Robbie Farah..Discussion Thread.....

I've not posted in here for a while, but obviously the Robbie Farah 'situation' brings out the opinion in everyone.

A lot of emotion is driving the responses at the moment, and I'm sure it'll calm down once the Tigers are out of the weekly spotlight.

The calls from some for Taylor's sacking over this are a bit harsh. It's hard to believe that Taylor would be allowed to make such a monumental call as to let the captain & highest paid player on the roster go without the full backing of the people above him. In fact, I'd suggest the call is too great to even actually come from Taylor- couldn't it be that the board have decided this is the best way to balance the books? And I'd suggest that it would be better received by Farah (or any player) if the board's decision to let him go came from the coach instead of some board member with no day-to-day contact with the player.

I'm not saying Taylor hasn't had some input in letting Farah leave. Just that to simply believe this all is JT's doing & he needs to be sacked as a result is a bit naive.

Farah has been a terrific player for the Tigers for a long time. And that the club's situation right now is leading to this release of Farah isn't fair on him at all, or the supporters. But that is life. We are governed by the decisions & choices of others when you receive a wage from them. The club has not said Farah won't receive his money. He will be paid. They will meet their contractual obligations to him. While the timing is very poor- with most rosters set for next season- the club & JT have obviously decided to let Farah try to find an alternative situation for him to enjoy his next couple of seasons in his career instead of watching his regular 1st grade spot be handed to Cherrington in front of him.

As for the poor timing- one thing that seems to have been brushed over was a comment from Sam Ayoub that the club told Ayoub BEFORE the Canberra game, and that Ayoub sat on that information & didn't tell Robbie because he didn't know how to break it to him. How many weeks ago was the Canberra game? That would have been valuable time to organise an alternative club for Farah- so either we are getting a VERY biased version of events, or Sam Ayoub has let his client down badly.

The comment earlier that Paul Vautin wasn't as important to Manly as Farah is to the Tigers must have come from someone that doesn't remember Vautin's days at Manly. He WAS that club, and watching him fall apart when they released him was hard even for a supporter of a different team. So Fatty's advice was not only sound, but I suspect very genuine. Robbie would do well to heed the advice of people like Fatty over say, Benji who had decided on his own that he needed out of the Tigers.

I thought Benji on 360 the other night went ok- but as always, he let's his mouth run too long. He had his say on the show- but I still see him talking to the press today about it. It's now too far & Benji should concentrate on Benji. I appreciated his candour & that he stood up for his mate, but that doesn't give him the 'right' if you like to continue bringing it up.

In fact, the 2005 'era' Tigers appear to have that in common- too many of them feel it's quite a good thing to air their grievances to the media. Someone back in that time (That's you, Mr Sheens) probably should have had the likes of Gibbs, Farah, Marshall, Ryan etc schooled in what is & is not appropriate media interaction. Gibbs & Ryan are currently looking like childish fools, while Benji & Farah are looking like they believe in a sense of higher entitlement than others.

I like Robbie Farah as a player. He seems like a good guy too. But he has overseen the downfall of Sheens & Potter, with much speculation to his involvement, and at 32, his career isn't improving. The club is in dire financial trouble & needs to get itself right- or there will be no Tigers for anyone, let alone Robbie Farah. No player is bigger than the club, no employee bigger than the business he/she works at.

There is a clear direction from the board & coaching staff to shift toward a youth movement. It seems we have all forgotten the sweeping changes Sheens brought in when he came in- with several big name players being removed from the roster for young kids & misfits from other clubs.

Did we all question those moves in 2005?

Let JT be the coach. Let the board get the salary cap & finances right. It's what they are entrusted to do.

If it means that a great player like Farah has to be moved on because he is either too expensive, doesn't fit the coach's gameplan, doesn't get on with the coach, influences the younger players too much or is simply regressing as a player- then that is the harsh reality of professional sport.

I don't see Robbie putting up his hand & offering to play in the UK a la Liam Fulton did to ease the cap pressure.

