New homeground

@pascoes_barber said in [New homeground](/post/1492313) said:
@cochise said in [New homeground](/post/1492267) said:
@mike said in [New homeground](/post/1492239) said:
@cochise said in [New homeground](/post/1492214) said:
@mike said in [New homeground](/post/1492183) said:
@innsaneink said in [New homeground](/post/1492160) said:
@russell said in [New homeground](/post/1492066) said:
@innsaneink said in [New homeground](/post/1491912) said:
I. Must say @mike your entire argument is made up of things that haven't happened or you think might happen... Not really strong.

Just upgrade Cambo.... If people.dont wanna follow the team because of the ground or where it is.... Looking at you.... Let them go follow dolphin

Getting a bit tired of this "if you don't like it, go follow someone else."

Maybe people have valid points, maybe people care about the future of the Tigers.

They are voicing opinions and deserve better than - "Go follow someone else"

Disappointed in your statement although you are not the first to voice it.

Yes I know - I should go and follow someone else!

@Russell
Mikes points aren't valid... That's who my posts directed at.

They either havent yet happened, are fabricated... They're just not correct and also made up

Except they are not made up at all. History has shown us who's territory Liverpool is, and it is the Bulldogs. Also don't forget the Bulldogs wanted to take over the Western Suburbs Magpies, not merge. If you don't think that this is still on the agenda for the Wests Tigers then you are just plain wrong. Wests Tigers are currently in a very weak position politically, having never been in the finals for 11 years, they are viewed as an option the merge/relocate by many. Liverpool would be a disaster and the beginning of the end of the franchise.

We are a relocation risk, so why move outside our area? Why be a club that represents the Western Suburbs playing in the Eastern Suburbs? You arguments are illogical.

Get over the it’s in the Eastern Suburbs crap, it’s not at Bondi Beach. It’s on the outskirts of the Sydney CBD in an specifically designed sporting and entertainment precinct that has 10s of thousands of people through the venues every week (excluding Covid restrictions). It’s within a reasonable distance from Wests Tigers HQ at Concord, Wests Ashfield and whatever is built on Victoria Rd at Balmain. Playing at this ground will only attract supporters and the right kind of media.

I don't have to get over it mate, it is fact it is in the Eastern Suburbs. We are called Wests Tigers for a reason. You raised us being at risk of relocation, no better way to do that than make such an illogical choice, we would represent nothing.

By that logic Liverpool is in the far southern suburbs of Sydney and should be the home to Souths.

Exactly, it’s an illogical argument. The name is just a name and no longer tied geographically. It hasn’t been for decades. It’s a last century idea long superseded.
 
@mike said in [New homeground](/post/1492320) said:
@pascoes_barber said in [New homeground](/post/1492313) said:
@cochise said in [New homeground](/post/1492267) said:
@mike said in [New homeground](/post/1492239) said:
@cochise said in [New homeground](/post/1492214) said:
@mike said in [New homeground](/post/1492183) said:
@innsaneink said in [New homeground](/post/1492160) said:
@russell said in [New homeground](/post/1492066) said:
@innsaneink said in [New homeground](/post/1491912) said:
I. Must say @mike your entire argument is made up of things that haven't happened or you think might happen... Not really strong.

Just upgrade Cambo.... If people.dont wanna follow the team because of the ground or where it is.... Looking at you.... Let them go follow dolphin

Getting a bit tired of this "if you don't like it, go follow someone else."

Maybe people have valid points, maybe people care about the future of the Tigers.

They are voicing opinions and deserve better than - "Go follow someone else"

Disappointed in your statement although you are not the first to voice it.

Yes I know - I should go and follow someone else!

@Russell
Mikes points aren't valid... That's who my posts directed at.

They either havent yet happened, are fabricated... They're just not correct and also made up

Except they are not made up at all. History has shown us who's territory Liverpool is, and it is the Bulldogs. Also don't forget the Bulldogs wanted to take over the Western Suburbs Magpies, not merge. If you don't think that this is still on the agenda for the Wests Tigers then you are just plain wrong. Wests Tigers are currently in a very weak position politically, having never been in the finals for 11 years, they are viewed as an option the merge/relocate by many. Liverpool would be a disaster and the beginning of the end of the franchise.

We are a relocation risk, so why move outside our area? Why be a club that represents the Western Suburbs playing in the Eastern Suburbs? You arguments are illogical.

Get over the it’s in the Eastern Suburbs crap, it’s not at Bondi Beach. It’s on the outskirts of the Sydney CBD in an specifically designed sporting and entertainment precinct that has 10s of thousands of people through the venues every week (excluding Covid restrictions). It’s within a reasonable distance from Wests Tigers HQ at Concord, Wests Ashfield and whatever is built on Victoria Rd at Balmain. Playing at this ground will only attract supporters and the right kind of media.

I don't have to get over it mate, it is fact it is in the Eastern Suburbs. We are called Wests Tigers for a reason. You raised us being at risk of relocation, no better way to do that than make such an illogical choice, we would represent nothing.

By that logic Liverpool is in the far southern suburbs of Sydney and should be the home to Souths.

Exactly, it’s an illogical argument. The name is just a name and no longer tied geographically. It hasn’t been for decades. It’s a last century idea long superseded.

So you are telling me the NRL teams are no longer linked to their geographical areas? Or is it only our club that has moved beyond that?
 
@pascoes_barber said in [New homeground](/post/1492313) said:
@cochise said in [New homeground](/post/1492267) said:
@mike said in [New homeground](/post/1492239) said:
@cochise said in [New homeground](/post/1492214) said:
@mike said in [New homeground](/post/1492183) said:
@innsaneink said in [New homeground](/post/1492160) said:
@russell said in [New homeground](/post/1492066) said:
@innsaneink said in [New homeground](/post/1491912) said:
I. Must say @mike your entire argument is made up of things that haven't happened or you think might happen... Not really strong.

Just upgrade Cambo.... If people.dont wanna follow the team because of the ground or where it is.... Looking at you.... Let them go follow dolphin

Getting a bit tired of this "if you don't like it, go follow someone else."

Maybe people have valid points, maybe people care about the future of the Tigers.

They are voicing opinions and deserve better than - "Go follow someone else"

Disappointed in your statement although you are not the first to voice it.

Yes I know - I should go and follow someone else!

@Russell
Mikes points aren't valid... That's who my posts directed at.

