Rothfield’s weekly dribble

@jirskyr said in [Rothfield’s weekly dribble](/post/1426677) said:
@jrtiger said in [Rothfield’s weekly dribble](/post/1426412) said:
the only thing that is in the club's control is the way they sell the club. the hesitancy with the TPJ and Finucane deals highlights that we're divided in who we're going after in the market. I'm sure if we didn't hesitate on TPJ he probably would've played for us last night, and we wouldn't have gone after Finucane as a result. there is no need to deviate from the plan just because Rothfield has hit the turps and rambled in his weekly column.

it's simple. if we're after a player we need to back ourselves to the hilt. get Lee out of the media or at the very least stop him from commenting on recruitment matters. if we're sticking with Madge, put the message out and target the players that will play for him. continue to poach elite talent stuck in other systems and develop them here. it's the only way up. who cares about established players, if they don't want to come to us then build it without them.

everything that is going on in the media is noise. Chammas, Rothfield and Crawley are gronks who write to drive up website traffic. we string a few performances together and finish the year strong then the heat dies down.

I don't get it - you finish up by saying everything in the media is "noise", but you open by quoting that same media as fact. What hesitancy about the TPJ and Finucane deals? What division on who we are going after? That's all pure speculation.

there was word from inside sources on here and the press that we were umming and ahhing about TPJ and Finucane for sometime. I could show you a post that Pom wrote about management being divided about offering Finucane a deal. obviously it's one person's word against another but I think that it's true.

the 'opinion' pieces written about the tigers i.e what Chammas and Buzz have produced in the past few weeks is the noise I'm speaking about. the club isn't going to come out and confirm that they were acting in that manner, that would be a nightmare. you may argue that that's speculation, but Lee coming out and saying that TPJ wasn't a good fit and then us going back in for him paints a pretty accurate picture imo.
 
@wt2k said in [Rothfield’s weekly dribble](/post/1426720) said:
@garryowen said in [Rothfield’s weekly dribble](/post/1426712) said:
Not going to link it, but FS now has a Hooper article up that goes against pretty much all of the Buzz nonsense. These clowns are brazenly playing both sides and people still lap it up.

FS getting a % of peptides next contract?

This is sooooo Pooper.. The headline Pursuit of Flanno.

In the article itself..Flanagan’s long-time advisor Wayne Beavis telephoned Wests Tigers chairman Lee Hagipantelis to introduce himself. Flanagan was never mentioned but this isn’t anyone in rugby league’s first rodeo and the next move was to start the media campaign designed to turn the screws on Maguire.


There you have it...a part of a media campaign you and your cronies drive you peanut..
 
@geo said in [Rothfield’s weekly dribble](/post/1426788) said:
@wt2k said in [Rothfield’s weekly dribble](/post/1426720) said:
@garryowen said in [Rothfield’s weekly dribble](/post/1426712) said:
Not going to link it, but FS now has a Hooper article up that goes against pretty much all of the Buzz nonsense. These clowns are brazenly playing both sides and people still lap it up.

FS getting a % of peptides next contract?

This is sooooo Pooper.. The headline Pursuit of Flanno.

In the article itself..Flanagan’s long-time advisor Wayne Beavis telephoned Wests Tigers chairman Lee Hagipantelis to introduce himself. Flanagan was never mentioned but this isn’t anyone in rugby league’s first rodeo and the next move was to start the media campaign designed to turn the screws on Maguire.


There you have it...a part of a media campaign you and your cronies drive you peanut..

I don't care who drives it or how it is done, just get it done Wests Tigers, things have to change and change now, while we have money to spend, Madge can't give it away
 
@jedi_tiger said in [Rothfield’s weekly dribble](/post/1426373) said:
@jirskyr said in [Rothfield’s weekly dribble](/post/1426356) said:
@jedi_tiger said in [Rothfield’s weekly dribble](/post/1426353) said:
we are not a very well run club and can’t even get our offers in smoothly. If it was not true then people like Woodford would not mention it and we have seen it with tpj and finucane.

You don't know any of this to be true. You can have your opinions, fine, but stop asserting that things are true because someone made a comment in the paper.

What does Simon Woolford know about anything? When is the last time someone went to Simon Woolford to ask his opinion? Next they'll start asking Alan Tongue, but at least Alan Tongue is respectable.

you are always pro the club the club can do no wrong
we made an offer at the death to Dale finucane, woolford is just giving his opinion he is allowed to state what has happened to him
you do not know it is not true

You do realise it’s not uncommon for an 11th hour bid right?

In recent cases I recall.

Korisou all but signed by Dogs.
DWZ all but signed by Tigers.
Rudolf all but signed by the Warriors (retainer by sharks)
Johnson all but signed by the Dogs.

… so in considering the above which clubs should have their club slung through the media in failing to get the deal done?
 
