New homeground

[the_third]

30k outdoor arena planned for Liverpool by the council ?
https://twitter.com/7NewsSydney/status/1447865008520458246?t=W8kOtOrR3p30ppouvR9SYA&s=19

Plans only, no money. It would be a disaster. Of all the time I have been alive a have never thought for one second that Liverpool is home to the Wests Tigers, Western Suburbs Magpies or the Balmain Tigers. It’s a rubbish idea.

But Moore Park is.

It’s closer to Wests Tigers HQ, Wests Ashfield & any Tigers club that gets developed in Balmain. So yeah.

Its a pretty poor argument that you have never thought of Liverpool as home to Wests Tigers when it is in our catchment but want to play at a stadium outside our area.

Walking past the Giant Roosters logo after losing a home game at Moore Park is a thrill

I suppose sitting on blue and white seats in the Mortimer/ Lamb grandstand in Liverpool is more to many’s liking !

Also having a schooner in the Peter Bullfrog Moore Bar will be fun

At least we will be in Tigers territory, not squatting in Roosters home.

Liverpool is a rubbish choice, weak leadership yet again if it’s true.

20 years to decide on a location that literally pleases no one except the apologists is pathetic

As a Balmain Tigers/Wests Tigers fan of 55 years, a member of 19 years, and a proud resident of Liverpool for the last 35+ years, what the hell gives you the right to pronounce that a potential WT stadium at Liverpool "pleases no one except the apologists"?

Your supreme arrogance is only matched by your ignorance.


it's an opinion just like yours, a straw poll of one. get over it

It's an opinion delivered in an arrogant and abusive tone. And your reply does nothing to question my final comment of your supreme arrogance mathing your supreme ignorance. Get over that one.

RUOK?

 

[GarryOwen]

https://youtu.be/5MYiMq1KokA

Just go here or Bankwest. Let's pretend we're gonna try competing.

Yes - I agree we need to go somewhere with modern facilities, otherwise it suggests we are a second rate club. Geographically it would be better to upgrade Campbelltown and play all our games here. In reality this is not going to happen and Wests Campbelltown Leagues Club don't seem overly interested in the football team's future? SFS or the revamped ANZ for me, but please, ONE home ground.

ANZ isn't being revamped

it will be engineers have been looking at it already and getting it ready for women's soccer world cup along with big screen etc

Are they making it rectangular and replacing the lower bowl?

no not replacing the lower bowl from what I have seen but making it rectangular

I don't think they're making any real changes to the bowl - just putting in a mega-screen at one end.
https://stadiumaustralia.com.au/footer/news-and-media/2020/great-southern-screen-to-transform-game-day-experience-at-stadium-australia/

 

[gallagher]

I. Must say @mike your entire argument is made up of things that haven't happened or you think might happen... Not really strong.

Just upgrade Cambo.... If people.dont wanna follow the team because of the ground or where it is.... Looking at you.... Let them go follow dolphin

Getting a bit tired of this "if you don't like it, go follow someone else."

Maybe people have valid points, maybe people care about the future of the Tigers.

They are voicing opinions and deserve better than - "Go follow someone else"

Disappointed in your statement although you are not the first to voice it.

Yes I know - I should go and follow someone else!

@Russell
Mikes points aren't valid... That's who my posts directed at.

They either havent yet happened, are fabricated... They're just not correct and also made up

Except they are not made up at all. History has shown us who's territory Liverpool is, and it is the Bulldogs. Also don't forget the Bulldogs wanted to take over the Western Suburbs Magpies, not merge. If you don't think that this is still on the agenda for the Wests Tigers then you are just plain wrong. Wests Tigers are currently in a very weak position politically, having never been in the finals for 11 years, they are viewed as an option the merge/relocate by many. Liverpool would be a disaster and the beginning of the end of the franchise.

Enjoy your creative writing, this is boring me

Then put me on foe and don’t read it.

Your arguments are getting worse @mike

No, I just see how this will play out.

You are an intelligent guy @mike, I'm happy for you to disagree with me, but some of your arguments trying to justify what you want are rubbish. To seriously suggest that geographical ties are superseded when every single NRL side is tied deeply to their geographical area is really poor argument and you know it. I am happy for you to prefer the SFS, but stop trying to make this that you are the smartest person in the room so your ideas are correct.

It is OK to just prefer the SFS, even if its because it is easier for you. No need for fantasy.

Souths play out of Homebush.

But are heavily tied to their community in South Sydney, I would actually take South Sydney as a great example of a club successfully playing outside their catchment and I would accept that argument in regards to stadium usage. The argument though was that geographical ties are superseded and even with Souths there is an undeniably strong tie to their geography.

I. Must say @mike your entire argument is made up of things that haven't happened or you think might happen... Not really strong.

Just upgrade Cambo.... If people.dont wanna follow the team because of the ground or where it is.... Looking at you.... Let them go follow dolphin

Getting a bit tired of this "if you don't like it, go follow someone else."

Maybe people have valid points, maybe people care about the future of the Tigers.

They are voicing opinions and deserve better than - "Go follow someone else"

Disappointed in your statement although you are not the first to voice it.

Yes I know - I should go and follow someone else!

@Russell
Mikes points aren't valid... That's who my posts directed at.

They either havent yet happened, are fabricated... They're just not correct and also made up

Except they are not made up at all. History has shown us who's territory Liverpool is, and it is the Bulldogs. Also don't forget the Bulldogs wanted to take over the Western Suburbs Magpies, not merge. If you don't think that this is still on the agenda for the Wests Tigers then you are just plain wrong. Wests Tigers are currently in a very weak position politically, having never been in the finals for 11 years, they are viewed as an option the merge/relocate by many. Liverpool would be a disaster and the beginning of the end of the franchise.

Enjoy your creative writing, this is boring me

Then put me on foe and don’t read it.

Your arguments are getting worse @mike

No, I just see how this will play out.

You are an intelligent guy @mike, I'm happy for you to disagree with me, but some of your arguments trying to justify what you want are rubbish. To seriously suggest that geographical ties are superseded when every single NRL side is tied deeply to their geographical area is really poor argument and you know it. I am happy for you to prefer the SFS, but stop trying to make this that you are the smartest person in the room so your ideas are correct.

It is OK to just prefer the SFS, even if its because it is easier for you. No need for fantasy.

Souths play out of Homebush.

But are heavily tied to their community in South Sydney, I would actually take South Sydney as a great example of a club successfully playing outside their catchment and I would accept that argument in regards to stadium usage. The argument though was that geographical ties are superseded and even with Souths there is an undeniably strong tie to their geography.

So why would playing at the SFS stop us having ties to our area?

That my friend is a valid argument, though I think it works for Souths as the stadium is central to all of Sydney. Not trying to move the goalpost just reasoning it out. I do see Souths as evidence of a club making it work though.

I really don't see valid arguments not to play at SFS, Homebush or Parra.

Have you been the ANZ?

Many times. I don't see a valid argument why the club shouldn't play there. I can see why some don't like it.

 

[Harvey]

The club is on a roll. Pratten Park as the new home ground

 

[Krammy]

https://youtu.be/5MYiMq1KokA

Just go here or Bankwest. Let's pretend we're gonna try competing.

Yes - I agree we need to go somewhere with modern facilities, otherwise it suggests we are a second rate club. Geographically it would be better to upgrade Campbelltown and play all our games here. In reality this is not going to happen and Wests Campbelltown Leagues Club don't seem overly interested in the football team's future? SFS or the revamped ANZ for me, but please, ONE home ground.

ANZ isn't being revamped

OK thanks - would still be SFS or ANZ at this stage.

 

[cochise]

I. Must say @mike your entire argument is made up of things that haven't happened or you think might happen... Not really strong.

Just upgrade Cambo.... If people.dont wanna follow the team because of the ground or where it is.... Looking at you.... Let them go follow dolphin

Getting a bit tired of this "if you don't like it, go follow someone else."

Maybe people have valid points, maybe people care about the future of the Tigers.

They are voicing opinions and deserve better than - "Go follow someone else"

Disappointed in your statement although you are not the first to voice it.

Yes I know - I should go and follow someone else!

@Russell
Mikes points aren't valid... That's who my posts directed at.

They either havent yet happened, are fabricated... They're just not correct and also made up

Except they are not made up at all. History has shown us who's territory Liverpool is, and it is the Bulldogs. Also don't forget the Bulldogs wanted to take over the Western Suburbs Magpies, not merge. If you don't think that this is still on the agenda for the Wests Tigers then you are just plain wrong. Wests Tigers are currently in a very weak position politically, having never been in the finals for 11 years, they are viewed as an option the merge/relocate by many. Liverpool would be a disaster and the beginning of the end of the franchise.

Enjoy your creative writing, this is boring me

Then put me on foe and don’t read it.

Your arguments are getting worse @mike

No, I just see how this will play out.

You are an intelligent guy @mike, I'm happy for you to disagree with me, but some of your arguments trying to justify what you want are rubbish. To seriously suggest that geographical ties are superseded when every single NRL side is tied deeply to their geographical area is really poor argument and you know it. I am happy for you to prefer the SFS, but stop trying to make this that you are the smartest person in the room so your ideas are correct.

It is OK to just prefer the SFS, even if its because it is easier for you. No need for fantasy.

Souths play out of Homebush.

But are heavily tied to their community in South Sydney, I would actually take South Sydney as a great example of a club successfully playing outside their catchment and I would accept that argument in regards to stadium usage. The argument though was that geographical ties are superseded and even with Souths there is an undeniably strong tie to their geography.

I. Must say @mike your entire argument is made up of things that haven't happened or you think might happen... Not really strong.