Lastly- the 'playing in reserve grade' comment- whoever it came from- was made in a 'private conversation' between the player, his manager & the coaching staff. I've not heard Reddy or Taylor mention it to the media. Only Robbie. that's rather unprofessional. I understand he would have been upset- and to be fair, when he said it to the media it seemed an 'off hand' comment- but you can't put that on Taylor. Could it have been said? I have no doubt it probably was. Big deal! You don't think that sort of thing gets said in these situations to make the player try to see the coaching staff's side of the situation? "Lok mate, we need you to move on as we want to play Cherrington. I can't guarantee you'll be in the 1st grade squad next year if you stay.."
\
\
In the end- it's an awkward situation, but despite the ridicule from some, Paul Vautin's advise last night is the soundest, and most genuine thing I've heard about it in a week.
 
Robbie Farah appeared on the footy show last night and came over well. Questions were pretty much loaded in his favour and popualar support,on the footy show,was certainly for robbie.

They mentioned some legal implications which limited the type of questions robbie could be asked.

jason taylor was also asked to come on the show but declined to do so.Probably a smart move by taylor.

im not a regular viewer of the show but i did remember a jason taylor interview after his sacking from souths. he was crying bleeding heart over his treatment by the souths board .but when asked to sit on the management side,it didnt suit.

irony,i think.

Whoever the bad guy is in all of this,im not on taylors side.
i wouldnt want to be on a life raft with him,put it that way.
 
Another year and another Robbie in the media for the wrong reasons again. He loves it as all narcissists do.
Same time last year its tallis and the pottergate scandal and now this.
The broken hand but trying to be fit for origin when everyone knew he wouldn't play. He just loves the attention being focused on him. The attention on our young squad is something Robbies ego can't take.

Robbie is all about Robbie.
 
@goldcoast tiger said:
Anyone with any intelligence at all, gets legal advice , especially when a contract of this amount of money is concerned. And usually would be advised of what he can say and what he can't, so as not to jeopardise himself in the event of any attempt by the club to try and weasel out of him being paid what he is entitled to. Nothing new.
And ink you've done as much banging on here about the other side of the argument, ignoring facts that don't don't suit you .
and your mate Gallagher has made an art form over it.
This wasn't started by Farah. He wasn't going any where.
And as he said last night. If he moves on it will be on his terms. Which is his right
Have a look at your own posts before you start attacking others

Hmmmm
Shall we count your posts compared to mine on the topic?
I'd safely guess you are four times ahead in this regard… And what facts have I ignored?
 
If Wests Tigers as an Organisation care for the damage it's doing to it's brand at the moment…..why don't they just pay Robbie Farah out the next 2 years of his Contract if he is such a nuisance ?
END OF DISCUSSION.

Some on here are saying it's not about the money :blah :blah :blah but the fact of the matter is the Club hasn't got a Tin to piss on.....so to speak.

Some of you are saying if he loved the Club then why doesn't he move on :bash :bash :bash , rubbish , you stay and fight for what you love ( if you know in your own mind you done nothing wrong ) .

Something has to give , we can't start pre-Season with both at the Club ( Farah and JT ) for the sake of not rubbing out a 2016 Season before it's begun , It has to be resolved.
If Farah stays on and week after week his having a blinder in Reserve Grade , we are just going to cop bad press from the media all year , some got there doubts that he would even play in Reserve Grade but depends the stubbornness of the bloke .
Regardless if he was threaten to play Reserve Grade if he stays , JT will Cop it either way for playing him in 1st Grade and not going through with his threat , either way this is going to be ugly ( Damage is done ) .
When Sponsors are calling for Meetings you know there Brand is being tarnished .
 
@innsaneink said:
@The_Doc said:
I wonder whether the board was in on the decision of JT to tell Robbie if he didn't move on next year he will be in Reggie's. This seems to be the major bone of contention, if JT has gone out on a limb and said that off his own bat he's position is almost untenable.
I'm also wondering if this is the basis of the speculated legal action from Robbie.
IMO if that statement had not been made this sh*t storm isn't anywhere near as bad, players ask and get told to explore their options all the time without all this fiasco.

The thing is its all heresay, and if it was said it was said in confidence behind closed doors

Robbie has said several times on the record last night on TFS said it again, I haven't actually heard anything where Taylor has confirmed it but there's been no actaul denial, just the comment that they don't comment on behind closed door matters.
Pretty damning if you ask me a simple denial would clear the air, this is the reason Robbie is "winning the battle of the media" also this is why I wondered whether the board was on board with the call to say he'll be in reserves if he stays. Perhaps they don't know how to handle this being put in a worse than necessary situation.
 
