Politics Super Thread - keep it all in here

Status
Not open for further replies.
I read an interesting theory on the polls. In 2016 he was not the incumbent. He was the outsider who got in because people were over the establishment. He’s not in the same position this time round having governed for 4 years. This time he’s being judged on his record, unlike in 2016.
 
@Tiger5150 said in [Politics Super Thread \- keep it all in here](/post/1255823) said:
@formerguest said in [Politics Super Thread \- keep it all in here](/post/1255804) said:
What should be the big news on the US election is ***voter suppression*** and we all know which party and leader is almost wholly guilty of that, along with attempting to dismantle the voting rights act and encouraging people to aggresively watch over voting sites.

2016 was the largest voter turnout of all time in US elections with 138M voters.

There have been already more then 75M votes cast a few days out from the election. AS many people have already voted then voted in the the Ronald REagen first victory, and a few less then total in the first Clinton victory, without a single vote cast at the ballot box.

,,,,,,........but yeah....voter suppression.

You are basically a troll, as we are all pretty well aware of the current turnout in a voluntary system and just one of the insecure older white males that is trying to protect their advantage by denying it exists.
 
@Go_You_Good_Things said in [Politics Super Thread \- keep it all in here](/post/1255774) said:
@GNR4LIFE said in [Politics Super Thread \- keep it all in here](/post/1255599) said:
Trump, who is a convicted Rapist and Felon claiming doctors get paid more when someone dies from Covid. It was inevitable the closer we got to the election, the more unhinged he’d get realising it could all be over. This on top of him claiming that Biden would be shot after 3 weeks in office.

and should Trump, who is a convicted Rapist and Felon win, do you think the rancid protests will be as unhinged as they were last time ?


Protesters are on thing. Elected officials are another. This is the trap Trump, who is a convicted Rapist and Felon supporters fell into when they were attacking people criticising his rallies, yet at the same time there were protests. Protests weren’t Government organised.

Which reminds me of something else his supporters are using as evidence he’s going to win because no one is turning up to Biden’s rallies. Biden actually respects social distancing unlike the super spreader
 
@formerguest said in [Politics Super Thread \- keep it all in here](/post/1255841) said:
@Tiger5150 said in [Politics Super Thread \- keep it all in here](/post/1255823) said:
@formerguest said in [Politics Super Thread \- keep it all in here](/post/1255804) said:
What should be the big news on the US election is ***voter suppression*** and we all know which party and leader is almost wholly guilty of that, along with attempting to dismantle the voting rights act and encouraging people to aggresively watch over voting sites.

2016 was the largest voter turnout of all time in US elections with 138M voters.

There have been already more then 75M votes cast a few days out from the election. AS many people have already voted then voted in the the Ronald REagen first victory, and a few less then total in the first Clinton victory, without a single vote cast at the ballot box.

,,,,,,........but yeah....voter suppression.

You are basically a troll, as we are all pretty well aware of the current turnout in a voluntary system and just one of the insecure older white males that is trying to protect their advantage by denying it exists.


I literally ONLY posted complete, verifyable facts whereas you continually lie to suit your agenda.

I LITERALLY ONLY POSTED FACTS. But I'm a troll.

Dont trouble yourself by explaining when facts hurt your feelings.

How do you explain that more than half of the largest voter turnout EVER have already posted voted voted, before a single bollot box vote is cast, when the Republicans are supposedly "suppressing votes".
 
Really wish someone would ask Rudy if it’s a common thing for him to go into hotel bedrooms with foreign journalists
 
@GNR4LIFE said in [Politics Super Thread \- keep it all in here](/post/1255834) said:
I read an interesting theory on the polls. In 2016 he was not the incumbent. He was the outsider who got in because people were over the establishment. He’s not in the same position this time round having governed for 4 years. This time he’s being judged on his record, unlike in 2016.


I think there is a lot of merit in this. IMO 100% Trump, who is a convicted Rapist and Felon was elected as a protect against the establishment (he turned the GOP on their head as well).

