NRL rd 16 *Spoilers

I expect a half hour discussion about the Roosters poor culture after the game.
 
@hobbo1 said in [NRL rd 16 \*Spoilers](/post/1401502) said:
I’d take Kenny Bromwich
Tough dude
Great link man
Awesome kicking game

Thoughts 💭?

I'd take anyone from storm. Even a jennings🤔 ....maybe not a Jennings
 
@hugh1954 said in [NRL rd 16 \*Spoilers](/post/1401510) said:
Makes for an exciting game doesnt it, who do the storm play next week?

Have the bye. Play Knights after it
 
So are the Roosters players not trying or is someone going to call out that you can't defend against these new rules without the ball.
 
@voice_of_reason said in [NRL rd 16 \*Spoilers](/post/1401469) said:
I hope the silver lining to these thrashings is the NRL move quicker to 'normalise' the rules again. Surely they can't think teams being pumped every week is a positive for the game.

Personally I hate seeing the thrashings, but my old man loves seeing all the tries being scored. I don’t know which supporters V’landys and co are surveying, but there are probably people out there that like it. God knows why…

If they do keep the rules, I hope teams can find a way to compete, because rugby league supporters won’t stand for 10 years of Melbourne v Penrith grand finals.
 
@telltails said in [NRL rd 16 \*Spoilers](/post/1401520) said:
So are the Roosters players not trying or is someone going to call out that you can't defend against these new rules without the ball.

What I was waiting for . He called 3 x6 agains in the last 3 minutes and I have no idea why they were for . How many games had penalties of 22-13 (6 agains and penalties) , prior to this crap rule.?
The refs have killed the game .
 
Back
Top