@fergiefurr said:@Geo. said:Yeah you're right…. kinda like Nofo who brings the ball back better but only ave 8,07 mpr compared to Pat's 10.07 and making 87 tackles and missing 23 at 21% and is a million times better finisher...
Nofo definitely has to work on his defence, but he is 21 and will continue to improve. Wingers stats on kick returns are hard to read. Obviously bringing a kick back when you have 20m of room is going to result in a bigger hit up then a dummyhalf run. If you seriously think Richards is more powerful then you musnt watch rugby league. Nofo scored multiple tries by running directly over the top of guys. Titans, storm, raiders and eagles all spring to mind. Pure strength by going in hard, something we don't see pat do.
_Posted using RoarFEED 4.2.0_
The thread title states Richards is a liability….clearly he's not ...where did I say Richards is more powerful...you bought up the comparison as I said try's count for 4 points no matter how there scored....Richards scored 10 last year...