They either havent yet happened, are fabricated... They're just not correct and also made up

Except they are not made up at all. History has shown us who's territory Liverpool is, and it is the Bulldogs. Also don't forget the Bulldogs wanted to take over the Western Suburbs Magpies, not merge. If you don't think that this is still on the agenda for the Wests Tigers then you are just plain wrong. Wests Tigers are currently in a very weak position politically, having never been in the finals for 11 years, they are viewed as an option the merge/relocate by many. Liverpool would be a disaster and the beginning of the end of the franchise.

We are a relocation risk, so why move outside our area? Why be a club that represents the Western Suburbs playing in the Eastern Suburbs? You arguments are illogical.

Get over the it’s in the Eastern Suburbs crap, it’s not at Bondi Beach. It’s on the outskirts of the Sydney CBD in an specifically designed sporting and entertainment precinct that has 10s of thousands of people through the venues every week (excluding Covid restrictions). It’s within a reasonable distance from Wests Tigers HQ at Concord, Wests Ashfield and whatever is built on Victoria Rd at Balmain. Playing at this ground will only attract supporters and the right kind of media.

I don't have to get over it mate, it is fact it is in the Eastern Suburbs. We are called Wests Tigers for a reason. You raised us being at risk of relocation, no better way to do that than make such an illogical choice, we would represent nothing.

By that logic Liverpool is in the far southern suburbs of Sydney and should be the home to Souths.

Except Liverpool has never been referred to as a “far southern suburb”. If such a thing even exists.
 
@mike said in [New homeground](/post/1492320) said:
@pascoes_barber said in [New homeground](/post/1492313) said:
@cochise said in [New homeground](/post/1492267) said:
@mike said in [New homeground](/post/1492239) said:
@cochise said in [New homeground](/post/1492214) said:
@mike said in [New homeground](/post/1492183) said:
@innsaneink said in [New homeground](/post/1492160) said:
@russell said in [New homeground](/post/1492066) said:
@innsaneink said in [New homeground](/post/1491912) said:
I. Must say @mike your entire argument is made up of things that haven't happened or you think might happen... Not really strong.

Just upgrade Cambo.... If people.dont wanna follow the team because of the ground or where it is.... Looking at you.... Let them go follow dolphin

Getting a bit tired of this "if you don't like it, go follow someone else."

Maybe people have valid points, maybe people care about the future of the Tigers.

They are voicing opinions and deserve better than - "Go follow someone else"

Disappointed in your statement although you are not the first to voice it.

Yes I know - I should go and follow someone else!

@Russell
Mikes points aren't valid... That's who my posts directed at.

They either havent yet happened, are fabricated... They're just not correct and also made up

Except they are not made up at all. History has shown us who's territory Liverpool is, and it is the Bulldogs. Also don't forget the Bulldogs wanted to take over the Western Suburbs Magpies, not merge. If you don't think that this is still on the agenda for the Wests Tigers then you are just plain wrong. Wests Tigers are currently in a very weak position politically, having never been in the finals for 11 years, they are viewed as an option the merge/relocate by many. Liverpool would be a disaster and the beginning of the end of the franchise.

We are a relocation risk, so why move outside our area? Why be a club that represents the Western Suburbs playing in the Eastern Suburbs? You arguments are illogical.

Get over the it’s in the Eastern Suburbs crap, it’s not at Bondi Beach. It’s on the outskirts of the Sydney CBD in an specifically designed sporting and entertainment precinct that has 10s of thousands of people through the venues every week (excluding Covid restrictions). It’s within a reasonable distance from Wests Tigers HQ at Concord, Wests Ashfield and whatever is built on Victoria Rd at Balmain. Playing at this ground will only attract supporters and the right kind of media.

I don't have to get over it mate, it is fact it is in the Eastern Suburbs. We are called Wests Tigers for a reason. You raised us being at risk of relocation, no better way to do that than make such an illogical choice, we would represent nothing.

By that logic Liverpool is in the far southern suburbs of Sydney and should be the home to Souths.

Exactly, it’s an illogical argument. The name is just a name and no longer tied geographically. It hasn’t been for decades. It’s a last century idea long superseded.

New name South Wests Tigers to be more geographically correct !
 
@mike said in [New homeground](/post/1492183) said:
@innsaneink said in [New homeground](/post/1492160) said:
@russell said in [New homeground](/post/1492066) said:
@innsaneink said in [New homeground](/post/1491912) said:
I. Must say @mike your entire argument is made up of things that haven't happened or you think might happen... Not really strong.

Just upgrade Cambo.... If people.dont wanna follow the team because of the ground or where it is.... Looking at you.... Let them go follow dolphin

Getting a bit tired of this "if you don't like it, go follow someone else."

Maybe people have valid points, maybe people care about the future of the Tigers.

They are voicing opinions and deserve better than - "Go follow someone else"

Disappointed in your statement although you are not the first to voice it.

Yes I know - I should go and follow someone else!

@Russell
Mikes points aren't valid... That's who my posts directed at.

They either havent yet happened, are fabricated... They're just not correct and also made up

Except they are not made up at all. History has shown us who's territory Liverpool is, and it is the Bulldogs. Also don't forget the Bulldogs wanted to take over the Western Suburbs Magpies, not merge. If you don't think that this is still on the agenda for the Wests Tigers then you are just plain wrong. Wests Tigers are currently in a very weak position politically, having never been in the finals for 11 years, they are viewed as an option the merge/relocate by many. Liverpool would be a disaster and the beginning of the end of the franchise.

Enjoy your creative writing, this threads boring me
 
@snake said in [New homeground](/post/1492327) said:
@mike said in [New homeground](/post/1492320) said:
@pascoes_barber said in [New homeground](/post/1492313) said:
@cochise said in [New homeground](/post/1492267) said:
@mike said in [New homeground](/post/1492239) said:
@cochise said in [New homeground](/post/1492214) said:
@mike said in [New homeground](/post/1492183) said:
@innsaneink said in [New homeground](/post/1492160) said:
@russell said in [New homeground](/post/1492066) said:
@innsaneink said in [New homeground](/post/1491912) said:
I. Must say @mike your entire argument is made up of things that haven't happened or you think might happen... Not really strong.

Just upgrade Cambo.... If people.dont wanna follow the team because of the ground or where it is.... Looking at you.... Let them go follow dolphin

Getting a bit tired of this "if you don't like it, go follow someone else."