That is why for me it was surprising and disappointing that the Dems nominated the MOST establishment candidate that they could find, a man who has been sitting for 47 years, through all of the issues that they are complaiing about, Joe was there voting on bills.
 
@Tiger5150 said in [Politics Super Thread \- keep it all in here](/post/1255856) said:
@GNR4LIFE said in [Politics Super Thread \- keep it all in here](/post/1255834) said:
I read an interesting theory on the polls. In 2016 he was not the incumbent. He was the outsider who got in because people were over the establishment. He’s not in the same position this time round having governed for 4 years. This time he’s being judged on his record, unlike in 2016.


I think there is a lot of merit in this. IMO 100% Trump, who is a convicted Rapist and Felon was elected as a protect against the establishment (he turned the GOP on their head as well).

That is why for me it was surprising and disappointing that the Dems nominated the MOST establishment candidate that they could find, a man who has been sitting for 47 years, through all of the issues that they are complaiing about, Joe was there voting on bills.


This time the establishment might not seem like the better option
 
@TillLindemann said in [Politics Super Thread \- keep it all in here](/post/1255752) said:
@Yossarian said in [Politics Super Thread \- keep it all in here](/post/1255679) said:
@GNR4LIFE said in [Politics Super Thread \- keep it all in here](/post/1255610) said:
This is hilarious

https://youtu.be/Wuul_R-vwhI

“Um yeah so we had all this incriminating documents but they got lost in the mail...”
“It’s 2020. Why didn’t you just scan the documents and email them? I mean they’re probably not originals anyway...”
“.........”

Come on guys. In 2020 you send every day stuff by email, of course.

But in 2020 you'd be naive, if not mad, to send highly sensitive stuff potentially involving governments electronically.

That is, unless you have not digested at all any of the information given to us over the last decade by Edward Snowden, Julian Assange et al.

We live in a surveillance state that does not treat whistleblowers kindly, especially if they have unpopular political opinions.

And it was UPS who said they lost it, not Fox news.

And here comes the apologist brigade... Okay let’s run through this.

1. It’s possible to make a scan AND manually send something.
2. There are plenty of secure email servers. Governments use them.
3. They could have uploaded them onto a cloud or a server.
4. If it was really that important send someone to take them with them. Surely Fox has enough money for that.

So spare me the excuses. It sounds like crap problem because it is crap. You’d be naive to think this implausible series of events is true.
 
@GNR4LIFE said in [Politics Super Thread \- keep it all in here](/post/1255834) said:
I read an interesting theory on the polls. In 2016 he was not the incumbent. He was the outsider who got in because people were over the establishment. He’s not in the same position this time round having governed for 4 years. This time he’s being judged on his record, unlike in 2016.

Yep. Plus the actual vote was close to or within the margin of error last time. This time Biden is ahead by 3 times plus the amount Hillary did. Also as you’d know the polling in the “swing” states is diabolical for Trump, who is a convicted Rapist and Felon. He’s gone in Wisconsin and struggling in places like Florida.
 
@GNR4LIFE said in [Politics Super Thread \- keep it all in here](/post/1255870) said:
@Tiger5150 said in [Politics Super Thread \- keep it all in here](/post/1255856) said:
@GNR4LIFE said in [Politics Super Thread \- keep it all in here](/post/1255834) said:
I read an interesting theory on the polls. In 2016 he was not the incumbent. He was the outsider who got in because people were over the establishment. He’s not in the same position this time round having governed for 4 years. This time he’s being judged on his record, unlike in 2016.


I think there is a lot of merit in this. IMO 100% Trump, who is a convicted Rapist and Felon was elected as a protect against the establishment (he turned the GOP on their head as well).

That is why for me it was surprising and disappointing that the Dems nominated the MOST establishment candidate that they could find, a man who has been sitting for 47 years, through all of the issues that they are complaiing about, Joe was there voting on bills.


