@AmericanHistoryX said:@LaT said:@stevetiger said:I can see your point but in my opinion Koro was significantly a better option than Richards and that was obvious when we played the Storm.
Maybe you can carry an old slow winger with a great kicking game if you have a firing backline. We haven't had that. Maybe this year will be different and we can afford to carry Richards. If I was the coach I wouldn't be risking my career on Richards though.
Now Koroibete was a liability on the end of our backline. He may have been made to look better in a defensively sound team like Storm but in our club he was the epitome of a liability.
therein lies the problem. sound defence was the liabilty not Koroibete.
Cause & effect. Koroibete was the effect - not the cause. Koroibete in fact was learning from people who were not sound in defence. I think he did a good job under those circumstances.
_Posted using RoarFEED Android 1.1.7_
I'll agree with that, all things considered Koro did quite well for a player of his experience, as a club we were just asking too much from him at that point of his career.