Just upgrade Cambo.... If people.dont wanna follow the team because of the ground or where it is.... Looking at you.... Let them go follow dolphin

Getting a bit tired of this "if you don't like it, go follow someone else."

Maybe people have valid points, maybe people care about the future of the Tigers.

They are voicing opinions and deserve better than - "Go follow someone else"

Disappointed in your statement although you are not the first to voice it.

Yes I know - I should go and follow someone else!

@Russell
Mikes points aren't valid... That's who my posts directed at.

They either havent yet happened, are fabricated... They're just not correct and also made up

Except they are not made up at all. History has shown us who's territory Liverpool is, and it is the Bulldogs. Also don't forget the Bulldogs wanted to take over the Western Suburbs Magpies, not merge. If you don't think that this is still on the agenda for the Wests Tigers then you are just plain wrong. Wests Tigers are currently in a very weak position politically, having never been in the finals for 11 years, they are viewed as an option the merge/relocate by many. Liverpool would be a disaster and the beginning of the end of the franchise.

Enjoy your creative writing, this is boring me

Then put me on foe and don’t read it.

Your arguments are getting worse @mike

No, I just see how this will play out.

You are an intelligent guy @mike, I'm happy for you to disagree with me, but some of your arguments trying to justify what you want are rubbish. To seriously suggest that geographical ties are superseded when every single NRL side is tied deeply to their geographical area is really poor argument and you know it. I am happy for you to prefer the SFS, but stop trying to make this that you are the smartest person in the room so your ideas are correct.

It is OK to just prefer the SFS, even if its because it is easier for you. No need for fantasy.

Souths play out of Homebush.

But are heavily tied to their community in South Sydney, I would actually take South Sydney as a great example of a club successfully playing outside their catchment and I would accept that argument in regards to stadium usage. The argument though was that geographical ties are superseded and even with Souths there is an undeniably strong tie to their geography.

So why would playing at the SFS stop us having ties to our area?

That my friend is a valid argument, though I think it works for Souths as the stadium is central to all of Sydney. Not trying to move the goalpost just reasoning it out. I do see Souths as evidence of a club making it work though.

I really don't see valid arguments not to play at SFS, Homebush or Parra.

Have you been the ANZ?

Many times. I don't see a valid argument why the club shouldn't play there. I can see why some don't like it.

That we don't fill a quarter of it.

 

[hobbo1]

I. Must say @mike your entire argument is made up of things that haven't happened or you think might happen... Not really strong.

Just upgrade Cambo.... If people.dont wanna follow the team because of the ground or where it is.... Looking at you.... Let them go follow dolphin

Getting a bit tired of this "if you don't like it, go follow someone else."

Maybe people have valid points, maybe people care about the future of the Tigers.

They are voicing opinions and deserve better than - "Go follow someone else"

Disappointed in your statement although you are not the first to voice it.

Yes I know - I should go and follow someone else!

@Russell
Mikes points aren't valid... That's who my posts directed at.

They either havent yet happened, are fabricated... They're just not correct and also made up

Except they are not made up at all. History has shown us who's territory Liverpool is, and it is the Bulldogs. Also don't forget the Bulldogs wanted to take over the Western Suburbs Magpies, not merge. If you don't think that this is still on the agenda for the Wests Tigers then you are just plain wrong. Wests Tigers are currently in a very weak position politically, having never been in the finals for 11 years, they are viewed as an option the merge/relocate by many. Liverpool would be a disaster and the beginning of the end of the franchise.

Enjoy your creative writing, this is boring me

Then put me on foe and don’t read it.

Your arguments are getting worse @mike

No, I just see how this will play out.

You are an intelligent guy @mike, I'm happy for you to disagree with me, but some of your arguments trying to justify what you want are rubbish. To seriously suggest that geographical ties are superseded when every single NRL side is tied deeply to their geographical area is really poor argument and you know it. I am happy for you to prefer the SFS, but stop trying to make this that you are the smartest person in the room so your ideas are correct.

It is OK to just prefer the SFS, even if its because it is easier for you. No need for fantasy.

Souths play out of Homebush.

But are heavily tied to their community in South Sydney, I would actually take South Sydney as a great example of a club successfully playing outside their catchment and I would accept that argument in regards to stadium usage. The argument though was that geographical ties are superseded and even with Souths there is an undeniably strong tie to their geography.

I. Must say @mike your entire argument is made up of things that haven't happened or you think might happen... Not really strong.

Just upgrade Cambo.... If people.dont wanna follow the team because of the ground or where it is.... Looking at you.... Let them go follow dolphin

Getting a bit tired of this "if you don't like it, go follow someone else."

Maybe people have valid points, maybe people care about the future of the Tigers.

They are voicing opinions and deserve better than - "Go follow someone else"

Disappointed in your statement although you are not the first to voice it.

Yes I know - I should go and follow someone else!

@Russell
Mikes points aren't valid... That's who my posts directed at.

They either havent yet happened, are fabricated... They're just not correct and also made up

Except they are not made up at all. History has shown us who's territory Liverpool is, and it is the Bulldogs. Also don't forget the Bulldogs wanted to take over the Western Suburbs Magpies, not merge. If you don't think that this is still on the agenda for the Wests Tigers then you are just plain wrong. Wests Tigers are currently in a very weak position politically, having never been in the finals for 11 years, they are viewed as an option the merge/relocate by many. Liverpool would be a disaster and the beginning of the end of the franchise.

Enjoy your creative writing, this is boring me

Then put me on foe and don’t read it.

Your arguments are getting worse @mike

No, I just see how this will play out.

You are an intelligent guy @mike, I'm happy for you to disagree with me, but some of your arguments trying to justify what you want are rubbish. To seriously suggest that geographical ties are superseded when every single NRL side is tied deeply to their geographical area is really poor argument and you know it. I am happy for you to prefer the SFS, but stop trying to make this that you are the smartest person in the room so your ideas are correct.

It is OK to just prefer the SFS, even if its because it is easier for you. No need for fantasy.

Souths play out of Homebush.

But are heavily tied to their community in South Sydney, I would actually take South Sydney as a great example of a club successfully playing outside their catchment and I would accept that argument in regards to stadium usage. The argument though was that geographical ties are superseded and even with Souths there is an undeniably strong tie to their geography.

So why would playing at the SFS stop us having ties to our area?

That my friend is a valid argument, though I think it works for Souths as the stadium is central to all of Sydney. Not trying to move the goalpost just reasoning it out. I do see Souths as evidence of a club making it work though.

I really don't see valid arguments not to play at SFS, Homebush or Parra.

Have you been the ANZ?

Many times. I don't see a valid argument why the club shouldn't play there. I can see why some don't like it.

That we don't fill a quarter of it.

Cause we’re shit ?

No Sydney club can fill a quarter of it.

I like leg room

 

[cochise]

I. Must say @mike your entire argument is made up of things that haven't happened or you think might happen... Not really strong.

Just upgrade Cambo.... If people.dont wanna follow the team because of the ground or where it is.... Looking at you.... Let them go follow dolphin

Getting a bit tired of this "if you don't like it, go follow someone else."

Maybe people have valid points, maybe people care about the future of the Tigers.

They are voicing opinions and deserve better than - "Go follow someone else"

Disappointed in your statement although you are not the first to voice it.

Yes I know - I should go and follow someone else!

@Russell
Mikes points aren't valid... That's who my posts directed at.

They either havent yet happened, are fabricated... They're just not correct and also made up

Except they are not made up at all. History has shown us who's territory Liverpool is, and it is the Bulldogs. Also don't forget the Bulldogs wanted to take over the Western Suburbs Magpies, not merge. If you don't think that this is still on the agenda for the Wests Tigers then you are just plain wrong. Wests Tigers are currently in a very weak position politically, having never been in the finals for 11 years, they are viewed as an option the merge/relocate by many. Liverpool would be a disaster and the beginning of the end of the franchise.

Enjoy your creative writing, this is boring me

Then put me on foe and don’t read it.

Your arguments are getting worse @mike

No, I just see how this will play out.

You are an intelligent guy @mike, I'm happy for you to disagree with me, but some of your arguments trying to justify what you want are rubbish. To seriously suggest that geographical ties are superseded when every single NRL side is tied deeply to their geographical area is really poor argument and you know it. I am happy for you to prefer the SFS, but stop trying to make this that you are the smartest person in the room so your ideas are correct.

It is OK to just prefer the SFS, even if its because it is easier for you. No need for fantasy.

Souths play out of Homebush.

But are heavily tied to their community in South Sydney, I would actually take South Sydney as a great example of a club successfully playing outside their catchment and I would accept that argument in regards to stadium usage. The argument though was that geographical ties are superseded and even with Souths there is an undeniably strong tie to their geography.

I. Must say @mike your entire argument is made up of things that haven't happened or you think might happen... Not really strong.

Just upgrade Cambo.... If people.dont wanna follow the team because of the ground or where it is.... Looking at you.... Let them go follow dolphin

Getting a bit tired of this "if you don't like it, go follow someone else."

Maybe people have valid points, maybe people care about the future of the Tigers.

They are voicing opinions and deserve better than - "Go follow someone else"

Disappointed in your statement although you are not the first to voice it.

Yes I know - I should go and follow someone else!

@Russell
Mikes points aren't valid... That's who my posts directed at.

They either havent yet happened, are fabricated... They're just not correct and also made up

Except they are not made up at all. History has shown us who's territory Liverpool is, and it is the Bulldogs. Also don't forget the Bulldogs wanted to take over the Western Suburbs Magpies, not merge. If you don't think that this is still on the agenda for the Wests Tigers then you are just plain wrong. Wests Tigers are currently in a very weak position politically, having never been in the finals for 11 years, they are viewed as an option the merge/relocate by many. Liverpool would be a disaster and the beginning of the end of the franchise.