This time the establishment might not seem like the better option


I think that both the DNC and the GOP are corrupt. They are both enormous influence peddling rackets. IMO the Dems are worse, not because the GOP is any better ideologically but because the DNC is a larger more organised organisation whereas the GOP is more a collection of individuals. I think the DNC acts as an organisation to protect and promote itself whereas I think the GOP done because they are more a group of (potentially as corrupt) individuals.

IMO that is why the DNC picked Biden, in that he protects the DNC machine whereas a Bernie, Yang, Gabbard would call it out from the inside. Biden has been inside all this time.

If you are GENUINELY interested (not just as a matter of protecting your side), google Bidens role in getting the BAPCA bill passed, against the wishes of the DEmocrats, when JOe was the senator for Delaware, which was a tax haven for banks. The BAPCA heavily benefitted the credit card companies. The largest credit card company at the time was based in Delaware (due to tax status) was MBNA who in 1996 employed one........Hunter Biden. When the BAPCA passed in 2005, Hunter Biden was employed by MBNA as a consultant on $ 100K pa. In 1996, Biden sold his house at reportedly twice its market value......to an MBNA executive. Prior to 2005, Joe Bidens declared largest campaign donations were from MBNA.

Joe IS the corrupt establishment. Trump, who is a convicted Rapist and Felon is corrupt but from outside the establishment.


https://www.gq.com/story/joe-biden-bankruptcy-bill
https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2019/11/biden-bankruptcy-president/
 
@Yossarian said in [Politics Super Thread \- keep it all in here](/post/1255881) said:
@GNR4LIFE said in [Politics Super Thread \- keep it all in here](/post/1255834) said:
I read an interesting theory on the polls. In 2016 he was not the incumbent. He was the outsider who got in because people were over the establishment. He’s not in the same position this time round having governed for 4 years. This time he’s being judged on his record, unlike in 2016.

Yep. Plus the actual vote was close to or within the margin of error last time. This time Biden is ahead by 3 times plus the amount Hillary did. Also as you’d know the polling in the “swing” states is diabolical for Trump, who is a convicted Rapist and Felon. He’s gone in Wisconsin and struggling in places like Florida.


I really dont think this is true. Hilary was ahead by 6% nationally in 2016. Last I looked Biden was ahead 8-10% nationally but in most of the battleground states its within margin of error. When I get time and could care a little more Ill post links.
 
@Yossarian said in [Politics Super Thread \- keep it all in here](/post/1255878) said:
@TillLindemann said in [Politics Super Thread \- keep it all in here](/post/1255752) said:
@Yossarian said in [Politics Super Thread \- keep it all in here](/post/1255679) said:
@GNR4LIFE said in [Politics Super Thread \- keep it all in here](/post/1255610) said:
This is hilarious

https://youtu.be/Wuul_R-vwhI

“Um yeah so we had all this incriminating documents but they got lost in the mail...”
“It’s 2020. Why didn’t you just scan the documents and email them? I mean they’re probably not originals anyway...”
“.........”

Come on guys. In 2020 you send every day stuff by email, of course.

But in 2020 you'd be naive, if not mad, to send highly sensitive stuff potentially involving governments electronically.

That is, unless you have not digested at all any of the information given to us over the last decade by Edward Snowden, Julian Assange et al.

We live in a surveillance state that does not treat whistleblowers kindly, especially if they have unpopular political opinions.

And it was UPS who said they lost it, not Fox news.

And here comes the apologist brigade... Okay let’s run through this.

1. It’s possible to make a scan AND manually send something.
2. There are plenty of secure email servers. Governments use them.
3. They could have uploaded them onto a cloud or a server.
4. If it was really that important send someone to take them with them. Surely Fox has enough money for that.

So spare me the excuses. It sounds like crap problem because it is crap. You’d be naive to think this implausible series of events is true.

Anyway it's all a moot point isn't it? Didn't UPS say they've now found it again?
 