@eyewonder said:
Robbie Farah appeared on the footy show last night and came over well. Questions were pretty much loaded in his favour and popualar support,on the footy show,was certainly for robbie.

They mentioned some legal implications which limited the type of questions robbie could be asked.

jason taylor was also asked to come on the show but declined to do so.Probably a smart move by taylor.

im not a regular viewer of the show but i did remember a jason taylor interview after his sacking from souths. he was crying bleeding heart over his treatment by the souths board .**but when asked to sit on the management side,it didnt suit.**

irony,i think.

Whoever the bad guy is in all of this,im not on taylors side.
i wouldnt want to be on a life raft with him,put it that way.

Or maybe he was just adhering to the Club's direction that nothing further would be said in public until the matter was resolved.

Why is it so hard to see the, stated, obvious?
 
If Farah digs his heels in and stays and of course he has every right to and it would be a popular decision for most punters, I bet you he will not play reserve grade. I think you will find that it was a throw away line from someone in a heated discussion who open their mouth without thinking…we all do it

Anyway the club just would not be able to cope with the negative press if they did dump Farah to reserve grade. So with a new CEO on board from November, you would imagine their is a real chance for someone to like him who has had no involvement in this saga to mediate a deal where Robbie has a chance to be a one club man and leave on his own terms
 
@NT Tiger said:
@eyewonder said:
Robbie Farah appeared on the footy show last night and came over well. Questions were pretty much loaded in his favour and popualar support,on the footy show,was certainly for robbie.

They mentioned some legal implications which limited the type of questions robbie could be asked.

jason taylor was also asked to come on the show but declined to do so.Probably a smart move by taylor.

im not a regular viewer of the show but i did remember a jason taylor interview after his sacking from souths. he was crying bleeding heart over his treatment by the souths board .**but when asked to sit on the management side,it didnt suit.**

irony,i think.

Whoever the bad guy is in all of this,im not on taylors side.
i wouldnt want to be on a life raft with him,put it that way.

Or maybe he was just adhering to the Club's direction that nothing further would be said in public until the matter was resolved.

Why is it so hard to see the, stated, obvious?

So true…the behind closed doors discussions have by one party at least remained behind closed doors as was the case before the 'Story' was originally leaked to the Media...
 
Farah is trying to play smart , he knows if he lets this play out in the media he wins the popularity contest.

But ultimately he will lose this , there is no turning back now , he won't be at the WT's after seeing that interview

I think he needed to come out and say that despite everything he still wanted to reconcile with the WT's , to leave that door even slightly ajar

He has painted himself into a corner now
 
@cktiger said:
@Tiger Watto said:
@Tiger In The Gong said:
@Tiger Watto said:
I read the comments about Reddy as he simply made a flippant comment to Farah in a jovial context.

Yes well i dont think anyone directly involved in the matter saw it as jovial.

maybe they need to put there big boy pants on then?

Maybe Reddy needed to put his brain in gear, Watto.
I don't think it would have been the time to make a smart alec comment like that when you've just told your captain and life member to look elsewhere - and then add 'or else'.

Reddy reminds me of Blocker. Both speak without thinking. What exactly is his role at the club anyway?? …..JT's minder maybe.. :mrgreen: Sure needs one at the moment, going by last weeks reception at the game :sunglasses:
 
I'm not a follower of Vautin but thinking about his advice to Farah I had to think why is Farah so entrenched in his position? He knows he'll get paid any way he looks at it.
I'm of the growing opinion that he is simply afraid to move on.
He saw what happened to Marshall. Benji moved on but soon found that outside the protective cocoon of WT he actually had to perform. To his credit, he is now doing exactly that.
Farah knows that here at WT he he can do no wrong. He is a legend with a following of idolators that will turn a blind eye, or make excuses for him no matter what he does.
The more I see of his off field performance, the more I'm thinking he won't be able to function here. I had hoped it could turn out otherwise but I'm no longer so optimistic.
 
Do u remember Taylor response when asked how he came about selecting Reddy for the job… it was something like "I was driving and the phone rang..Rocket rang to congratulate me on the job, then i thought,Yeah he would be good, we worked together at Parra"
 
@alexaki said:
@littletiger said:
What was the point of him going on the footy show?

To continue to ride the sympathy wave…...he comes across a very stubborn man.