Enjoy your creative writing, this is boring me

Then put me on foe and don’t read it.

Your arguments are getting worse @mike

No, I just see how this will play out.

You are an intelligent guy @mike, I'm happy for you to disagree with me, but some of your arguments trying to justify what you want are rubbish. To seriously suggest that geographical ties are superseded when every single NRL side is tied deeply to their geographical area is really poor argument and you know it. I am happy for you to prefer the SFS, but stop trying to make this that you are the smartest person in the room so your ideas are correct.

It is OK to just prefer the SFS, even if its because it is easier for you. No need for fantasy.

Souths play out of Homebush.

But are heavily tied to their community in South Sydney, I would actually take South Sydney as a great example of a club successfully playing outside their catchment and I would accept that argument in regards to stadium usage. The argument though was that geographical ties are superseded and even with Souths there is an undeniably strong tie to their geography.

So why would playing at the SFS stop us having ties to our area?

That my friend is a valid argument, though I think it works for Souths as the stadium is central to all of Sydney. Not trying to move the goalpost just reasoning it out. I do see Souths as evidence of a club making it work though.

I really don't see valid arguments not to play at SFS, Homebush or Parra.

Have you been the ANZ?

Many times. I don't see a valid argument why the club shouldn't play there. I can see why some don't like it.

That we don't fill a quarter of it.

Cause we’re shit ?

No Sydney club can fill a quarter of it.

I like leg room

You can lay down if you want lol

 

[mike]

I. Must say @mike your entire argument is made up of things that haven't happened or you think might happen... Not really strong.

Just upgrade Cambo.... If people.dont wanna follow the team because of the ground or where it is.... Looking at you.... Let them go follow dolphin

Getting a bit tired of this "if you don't like it, go follow someone else."

Maybe people have valid points, maybe people care about the future of the Tigers.

They are voicing opinions and deserve better than - "Go follow someone else"

Disappointed in your statement although you are not the first to voice it.

Yes I know - I should go and follow someone else!

@Russell
Mikes points aren't valid... That's who my posts directed at.

They either havent yet happened, are fabricated... They're just not correct and also made up

Except they are not made up at all. History has shown us who's territory Liverpool is, and it is the Bulldogs. Also don't forget the Bulldogs wanted to take over the Western Suburbs Magpies, not merge. If you don't think that this is still on the agenda for the Wests Tigers then you are just plain wrong. Wests Tigers are currently in a very weak position politically, having never been in the finals for 11 years, they are viewed as an option the merge/relocate by many. Liverpool would be a disaster and the beginning of the end of the franchise.

Enjoy your creative writing, this is boring me

Then put me on foe and don’t read it.

Your arguments are getting worse @mike

No, I just see how this will play out.

You are an intelligent guy @mike, I'm happy for you to disagree with me, but some of your arguments trying to justify what you want are rubbish. To seriously suggest that geographical ties are superseded when every single NRL side is tied deeply to their geographical area is really poor argument and you know it. I am happy for you to prefer the SFS, but stop trying to make this that you are the smartest person in the room so your ideas are correct.

It is OK to just prefer the SFS, even if its because it is easier for you. No need for fantasy.

Souths play out of Homebush.

But are heavily tied to their community in South Sydney, I would actually take South Sydney as a great example of a club successfully playing outside their catchment and I would accept that argument in regards to stadium usage. The argument though was that geographical ties are superseded and even with Souths there is an undeniably strong tie to their geography.

I. Must say @mike your entire argument is made up of things that haven't happened or you think might happen... Not really strong.

Just upgrade Cambo.... If people.dont wanna follow the team because of the ground or where it is.... Looking at you.... Let them go follow dolphin

Getting a bit tired of this "if you don't like it, go follow someone else."

Maybe people have valid points, maybe people care about the future of the Tigers.

They are voicing opinions and deserve better than - "Go follow someone else"

Disappointed in your statement although you are not the first to voice it.

Yes I know - I should go and follow someone else!

@Russell
Mikes points aren't valid... That's who my posts directed at.

They either havent yet happened, are fabricated... They're just not correct and also made up

Except they are not made up at all. History has shown us who's territory Liverpool is, and it is the Bulldogs. Also don't forget the Bulldogs wanted to take over the Western Suburbs Magpies, not merge. If you don't think that this is still on the agenda for the Wests Tigers then you are just plain wrong. Wests Tigers are currently in a very weak position politically, having never been in the finals for 11 years, they are viewed as an option the merge/relocate by many. Liverpool would be a disaster and the beginning of the end of the franchise.

Enjoy your creative writing, this is boring me

Then put me on foe and don’t read it.

Your arguments are getting worse @mike

No, I just see how this will play out.

You are an intelligent guy @mike, I'm happy for you to disagree with me, but some of your arguments trying to justify what you want are rubbish. To seriously suggest that geographical ties are superseded when every single NRL side is tied deeply to their geographical area is really poor argument and you know it. I am happy for you to prefer the SFS, but stop trying to make this that you are the smartest person in the room so your ideas are correct.

It is OK to just prefer the SFS, even if its because it is easier for you. No need for fantasy.

Souths play out of Homebush.

But are heavily tied to their community in South Sydney, I would actually take South Sydney as a great example of a club successfully playing outside their catchment and I would accept that argument in regards to stadium usage. The argument though was that geographical ties are superseded and even with Souths there is an undeniably strong tie to their geography.

So why would playing at the SFS stop us having ties to our area?

That my friend is a valid argument, though I think it works for Souths as the stadium is central to all of Sydney. Not trying to move the goalpost just reasoning it out. I do see Souths as evidence of a club making it work though.

I really don't see valid arguments not to play at SFS, Homebush or Parra.

Have you been the ANZ?

Many times. I don't see a valid argument why the club shouldn't play there. I can see why some don't like it.

That we don't fill a quarter of it.

Cause we’re shit ?

No Sydney club can fill a quarter of it.

I like leg room

You can lay down if you want lol

ANZ is great, I can sit with all my friends.

 

[cochise]

I. Must say @mike your entire argument is made up of things that haven't happened or you think might happen... Not really strong.

Just upgrade Cambo.... If people.dont wanna follow the team because of the ground or where it is.... Looking at you.... Let them go follow dolphin

Getting a bit tired of this "if you don't like it, go follow someone else."

Maybe people have valid points, maybe people care about the future of the Tigers.

They are voicing opinions and deserve better than - "Go follow someone else"

Disappointed in your statement although you are not the first to voice it.

Yes I know - I should go and follow someone else!

@Russell
Mikes points aren't valid... That's who my posts directed at.

They either havent yet happened, are fabricated... They're just not correct and also made up

Except they are not made up at all. History has shown us who's territory Liverpool is, and it is the Bulldogs. Also don't forget the Bulldogs wanted to take over the Western Suburbs Magpies, not merge. If you don't think that this is still on the agenda for the Wests Tigers then you are just plain wrong. Wests Tigers are currently in a very weak position politically, having never been in the finals for 11 years, they are viewed as an option the merge/relocate by many. Liverpool would be a disaster and the beginning of the end of the franchise.

Enjoy your creative writing, this is boring me

Then put me on foe and don’t read it.

Your arguments are getting worse @mike

No, I just see how this will play out.

You are an intelligent guy @mike, I'm happy for you to disagree with me, but some of your arguments trying to justify what you want are rubbish. To seriously suggest that geographical ties are superseded when every single NRL side is tied deeply to their geographical area is really poor argument and you know it. I am happy for you to prefer the SFS, but stop trying to make this that you are the smartest person in the room so your ideas are correct.

It is OK to just prefer the SFS, even if its because it is easier for you. No need for fantasy.

Souths play out of Homebush.

But are heavily tied to their community in South Sydney, I would actually take South Sydney as a great example of a club successfully playing outside their catchment and I would accept that argument in regards to stadium usage. The argument though was that geographical ties are superseded and even with Souths there is an undeniably strong tie to their geography.

I. Must say @mike your entire argument is made up of things that haven't happened or you think might happen... Not really strong.

Just upgrade Cambo.... If people.dont wanna follow the team because of the ground or where it is.... Looking at you.... Let them go follow dolphin

Getting a bit tired of this "if you don't like it, go follow someone else."

Maybe people have valid points, maybe people care about the future of the Tigers.

They are voicing opinions and deserve better than - "Go follow someone else"

Disappointed in your statement although you are not the first to voice it.

Yes I know - I should go and follow someone else!

@Russell
Mikes points aren't valid... That's who my posts directed at.

They either havent yet happened, are fabricated... They're just not correct and also made up

Except they are not made up at all. History has shown us who's territory Liverpool is, and it is the Bulldogs. Also don't forget the Bulldogs wanted to take over the Western Suburbs Magpies, not merge. If you don't think that this is still on the agenda for the Wests Tigers then you are just plain wrong. Wests Tigers are currently in a very weak position politically, having never been in the finals for 11 years, they are viewed as an option the merge/relocate by many. Liverpool would be a disaster and the beginning of the end of the franchise.

Enjoy your creative writing, this is boring me

Then put me on foe and don’t read it.

Your arguments are getting worse @mike

No, I just see how this will play out.

You are an intelligent guy @mike, I'm happy for you to disagree with me, but some of your arguments trying to justify what you want are rubbish. To seriously suggest that geographical ties are superseded when every single NRL side is tied deeply to their geographical area is really poor argument and you know it. I am happy for you to prefer the SFS, but stop trying to make this that you are the smartest person in the room so your ideas are correct.

It is OK to just prefer the SFS, even if its because it is easier for you. No need for fantasy.

Souths play out of Homebush.

