@hugh1954 said in [Politics Super Thread \- keep it all in here](/post/1295586) said:
So lets not celebrate anything because a minority in many areas don't feel its a celebration for them. GIVE ME A BREAK
Yeah so lets exclude them from our National Celebration.
No ones excluding them .. they have a choice .
The date excludes some indigenous people from celebrating as they don't view it as a day to celebrate. Regardless of that in my opinion we are celebrating the wrong day anyway, we are celebrating our national day on the day the first fleet arrived to set up a penal colony. Why don't we celebrate the day we actually became Australia?
Because its New Years Day and we already have a holiday on that day and 50% of the country would be hung over for our national celebration.
So its the public holiday you want?
Not particularly, but it would be pretty quickly swallowed up in a post NYE haze, wouldnt really give the day what it deserves.
I dont actually celebrate or denounce Aus day on 26 Jan, but obviously many do on both sides. It WAS an incredible achievement for the first fleet to get here and eek out an existence which ultimately flourished into the great country we have today. That is not to "whitewash" (word chosen intentionally) aboriginal history. There was no "genocide" or even violence between the first fleet and the local indigenous on this day and there is a lot of historical documents supporting the efforts for peace between the two. AGAIN this is not to avoid the fact of the atrocities to come.
IMO we should keep it where it is. It is an opportunity to actually reflect on what happened, what it means to the society we have built, what it means to indigenous Australians. Removing it from the calendar foregoes this opportunity but will not erase what has happened for good or bad. The call to move Aus day is some sort of childish admission that we are not mature enough to commemorate this day properly.
To be honest, and I can't believe I am about to say this. The best idea I heard in regards to this debate came from Anthony Mundine a number of years ago. I am not sure if it was his idea or whether he still likes this idea as I have never heard him mention it again.
The idea he said was to break the day up in 2 parts, similar to what we do with ANZAC day, use the morning to commemorate and recognise the loss of culture that indigenous population feels. Then use the afternoon to celebrate what Australia has become. I personally don't mind that idea.
I think that is exactly what the day should be now, but dont see why it needs to be mandated that the morning is for this, the afternoon is for that.
Why the hell cant people just commemorate the day and the country for what it is, what it has been and where we ALL have come from, on their own terms in what ever way they see fit?
Some will commemorate it as "invasion day" (stupid title...wasnt an invasion) or a "day of mourning" as marking the day that Europeans arrived here with the intent of settling, from which great hardship resulted for the indigenous people. Some will commemorate it as the start of an incredible process from First fleeters arriving to a reasonably barren and inhospitable place from which they initially survived and went on to form a great nation. Some people I hope are capable of thinking two things at once and blending these two historic facts together. All three are right and are right to commemorate as they see fit.
Some just see it as a bogan drinking day. I see it as a day to get some work done without distraction.
I have celebrated Australia Day many,many times with people of all cultures and ancestry...I cant for the life of me understand the "invasion day"syndrome...My Aboriginal friends that I played football with in Wagga always came along to the BBQs and never once did they look for sympathy or reparation or even mention that the white man owes them...the sooner some of the younger generation grow up and realise that we are one country only divided by the extreme sympathisers will we ever close that divide ..30 yrs ago all this take a knee,invasion day etc would have been frowned upon,now we have to bow down to it ..unfortunately for them I wont bow down to anyone...
In 1968 Mexico Olyimpic Games the Black Power salute is recognised as a protest for human rights included Australian Peter Norman...it is not bowed down too
Ive always thought the "taking a knee" is a weird gesture of support of black rights. Taking a knee is a submissive gesture and it seems a weird way to show strength. I understand the reference to George Floyds death, but it still seems conflicting.
If thats how they wish to support their brothers and sisters ...who are we to question it