Maybe people have valid points, maybe people care about the future of the Tigers.

They are voicing opinions and deserve better than - "Go follow someone else"

Disappointed in your statement although you are not the first to voice it.

Yes I know - I should go and follow someone else!

@Russell
Mikes points aren't valid... That's who my posts directed at.

They either havent yet happened, are fabricated... They're just not correct and also made up

Except they are not made up at all. History has shown us who's territory Liverpool is, and it is the Bulldogs. Also don't forget the Bulldogs wanted to take over the Western Suburbs Magpies, not merge. If you don't think that this is still on the agenda for the Wests Tigers then you are just plain wrong. Wests Tigers are currently in a very weak position politically, having never been in the finals for 11 years, they are viewed as an option the merge/relocate by many. Liverpool would be a disaster and the beginning of the end of the franchise.

We are a relocation risk, so why move outside our area? Why be a club that represents the Western Suburbs playing in the Eastern Suburbs? You arguments are illogical.

Get over the it’s in the Eastern Suburbs crap, it’s not at Bondi Beach. It’s on the outskirts of the Sydney CBD in an specifically designed sporting and entertainment precinct that has 10s of thousands of people through the venues every week (excluding Covid restrictions). It’s within a reasonable distance from Wests Tigers HQ at Concord, Wests Ashfield and whatever is built on Victoria Rd at Balmain. Playing at this ground will only attract supporters and the right kind of media.

I don't have to get over it mate, it is fact it is in the Eastern Suburbs. We are called Wests Tigers for a reason. You raised us being at risk of relocation, no better way to do that than make such an illogical choice, we would represent nothing.

By that logic Liverpool is in the far southern suburbs of Sydney and should be the home to Souths.

Exactly, it’s an illogical argument. The name is just a name and no longer tied geographically. It hasn’t been for decades. It’s a last century idea long superseded.

New name South Wests Tigers to be more geographically correct !

No Geographical areas are superseded now, like how Penrith, Parramatta, Cronulla, the Roosters and eve Souths who play outside their catchment have no tie to their geographical areas.
 
@innsaneink said in [New homeground](/post/1492329) said:
@mike said in [New homeground](/post/1492183) said:
@innsaneink said in [New homeground](/post/1492160) said:
@russell said in [New homeground](/post/1492066) said:
@innsaneink said in [New homeground](/post/1491912) said:
I. Must say @mike your entire argument is made up of things that haven't happened or you think might happen... Not really strong.

Just upgrade Cambo.... If people.dont wanna follow the team because of the ground or where it is.... Looking at you.... Let them go follow dolphin

Getting a bit tired of this "if you don't like it, go follow someone else."

Maybe people have valid points, maybe people care about the future of the Tigers.

They are voicing opinions and deserve better than - "Go follow someone else"

Disappointed in your statement although you are not the first to voice it.

Yes I know - I should go and follow someone else!

@Russell
Mikes points aren't valid... That's who my posts directed at.

They either havent yet happened, are fabricated... They're just not correct and also made up

Except they are not made up at all. History has shown us who's territory Liverpool is, and it is the Bulldogs. Also don't forget the Bulldogs wanted to take over the Western Suburbs Magpies, not merge. If you don't think that this is still on the agenda for the Wests Tigers then you are just plain wrong. Wests Tigers are currently in a very weak position politically, having never been in the finals for 11 years, they are viewed as an option the merge/relocate by many. Liverpool would be a disaster and the beginning of the end of the franchise.

Enjoy your creative writing, this is boring me

Then put me on foe and don’t read it.
 
@mike said in [New homeground](/post/1492335) said:
@innsaneink said in [New homeground](/post/1492329) said:
@mike said in [New homeground](/post/1492183) said:
@innsaneink said in [New homeground](/post/1492160) said:
@russell said in [New homeground](/post/1492066) said:
@innsaneink said in [New homeground](/post/1491912) said:
I. Must say @mike your entire argument is made up of things that haven't happened or you think might happen... Not really strong.

Just upgrade Cambo.... If people.dont wanna follow the team because of the ground or where it is.... Looking at you.... Let them go follow dolphin

Getting a bit tired of this "if you don't like it, go follow someone else."

Maybe people have valid points, maybe people care about the future of the Tigers.

They are voicing opinions and deserve better than - "Go follow someone else"

Disappointed in your statement although you are not the first to voice it.

Yes I know - I should go and follow someone else!

@Russell
Mikes points aren't valid... That's who my posts directed at.

They either havent yet happened, are fabricated... They're just not correct and also made up

Except they are not made up at all. History has shown us who's territory Liverpool is, and it is the Bulldogs. Also don't forget the Bulldogs wanted to take over the Western Suburbs Magpies, not merge. If you don't think that this is still on the agenda for the Wests Tigers then you are just plain wrong. Wests Tigers are currently in a very weak position politically, having never been in the finals for 11 years, they are viewed as an option the merge/relocate by many. Liverpool would be a disaster and the beginning of the end of the franchise.

Enjoy your creative writing, this is boring me

Then put me on foe and don’t read it.

Your arguments are getting worse @mike
 
@cochise said in [New homeground](/post/1492339) said:
@mike said in [New homeground](/post/1492335) said:
@innsaneink said in [New homeground](/post/1492329) said:
@mike said in [New homeground](/post/1492183) said:
@innsaneink said in [New homeground](/post/1492160) said:
@russell said in [New homeground](/post/1492066) said:
@innsaneink said in [New homeground](/post/1491912) said:
I. Must say @mike your entire argument is made up of things that haven't happened or you think might happen... Not really strong.

Just upgrade Cambo.... If people.dont wanna follow the team because of the ground or where it is.... Looking at you.... Let them go follow dolphin

Getting a bit tired of this "if you don't like it, go follow someone else."

Maybe people have valid points, maybe people care about the future of the Tigers.

They are voicing opinions and deserve better than - "Go follow someone else"

Disappointed in your statement although you are not the first to voice it.

Yes I know - I should go and follow someone else!

@Russell
Mikes points aren't valid... That's who my posts directed at.

They either havent yet happened, are fabricated... They're just not correct and also made up

Except they are not made up at all. History has shown us who's territory Liverpool is, and it is the Bulldogs. Also don't forget the Bulldogs wanted to take over the Western Suburbs Magpies, not merge. If you don't think that this is still on the agenda for the Wests Tigers then you are just plain wrong. Wests Tigers are currently in a very weak position politically, having never been in the finals for 11 years, they are viewed as an option the merge/relocate by many. Liverpool would be a disaster and the beginning of the end of the franchise.