But are heavily tied to their community in South Sydney, I would actually take South Sydney as a great example of a club successfully playing outside their catchment and I would accept that argument in regards to stadium usage. The argument though was that geographical ties are superseded and even with Souths there is an undeniably strong tie to their geography.

So why would playing at the SFS stop us having ties to our area?

That my friend is a valid argument, though I think it works for Souths as the stadium is central to all of Sydney. Not trying to move the goalpost just reasoning it out. I do see Souths as evidence of a club making it work though.

I really don't see valid arguments not to play at SFS, Homebush or Parra.

Have you been the ANZ?

Many times. I don't see a valid argument why the club shouldn't play there. I can see why some don't like it.

That we don't fill a quarter of it.

Cause we’re shit ?

No Sydney club can fill a quarter of it.

I like leg room

You can lay down if you want lol

ANZ is great, I can sit with all my friends.

Do you have 60 000 more you can bring? We have room for them.

 

[mike]

I. Must say @mike your entire argument is made up of things that haven't happened or you think might happen... Not really strong.

Just upgrade Cambo.... If people.dont wanna follow the team because of the ground or where it is.... Looking at you.... Let them go follow dolphin

Getting a bit tired of this "if you don't like it, go follow someone else."

Maybe people have valid points, maybe people care about the future of the Tigers.

They are voicing opinions and deserve better than - "Go follow someone else"

Disappointed in your statement although you are not the first to voice it.

Yes I know - I should go and follow someone else!

@Russell
Mikes points aren't valid... That's who my posts directed at.

They either havent yet happened, are fabricated... They're just not correct and also made up

Except they are not made up at all. History has shown us who's territory Liverpool is, and it is the Bulldogs. Also don't forget the Bulldogs wanted to take over the Western Suburbs Magpies, not merge. If you don't think that this is still on the agenda for the Wests Tigers then you are just plain wrong. Wests Tigers are currently in a very weak position politically, having never been in the finals for 11 years, they are viewed as an option the merge/relocate by many. Liverpool would be a disaster and the beginning of the end of the franchise.

Enjoy your creative writing, this is boring me

Then put me on foe and don’t read it.

Your arguments are getting worse @mike

No, I just see how this will play out.

You are an intelligent guy @mike, I'm happy for you to disagree with me, but some of your arguments trying to justify what you want are rubbish. To seriously suggest that geographical ties are superseded when every single NRL side is tied deeply to their geographical area is really poor argument and you know it. I am happy for you to prefer the SFS, but stop trying to make this that you are the smartest person in the room so your ideas are correct.

It is OK to just prefer the SFS, even if its because it is easier for you. No need for fantasy.

Souths play out of Homebush.

But are heavily tied to their community in South Sydney, I would actually take South Sydney as a great example of a club successfully playing outside their catchment and I would accept that argument in regards to stadium usage. The argument though was that geographical ties are superseded and even with Souths there is an undeniably strong tie to their geography.

I. Must say @mike your entire argument is made up of things that haven't happened or you think might happen... Not really strong.

Just upgrade Cambo.... If people.dont wanna follow the team because of the ground or where it is.... Looking at you.... Let them go follow dolphin

Getting a bit tired of this "if you don't like it, go follow someone else."

Maybe people have valid points, maybe people care about the future of the Tigers.

They are voicing opinions and deserve better than - "Go follow someone else"

Disappointed in your statement although you are not the first to voice it.

Yes I know - I should go and follow someone else!

@Russell
Mikes points aren't valid... That's who my posts directed at.

They either havent yet happened, are fabricated... They're just not correct and also made up

Except they are not made up at all. History has shown us who's territory Liverpool is, and it is the Bulldogs. Also don't forget the Bulldogs wanted to take over the Western Suburbs Magpies, not merge. If you don't think that this is still on the agenda for the Wests Tigers then you are just plain wrong. Wests Tigers are currently in a very weak position politically, having never been in the finals for 11 years, they are viewed as an option the merge/relocate by many. Liverpool would be a disaster and the beginning of the end of the franchise.

Enjoy your creative writing, this is boring me

Then put me on foe and don’t read it.

Your arguments are getting worse @mike

No, I just see how this will play out.

You are an intelligent guy @mike, I'm happy for you to disagree with me, but some of your arguments trying to justify what you want are rubbish. To seriously suggest that geographical ties are superseded when every single NRL side is tied deeply to their geographical area is really poor argument and you know it. I am happy for you to prefer the SFS, but stop trying to make this that you are the smartest person in the room so your ideas are correct.

It is OK to just prefer the SFS, even if its because it is easier for you. No need for fantasy.

Souths play out of Homebush.

But are heavily tied to their community in South Sydney, I would actually take South Sydney as a great example of a club successfully playing outside their catchment and I would accept that argument in regards to stadium usage. The argument though was that geographical ties are superseded and even with Souths there is an undeniably strong tie to their geography.

So why would playing at the SFS stop us having ties to our area?

That my friend is a valid argument, though I think it works for Souths as the stadium is central to all of Sydney. Not trying to move the goalpost just reasoning it out. I do see Souths as evidence of a club making it work though.

I really don't see valid arguments not to play at SFS, Homebush or Parra.

Have you been the ANZ?

Many times. I don't see a valid argument why the club shouldn't play there. I can see why some don't like it.

That we don't fill a quarter of it.

Cause we’re shit ?

No Sydney club can fill a quarter of it.

I like leg room

You can lay down if you want lol

ANZ is great, I can sit with all my friends.

Do you have 60 000 more you can bring? We have room for them.

No, but I can sit on my own in peace.

 

[cochise]

I. Must say @mike your entire argument is made up of things that haven't happened or you think might happen... Not really strong.

Just upgrade Cambo.... If people.dont wanna follow the team because of the ground or where it is.... Looking at you.... Let them go follow dolphin

Getting a bit tired of this "if you don't like it, go follow someone else."

Maybe people have valid points, maybe people care about the future of the Tigers.

They are voicing opinions and deserve better than - "Go follow someone else"

Disappointed in your statement although you are not the first to voice it.

Yes I know - I should go and follow someone else!

@Russell
Mikes points aren't valid... That's who my posts directed at.

They either havent yet happened, are fabricated... They're just not correct and also made up

Except they are not made up at all. History has shown us who's territory Liverpool is, and it is the Bulldogs. Also don't forget the Bulldogs wanted to take over the Western Suburbs Magpies, not merge. If you don't think that this is still on the agenda for the Wests Tigers then you are just plain wrong. Wests Tigers are currently in a very weak position politically, having never been in the finals for 11 years, they are viewed as an option the merge/relocate by many. Liverpool would be a disaster and the beginning of the end of the franchise.

Enjoy your creative writing, this is boring me

Then put me on foe and don’t read it.

Your arguments are getting worse @mike

No, I just see how this will play out.

You are an intelligent guy @mike, I'm happy for you to disagree with me, but some of your arguments trying to justify what you want are rubbish. To seriously suggest that geographical ties are superseded when every single NRL side is tied deeply to their geographical area is really poor argument and you know it. I am happy for you to prefer the SFS, but stop trying to make this that you are the smartest person in the room so your ideas are correct.

It is OK to just prefer the SFS, even if its because it is easier for you. No need for fantasy.

Souths play out of Homebush.

But are heavily tied to their community in South Sydney, I would actually take South Sydney as a great example of a club successfully playing outside their catchment and I would accept that argument in regards to stadium usage. The argument though was that geographical ties are superseded and even with Souths there is an undeniably strong tie to their geography.

I. Must say @mike your entire argument is made up of things that haven't happened or you think might happen... Not really strong.

Just upgrade Cambo.... If people.dont wanna follow the team because of the ground or where it is.... Looking at you.... Let them go follow dolphin

Getting a bit tired of this "if you don't like it, go follow someone else."

Maybe people have valid points, maybe people care about the future of the Tigers.

They are voicing opinions and deserve better than - "Go follow someone else"

Disappointed in your statement although you are not the first to voice it.

Yes I know - I should go and follow someone else!

@Russell
Mikes points aren't valid... That's who my posts directed at.

They either havent yet happened, are fabricated... They're just not correct and also made up

Except they are not made up at all. History has shown us who's territory Liverpool is, and it is the Bulldogs. Also don't forget the Bulldogs wanted to take over the Western Suburbs Magpies, not merge. If you don't think that this is still on the agenda for the Wests Tigers then you are just plain wrong. Wests Tigers are currently in a very weak position politically, having never been in the finals for 11 years, they are viewed as an option the merge/relocate by many. Liverpool would be a disaster and the beginning of the end of the franchise.

Enjoy your creative writing, this is boring me

Then put me on foe and don’t read it.

Your arguments are getting worse @mike

No, I just see how this will play out.

You are an intelligent guy @mike, I'm happy for you to disagree with me, but some of your arguments trying to justify what you want are rubbish. To seriously suggest that geographical ties are superseded when every single NRL side is tied deeply to their geographical area is really poor argument and you know it. I am happy for you to prefer the SFS, but stop trying to make this that you are the smartest person in the room so your ideas are correct.

It is OK to just prefer the SFS, even if its because it is easier for you. No need for fantasy.

Souths play out of Homebush.

But are heavily tied to their community in South Sydney, I would actually take South Sydney as a great example of a club successfully playing outside their catchment and I would accept that argument in regards to stadium usage. The argument though was that geographical ties are superseded and even with Souths there is an undeniably strong tie to their geography.

So why would playing at the SFS stop us having ties to our area?

That my friend is a valid argument, though I think it works for Souths as the stadium is central to all of Sydney. Not trying to move the goalpost just reasoning it out. I do see Souths as evidence of a club making it work though.

I really don't see valid arguments not to play at SFS, Homebush or Parra.

Have you been the ANZ?

