Robbie Farah..Discussion Thread.....

@Byron Bay Fan said:
I am now up to page 74 of this thread. I think that supposed putting Robbie under probation is the backdown. Nothing will change next year, the sideshow is over.

BTW, is it worth reading the next 100 pages?

Probably a good idea to temporarily foe goldcoast tiger first as apparently you will not see a foe's posts and whilst you won't get to know his opinion, it should about halve your reading time on this particular thread :smiley:
 
@goldcoast tiger said:
You think so?
I think that GNR and Gallager among others have got me covered well and truly when it comes to posts on this thread :laughing:

You have 13% of posts in this thread…almost 250 comments which are basically the same thing over and over and over
 
@innsaneink said:
@goldcoast tiger said:
You think so?
I think that GNR and Gallager among others have got me covered well and truly when it comes to posts on this thread :laughing:

You have 13% of posts in this thread…almost 250 comments which are basically the same thing over and over and over

sorry that I'm not up to your high level of quality comments, I'll try harder in future, but I still think that Gallager and GNR have me covered, but who cares anyway,
You are no shrinking violet yourself. But then anything that you say is of earth shaking importance, so I'll keeping awaiting your every comment
 
@innsaneink said:
Who cares?
You obviously, you brought it up…you have the most posts here, congrats

Don't you read? Wheredid you get the idea that I bought it up,
The subject was raised by Former Guest , I merely replied to his post.
Are you having a seniors moment? :smiley:
I thought only us old buggers had them.
 
The Robbie Farah thread will live forever as it is discussing Robbie Farah….if he stays we can discuss his performances or lack there of ...if he goes to a different Club we can discuss his performances or lack there of ....win/win...

Or we can go back to the norm of 10 to 20 different threads discussing the same thing...
 
@innsaneink said:
@goldcoast tiger said:
You think so?
I think that GNR and Gallager among others have got me covered well and truly when it comes to posts on this thread :laughing:

You have 13% of posts in this thread…almost 250 comments which are basically the same thing over and over and over

Before you have a go at someone Ink, it may pay to be accurate, (or even reasonably close) with your figures.
This thread has 3252 posts. I have , as you said, posted 250 approx.
last time that I looked, 250 is NOT 13% of the posts in this thread.
Actually it is approx 7%
im sure you weren't inflating figures to make your post sound better.
Maybe it was just a brain snap.
 
Geez, I didn't mean to cause a kerfuffle, hence the smile added regarding the exaggeration of the ardent support of Farah from GCT.
 
The figure of 13% is actually of your total posts GCT..ie 13% of your total posts are in this thread..anyhow…

Go Robbie.... :unamused:
 
@formerguest said:
Geez, I didn't mean to cause a kerfuffle, hence the smile added regarding the exaggeration of the ardent support of Farah from GCT.

I don't have any problems with your post Fg. I took it as it was intended no worries at all.

My problem is someone has a shot at me and uses figures to make it seem authentic, but uses figures that he pulls out of a hat, or a part of his anatomy.
 
@Geo. said:
The figure of 13% is actually of your total posts GCT..ie 13% of your total posts are in this thread..anyhow…

Go Robbie.... :unamused:

Geo, that what you say is correct, and I have no problem with that, but that is not what ink said
Which was "You have 13 %of posts in this thread". I do not

End of story
 
Semantics…

![](http://ocw.mit.edu/courses/linguistics-and-philosophy/24-903-language-and-its-structure-iii-semantics-and-pragmatics-spring-2005/24-903s05.jpg)
 
And the thread has descended into who posts the most in here or not..

Whoopee do if someone posts 13%, or if someone calls you out for it, or if the figures are wrong, or right… or whatever.

Perhaps the next stat should be % total of posts some people have written directed at other posters instead of on the topic...

Or we could all just agree to call each other out & see who scores the most internet tough-guy points I guess...
 

Members online

Back
Top