Enjoy your creative writing, this is boring me

Then put me on foe and don’t read it.

Your arguments are getting worse @mike

No, I just see how this will play out.
 
@mike said in [New homeground](/post/1492342) said:
@cochise said in [New homeground](/post/1492339) said:
@mike said in [New homeground](/post/1492335) said:
@innsaneink said in [New homeground](/post/1492329) said:
@mike said in [New homeground](/post/1492183) said:
@innsaneink said in [New homeground](/post/1492160) said:
@russell said in [New homeground](/post/1492066) said:
@innsaneink said in [New homeground](/post/1491912) said:
I. Must say @mike your entire argument is made up of things that haven't happened or you think might happen... Not really strong.

Just upgrade Cambo.... If people.dont wanna follow the team because of the ground or where it is.... Looking at you.... Let them go follow dolphin

Getting a bit tired of this "if you don't like it, go follow someone else."

Maybe people have valid points, maybe people care about the future of the Tigers.

They are voicing opinions and deserve better than - "Go follow someone else"

Disappointed in your statement although you are not the first to voice it.

Yes I know - I should go and follow someone else!

@Russell
Mikes points aren't valid... That's who my posts directed at.

They either havent yet happened, are fabricated... They're just not correct and also made up

Except they are not made up at all. History has shown us who's territory Liverpool is, and it is the Bulldogs. Also don't forget the Bulldogs wanted to take over the Western Suburbs Magpies, not merge. If you don't think that this is still on the agenda for the Wests Tigers then you are just plain wrong. Wests Tigers are currently in a very weak position politically, having never been in the finals for 11 years, they are viewed as an option the merge/relocate by many. Liverpool would be a disaster and the beginning of the end of the franchise.

Enjoy your creative writing, this is boring me

Then put me on foe and don’t read it.

Your arguments are getting worse @mike

No, I just see how this will play out.

You are an intelligent guy @mike, I'm happy for you to disagree with me, but some of your arguments trying to justify what you want are rubbish. To seriously suggest that geographical ties are superseded when every single NRL side is tied deeply to their geographical area is really poor argument and you know it. I am happy for you to prefer the SFS, but stop trying to make this that you are the smartest person in the room so your ideas are correct.

It is OK to just prefer the SFS, even if its because it is easier for you. No need for fantasy.
 
This thread is the best endorsement for Wests Tigers continuing to play all their games at Stadium "X" with 3-4 games at LO & 3-4 at CSS every year.
 
@cochise said in [New homeground](/post/1492345) said:
@mike said in [New homeground](/post/1492342) said:
@cochise said in [New homeground](/post/1492339) said:
@mike said in [New homeground](/post/1492335) said:
@innsaneink said in [New homeground](/post/1492329) said:
@mike said in [New homeground](/post/1492183) said:
@innsaneink said in [New homeground](/post/1492160) said:
@russell said in [New homeground](/post/1492066) said:
@innsaneink said in [New homeground](/post/1491912) said:
I. Must say @mike your entire argument is made up of things that haven't happened or you think might happen... Not really strong.

Just upgrade Cambo.... If people.dont wanna follow the team because of the ground or where it is.... Looking at you.... Let them go follow dolphin

Getting a bit tired of this "if you don't like it, go follow someone else."

Maybe people have valid points, maybe people care about the future of the Tigers.

They are voicing opinions and deserve better than - "Go follow someone else"

Disappointed in your statement although you are not the first to voice it.

Yes I know - I should go and follow someone else!

@Russell
Mikes points aren't valid... That's who my posts directed at.

They either havent yet happened, are fabricated... They're just not correct and also made up

Except they are not made up at all. History has shown us who's territory Liverpool is, and it is the Bulldogs. Also don't forget the Bulldogs wanted to take over the Western Suburbs Magpies, not merge. If you don't think that this is still on the agenda for the Wests Tigers then you are just plain wrong. Wests Tigers are currently in a very weak position politically, having never been in the finals for 11 years, they are viewed as an option the merge/relocate by many. Liverpool would be a disaster and the beginning of the end of the franchise.

Enjoy your creative writing, this is boring me

Then put me on foe and don’t read it.

Your arguments are getting worse @mike

No, I just see how this will play out.

You are an intelligent guy @mike, I'm happy for you to disagree with me, but some of your arguments trying to justify what you want are rubbish. To seriously suggest that geographical ties are superseded when every single NRL side is tied deeply to their geographical area is really poor argument and you know it. I am happy for you to prefer the SFS, but stop trying to make this that you are the smartest person in the room so your ideas are correct.

It is OK to just prefer the SFS, even if its because it is easier for you. No need for fantasy.

Souths play out of Homebush.
 
@gallagher said in [New homeground](/post/1492357) said:
@cochise said in [New homeground](/post/1492345) said:
@mike said in [New homeground](/post/1492342) said:
@cochise said in [New homeground](/post/1492339) said:
@mike said in [New homeground](/post/1492335) said:
@innsaneink said in [New homeground](/post/1492329) said:
@mike said in [New homeground](/post/1492183) said:
@innsaneink said in [New homeground](/post/1492160) said:
@russell said in [New homeground](/post/1492066) said:
@innsaneink said in [New homeground](/post/1491912) said:
I. Must say @mike your entire argument is made up of things that haven't happened or you think might happen... Not really strong.

Just upgrade Cambo.... If people.dont wanna follow the team because of the ground or where it is.... Looking at you.... Let them go follow dolphin

Getting a bit tired of this "if you don't like it, go follow someone else."

Maybe people have valid points, maybe people care about the future of the Tigers.

They are voicing opinions and deserve better than - "Go follow someone else"

Disappointed in your statement although you are not the first to voice it.

Yes I know - I should go and follow someone else!

@Russell
Mikes points aren't valid... That's who my posts directed at.

They either havent yet happened, are fabricated... They're just not correct and also made up

Except they are not made up at all. History has shown us who's territory Liverpool is, and it is the Bulldogs. Also don't forget the Bulldogs wanted to take over the Western Suburbs Magpies, not merge. If you don't think that this is still on the agenda for the Wests Tigers then you are just plain wrong. Wests Tigers are currently in a very weak position politically, having never been in the finals for 11 years, they are viewed as an option the merge/relocate by many. Liverpool would be a disaster and the beginning of the end of the franchise.

