different game for many of them.

“I think Luke has had to learn that on the job.

“The role we have him playing now is a little more oriented towards controlling it rather than steering it between his other halve.

“He has trained really well.

“He is one of those kids who has always had troubles with injuries from the data I have.

“But he is fit and strong and looking really good.

“He has certainly put himself in a good position to have a good season.

“Josh Reynolds is an easy one because he is who he is and what you see is what you get.

“He is very competitive and he is motivated and he does his best every day.

“I am looking forward to seeing him in a Wests Tigers jumper.”

As he is to having Marshall back.

“He just looks happy to be here,” Cleary said.

“For a guy that has done so much, not just in the game but at this club, it is a nice link to the past.

“But he is also really keen and positive about contributing as much as he can to the future.”
 
@ said:
@ said:
@ said:
@ said:
Yep - and you keep trying to convince your self its a good thing for the club to lose talented players to other clubs.

No not at all. I don't have to convince myself of anything because Wests Tigers haven't 'lost' anything.
You just don't get it do you? Wests Tigers have gained not lost.
You have this fixation of Suli as some super player. He had talent, bad ankles and a bad attitude to go with it. Reality is, he's a potential player that didn't want to play with WT. Let's just say, he didn't reach his potential.
The club did what they could to turn him around but it didn't work because he didn't care enough to make it happen. Meanwhile back at Concord, a team, Wests Tigers are putting in some big effort for the coming season. While megabucks Suli sleeps in a car.
Get it yet?
Otherwise, keep trying to convince yourself that we've lost something worthwhile.
Good riddance!

NT - I dont have a fixation with Suli. I didnt sign him for 1.3.mill our club did, as the next big thing and we were told as much.
No mention of bad ankles or bad attitude then, in fact quite the opposite a priority during negs with what use to be referred to as the "big 4."-and like many I thought it was very risky.
However, his performances as an 18 year old in the FG showed enough to suggest that there was some validity for doing so. So good move - and last week most would agree he was in our plans for the next couple of years and hopefully beyond..
This week because we discover he is no longer at the club and at another club, we get the wrong attitude explanation and bad ankles and its good riddance and of course a threat to this new culture we are building.
All very well but - the Dogs are prepared to take on the bad attitude and ankles and we are less another young talent. The message I get from our club is give some attitude and the Tigers will release you and someone else will sign you on and we all buy it as developing a better culture.
When and if the club announce a suitable replacement fair enough all good. - but otherwise the inabilty of our club to manage young men with reportedly bad attitudes is just not cutting it for me.anymore especially when just 12 months prior they were prepared to offer a mammoth contract to secure him - **Now he will go play with the dogs who are willing to find a place for him without him being a threat to their so called "culture".**
The only good outcome is the fact we are reportedly not paying him anything. Thankful for that at least.

Maybe, just maybe, the culture at the Dogs fits Suli and Suli fits their culture, so that he is no threat!
Who was the main person behind the signing of Suli to the Wests Tigers about eighteen months ago?
Where does he work now?
I say, like most others I read on this Forum, well done by the Club and what a refreshing change to have the Club "in charge" and not some petulant young man.

Yes - a link there.
Alot resting about this new culture change and easy to embrace it while the footy is not on - but when it all comes down to it the teams with the best players are always going to be the most successful and I hate seeing talent go without replacing it - and I would hope that they are in the process of doing that. JAC had an attitude problem too I was led to believe
 
According to NRL rules every club must have 29 players signed by Mar 1 and 30 by Jun 1\. As we have 28 currently, means an additional signing is on the cards by Mar 1
 
@ said:
Lets not forget he was punted from parra as well early on, before they had a change of heart, and other clubs were circling…it was a panicky signing...but hes been punted before

And by the sounds of him he will languish in reserve grade for a long, long time…for him to shed 20+kg's to get to NRL fitness and playing weight will take enormous dedication and commitment - two qualities he apparently never showed with the WT.
 
@ said:
Win/win for mine.
He was on an outrageous contract worse than the ridiciulous ones Broses were given and delivered little. His only asset was size for his age. He had a long way to go before he earned his dough. Terrible signing that should lead to the dismissal of the moron who drew it up. On the upside, his 'departure' allows us to spend his money on a first grade quality player. So we dont have him infecting the playing group and we have his money.
Like I said, win/win.

If memory serves me right, the person who did sign him on that money went about three rounds in last year.
 

Members online

Back
Top