Many times. I don't see a valid argument why the club shouldn't play there. I can see why some don't like it.

That we don't fill a quarter of it.

Cause we’re shit ?

No Sydney club can fill a quarter of it.

I like leg room

You can lay down if you want lol

ANZ is great, I can sit with all my friends.

Do you have 60 000 more you can bring? We have room for them.

No, but I can sit on my own in peace.

You can do that at home.

 

[mike]

I. Must say @mike your entire argument is made up of things that haven't happened or you think might happen... Not really strong.

Just upgrade Cambo.... If people.dont wanna follow the team because of the ground or where it is.... Looking at you.... Let them go follow dolphin

Getting a bit tired of this "if you don't like it, go follow someone else."

Maybe people have valid points, maybe people care about the future of the Tigers.

They are voicing opinions and deserve better than - "Go follow someone else"

Disappointed in your statement although you are not the first to voice it.

Yes I know - I should go and follow someone else!

@Russell
Mikes points aren't valid... That's who my posts directed at.

They either havent yet happened, are fabricated... They're just not correct and also made up

Except they are not made up at all. History has shown us who's territory Liverpool is, and it is the Bulldogs. Also don't forget the Bulldogs wanted to take over the Western Suburbs Magpies, not merge. If you don't think that this is still on the agenda for the Wests Tigers then you are just plain wrong. Wests Tigers are currently in a very weak position politically, having never been in the finals for 11 years, they are viewed as an option the merge/relocate by many. Liverpool would be a disaster and the beginning of the end of the franchise.

Enjoy your creative writing, this is boring me

Then put me on foe and don’t read it.

Your arguments are getting worse @mike

No, I just see how this will play out.

You are an intelligent guy @mike, I'm happy for you to disagree with me, but some of your arguments trying to justify what you want are rubbish. To seriously suggest that geographical ties are superseded when every single NRL side is tied deeply to their geographical area is really poor argument and you know it. I am happy for you to prefer the SFS, but stop trying to make this that you are the smartest person in the room so your ideas are correct.

It is OK to just prefer the SFS, even if its because it is easier for you. No need for fantasy.

Souths play out of Homebush.

But are heavily tied to their community in South Sydney, I would actually take South Sydney as a great example of a club successfully playing outside their catchment and I would accept that argument in regards to stadium usage. The argument though was that geographical ties are superseded and even with Souths there is an undeniably strong tie to their geography.

I. Must say @mike your entire argument is made up of things that haven't happened or you think might happen... Not really strong.

Just upgrade Cambo.... If people.dont wanna follow the team because of the ground or where it is.... Looking at you.... Let them go follow dolphin

Getting a bit tired of this "if you don't like it, go follow someone else."

Maybe people have valid points, maybe people care about the future of the Tigers.

They are voicing opinions and deserve better than - "Go follow someone else"

Disappointed in your statement although you are not the first to voice it.

Yes I know - I should go and follow someone else!

@Russell
Mikes points aren't valid... That's who my posts directed at.

They either havent yet happened, are fabricated... They're just not correct and also made up

Except they are not made up at all. History has shown us who's territory Liverpool is, and it is the Bulldogs. Also don't forget the Bulldogs wanted to take over the Western Suburbs Magpies, not merge. If you don't think that this is still on the agenda for the Wests Tigers then you are just plain wrong. Wests Tigers are currently in a very weak position politically, having never been in the finals for 11 years, they are viewed as an option the merge/relocate by many. Liverpool would be a disaster and the beginning of the end of the franchise.

Enjoy your creative writing, this is boring me

Then put me on foe and don’t read it.

Your arguments are getting worse @mike

No, I just see how this will play out.

You are an intelligent guy @mike, I'm happy for you to disagree with me, but some of your arguments trying to justify what you want are rubbish. To seriously suggest that geographical ties are superseded when every single NRL side is tied deeply to their geographical area is really poor argument and you know it. I am happy for you to prefer the SFS, but stop trying to make this that you are the smartest person in the room so your ideas are correct.

It is OK to just prefer the SFS, even if its because it is easier for you. No need for fantasy.

Souths play out of Homebush.

But are heavily tied to their community in South Sydney, I would actually take South Sydney as a great example of a club successfully playing outside their catchment and I would accept that argument in regards to stadium usage. The argument though was that geographical ties are superseded and even with Souths there is an undeniably strong tie to their geography.

So why would playing at the SFS stop us having ties to our area?

That my friend is a valid argument, though I think it works for Souths as the stadium is central to all of Sydney. Not trying to move the goalpost just reasoning it out. I do see Souths as evidence of a club making it work though.

I really don't see valid arguments not to play at SFS, Homebush or Parra.

Have you been the ANZ?

Many times. I don't see a valid argument why the club shouldn't play there. I can see why some don't like it.

That we don't fill a quarter of it.

Cause we’re shit ?

No Sydney club can fill a quarter of it.

I like leg room

You can lay down if you want lol

ANZ is great, I can sit with all my friends.

Do you have 60 000 more you can bring? We have room for them.

No, but I can sit on my own in peace.

You can do that at home.

Not the same as being at the ground... lol

 

[cochise]

I. Must say @mike your entire argument is made up of things that haven't happened or you think might happen... Not really strong.

Just upgrade Cambo.... If people.dont wanna follow the team because of the ground or where it is.... Looking at you.... Let them go follow dolphin

Getting a bit tired of this "if you don't like it, go follow someone else."

Maybe people have valid points, maybe people care about the future of the Tigers.

They are voicing opinions and deserve better than - "Go follow someone else"

Disappointed in your statement although you are not the first to voice it.

Yes I know - I should go and follow someone else!

@Russell
Mikes points aren't valid... That's who my posts directed at.

They either havent yet happened, are fabricated... They're just not correct and also made up

Except they are not made up at all. History has shown us who's territory Liverpool is, and it is the Bulldogs. Also don't forget the Bulldogs wanted to take over the Western Suburbs Magpies, not merge. If you don't think that this is still on the agenda for the Wests Tigers then you are just plain wrong. Wests Tigers are currently in a very weak position politically, having never been in the finals for 11 years, they are viewed as an option the merge/relocate by many. Liverpool would be a disaster and the beginning of the end of the franchise.

Enjoy your creative writing, this is boring me

Then put me on foe and don’t read it.

Your arguments are getting worse @mike

No, I just see how this will play out.

You are an intelligent guy @mike, I'm happy for you to disagree with me, but some of your arguments trying to justify what you want are rubbish. To seriously suggest that geographical ties are superseded when every single NRL side is tied deeply to their geographical area is really poor argument and you know it. I am happy for you to prefer the SFS, but stop trying to make this that you are the smartest person in the room so your ideas are correct.

It is OK to just prefer the SFS, even if its because it is easier for you. No need for fantasy.

Souths play out of Homebush.

But are heavily tied to their community in South Sydney, I would actually take South Sydney as a great example of a club successfully playing outside their catchment and I would accept that argument in regards to stadium usage. The argument though was that geographical ties are superseded and even with Souths there is an undeniably strong tie to their geography.

I. Must say @mike your entire argument is made up of things that haven't happened or you think might happen... Not really strong.

Just upgrade Cambo.... If people.dont wanna follow the team because of the ground or where it is.... Looking at you.... Let them go follow dolphin

Getting a bit tired of this "if you don't like it, go follow someone else."

Maybe people have valid points, maybe people care about the future of the Tigers.

They are voicing opinions and deserve better than - "Go follow someone else"

Disappointed in your statement although you are not the first to voice it.

Yes I know - I should go and follow someone else!

@Russell
Mikes points aren't valid... That's who my posts directed at.

They either havent yet happened, are fabricated... They're just not correct and also made up

Except they are not made up at all. History has shown us who's territory Liverpool is, and it is the Bulldogs. Also don't forget the Bulldogs wanted to take over the Western Suburbs Magpies, not merge. If you don't think that this is still on the agenda for the Wests Tigers then you are just plain wrong. Wests Tigers are currently in a very weak position politically, having never been in the finals for 11 years, they are viewed as an option the merge/relocate by many. Liverpool would be a disaster and the beginning of the end of the franchise.

Enjoy your creative writing, this is boring me

Then put me on foe and don’t read it.

Your arguments are getting worse @mike

No, I just see how this will play out.

You are an intelligent guy @mike, I'm happy for you to disagree with me, but some of your arguments trying to justify what you want are rubbish. To seriously suggest that geographical ties are superseded when every single NRL side is tied deeply to their geographical area is really poor argument and you know it. I am happy for you to prefer the SFS, but stop trying to make this that you are the smartest person in the room so your ideas are correct.

It is OK to just prefer the SFS, even if its because it is easier for you. No need for fantasy.

Souths play out of Homebush.

But are heavily tied to their community in South Sydney, I would actually take South Sydney as a great example of a club successfully playing outside their catchment and I would accept that argument in regards to stadium usage. The argument though was that geographical ties are superseded and even with Souths there is an undeniably strong tie to their geography.

So why would playing at the SFS stop us having ties to our area?

That my friend is a valid argument, though I think it works for Souths as the stadium is central to all of Sydney. Not trying to move the goalpost just reasoning it out. I do see Souths as evidence of a club making it work though.

I really don't see valid arguments not to play at SFS, Homebush or Parra.

Have you been the ANZ?

Many times. I don't see a valid argument why the club shouldn't play there. I can see why some don't like it.

That we don't fill a quarter of it.

Cause we’re shit ?

No Sydney club can fill a quarter of it.

I like leg room

You can lay down if you want lol

ANZ is great, I can sit with all my friends.

Do you have 60 000 more you can bring? We have room for them.

No, but I can sit on my own in peace.

You can do that at home.