Enjoy your creative writing, this is boring me

Then put me on foe and don’t read it.

Your arguments are getting worse @mike

No, I just see how this will play out.

You are an intelligent guy @mike, I'm happy for you to disagree with me, but some of your arguments trying to justify what you want are rubbish. To seriously suggest that geographical ties are superseded when every single NRL side is tied deeply to their geographical area is really poor argument and you know it. I am happy for you to prefer the SFS, but stop trying to make this that you are the smartest person in the room so your ideas are correct.

It is OK to just prefer the SFS, even if its because it is easier for you. No need for fantasy.

Souths play out of Homebush.

But are heavily tied to their community in South Sydney, I would actually take South Sydney as a great example of a club successfully playing outside their catchment and I would accept that argument in regards to stadium usage. The argument though was that geographical ties are superseded and even with Souths there is an undeniably strong tie to their geography.
 
@cochise said in [New homeground](/post/1492361) said:
@gallagher said in [New homeground](/post/1492357) said:
@cochise said in [New homeground](/post/1492345) said:
@mike said in [New homeground](/post/1492342) said:
@cochise said in [New homeground](/post/1492339) said:
@mike said in [New homeground](/post/1492335) said:
@innsaneink said in [New homeground](/post/1492329) said:
@mike said in [New homeground](/post/1492183) said:
@innsaneink said in [New homeground](/post/1492160) said:
@russell said in [New homeground](/post/1492066) said:
@innsaneink said in [New homeground](/post/1491912) said:
I. Must say @mike your entire argument is made up of things that haven't happened or you think might happen... Not really strong.

Just upgrade Cambo.... If people.dont wanna follow the team because of the ground or where it is.... Looking at you.... Let them go follow dolphin

Getting a bit tired of this "if you don't like it, go follow someone else."

Maybe people have valid points, maybe people care about the future of the Tigers.

They are voicing opinions and deserve better than - "Go follow someone else"

Disappointed in your statement although you are not the first to voice it.

Yes I know - I should go and follow someone else!

@Russell
Mikes points aren't valid... That's who my posts directed at.

They either havent yet happened, are fabricated... They're just not correct and also made up

Except they are not made up at all. History has shown us who's territory Liverpool is, and it is the Bulldogs. Also don't forget the Bulldogs wanted to take over the Western Suburbs Magpies, not merge. If you don't think that this is still on the agenda for the Wests Tigers then you are just plain wrong. Wests Tigers are currently in a very weak position politically, having never been in the finals for 11 years, they are viewed as an option the merge/relocate by many. Liverpool would be a disaster and the beginning of the end of the franchise.

Enjoy your creative writing, this is boring me

Then put me on foe and don’t read it.

Your arguments are getting worse @mike

No, I just see how this will play out.

You are an intelligent guy @mike, I'm happy for you to disagree with me, but some of your arguments trying to justify what you want are rubbish. To seriously suggest that geographical ties are superseded when every single NRL side is tied deeply to their geographical area is really poor argument and you know it. I am happy for you to prefer the SFS, but stop trying to make this that you are the smartest person in the room so your ideas are correct.

It is OK to just prefer the SFS, even if its because it is easier for you. No need for fantasy.

Souths play out of Homebush.

But are heavily tied to their community in South Sydney, I would actually take South Sydney as a great example of a club successfully playing outside their catchment and I would accept that argument in regards to stadium usage. The argument though was that geographical ties are superseded and even with Souths there is an undeniably strong tie to their geography.



@cochise said in [New homeground](/post/1492361) said:
@gallagher said in [New homeground](/post/1492357) said:
@cochise said in [New homeground](/post/1492345) said:
@mike said in [New homeground](/post/1492342) said:
@cochise said in [New homeground](/post/1492339) said:
@mike said in [New homeground](/post/1492335) said:
@innsaneink said in [New homeground](/post/1492329) said:
@mike said in [New homeground](/post/1492183) said:
@innsaneink said in [New homeground](/post/1492160) said:
@russell said in [New homeground](/post/1492066) said:
@innsaneink said in [New homeground](/post/1491912) said:
I. Must say @mike your entire argument is made up of things that haven't happened or you think might happen... Not really strong.

Just upgrade Cambo.... If people.dont wanna follow the team because of the ground or where it is.... Looking at you.... Let them go follow dolphin

Getting a bit tired of this "if you don't like it, go follow someone else."

Maybe people have valid points, maybe people care about the future of the Tigers.

They are voicing opinions and deserve better than - "Go follow someone else"

Disappointed in your statement although you are not the first to voice it.

Yes I know - I should go and follow someone else!

@Russell
Mikes points aren't valid... That's who my posts directed at.

They either havent yet happened, are fabricated... They're just not correct and also made up

Except they are not made up at all. History has shown us who's territory Liverpool is, and it is the Bulldogs. Also don't forget the Bulldogs wanted to take over the Western Suburbs Magpies, not merge. If you don't think that this is still on the agenda for the Wests Tigers then you are just plain wrong. Wests Tigers are currently in a very weak position politically, having never been in the finals for 11 years, they are viewed as an option the merge/relocate by many. Liverpool would be a disaster and the beginning of the end of the franchise.

Enjoy your creative writing, this is boring me

Then put me on foe and don’t read it.

Your arguments are getting worse @mike

No, I just see how this will play out.

You are an intelligent guy @mike, I'm happy for you to disagree with me, but some of your arguments trying to justify what you want are rubbish. To seriously suggest that geographical ties are superseded when every single NRL side is tied deeply to their geographical area is really poor argument and you know it. I am happy for you to prefer the SFS, but stop trying to make this that you are the smartest person in the room so your ideas are correct.

It is OK to just prefer the SFS, even if its because it is easier for you. No need for fantasy.

Souths play out of Homebush.

But are heavily tied to their community in South Sydney, I would actually take South Sydney as a great example of a club successfully playing outside their catchment and I would accept that argument in regards to stadium usage. The argument though was that geographical ties are superseded and even with Souths there is an undeniably strong tie to their geography.

So why would playing at the SFS stop us having ties to our area?
 
