NRL cash might put Wests Tigers' Leichhardt affection to the test

Discussion_Bot

New member
THE NRL has dangled the carrot of a cash payment to Wests Tigers to stage a home final at the SFS rather than their suburban spiritual homes at Leichhardt and Campbelltown.

The Tigers can secure a home final with a win over Melbourne at Leichhardt Oval on Sunday, after which the club will have to decide whether to potentially forgo a home advantage in favour of a bigger crowd, and bigger gate receipts.

The issue would be clouded even further because the Tigers might be forced to play Sydney Roosters on the first weekend of the play-offs. If they play at the SFS, they would hand some of their advantage back to the Roosters, who play out of the 45,500-seat stadium.

But the Tigers might be coaxed into playing at the SFS, with the NRL's chief operating officer Graham Annesley admitting yesterday that officials would likely look favourably on any request for compensation.

Last year, the NRL offered St George Illawarra $250,000 to switch their match against Parramatta, in week one of the finals, to the SFS, rather than playing at the smaller but more intimidating WIN Jubilee Oval. The Dragons rejected the offer.

The Tigers, currently in third place, are keeping their options open. Chief executive Stephen Humphreys did not wish to comment on where a first final would be played, should they claim one, although he was set to brief the club's board last night.

Even though it is up to the clubs as to where they play their home finals, the NRL would certainly prefer that a final against the Roosters be played at the Sydney Football Stadium. There are also concerns about the corporate facilities at Leichhardt Oval.

Asked whether the Tigers would be afforded the same offer that the Dragons were last year, Annesley said: ''There's no current money offer sitting on the table for anyone, but if the club came to us and said we'd be prepared to discuss playing at a bigger venue, of course we'd discuss that with them, and possibly come to a suitable arrangement.

''There's no off-the-shelf package that they can say, 'come and take X amount of dollars'. It would have to be negotiated.''

Of course, those circumstances would probably depend on the Tigers playing against a fellow Sydney club. Should they be pitted against the Warriors, for instance, the NRL might be happy for them to hold the game at one of the club's suburban venues.

Tigers coach Tim Sheens would not speculate on his preference yesterday, saying: ''We haven't got there yet, so I don't talk about that.''

Ironically the Dragons have not ruled out playing their home final - which they have been assured of - at the Sydney Football Stadium as well.

Doust said this week a decision had not been made yet, although it is likely he will again stick to his guns and opt for Kogarah. Wollongong's WIN Stadium is already out of play due to a $29 million redevelopment.

The various scenarios also throw up an interesting possibility, although an unlikely one. If the Dragons finish second, the Tigers third, and they both opt for the SFS, the NRL would have two finals on a Saturday evening at the same ground. A finals double-header, perchance?

[Source](http://www.smh.com.au/rugby-league/league-news/nrl-cash-might-put-wests-tigers-leichhardt-affection-to-the-test-20100826-13uag.html)
 
stuff the corporate facilities

i'd happily pay twice as much as I normally would for a ticket if the game were held at Leichhardt
 
@Discussion Bot said:
The various scenarios also throw up an interesting possibility, although an unlikely one. If the Dragons finish second, the Tigers third, and they both opt for the SFS, the NRL would have two finals on a Saturday evening at the same ground. A finals double-header, perchance?

If that happens we should have our home final at ANZ Stadium like we did in 2005.
 
We play a double header at the SFS alot of our fans could miss out on a ticket.
 
I like Lillyfield Rectangle but the $$$ of the SFS could really boost the Tigers on and off the field

Roosters only have 15 odd supporters anyway, we will out number them 3 to 1
 
@Kul said:
stuff the corporate facilities

i'd happily pay twice as much as I normally would for a ticket if the game were held at Leichhardt

Me too, Kul!!

We should give the team every opportunity to win - and that would mean playing at a real home ground.

And no - certainly not at ANZ…..

Tigergran
 
We wait 5 years to make the finals again and we shut out 20,000+ fans and provide awful corporate facilities for our sponsors.

Wake up.
 
@Gary Bakerloo said:
We wait 5 years to make the finals again and we shut out 20,000+ fans and provide awful corporate facilities for our sponsors.

Wake up.

x2

We have a responsibility to our corporate sponsors to give them the most exposure. The home ground advantage is a wank and our boys really want it, they'll turn up on the day and take it.

I hope Humphreys has the balls to stand up to the traditional elements and doesn't fall into the same trap as that idiot Peter Doust. Home ground advantage worked really well for them last year didn't it?
 
Our sponsors, to my knowledge, haven't complained yet about our facilities and hospitality so as far as I'm concerned that's a non issue. I honestly believe that if the players want to play at leichhardt then let's play there. I think tigers members should have first bite of the cherry when it came to tickets and the rest should be a first in first served basis. Is that a little bit unfair for the rest? Yes it is unfair but maybe next year they'll become a paid member and it'll be a non issue for them. I'm all for Leichhardt simply because I want every advantage for our team as possible.
 