Not the same as being at the ground... lol

Maybe we can install a nice comfy recliner for you, we sure have the space lol

 

[gallagher]

I. Must say @mike your entire argument is made up of things that haven't happened or you think might happen... Not really strong.

Just upgrade Cambo.... If people.dont wanna follow the team because of the ground or where it is.... Looking at you.... Let them go follow dolphin

Getting a bit tired of this "if you don't like it, go follow someone else."

Maybe people have valid points, maybe people care about the future of the Tigers.

They are voicing opinions and deserve better than - "Go follow someone else"

Disappointed in your statement although you are not the first to voice it.

Yes I know - I should go and follow someone else!

@Russell
Mikes points aren't valid... That's who my posts directed at.

They either havent yet happened, are fabricated... They're just not correct and also made up

Except they are not made up at all. History has shown us who's territory Liverpool is, and it is the Bulldogs. Also don't forget the Bulldogs wanted to take over the Western Suburbs Magpies, not merge. If you don't think that this is still on the agenda for the Wests Tigers then you are just plain wrong. Wests Tigers are currently in a very weak position politically, having never been in the finals for 11 years, they are viewed as an option the merge/relocate by many. Liverpool would be a disaster and the beginning of the end of the franchise.

Enjoy your creative writing, this is boring me

Then put me on foe and don’t read it.

Your arguments are getting worse @mike

No, I just see how this will play out.

You are an intelligent guy @mike, I'm happy for you to disagree with me, but some of your arguments trying to justify what you want are rubbish. To seriously suggest that geographical ties are superseded when every single NRL side is tied deeply to their geographical area is really poor argument and you know it. I am happy for you to prefer the SFS, but stop trying to make this that you are the smartest person in the room so your ideas are correct.

It is OK to just prefer the SFS, even if its because it is easier for you. No need for fantasy.

Souths play out of Homebush.

But are heavily tied to their community in South Sydney, I would actually take South Sydney as a great example of a club successfully playing outside their catchment and I would accept that argument in regards to stadium usage. The argument though was that geographical ties are superseded and even with Souths there is an undeniably strong tie to their geography.

I. Must say @mike your entire argument is made up of things that haven't happened or you think might happen... Not really strong.

Just upgrade Cambo.... If people.dont wanna follow the team because of the ground or where it is.... Looking at you.... Let them go follow dolphin

Getting a bit tired of this "if you don't like it, go follow someone else."

Maybe people have valid points, maybe people care about the future of the Tigers.

They are voicing opinions and deserve better than - "Go follow someone else"

Disappointed in your statement although you are not the first to voice it.

Yes I know - I should go and follow someone else!

@Russell
Mikes points aren't valid... That's who my posts directed at.

They either havent yet happened, are fabricated... They're just not correct and also made up

Except they are not made up at all. History has shown us who's territory Liverpool is, and it is the Bulldogs. Also don't forget the Bulldogs wanted to take over the Western Suburbs Magpies, not merge. If you don't think that this is still on the agenda for the Wests Tigers then you are just plain wrong. Wests Tigers are currently in a very weak position politically, having never been in the finals for 11 years, they are viewed as an option the merge/relocate by many. Liverpool would be a disaster and the beginning of the end of the franchise.

Enjoy your creative writing, this is boring me

Then put me on foe and don’t read it.

Your arguments are getting worse @mike

No, I just see how this will play out.

You are an intelligent guy @mike, I'm happy for you to disagree with me, but some of your arguments trying to justify what you want are rubbish. To seriously suggest that geographical ties are superseded when every single NRL side is tied deeply to their geographical area is really poor argument and you know it. I am happy for you to prefer the SFS, but stop trying to make this that you are the smartest person in the room so your ideas are correct.

It is OK to just prefer the SFS, even if its because it is easier for you. No need for fantasy.

Souths play out of Homebush.

But are heavily tied to their community in South Sydney, I would actually take South Sydney as a great example of a club successfully playing outside their catchment and I would accept that argument in regards to stadium usage. The argument though was that geographical ties are superseded and even with Souths there is an undeniably strong tie to their geography.

So why would playing at the SFS stop us having ties to our area?

That my friend is a valid argument, though I think it works for Souths as the stadium is central to all of Sydney. Not trying to move the goalpost just reasoning it out. I do see Souths as evidence of a club making it work though.

I really don't see valid arguments not to play at SFS, Homebush or Parra.

Have you been the ANZ?

Many times. I don't see a valid argument why the club shouldn't play there. I can see why some don't like it.

That we don't fill a quarter of it.

How does that effect the club?

 

[cochise]

I. Must say @mike your entire argument is made up of things that haven't happened or you think might happen... Not really strong.

Just upgrade Cambo.... If people.dont wanna follow the team because of the ground or where it is.... Looking at you.... Let them go follow dolphin

Getting a bit tired of this "if you don't like it, go follow someone else."

Maybe people have valid points, maybe people care about the future of the Tigers.

They are voicing opinions and deserve better than - "Go follow someone else"

Disappointed in your statement although you are not the first to voice it.

Yes I know - I should go and follow someone else!

@Russell
Mikes points aren't valid... That's who my posts directed at.

They either havent yet happened, are fabricated... They're just not correct and also made up

Except they are not made up at all. History has shown us who's territory Liverpool is, and it is the Bulldogs. Also don't forget the Bulldogs wanted to take over the Western Suburbs Magpies, not merge. If you don't think that this is still on the agenda for the Wests Tigers then you are just plain wrong. Wests Tigers are currently in a very weak position politically, having never been in the finals for 11 years, they are viewed as an option the merge/relocate by many. Liverpool would be a disaster and the beginning of the end of the franchise.

Enjoy your creative writing, this is boring me

Then put me on foe and don’t read it.

Your arguments are getting worse @mike

No, I just see how this will play out.

You are an intelligent guy @mike, I'm happy for you to disagree with me, but some of your arguments trying to justify what you want are rubbish. To seriously suggest that geographical ties are superseded when every single NRL side is tied deeply to their geographical area is really poor argument and you know it. I am happy for you to prefer the SFS, but stop trying to make this that you are the smartest person in the room so your ideas are correct.

It is OK to just prefer the SFS, even if its because it is easier for you. No need for fantasy.

Souths play out of Homebush.

But are heavily tied to their community in South Sydney, I would actually take South Sydney as a great example of a club successfully playing outside their catchment and I would accept that argument in regards to stadium usage. The argument though was that geographical ties are superseded and even with Souths there is an undeniably strong tie to their geography.

I. Must say @mike your entire argument is made up of things that haven't happened or you think might happen... Not really strong.

Just upgrade Cambo.... If people.dont wanna follow the team because of the ground or where it is.... Looking at you.... Let them go follow dolphin

Getting a bit tired of this "if you don't like it, go follow someone else."

Maybe people have valid points, maybe people care about the future of the Tigers.

They are voicing opinions and deserve better than - "Go follow someone else"

Disappointed in your statement although you are not the first to voice it.

Yes I know - I should go and follow someone else!

@Russell
Mikes points aren't valid... That's who my posts directed at.

They either havent yet happened, are fabricated... They're just not correct and also made up

Except they are not made up at all. History has shown us who's territory Liverpool is, and it is the Bulldogs. Also don't forget the Bulldogs wanted to take over the Western Suburbs Magpies, not merge. If you don't think that this is still on the agenda for the Wests Tigers then you are just plain wrong. Wests Tigers are currently in a very weak position politically, having never been in the finals for 11 years, they are viewed as an option the merge/relocate by many. Liverpool would be a disaster and the beginning of the end of the franchise.

Enjoy your creative writing, this is boring me

Then put me on foe and don’t read it.

Your arguments are getting worse @mike

No, I just see how this will play out.

You are an intelligent guy @mike, I'm happy for you to disagree with me, but some of your arguments trying to justify what you want are rubbish. To seriously suggest that geographical ties are superseded when every single NRL side is tied deeply to their geographical area is really poor argument and you know it. I am happy for you to prefer the SFS, but stop trying to make this that you are the smartest person in the room so your ideas are correct.

It is OK to just prefer the SFS, even if its because it is easier for you. No need for fantasy.

Souths play out of Homebush.

But are heavily tied to their community in South Sydney, I would actually take South Sydney as a great example of a club successfully playing outside their catchment and I would accept that argument in regards to stadium usage. The argument though was that geographical ties are superseded and even with Souths there is an undeniably strong tie to their geography.

So why would playing at the SFS stop us having ties to our area?

That my friend is a valid argument, though I think it works for Souths as the stadium is central to all of Sydney. Not trying to move the goalpost just reasoning it out. I do see Souths as evidence of a club making it work though.

I really don't see valid arguments not to play at SFS, Homebush or Parra.

Have you been the ANZ?

Many times. I don't see a valid argument why the club shouldn't play there. I can see why some don't like it.

That we don't fill a quarter of it.

How does that effect the club?

It effects the game day experience rubbish. People want to attend when you give them a good experience. ANZ is not a good experience until you are pushing 35000 people. You are too far from the field. Honestly it is not suitable for club games and should only be used for events.

 

[gallagher]

I. Must say @mike your entire argument is made up of things that haven't happened or you think might happen... Not really strong.

Just upgrade Cambo.... If people.dont wanna follow the team because of the ground or where it is.... Looking at you.... Let them go follow dolphin

Getting a bit tired of this "if you don't like it, go follow someone else."

Maybe people have valid points, maybe people care about the future of the Tigers.

They are voicing opinions and deserve better than - "Go follow someone else"

Disappointed in your statement although you are not the first to voice it.

Yes I know - I should go and follow someone else!

@Russell
Mikes points aren't valid... That's who my posts directed at.