@gallagher said in [New homeground](/post/1492369) said:
@cochise said in [New homeground](/post/1492361) said:
@gallagher said in [New homeground](/post/1492357) said:
@cochise said in [New homeground](/post/1492345) said:
@mike said in [New homeground](/post/1492342) said:
@cochise said in [New homeground](/post/1492339) said:
@mike said in [New homeground](/post/1492335) said:
@innsaneink said in [New homeground](/post/1492329) said:
@mike said in [New homeground](/post/1492183) said:
@innsaneink said in [New homeground](/post/1492160) said:
@russell said in [New homeground](/post/1492066) said:
@innsaneink said in [New homeground](/post/1491912) said:
I. Must say @mike your entire argument is made up of things that haven't happened or you think might happen... Not really strong.

Just upgrade Cambo.... If people.dont wanna follow the team because of the ground or where it is.... Looking at you.... Let them go follow dolphin

Getting a bit tired of this "if you don't like it, go follow someone else."

Maybe people have valid points, maybe people care about the future of the Tigers.

They are voicing opinions and deserve better than - "Go follow someone else"

Disappointed in your statement although you are not the first to voice it.

Yes I know - I should go and follow someone else!

@Russell
Mikes points aren't valid... That's who my posts directed at.

They either havent yet happened, are fabricated... They're just not correct and also made up

Except they are not made up at all. History has shown us who's territory Liverpool is, and it is the Bulldogs. Also don't forget the Bulldogs wanted to take over the Western Suburbs Magpies, not merge. If you don't think that this is still on the agenda for the Wests Tigers then you are just plain wrong. Wests Tigers are currently in a very weak position politically, having never been in the finals for 11 years, they are viewed as an option the merge/relocate by many. Liverpool would be a disaster and the beginning of the end of the franchise.

Enjoy your creative writing, this is boring me

Then put me on foe and don’t read it.

Your arguments are getting worse @mike

No, I just see how this will play out.

You are an intelligent guy @mike, I'm happy for you to disagree with me, but some of your arguments trying to justify what you want are rubbish. To seriously suggest that geographical ties are superseded when every single NRL side is tied deeply to their geographical area is really poor argument and you know it. I am happy for you to prefer the SFS, but stop trying to make this that you are the smartest person in the room so your ideas are correct.

It is OK to just prefer the SFS, even if its because it is easier for you. No need for fantasy.

Souths play out of Homebush.

But are heavily tied to their community in South Sydney, I would actually take South Sydney as a great example of a club successfully playing outside their catchment and I would accept that argument in regards to stadium usage. The argument though was that geographical ties are superseded and even with Souths there is an undeniably strong tie to their geography.



@cochise said in [New homeground](/post/1492361) said:
@gallagher said in [New homeground](/post/1492357) said:
@cochise said in [New homeground](/post/1492345) said:
@mike said in [New homeground](/post/1492342) said:
@cochise said in [New homeground](/post/1492339) said:
@mike said in [New homeground](/post/1492335) said:
@innsaneink said in [New homeground](/post/1492329) said:
@mike said in [New homeground](/post/1492183) said:
@innsaneink said in [New homeground](/post/1492160) said:
@russell said in [New homeground](/post/1492066) said:
@innsaneink said in [New homeground](/post/1491912) said:
I. Must say @mike your entire argument is made up of things that haven't happened or you think might happen... Not really strong.

Just upgrade Cambo.... If people.dont wanna follow the team because of the ground or where it is.... Looking at you.... Let them go follow dolphin

Getting a bit tired of this "if you don't like it, go follow someone else."

Maybe people have valid points, maybe people care about the future of the Tigers.

They are voicing opinions and deserve better than - "Go follow someone else"

Disappointed in your statement although you are not the first to voice it.

Yes I know - I should go and follow someone else!

@Russell
Mikes points aren't valid... That's who my posts directed at.

They either havent yet happened, are fabricated... They're just not correct and also made up

Except they are not made up at all. History has shown us who's territory Liverpool is, and it is the Bulldogs. Also don't forget the Bulldogs wanted to take over the Western Suburbs Magpies, not merge. If you don't think that this is still on the agenda for the Wests Tigers then you are just plain wrong. Wests Tigers are currently in a very weak position politically, having never been in the finals for 11 years, they are viewed as an option the merge/relocate by many. Liverpool would be a disaster and the beginning of the end of the franchise.

Enjoy your creative writing, this is boring me

Then put me on foe and don’t read it.

Your arguments are getting worse @mike

No, I just see how this will play out.

You are an intelligent guy @mike, I'm happy for you to disagree with me, but some of your arguments trying to justify what you want are rubbish. To seriously suggest that geographical ties are superseded when every single NRL side is tied deeply to their geographical area is really poor argument and you know it. I am happy for you to prefer the SFS, but stop trying to make this that you are the smartest person in the room so your ideas are correct.

It is OK to just prefer the SFS, even if its because it is easier for you. No need for fantasy.

Souths play out of Homebush.

But are heavily tied to their community in South Sydney, I would actually take South Sydney as a great example of a club successfully playing outside their catchment and I would accept that argument in regards to stadium usage. The argument though was that geographical ties are superseded and even with Souths there is an undeniably strong tie to their geography.

So why would playing at the SFS stop us having ties to our area?

That my friend is a valid argument, though I think it works for Souths as the stadium is central to all of Sydney. Not trying to move the goalpost just reasoning it out. I do see Souths as evidence of a club making it work though.
 
@cochise said in [New homeground](/post/1492372) said:
@gallagher said in [New homeground](/post/1492369) said:
@cochise said in [New homeground](/post/1492361) said:
@gallagher said in [New homeground](/post/1492357) said:
@cochise said in [New homeground](/post/1492345) said:
@mike said in [New homeground](/post/1492342) said:
@cochise said in [New homeground](/post/1492339) said:
@mike said in [New homeground](/post/1492335) said:
@innsaneink said in [New homeground](/post/1492329) said:
@mike said in [New homeground](/post/1492183) said:
@innsaneink said in [New homeground](/post/1492160) said:
@russell said in [New homeground](/post/1492066) said:
@innsaneink said in [New homeground](/post/1491912) said:
I. Must say @mike your entire argument is made up of things that haven't happened or you think might happen... Not really strong.

Just upgrade Cambo.... If people.dont wanna follow the team because of the ground or where it is.... Looking at you.... Let them go follow dolphin

Getting a bit tired of this "if you don't like it, go follow someone else."