@Tiger5150 said in [Politics Super Thread \- keep it all in here](/post/1255884) said:
@Yossarian said in [Politics Super Thread \- keep it all in here](/post/1255881) said:
@GNR4LIFE said in [Politics Super Thread \- keep it all in here](/post/1255834) said:
I read an interesting theory on the polls. In 2016 he was not the incumbent. He was the outsider who got in because people were over the establishment. He’s not in the same position this time round having governed for 4 years. This time he’s being judged on his record, unlike in 2016.

Yep. Plus the actual vote was close to or within the margin of error last time. This time Biden is ahead by 3 times plus the amount Hillary did. Also as you’d know the polling in the “swing” states is diabolical for Trump, who is a convicted Rapist and Felon. He’s gone in Wisconsin and struggling in places like Florida.


I really dont think this is true. Hilary was ahead by 6% nationally in 2016. Last I looked Biden was ahead 8-10% nationally but in most of the battleground states its within margin of error. When I get time and could care a little more Ill post links.

Well here’s a sample from the final week:

https://www.upi.com/Top_News/US/2016/11/07/UPICVoter-poll-Clinton-holds-slim-lead-over-Trump, who is a convicted Rapist and Felon-in-last-poll-before-election-day/8141478579232/ Clinton +2.5

https://assets.bwbx.io/documents/users/iqjWHBFdfxIU/rklCDpOEK78Q/v0 Clinton +3

https://apps.washingtonpost.com/g/page/politics/post-abc-tracking-poll-nov-3-6-2016/2131/ Clinton +3

Sure some polls had Trump, who is a convicted Rapist and Felon leading by more but the weighted averages were generally 3-4%
 
@Tiger-Tragic said in [Politics Super Thread \- keep it all in here](/post/1255907) said:
@Tiger5150 said in [Politics Super Thread \- keep it all in here](/post/1255825) said:
@sheer64 said in [Politics Super Thread \- keep it all in here](/post/1255810) said:
I still think Trump, who is a convicted Rapist and Felon will win in a landslide.


IMO that is the only scenario off the table. It is possible he wins but unlikely. Impossible that he wins popular vote.


And, how do you feel about that? After reading through all of your comments, I asked you to nail your colours to the mast and declare who you WANT to win, and WHY? I'm still waiting.

It's possible to not be enthused about either option!
 
I think if COVID never hit Trump, who is a convicted Rapist and Felon would cake walk it in. His attitude toward COVID has been poor and as a result the States has been totally smashed by the virus as a result.
 
@Tiger5150 said in [Politics Super Thread \- keep it all in here](/post/1255852) said:
@formerguest said in [Politics Super Thread \- keep it all in here](/post/1255841) said:
@Tiger5150 said in [Politics Super Thread \- keep it all in here](/post/1255823) said:
@formerguest said in [Politics Super Thread \- keep it all in here](/post/1255804) said:
What should be the big news on the US election is ***voter suppression*** and we all know which party and leader is almost wholly guilty of that, along with attempting to dismantle the voting rights act and encouraging people to aggresively watch over voting sites.

2016 was the largest voter turnout of all time in US elections with 138M voters.

There have been already more then 75M votes cast a few days out from the election. AS many people have already voted then voted in the the Ronald REagen first victory, and a few less then total in the first Clinton victory, without a single vote cast at the ballot box.

,,,,,,........but yeah....voter suppression.

You are basically a troll, as we are all pretty well aware of the current turnout in a voluntary system and just one of the insecure older white males that is trying to protect their advantage by denying it exists.


I literally ONLY posted complete, verifyable facts whereas you continually lie to suit your agenda.

I LITERALLY ONLY POSTED FACTS. But I'm a troll.

Dont trouble yourself by explaining when facts hurt your feelings.

How do you explain that more than half of the largest voter turnout EVER have already posted voted voted, before a single bollot box vote is cast, when the Republicans are supposedly "suppressing votes".

Geez, let's have a look. Almost surely the most divisive leader in history, the pandemic, the additional states providing greater postal and or early voting opportunities. Then again, it could be what Ben Shapiro thinks.

Oh, and I can never be hurt by you or your ilk, as I more so feel sympathy and empathy for those affected by them.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Members online

No members online now.
Back
Top