Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
@stryker said:Well done boys - get to fight another week.
On the u20's in general it must best be described as Rugby League Light. I usually laugh my head off watching the ESL but this comp is way worse. A bit embarrasing really …...
@stryker said:Well done boys - get to fight another week.
On the u20's in general it must best be described as Rugby League Light. I usually laugh my head off watching the ESL but this comp is way worse. A bit embarrasing really …...
@steven_tiger said:Quality wise?
I disagree. The NYC is stronger than Flegg, and the footy is better.
@smeghead said:The speed is better because there is no defence. Defence chews petrol.
NYC has it's place and I think it is a TV friendly and easily accesible form of the game. In fact I think it should be marketed to free to air as it would be a wonderful introduction for irregular viewers.
The problem I have is that the NRL have set it up as the step below NRL level which it is not. It rushes kids into the top grade. The flegg system provided experience and progression at the correct rate. The NYC has seen many more serious injuries than it's Flegg predecesor and IMO will see player burn out much earlier.
I think the NYC has it's place but the system in general needs a better balance.
@simonthetiger said:Im surpised at the knockers of the under 20's.
The skill level of these kids is phenom,as well as the size of them too,wow they are huge for 19 year olds.
Ive been to plenty of Beam and /20 games,and while defense is better in the olders,the speed of the unders is amazing and a much better game to watch IMO.
ANd there have been plenty of kids come straight from the toyota and slot straight in no worries.Even us.