@ said:@ said:@ said:@ said:Hope he uses whatsApp instead of emails
Certainly not immune from using WhatsApp.
BBM
Old tech…
Nokia ?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
@ said:@ said:@ said:@ said:Hope he uses whatsApp instead of emails
Certainly not immune from using WhatsApp.
BBM
Old tech…
@ said:@ said:@ said:@ said:Hope he uses whatsApp instead of emails
Certainly not immune from using WhatsApp.
BBM
Old tech…
@ said:@ said:@ said:@ said:Certainly not immune from using WhatsApp.
BBM
Old tech…
I think your confusing the blackberry phone with the blackberry messenger.
The phones are old tech but the BBM the most secure instant messenger on the planet.
My company does all internal messaging using BBM because of its encryption.
Even android and Apple users can download the BBM app and have the same security.
Blackberry focus on secure software. There is no money in hardware anymore.
Even Samsung is moving in this direction with the rise of Chinese phones.
@ said:@ said:@ said:@ said:Certainly not immune from using WhatsApp.
BBM
Old tech…
I think your confusing the blackberry phone with the blackberry messenger.
The phones are old tech but the BBM the most secure instant messenger on the planet.
My company does all internal messaging using BBM because of its encryption.
Even android and Apple users can download the BBM app and have the same security.
Blackberry focus on secure software. There is no money in hardware anymore.
Even Samsung is moving in this direction with the rise of Chinese phones.
@ said:all in all, i don't buy the whole "we were mean to you so here's 639k from an organisation that hasn't profited in 20 years"
@ said:Very odd that we didn't actually get dispensation for Farah's previous contract. I originally understood the NRL must havr granted some kind of allowance, to now be so upset.
I don't see therefore why the NRL thinks it's dishonest to apply for an exemption, not get it, then offer a player a different role later in life.
It's like applying for Family Child Support and not being entirely sure whether or not you are eligible… then the govt knocks you back and fines you for paying for daycare anyway.
@ said:The more I read abou JP the more I think that Greenberg saw him as a threat to his position and so took extraordinary steps to tarnish his reputation. TG better watch his next steps carefully. This could get very ugly very quickly.
@ said:@ said:Very odd that we didn't actually get dispensation for Farah's previous contract. I originally understood the NRL must havr granted some kind of allowance, to now be so upset.
I don't see therefore why the NRL thinks it's dishonest to apply for an exemption, not get it, then offer a player a different role later in life.
It's like applying for Family Child Support and not being entirely sure whether or not you are eligible… then the govt knocks you back and fines you for paying for daycare anyway.
Did Raylene Castle or Todd Greenberg get de-registered after the Canterbury disaster?
@ said:There's an awfully long list of past players employed by their previous clubs post career. Suggesting we can't do the same boggles the mind. If the difference is that ours is arranged whilst said player is still contracted to actually play as opposed to others that supposedly don't have a formal agreement in place, well really, that's a joke given it was so out there in the public domain for so long.
@ said:@ said:There's an awfully long list of past players employed by their previous clubs post career. Suggesting we can't do the same boggles the mind. If the difference is that ours is arranged whilst said player is still contracted to actually play as opposed to others that supposedly don't have a formal agreement in place, well really, that's a joke given it was so out there in the public domain for so long.
The issue is that we didn”t disclose it to the NRL.
@ said:@ said:@ said:There's an awfully long list of past players employed by their previous clubs post career. Suggesting we can't do the same boggles the mind. If the difference is that ours is arranged whilst said player is still contracted to actually play as opposed to others that supposedly don't have a formal agreement in place, well really, that's a joke given it was so out there in the public domain for so long.
The issue is that we didn”t disclose it to the NRL.
All clubs do it as incentive for that player to sign another contract and stay at the club. Usually on a lower contract.
The player we offered it to was going to Souths.
Massive difference.
The issue is corruption within the NRL.
@ said:@ said:There's an awfully long list of past players employed by their previous clubs post career. Suggesting we can't do the same boggles the mind. If the difference is that ours is arranged whilst said player is still contracted to actually play as opposed to others that supposedly don't have a formal agreement in place, well really, that's a joke given it was so out there in the public domain for so long.
The issue is that we didn”t disclose it to the NRL.