What would you do Alexaki? Roll over and walk away without a whimper, or fight for your livelihood and reputation? I know which path I'd take, and i expect nothing less from Robbie.
His within his rights to fight this like it or not.
People are sympathetic because they can see how badly this has been handled by the club. Just so you know, Robbie has my sympathy vote too…
 
WooooooW

this thread and some on here seemed to have had a sugar explosion.
All im going to say is if you take the personalities out, take the emotion out and for a moment forget its your football team thats been walloped on and now more so off the field, this is all pretty simple.
regardless of who you like or side your sitting on….... yarda yarda yarrrrrrrrda....

in Australia in 2015 NO employer can threaten their staff that if he dosnt walk away he will be sent to a lower grade for the sole reason the manager is attempting to force the person to leave the company.
Thats the point here.

and of corse when the stakes are high.... well, its brought out the best in all of us hasnt it........ !
 
@bobo125 said:
WooooooW

this thread and some on here seemed to have had a sugar explosion.
All im going to say is if you take the personalities out, take the emotion out and for a moment forget its your football team thats been walloped on and now more so off the field, this is all pretty simple.
regardless of who you like or side your sitting on….... yarda yarda yarrrrrrrrda....

in Australia in 2015 NO employer can threaten their staff that if he dosnt walk away he will be sent to a lower grade for the sole reason the manager is attempting to force the person to leave the company.
Thats the point here.

and of corse when the stakes are high.... well, its brought out the best in all of us hasnt it........ !

In other words you are saying a coach isn't entitled to have a say on the squad he wants. So what's the point in JT having any authority? As has been stated 100 times, no one is threatening not to pay him.
 
@Tigerdon said:
Do u remember Taylor response when asked how he came about selecting Reddy for the job… it was something like "I was driving and the phone rang..Rocket rang to congratulate me on the job, then i thought,Yeah he would be good, we worked together at Parra"

Lol… That about sums it up, doesn't it. :laughing:
 
@GNR4LIFE said:
@bobo125 said:
WooooooW

this thread and some on here seemed to have had a sugar explosion.
All im going to say is if you take the personalities out, take the emotion out and for a moment forget its your football team thats been walloped on and now more so off the field, this is all pretty simple.
regardless of who you like or side your sitting on….... yarda yarda yarrrrrrrrda....

in Australia in 2015 NO employer can threaten their staff that if he dosnt walk away he will be sent to a lower grade for the sole reason the manager is attempting to force the person to leave the company.
Thats the point here.

and of corse when the stakes are high.... well, its brought out the best in all of us hasnt it........ !

In other words you are saying a coach isn't entitled to have a say on the squad he wants. So what's the point in JT having any authority? As has been stated 100 times, no one is threatening not to pay him.

your missing the point mate.
theres no question over the money
theres no question that there is a fractured team etc etc
The coach and the management can choose whatever team and or what ever direction they want to go in but the can not try and make someone quit via threatening him.

the smarter play here would have been to let Farah play poorly and merely put him on the bench or reserves and let Farah make up his own mind.
certainly not say leave or …......
thats the point
 
@bobo125 said:
@GNR4LIFE said:
@bobo125 said:
WooooooW

this thread and some on here seemed to have had a sugar explosion.
All im going to say is if you take the personalities out, take the emotion out and for a moment forget its your football team thats been walloped on and now more so off the field, this is all pretty simple.
regardless of who you like or side your sitting on….... yarda yarda yarrrrrrrrda....

in Australia in 2015 NO employer can threaten their staff that if he dosnt walk away he will be sent to a lower grade for the sole reason the manager is attempting to force the person to leave the company.
Thats the point here.

and of corse when the stakes are high.... well, its brought out the best in all of us hasnt it........ !

In other words you are saying a coach isn't entitled to have a say on the squad he wants. So what's the point in JT having any authority? As has been stated 100 times, no one is threatening not to pay him.

your missing the point mate.
theres no question over the money
theres no question that there is a fractured team etc etc
The coach and the management can choose whatever team and or what ever direction they want to go in but the can not try and make someone quit via threatening him.

the smarter play here would have been to let Farah play poorly and merely put him on the bench or reserves and let Farah make up his own mind.
certainly not say leave or …......
thats the point

But what makes you so sure it was used as a threat to make him leave? How do you know they weren't trying to be fair to him by telling him how things would be, thus giving Farah a chance to explore other options.
 
Back
Top