Maybe people have valid points, maybe people care about the future of the Tigers.

They are voicing opinions and deserve better than - "Go follow someone else"

Disappointed in your statement although you are not the first to voice it.

Yes I know - I should go and follow someone else!

@Russell
Mikes points aren't valid... That's who my posts directed at.

They either havent yet happened, are fabricated... They're just not correct and also made up

Except they are not made up at all. History has shown us who's territory Liverpool is, and it is the Bulldogs. Also don't forget the Bulldogs wanted to take over the Western Suburbs Magpies, not merge. If you don't think that this is still on the agenda for the Wests Tigers then you are just plain wrong. Wests Tigers are currently in a very weak position politically, having never been in the finals for 11 years, they are viewed as an option the merge/relocate by many. Liverpool would be a disaster and the beginning of the end of the franchise.

Enjoy your creative writing, this is boring me

Then put me on foe and don’t read it.

Your arguments are getting worse @mike

No, I just see how this will play out.

You are an intelligent guy @mike, I'm happy for you to disagree with me, but some of your arguments trying to justify what you want are rubbish. To seriously suggest that geographical ties are superseded when every single NRL side is tied deeply to their geographical area is really poor argument and you know it. I am happy for you to prefer the SFS, but stop trying to make this that you are the smartest person in the room so your ideas are correct.

It is OK to just prefer the SFS, even if its because it is easier for you. No need for fantasy.

Souths play out of Homebush.

But are heavily tied to their community in South Sydney, I would actually take South Sydney as a great example of a club successfully playing outside their catchment and I would accept that argument in regards to stadium usage. The argument though was that geographical ties are superseded and even with Souths there is an undeniably strong tie to their geography.



@cochise said in [New homeground](/post/1492361) said:
@gallagher said in [New homeground](/post/1492357) said:
@cochise said in [New homeground](/post/1492345) said:
@mike said in [New homeground](/post/1492342) said:
@cochise said in [New homeground](/post/1492339) said:
@mike said in [New homeground](/post/1492335) said:
@innsaneink said in [New homeground](/post/1492329) said:
@mike said in [New homeground](/post/1492183) said:
@innsaneink said in [New homeground](/post/1492160) said:
@russell said in [New homeground](/post/1492066) said:
@innsaneink said in [New homeground](/post/1491912) said:
I. Must say @mike your entire argument is made up of things that haven't happened or you think might happen... Not really strong.

Just upgrade Cambo.... If people.dont wanna follow the team because of the ground or where it is.... Looking at you.... Let them go follow dolphin

Getting a bit tired of this "if you don't like it, go follow someone else."

Maybe people have valid points, maybe people care about the future of the Tigers.

They are voicing opinions and deserve better than - "Go follow someone else"

Disappointed in your statement although you are not the first to voice it.

Yes I know - I should go and follow someone else!

@Russell
Mikes points aren't valid... That's who my posts directed at.

They either havent yet happened, are fabricated... They're just not correct and also made up

Except they are not made up at all. History has shown us who's territory Liverpool is, and it is the Bulldogs. Also don't forget the Bulldogs wanted to take over the Western Suburbs Magpies, not merge. If you don't think that this is still on the agenda for the Wests Tigers then you are just plain wrong. Wests Tigers are currently in a very weak position politically, having never been in the finals for 11 years, they are viewed as an option the merge/relocate by many. Liverpool would be a disaster and the beginning of the end of the franchise.

Enjoy your creative writing, this is boring me

Then put me on foe and don’t read it.

Your arguments are getting worse @mike

No, I just see how this will play out.

You are an intelligent guy @mike, I'm happy for you to disagree with me, but some of your arguments trying to justify what you want are rubbish. To seriously suggest that geographical ties are superseded when every single NRL side is tied deeply to their geographical area is really poor argument and you know it. I am happy for you to prefer the SFS, but stop trying to make this that you are the smartest person in the room so your ideas are correct.

It is OK to just prefer the SFS, even if its because it is easier for you. No need for fantasy.

Souths play out of Homebush.

But are heavily tied to their community in South Sydney, I would actually take South Sydney as a great example of a club successfully playing outside their catchment and I would accept that argument in regards to stadium usage. The argument though was that geographical ties are superseded and even with Souths there is an undeniably strong tie to their geography.

So why would playing at the SFS stop us having ties to our area?

That my friend is a valid argument, though I think it works for Souths as the stadium is central to all of Sydney. Not trying to move the goalpost just reasoning it out. I do see Souths as evidence of a club making it work though.

I really don't see valid arguments not to play at SFS, Homebush or Parra.
 
@gallagher said in [New homeground](/post/1492376) said:
@cochise said in [New homeground](/post/1492372) said:
@gallagher said in [New homeground](/post/1492369) said:
@cochise said in [New homeground](/post/1492361) said:
@gallagher said in [New homeground](/post/1492357) said:
@cochise said in [New homeground](/post/1492345) said:
@mike said in [New homeground](/post/1492342) said:
@cochise said in [New homeground](/post/1492339) said:
@mike said in [New homeground](/post/1492335) said:
@innsaneink said in [New homeground](/post/1492329) said:
@mike said in [New homeground](/post/1492183) said:
@innsaneink said in [New homeground](/post/1492160) said:
@russell said in [New homeground](/post/1492066) said:
@innsaneink said in [New homeground](/post/1491912) said:
I. Must say @mike your entire argument is made up of things that haven't happened or you think might happen... Not really strong.

Just upgrade Cambo.... If people.dont wanna follow the team because of the ground or where it is.... Looking at you.... Let them go follow dolphin

Getting a bit tired of this "if you don't like it, go follow someone else."

Maybe people have valid points, maybe people care about the future of the Tigers.

They are voicing opinions and deserve better than - "Go follow someone else"

Disappointed in your statement although you are not the first to voice it.

Yes I know - I should go and follow someone else!

@Russell
Mikes points aren't valid... That's who my posts directed at.

They either havent yet happened, are fabricated... They're just not correct and also made up

Except they are not made up at all. History has shown us who's territory Liverpool is, and it is the Bulldogs. Also don't forget the Bulldogs wanted to take over the Western Suburbs Magpies, not merge. If you don't think that this is still on the agenda for the Wests Tigers then you are just plain wrong. Wests Tigers are currently in a very weak position politically, having never been in the finals for 11 years, they are viewed as an option the merge/relocate by many. Liverpool would be a disaster and the beginning of the end of the franchise.