They either havent yet happened, are fabricated... They're just not correct and also made up

Except they are not made up at all. History has shown us who's territory Liverpool is, and it is the Bulldogs. Also don't forget the Bulldogs wanted to take over the Western Suburbs Magpies, not merge. If you don't think that this is still on the agenda for the Wests Tigers then you are just plain wrong. Wests Tigers are currently in a very weak position politically, having never been in the finals for 11 years, they are viewed as an option the merge/relocate by many. Liverpool would be a disaster and the beginning of the end of the franchise.

Enjoy your creative writing, this is boring me

Then put me on foe and don’t read it.

Your arguments are getting worse @mike

No, I just see how this will play out.

You are an intelligent guy @mike, I'm happy for you to disagree with me, but some of your arguments trying to justify what you want are rubbish. To seriously suggest that geographical ties are superseded when every single NRL side is tied deeply to their geographical area is really poor argument and you know it. I am happy for you to prefer the SFS, but stop trying to make this that you are the smartest person in the room so your ideas are correct.

It is OK to just prefer the SFS, even if its because it is easier for you. No need for fantasy.

Souths play out of Homebush.

But are heavily tied to their community in South Sydney, I would actually take South Sydney as a great example of a club successfully playing outside their catchment and I would accept that argument in regards to stadium usage. The argument though was that geographical ties are superseded and even with Souths there is an undeniably strong tie to their geography.

I. Must say @mike your entire argument is made up of things that haven't happened or you think might happen... Not really strong.

Just upgrade Cambo.... If people.dont wanna follow the team because of the ground or where it is.... Looking at you.... Let them go follow dolphin

Getting a bit tired of this "if you don't like it, go follow someone else."

Maybe people have valid points, maybe people care about the future of the Tigers.

They are voicing opinions and deserve better than - "Go follow someone else"

Disappointed in your statement although you are not the first to voice it.

Yes I know - I should go and follow someone else!

@Russell
Mikes points aren't valid... That's who my posts directed at.

They either havent yet happened, are fabricated... They're just not correct and also made up

Except they are not made up at all. History has shown us who's territory Liverpool is, and it is the Bulldogs. Also don't forget the Bulldogs wanted to take over the Western Suburbs Magpies, not merge. If you don't think that this is still on the agenda for the Wests Tigers then you are just plain wrong. Wests Tigers are currently in a very weak position politically, having never been in the finals for 11 years, they are viewed as an option the merge/relocate by many. Liverpool would be a disaster and the beginning of the end of the franchise.

Enjoy your creative writing, this is boring me

Then put me on foe and don’t read it.

Your arguments are getting worse @mike

No, I just see how this will play out.

You are an intelligent guy @mike, I'm happy for you to disagree with me, but some of your arguments trying to justify what you want are rubbish. To seriously suggest that geographical ties are superseded when every single NRL side is tied deeply to their geographical area is really poor argument and you know it. I am happy for you to prefer the SFS, but stop trying to make this that you are the smartest person in the room so your ideas are correct.

It is OK to just prefer the SFS, even if its because it is easier for you. No need for fantasy.

Souths play out of Homebush.

But are heavily tied to their community in South Sydney, I would actually take South Sydney as a great example of a club successfully playing outside their catchment and I would accept that argument in regards to stadium usage. The argument though was that geographical ties are superseded and even with Souths there is an undeniably strong tie to their geography.

So why would playing at the SFS stop us having ties to our area?

That my friend is a valid argument, though I think it works for Souths as the stadium is central to all of Sydney. Not trying to move the goalpost just reasoning it out. I do see Souths as evidence of a club making it work though.

I really don't see valid arguments not to play at SFS, Homebush or Parra.

Have you been the ANZ?

Many times. I don't see a valid argument why the club shouldn't play there. I can see why some don't like it.

That we don't fill a quarter of it.

How does that effect the club?

It effects the game day experience rubbish. People want to attend when you give them a good experience. ANZ is not a good experience until you are pushing 35000 people. You are too far from the field. Honestly it is not suitable for club games and should only be used for events.

But that doesn't effect the club. Other clubs have played there fulltime successfully

 

[cochise]

I. Must say @mike your entire argument is made up of things that haven't happened or you think might happen... Not really strong.

Just upgrade Cambo.... If people.dont wanna follow the team because of the ground or where it is.... Looking at you.... Let them go follow dolphin

Getting a bit tired of this "if you don't like it, go follow someone else."

Maybe people have valid points, maybe people care about the future of the Tigers.

They are voicing opinions and deserve better than - "Go follow someone else"

Disappointed in your statement although you are not the first to voice it.

Yes I know - I should go and follow someone else!

@Russell
Mikes points aren't valid... That's who my posts directed at.

They either havent yet happened, are fabricated... They're just not correct and also made up

Except they are not made up at all. History has shown us who's territory Liverpool is, and it is the Bulldogs. Also don't forget the Bulldogs wanted to take over the Western Suburbs Magpies, not merge. If you don't think that this is still on the agenda for the Wests Tigers then you are just plain wrong. Wests Tigers are currently in a very weak position politically, having never been in the finals for 11 years, they are viewed as an option the merge/relocate by many. Liverpool would be a disaster and the beginning of the end of the franchise.

Enjoy your creative writing, this is boring me

Then put me on foe and don’t read it.

Your arguments are getting worse @mike

No, I just see how this will play out.

You are an intelligent guy @mike, I'm happy for you to disagree with me, but some of your arguments trying to justify what you want are rubbish. To seriously suggest that geographical ties are superseded when every single NRL side is tied deeply to their geographical area is really poor argument and you know it. I am happy for you to prefer the SFS, but stop trying to make this that you are the smartest person in the room so your ideas are correct.

It is OK to just prefer the SFS, even if its because it is easier for you. No need for fantasy.

Souths play out of Homebush.

But are heavily tied to their community in South Sydney, I would actually take South Sydney as a great example of a club successfully playing outside their catchment and I would accept that argument in regards to stadium usage. The argument though was that geographical ties are superseded and even with Souths there is an undeniably strong tie to their geography.

I. Must say @mike your entire argument is made up of things that haven't happened or you think might happen... Not really strong.

Just upgrade Cambo.... If people.dont wanna follow the team because of the ground or where it is.... Looking at you.... Let them go follow dolphin

Getting a bit tired of this "if you don't like it, go follow someone else."

Maybe people have valid points, maybe people care about the future of the Tigers.

They are voicing opinions and deserve better than - "Go follow someone else"

Disappointed in your statement although you are not the first to voice it.

Yes I know - I should go and follow someone else!

@Russell
Mikes points aren't valid... That's who my posts directed at.

They either havent yet happened, are fabricated... They're just not correct and also made up

Except they are not made up at all. History has shown us who's territory Liverpool is, and it is the Bulldogs. Also don't forget the Bulldogs wanted to take over the Western Suburbs Magpies, not merge. If you don't think that this is still on the agenda for the Wests Tigers then you are just plain wrong. Wests Tigers are currently in a very weak position politically, having never been in the finals for 11 years, they are viewed as an option the merge/relocate by many. Liverpool would be a disaster and the beginning of the end of the franchise.

Enjoy your creative writing, this is boring me

Then put me on foe and don’t read it.

Your arguments are getting worse @mike

No, I just see how this will play out.

You are an intelligent guy @mike, I'm happy for you to disagree with me, but some of your arguments trying to justify what you want are rubbish. To seriously suggest that geographical ties are superseded when every single NRL side is tied deeply to their geographical area is really poor argument and you know it. I am happy for you to prefer the SFS, but stop trying to make this that you are the smartest person in the room so your ideas are correct.

It is OK to just prefer the SFS, even if its because it is easier for you. No need for fantasy.

Souths play out of Homebush.

But are heavily tied to their community in South Sydney, I would actually take South Sydney as a great example of a club successfully playing outside their catchment and I would accept that argument in regards to stadium usage. The argument though was that geographical ties are superseded and even with Souths there is an undeniably strong tie to their geography.

So why would playing at the SFS stop us having ties to our area?

That my friend is a valid argument, though I think it works for Souths as the stadium is central to all of Sydney. Not trying to move the goalpost just reasoning it out. I do see Souths as evidence of a club making it work though.

I really don't see valid arguments not to play at SFS, Homebush or Parra.

Have you been the ANZ?

Many times. I don't see a valid argument why the club shouldn't play there. I can see why some don't like it.

That we don't fill a quarter of it.

How does that effect the club?

It effects the game day experience rubbish. People want to attend when you give them a good experience. ANZ is not a good experience until you are pushing 35000 people. You are too far from the field. Honestly it is not suitable for club games and should only be used for events.

But that doesn't effect the club. Other clubs have played there fulltime successfully

Are you kidding? Of course it effects the club, you want to provide the best game day experience possible to get people to attend games and sign up for memberships. ANZ does not provide a good game day experience. Outside of LO and CSS the best game day experience is at bankwest, but people don't like it due to the Parramatta connection.

The issue is there isn't the perfect solution and each option had major flaws that make it unacceptable to some as a homeground. If there was a Bankwest style stadium at Homebush I have no doubt we would be there already.

 

[gallagher]

I. Must say @mike your entire argument is made up of things that haven't happened or you think might happen... Not really strong.

Just upgrade Cambo.... If people.dont wanna follow the team because of the ground or where it is.... Looking at you.... Let them go follow dolphin

Getting a bit tired of this "if you don't like it, go follow someone else."

Maybe people have valid points, maybe people care about the future of the Tigers.

They are voicing opinions and deserve better than - "Go follow someone else"

Disappointed in your statement although you are not the first to voice it.

Yes I know - I should go and follow someone else!

@Russell
Mikes points aren't valid... That's who my posts directed at.

