@Furious1 said in [NRL Round 7 \*LIVE SPOILERS\*](/post/1006962) said:
The insinuation ( i only say this as im too lazy to look for facts) that the Roosters have been in 15 of the last 20 GF should show even the most ardent opponent of such a system the salary cap does not work.
Cmon surely your memory doesn't agree with the idea that Roosters have only missed 5 GFs in the last 20?
The stat that is bandied about is that either Roosters **or** Storm have contested 15 of the last 20 GFs. Now one of those sides cheated in the last 2000s, the other is accused of having cheated now.
Thing about the Roosters is they also frequently fail to make the finals, which has always seemed odd to me. I have never analysed the "consistency" of successful teams, but last time I looked at the Roosters they miss the finals something like 40% in the NRL era. They'll win 2 or 3 MPs, make a GF, then come 14th. Definite cycle for me, where it takes them a few years to develop the top-quality team, and they wear a few lean years, then dominate for 4 or 5 years.
Tigers on the other hand had a top-quality side just twice, but those tilts lasted 2-3 seasons rather than 5-6.
Storm on the other hand have kept the core quality going more or less continuously. They are good recruiters but even better junior scouters. Yes they cheated but one would fairly say that the current Storm side is a very competitive mix rather than a huge $$$ outlay, and when you have the best hooker in history playing for the past 15 years with some very good other talent, Storm have been fortunate to have a small core of highly consistent and rarely injured elite players to keep them at the top, plus one of the best coaches in history.
All that being said, do I believe the Roosters are cap-compliant? I am sure they are, officially and on paper. Do I believe players take pay cuts to stay in a winning team at Bondi - no I don't believe this at all. Roosters do have a couple of quality players that they developed themselves, so it is fair those blokes like Latrell, Manu and Radley might have $$$ loyalty to Bondi.
The thing that gets up everyone's nose is clearly that Roosters already had a quality side, then added the comp's best halfback and fullback in one year, followed by one of the best backrowers a year later. They seem to find space for a few million just when needed, and that is what I call BS on. They release some $1M of talent to make space for $2M of talent.