Enjoy your creative writing, this is boring me

Then put me on foe and don’t read it.

Your arguments are getting worse @mike

No, I just see how this will play out.

You are an intelligent guy @mike, I'm happy for you to disagree with me, but some of your arguments trying to justify what you want are rubbish. To seriously suggest that geographical ties are superseded when every single NRL side is tied deeply to their geographical area is really poor argument and you know it. I am happy for you to prefer the SFS, but stop trying to make this that you are the smartest person in the room so your ideas are correct.

It is OK to just prefer the SFS, even if its because it is easier for you. No need for fantasy.

Souths play out of Homebush.

But are heavily tied to their community in South Sydney, I would actually take South Sydney as a great example of a club successfully playing outside their catchment and I would accept that argument in regards to stadium usage. The argument though was that geographical ties are superseded and even with Souths there is an undeniably strong tie to their geography.



@cochise said in [New homeground](/post/1492361) said:
@gallagher said in [New homeground](/post/1492357) said:
@cochise said in [New homeground](/post/1492345) said:
@mike said in [New homeground](/post/1492342) said:
@cochise said in [New homeground](/post/1492339) said:
@mike said in [New homeground](/post/1492335) said:
@innsaneink said in [New homeground](/post/1492329) said:
@mike said in [New homeground](/post/1492183) said:
@innsaneink said in [New homeground](/post/1492160) said:
@russell said in [New homeground](/post/1492066) said:
@innsaneink said in [New homeground](/post/1491912) said:
I. Must say @mike your entire argument is made up of things that haven't happened or you think might happen... Not really strong.

Just upgrade Cambo.... If people.dont wanna follow the team because of the ground or where it is.... Looking at you.... Let them go follow dolphin

Getting a bit tired of this "if you don't like it, go follow someone else."

Maybe people have valid points, maybe people care about the future of the Tigers.

They are voicing opinions and deserve better than - "Go follow someone else"

Disappointed in your statement although you are not the first to voice it.

Yes I know - I should go and follow someone else!

@Russell
Mikes points aren't valid... That's who my posts directed at.

They either havent yet happened, are fabricated... They're just not correct and also made up

Except they are not made up at all. History has shown us who's territory Liverpool is, and it is the Bulldogs. Also don't forget the Bulldogs wanted to take over the Western Suburbs Magpies, not merge. If you don't think that this is still on the agenda for the Wests Tigers then you are just plain wrong. Wests Tigers are currently in a very weak position politically, having never been in the finals for 11 years, they are viewed as an option the merge/relocate by many. Liverpool would be a disaster and the beginning of the end of the franchise.

Enjoy your creative writing, this is boring me

Then put me on foe and don’t read it.

Your arguments are getting worse @mike

No, I just see how this will play out.

You are an intelligent guy @mike, I'm happy for you to disagree with me, but some of your arguments trying to justify what you want are rubbish. To seriously suggest that geographical ties are superseded when every single NRL side is tied deeply to their geographical area is really poor argument and you know it. I am happy for you to prefer the SFS, but stop trying to make this that you are the smartest person in the room so your ideas are correct.

It is OK to just prefer the SFS, even if its because it is easier for you. No need for fantasy.

Souths play out of Homebush.

But are heavily tied to their community in South Sydney, I would actually take South Sydney as a great example of a club successfully playing outside their catchment and I would accept that argument in regards to stadium usage. The argument though was that geographical ties are superseded and even with Souths there is an undeniably strong tie to their geography.

So why would playing at the SFS stop us having ties to our area?

That my friend is a valid argument, though I think it works for Souths as the stadium is central to all of Sydney. Not trying to move the goalpost just reasoning it out. I do see Souths as evidence of a club making it work though.

I really don't see valid arguments not to play at SFS, Homebush or Parra.

Have you been the ANZ?
 
@cochise said in [New homeground](/post/1492345) said:
@mike said in [New homeground](/post/1492342) said:
@cochise said in [New homeground](/post/1492339) said:
@mike said in [New homeground](/post/1492335) said:
@innsaneink said in [New homeground](/post/1492329) said:
@mike said in [New homeground](/post/1492183) said:
@innsaneink said in [New homeground](/post/1492160) said:
@russell said in [New homeground](/post/1492066) said:
@innsaneink said in [New homeground](/post/1491912) said:
I. Must say @mike your entire argument is made up of things that haven't happened or you think might happen... Not really strong.

Just upgrade Cambo.... If people.dont wanna follow the team because of the ground or where it is.... Looking at you.... Let them go follow dolphin

Getting a bit tired of this "if you don't like it, go follow someone else."

Maybe people have valid points, maybe people care about the future of the Tigers.

They are voicing opinions and deserve better than - "Go follow someone else"

Disappointed in your statement although you are not the first to voice it.

Yes I know - I should go and follow someone else!

@Russell
Mikes points aren't valid... That's who my posts directed at.

They either havent yet happened, are fabricated... They're just not correct and also made up

Except they are not made up at all. History has shown us who's territory Liverpool is, and it is the Bulldogs. Also don't forget the Bulldogs wanted to take over the Western Suburbs Magpies, not merge. If you don't think that this is still on the agenda for the Wests Tigers then you are just plain wrong. Wests Tigers are currently in a very weak position politically, having never been in the finals for 11 years, they are viewed as an option the merge/relocate by many. Liverpool would be a disaster and the beginning of the end of the franchise.

Enjoy your creative writing, this is boring me

Then put me on foe and don’t read it.

Your arguments are getting worse @mike

No, I just see how this will play out.

You are an intelligent guy @mike, I'm happy for you to disagree with me, but some of your arguments trying to justify what you want are rubbish. To seriously suggest that geographical ties are superseded when every single NRL side is tied deeply to their geographical area is really poor argument and you know it. I am happy for you to prefer the SFS, but stop trying to make this that you are the smartest person in the room so your ideas are correct.

It is OK to just prefer the SFS, even if its because it is easier for you. No need for fantasy.

Not fantasy but reality. If you can’t see it because you live in the area that’s fine. Just for the record my preferred locations:

Homebush/Lidcombe (Redeveloped or new)
SFS
CSS (redeveloped)

I would attend all games at any of these venues. Given the likelihood of what will be available as a modern, 21st century stadium, SFS it is.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top