@Cultured Bogan said:If the difference between paying $135 a month means ads or no ads during Rugby League and that's it, I'll take the ads thanks.
All Fox really screens that isn't available on elsewhere is exclusive A-League and half the NRL. The American Football offering is pathetic at the moment. Plenty of college ball which is all well and good but I've had to wait until last Friday to see a Bengals game, and that's only because they were 7-0 coming into it and it was the Ohio derby against Cleveland.
I love watching Sydney FC run around and the Fox product is very glossy and well produced, but I'm sorry to say it isn't worth $135 a month to me.
My response was to Happy saying Fox would take a big hit because they lost the rights to the EPL…He did not mention other sports and their coverage..If for eg you are a fan of test cricket you get foreign series on Fox as well
My point ...which is one of points in Roy's article is that the new deal if it comes to fruition would be Fox having simulcast rights for All 8 NRL games not just 4 Live games...as Ghost pointed out $50 for the sports package that has All NRL games live would see and increase in subscribers that would off-set any losses they may suffer because they lost the EPL...
Of course this is only a personal choice...