@Cultured Bogan said:
@Gary Bakerloo said:
We wait 5 years to make the finals again and we shut out 20,000+ fans and provide awful corporate facilities for our sponsors.

Wake up.

x2

We have a responsibility to our corporate sponsors to give them the most exposure. The home ground advantage is a wank and our boys really want it, they'll turn up on the day and take it.

I hope Humphreys has the balls to stand up to the traditional elements and doesn't fall into the same trap as that idiot Peter Doust. Home ground advantage worked really well for them last year didn't it?

x3
SFS is a must. We haven't made it in 5 years and they want to hold the game at a pre-historic ground with no seating and no amenities and it's a nightmare public transport and parking wise. Common Sense must prevail.
 
@Chris said:
I honestly believe that if the players want to play at leichhardt then let's play there.

That's nice, but players also want the salary cap increased and get paid more. Sorry, but you can't get paid more if you only play in front of 20,000 people.

@Chris said:
I think tigers members should have first bite of the cherry when it came to tickets and the rest should be a first in first served basis. Is that a little bit unfair for the rest?

Yes, not everyone can afford to pay for memberships. Some people are only able to attend a couple of games per year and will make the extra effort to attend a finals match. In addition, both Wests and Balmain have always been the working class clubs of rugby league. For over 100 hundred year the clubs have represented working class areas and had the ethic of everyone to be given a fair go. The clubs have never been organisations that excludes others from participating in its welfare and success.
 
@Kul said:
stuff the corporate facilities

i'd happily pay twice as much as I normally would for a ticket if the game were held at Leichhardt

Sorry the atmosphere at the SFS is awful as well. Who can forget the games against Brisbane and St George in 2005, it was like a morgue!!
 
It may have just been because I was sitting with a big group of Tigers supporters right next to a huge group of Dragons supporters but the 2005 final vs the Dragons was anything but a morgue. It was without a doubt the best atmosphere I have experienced at the SFS. The Brisbane game wasn't as loud I must admit.

I'd like to see the game at Campbelltown myself. Mainly because I live within 2 mins of the ground, it has been much improved and Tigers have played very, very well there this year (except for the Roosters game)….but in saying that I think it should be at the SFS as it would be a shame to lock out 25000 fans and the money could very well come in handy.
 
More than likely we'll out number any other fans at the SFS.
It will be like a home ground anyway and no tigers fan should miss out on getting a ticket.
 
@Alf Duguid said:
@Kul said:
stuff the corporate facilities

i'd happily pay twice as much as I normally would for a ticket if the game were held at Leichhardt

Sorry the atmosphere at the SFS is awful as well. Who can forget the games against Brisbane and St George in 2005, it was like a morgue!!

I wouldn't say that SFS is awful, it's actually up there with my favourite grounds and we've more than proven that we can get the job done there. I also agree with CB that if we want it bad enough we'll take it regardless of where we play.

But I'm slightly more on Chris's side of the fence here… We need to give them every last chance we can to win.

**At the end of the day, even from a dollars point of view, I believe there's got to be way more money in progressing further into the finals series** and if playing at LO gives us the slightest increased advantage then that's another step towards makes the GF. Surely that's going to make us much more than increased ticket sales at this game.

And as far as fan's missing out, this is the first year I couldn't buy a season ticket because my new position has me interstate close to every weekend. But I'll camp out in cold or rain and pay double to get a ticket but if that fails I'll still be happy to know we gave it every shot to make it to round 3!
 
@Chris said:
Our sponsors, to my knowledge, haven't complained yet about our facilities and hospitality so as far as I'm concerned that's a non issue. I honestly believe that if the players want to play at leichhardt then let's play there. I think tigers members should have first bite of the cherry when it came to tickets and the rest should be a first in first served basis. Is that a little bit unfair for the rest? Yes it is unfair but maybe next year they'll become a paid member and it'll be a non issue for them. I'm all for Leichhardt simply because I want every advantage for our team as possible.

agree.

lets get there first though.
 
@Gary Bakerloo said:
@Chris said:
I think tigers members should have first bite of the cherry when it came to tickets and the rest should be a first in first served basis. Is that a little bit unfair for the rest?

Yes, not everyone can afford to pay for memberships. Some people are only able to attend a couple of games per year and will make the extra effort to attend a finals match. In addition, both Wests and Balmain have always been the working class clubs of rugby league. For over 100 hundred year the clubs have represented working class areas and had the ethic of everyone to be given a fair go. The clubs have never been organisations that excludes others from participating in its welfare and success.

Tigers had a payment plan that was affordable to almost everyone but I have to agree with SIncas, let's get there first.
 
Back
Top