Yep - and you keep trying to convince your self its a good thing for the club to lose talented players to other clubs.
No not at all. I don't have to convince myself of anything because Wests Tigers haven't 'lost' anything.
You just don't get it do you? Wests Tigers have gained not lost.
You have this fixation of Suli as some super player. He had talent, bad ankles and a bad attitude to go with it. Reality is, he's a potential player that didn't want to play with WT. Let's just say, he didn't reach his potential.
The club did what they could to turn him around but it didn't work because he didn't care enough to make it happen. Meanwhile back at Concord, a team, Wests Tigers are putting in some big effort for the coming season. While megabucks Suli sleeps in a car.
Get it yet?
Otherwise, keep trying to convince yourself that we've lost something worthwhile.
Good riddance!
NT - I dont have a fixation with Suli. I didnt sign him for 1.3.mill our club did, as the next big thing and we were told as much.
No mention of bad ankles or bad attitude then, in fact quite the opposite a priority during negs with what use to be referred to as the "big 4."-and like many I thought it was very risky.
However, his performances as an 18 year old in the FG showed enough to suggest that there was some validity for doing so. So good move - and last week most would agree he was in our plans for the next couple of years and hopefully beyond..
This week because we discover he is no longer at the club and at another club, we get the wrong attitude explanation and bad ankles and its good riddance and of course a threat to this new culture we are building.
All very well but - the Dogs are prepared to take on the bad attitude and ankles and we are less another young talent. The message I get from our club is give some attitude and the Tigers will release you and someone else will sign you on and we all buy it as developing a better culture.
When and if the club announce a suitable replacement fair enough all good. - but otherwise the inabilty of our club to manage young men with reportedly bad attitudes is just not cutting it for me.anymore especially when just 12 months prior they were prepared to offer a mammoth contract to secure him - **Now he will go play with the dogs who are willing to find a place for him without him being a threat to their so called "culture".**
The only good outcome is the fact we are reportedly not paying him anything. Thankful for that at least.
Maybe, just maybe, the culture at the Dogs fits Suli and Suli fits their culture, so that he is no threat!
Who was the main person behind the signing of Suli to the Wests Tigers about eighteen months ago?
Where does he work now?
I say, like most others I read on this Forum, well done by the Club and what a refreshing change to have the Club "in charge" and not some petulant young man.