They either havent yet happened, are fabricated... They're just not correct and also made up

Except they are not made up at all. History has shown us who's territory Liverpool is, and it is the Bulldogs. Also don't forget the Bulldogs wanted to take over the Western Suburbs Magpies, not merge. If you don't think that this is still on the agenda for the Wests Tigers then you are just plain wrong. Wests Tigers are currently in a very weak position politically, having never been in the finals for 11 years, they are viewed as an option the merge/relocate by many. Liverpool would be a disaster and the beginning of the end of the franchise.

Enjoy your creative writing, this is boring me

Then put me on foe and don’t read it.

Your arguments are getting worse @mike

No, I just see how this will play out.

You are an intelligent guy @mike, I'm happy for you to disagree with me, but some of your arguments trying to justify what you want are rubbish. To seriously suggest that geographical ties are superseded when every single NRL side is tied deeply to their geographical area is really poor argument and you know it. I am happy for you to prefer the SFS, but stop trying to make this that you are the smartest person in the room so your ideas are correct.

It is OK to just prefer the SFS, even if its because it is easier for you. No need for fantasy.

Souths play out of Homebush.

But are heavily tied to their community in South Sydney, I would actually take South Sydney as a great example of a club successfully playing outside their catchment and I would accept that argument in regards to stadium usage. The argument though was that geographical ties are superseded and even with Souths there is an undeniably strong tie to their geography.

I. Must say @mike your entire argument is made up of things that haven't happened or you think might happen... Not really strong.

Just upgrade Cambo.... If people.dont wanna follow the team because of the ground or where it is.... Looking at you.... Let them go follow dolphin

Getting a bit tired of this "if you don't like it, go follow someone else."

Maybe people have valid points, maybe people care about the future of the Tigers.

They are voicing opinions and deserve better than - "Go follow someone else"

Disappointed in your statement although you are not the first to voice it.

Yes I know - I should go and follow someone else!

@Russell
Mikes points aren't valid... That's who my posts directed at.

They either havent yet happened, are fabricated... They're just not correct and also made up

Except they are not made up at all. History has shown us who's territory Liverpool is, and it is the Bulldogs. Also don't forget the Bulldogs wanted to take over the Western Suburbs Magpies, not merge. If you don't think that this is still on the agenda for the Wests Tigers then you are just plain wrong. Wests Tigers are currently in a very weak position politically, having never been in the finals for 11 years, they are viewed as an option the merge/relocate by many. Liverpool would be a disaster and the beginning of the end of the franchise.

Enjoy your creative writing, this is boring me

Then put me on foe and don’t read it.

Your arguments are getting worse @mike

No, I just see how this will play out.

You are an intelligent guy @mike, I'm happy for you to disagree with me, but some of your arguments trying to justify what you want are rubbish. To seriously suggest that geographical ties are superseded when every single NRL side is tied deeply to their geographical area is really poor argument and you know it. I am happy for you to prefer the SFS, but stop trying to make this that you are the smartest person in the room so your ideas are correct.

It is OK to just prefer the SFS, even if its because it is easier for you. No need for fantasy.

Souths play out of Homebush.

But are heavily tied to their community in South Sydney, I would actually take South Sydney as a great example of a club successfully playing outside their catchment and I would accept that argument in regards to stadium usage. The argument though was that geographical ties are superseded and even with Souths there is an undeniably strong tie to their geography.

So why would playing at the SFS stop us having ties to our area?

That my friend is a valid argument, though I think it works for Souths as the stadium is central to all of Sydney. Not trying to move the goalpost just reasoning it out. I do see Souths as evidence of a club making it work though.

I really don't see valid arguments not to play at SFS, Homebush or Parra.

Have you been the ANZ?

Many times. I don't see a valid argument why the club shouldn't play there. I can see why some don't like it.

That we don't fill a quarter of it.

How does that effect the club?

It effects the game day experience rubbish. People want to attend when you give them a good experience. ANZ is not a good experience until you are pushing 35000 people. You are too far from the field. Honestly it is not suitable for club games and should only be used for events.

But that doesn't effect the club. Other clubs have played there fulltime successfully

Are you kidding? Of course it effects the club, you want to provide the best game day experience possible to get people to attend games and sign up for memberships. ANZ does not provide a good game day experience. Outside of LO and CSS the best game day experience is at bankwest, but people don't like it due to the Parramatta connection.

The issue is there isn't the perfect solution and each option had major flaws that make it unacceptable to some as a homeground. If there was a Bankwest style stadium at Homebush I have no doubt we would be there already.

Fans will still go there though. Souths fans still go, so no it won't effect the club.

 

[cochise]

I. Must say @mike your entire argument is made up of things that haven't happened or you think might happen... Not really strong.

Just upgrade Cambo.... If people.dont wanna follow the team because of the ground or where it is.... Looking at you.... Let them go follow dolphin

Getting a bit tired of this "if you don't like it, go follow someone else."

Maybe people have valid points, maybe people care about the future of the Tigers.

They are voicing opinions and deserve better than - "Go follow someone else"

Disappointed in your statement although you are not the first to voice it.

Yes I know - I should go and follow someone else!

@Russell
Mikes points aren't valid... That's who my posts directed at.

They either havent yet happened, are fabricated... They're just not correct and also made up

Except they are not made up at all. History has shown us who's territory Liverpool is, and it is the Bulldogs. Also don't forget the Bulldogs wanted to take over the Western Suburbs Magpies, not merge. If you don't think that this is still on the agenda for the Wests Tigers then you are just plain wrong. Wests Tigers are currently in a very weak position politically, having never been in the finals for 11 years, they are viewed as an option the merge/relocate by many. Liverpool would be a disaster and the beginning of the end of the franchise.

Enjoy your creative writing, this is boring me

Then put me on foe and don’t read it.

Your arguments are getting worse @mike

No, I just see how this will play out.

You are an intelligent guy @mike, I'm happy for you to disagree with me, but some of your arguments trying to justify what you want are rubbish. To seriously suggest that geographical ties are superseded when every single NRL side is tied deeply to their geographical area is really poor argument and you know it. I am happy for you to prefer the SFS, but stop trying to make this that you are the smartest person in the room so your ideas are correct.

It is OK to just prefer the SFS, even if its because it is easier for you. No need for fantasy.

Souths play out of Homebush.

But are heavily tied to their community in South Sydney, I would actually take South Sydney as a great example of a club successfully playing outside their catchment and I would accept that argument in regards to stadium usage. The argument though was that geographical ties are superseded and even with Souths there is an undeniably strong tie to their geography.

I. Must say @mike your entire argument is made up of things that haven't happened or you think might happen... Not really strong.

Just upgrade Cambo.... If people.dont wanna follow the team because of the ground or where it is.... Looking at you.... Let them go follow dolphin

Getting a bit tired of this "if you don't like it, go follow someone else."

Maybe people have valid points, maybe people care about the future of the Tigers.

They are voicing opinions and deserve better than - "Go follow someone else"

Disappointed in your statement although you are not the first to voice it.

Yes I know - I should go and follow someone else!

@Russell
Mikes points aren't valid... That's who my posts directed at.

They either havent yet happened, are fabricated... They're just not correct and also made up

Except they are not made up at all. History has shown us who's territory Liverpool is, and it is the Bulldogs. Also don't forget the Bulldogs wanted to take over the Western Suburbs Magpies, not merge. If you don't think that this is still on the agenda for the Wests Tigers then you are just plain wrong. Wests Tigers are currently in a very weak position politically, having never been in the finals for 11 years, they are viewed as an option the merge/relocate by many. Liverpool would be a disaster and the beginning of the end of the franchise.

Enjoy your creative writing, this is boring me

Then put me on foe and don’t read it.

Your arguments are getting worse @mike

No, I just see how this will play out.

You are an intelligent guy @mike, I'm happy for you to disagree with me, but some of your arguments trying to justify what you want are rubbish. To seriously suggest that geographical ties are superseded when every single NRL side is tied deeply to their geographical area is really poor argument and you know it. I am happy for you to prefer the SFS, but stop trying to make this that you are the smartest person in the room so your ideas are correct.

It is OK to just prefer the SFS, even if its because it is easier for you. No need for fantasy.

Souths play out of Homebush.

But are heavily tied to their community in South Sydney, I would actually take South Sydney as a great example of a club successfully playing outside their catchment and I would accept that argument in regards to stadium usage. The argument though was that geographical ties are superseded and even with Souths there is an undeniably strong tie to their geography.

So why would playing at the SFS stop us having ties to our area?

That my friend is a valid argument, though I think it works for Souths as the stadium is central to all of Sydney. Not trying to move the goalpost just reasoning it out. I do see Souths as evidence of a club making it work though.

I really don't see valid arguments not to play at SFS, Homebush or Parra.

Have you been the ANZ?

Many times. I don't see a valid argument why the club shouldn't play there. I can see why some don't like it.

That we don't fill a quarter of it.

How does that effect the club?

It effects the game day experience rubbish. People want to attend when you give them a good experience. ANZ is not a good experience until you are pushing 35000 people. You are too far from the field. Honestly it is not suitable for club games and should only be used for events.

But that doesn't effect the club. Other clubs have played there fulltime successfully

Are you kidding? Of course it effects the club, you want to provide the best game day experience possible to get people to attend games and sign up for memberships. ANZ does not provide a good game day experience. Outside of LO and CSS the best game day experience is at bankwest, but people don't like it due to the Parramatta connection.

The issue is there isn't the perfect solution and each option had major flaws that make it unacceptable to some as a homeground. If there was a Bankwest style stadium at Homebush I have no doubt we would be there already.

Fans will still go there though. Souths fans still go, so no it won't effect the club.

There are plenty of people that won't go to certain grounds for various reasons.