Politics Super Thread - keep it all in here

Status
Not open for further replies.
@jadtiger said:
Charlie Hedbo was terrorism exactly the same as this.I am not even sure why you are asking the question.

I agree they are terrorist attacks committed by some of the lowest scum on the earth. I am trying to work out how patriotic rhetoric is the reason or justification for any of them
 
Remember this motion in the Senate and the large number of Liberals (Cash, Cormann and Co), Nats and other conservatives who supported it. With Morrison, Dutton and all the other far right conservatives demonising those seeking asylum in Australia, it must truly be shocking for them to realise a terrorist is a home grown Australian. What blame do you believe should be apportioned to these politicians

https://www.news.com.au/national/politics/pauline-hansons-its-ok-to-be-white-motion-fails/news-story/a2c7ae364702100f55b8bacf9b5f823c

In terms also of that advertising campaign against the Shooters and Fishers and Daley based on speculation, remember it is the Nats who support the introduction of an auto shot gun and the LNP/Nats who introduced shooting in National Parks.
 
Yes Paws but the S & FP want to put guns in under 18 year old hands …now how long will it be before our schools turn into the great American tragedy of school massacres. Sorry Daley has sold his sole on this one , no matter what side of politics you support this act by Daley borders on criminal to get a few votes !
 
Isn't it a National Firearms Framework which requires the agreement of all States to change?

Funny the best Gladys and co can do is wheel out Honest John (cough cough) whose most recent claim to fame is writing a reference for a convicted paedophile priest.

The SFF have abandoned its policy regarding semi automatic weapons and licensing of children;

And isn't it the LNP/Nats trying to work some shonky deal to reclassify the Adler shotgun 7 ?
 
The gunman specifically stated in his 'manifesto' that among his aims were to :

1\. Get Leftists to call for gun bans, and
2\. Start a war between the Left and Right by sarcastically naming right wing political figures in his manifesto.

In other words, people's reactions would be totally predictable and he would be able to manipulate them by his actions.

Judging by reactions both on this forum and in the political landscape at large, it looks like he was spot on in his prediction.
 
The calls for gun restrictions are bipartisan and it's hardly some great act of foretelling that people would call for restrictions in the wake of a gun massacre. Kill a lot of people and make a lot of people angry, who'd have thought…
 
I have zero interest in reading his diatribe and giving him attention. The only calls for gun reform it is going to bring about are in Australia and New Zealand.
 
Any discussion about this mentally deranged individual only empowers what he has done … he should be taken to the rear of the watch house and executed and thrown into an unmarked grave.
 
I agree nobody should give him personal notoriety.

But he didn't exist in a vacuum, there are other people who share his ideas, and other dim individuals who will read his writings and agree with his ideology.

Isn't the best way to make sure that doesn't happen, is dismantling his ideas and expose clearly why he is wrong?

Blocking your ears and closing your eyes doesn't really achieve anything.
 
Ok enough of the personal attacks..posts have been deleted..any further will result in more action..
 
So why was my response to Snake deleted?

What on earth was inappropriate about it? It was a direct response without swearing or insults.
 
Laughable that in general, the coalition government are saying that the discussion in the wake of Christchurch should not be political. Absolute rubbish!

For more than twice the lifetime of my eight year old son, those parties have been fostering hate and creating a divide in our community since they started creating fear, winning an election on the back of knowingly and fraudulently claiming that asylum seekers were throwing their children overboard, whilst also having refused to allow the ill equipped private Norwegian rescue ship Tampa to disembark rescued refugees from another sinking fishing vessel.

There is no doubt that the Australian terrorist responsible for the horrendous massacre of our New Zealand neighbors was affected in some way by their words and actions, just as are people that I know, have been by the consistent narrative.

Quite ironic that most of those people aboard that sinking fishing boat were fleeing a country to which the next month we deployed troops, with our armed services still having a presence to this day.

Edited. Plus, as a hundred or so of those refugees were taken in by New Zealand, I wonder if any of them, or their families, were present at this attack?t
 
So where is your evidence that this psycho was influenced to kill 50 people, by the Liberal Party of Australia ?

I hope its better than the evidence you couldn't find about Global Warming being stopped by a Carbon tax.
 
I see Rush Limbaugh promoting a theory that the shooter was a leftie, masquerading as a right winger to make the right look bad. This is what separates the right from the left. Someone from the left does something and the left own it. The right does something and they still blame the left. People go on about the left and how ott they can be, which is totally true. You never, NEVER see these same people call out the loons on the right, the alt right. They bury their heads and pretend this element doesn’t exist. Show me a media outlet on the left that is as crazy as InfoWars. I dare you.
 
So you have no evidence, like usual.

You just like making outlandish statements that have no basis in reality.

At least you're consistent.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top