Good cop, bad cop routine ehhh.

These pair are just imagining things up to get some clicks for the ad revenue now.

Rothfield and the mystery man who has no history Hooper need to be de-platformed !
 
@needaname said in [Rothfield’s weekly dribble](/post/1426806) said:
@jedi_tiger said in [Rothfield’s weekly dribble](/post/1426373) said:
@jirskyr said in [Rothfield’s weekly dribble](/post/1426356) said:
@jedi_tiger said in [Rothfield’s weekly dribble](/post/1426353) said:
we are not a very well run club and can’t even get our offers in smoothly. If it was not true then people like Woodford would not mention it and we have seen it with tpj and finucane.

You don't know any of this to be true. You can have your opinions, fine, but stop asserting that things are true because someone made a comment in the paper.

What does Simon Woolford know about anything? When is the last time someone went to Simon Woolford to ask his opinion? Next they'll start asking Alan Tongue, but at least Alan Tongue is respectable.

you are always pro the club the club can do no wrong
we made an offer at the death to Dale finucane, woolford is just giving his opinion he is allowed to state what has happened to him
you do not know it is not true

You do realise it’s not uncommon for an 11th hour bid right?

In recent cases I recall.

Korisou all but signed by Dogs.
DWZ all but signed by Tigers.
Rudolf all but signed by the Warriors (retainer by sharks)
Johnson all but signed by the Dogs.

… so in considering the above which clubs should have their club slung through the media in failing to get the deal done?

so the club IS doing a good job with negotiations ok thanks for letting us all know
guys no need to worry our recruitment department is going great
The tpj offer of on again off again for a start
 
@tigertuff said in [Rothfield’s weekly dribble](/post/1426444) said:
@truetiger said in [Rothfield’s weekly dribble](/post/1426325) said:
@tigertuff said in [Rothfield’s weekly dribble](/post/1426267) said:
@twentyforty said in [Rothfield’s weekly dribble](/post/1426223) said:
@pawsandclaws1 said in [Rothfield’s weekly dribble](/post/1426217) said:
@tyga said in [Rothfield’s weekly dribble](/post/1426195) said:
The game plan is clear posted it a few times re Flanagan. There are a few sympathising with Madge as there is more to the story. What I’ve heard from people with a good idea is we are asleep at the wheel with scouting and showing up to get deals done with players. Somethings up and it’s not all the coach.

As soon as Maguire comes under the microscope the mantra "look over there" emanates. He is accountable for the atrocious defence and must go.


We had one player miss 11 of the 48 missed tackles against Manly. We have an inexperienced roster not playing as a team, because they not only don’t know each other, but they are still learning to play . I honestly believe this is a true reflection of the entire organisation, and if that’s the case, sacking the coach will not fix it.

Defence is one thing. How do you explain the pedestrian looking attack that we play with each week. My under 10s footy side used to pass the ball out the back line like they do. They cant even draw and pass (Talau). That stuff should be second nature to these guys. We badly need a footy coach not a motivator.

We have a footy coach ......we need a coachable roster that understand the basics of the game,you know,tackle,support,linespeed and hold the ball.....

So these guys are first grade players and they dont know the basics. That will do me. How did they get there then. All our players offer something to this team in my view but the coach needs to find that balance across the team and coach them to their strengths. He is just throwing anyone in there in the hope they will look good. I will put money on it Big Steph would not have started last week if he wasnt picked in the origin camp. He did it because Freddy can see something in him and gives him belief. Thats what most of our guys need.
I think we all agree as supporters we can cop a loss as long as they guys are having a crack. We are not getting better as a team and most individuals are not also. That comes back to the coach.

Isn’t it easy to see, that it’s taken at least 100- 150 first grade games for our current longest serving player to play with the mentality to compete in the NRL.
How can you expect players with less than 50 games to have caught up? We have about 15 of them rotating through our squad.

At a club with a history of performing more consistently and a culture of competivness the improvement of those players may be a bit quicker if they are surrounded by rep players of 200-250 games.

I use Brooks as a real example. So much so that everyone is saying, keep him: sack him: coach him better: let him play his own way etc. but through 5 coaches all of varrying strategies we’ve only seen him lay it all on the line for the club over the last 50 games of his career.
It was only a couple years back that you would question his genuine interest in being a first grader.

And yeah you expect half of our squad to get up to speed to that level without having a history of a competitive culture?
 
@jedi_tiger said in [Rothfield’s weekly dribble](/post/1426820) said:
@needaname said in [Rothfield’s weekly dribble](/post/1426806) said:
@jedi_tiger said in [Rothfield’s weekly dribble](/post/1426373) said:
@jirskyr said in [Rothfield’s weekly dribble](/post/1426356) said:
@jedi_tiger said in [Rothfield’s weekly dribble](/post/1426353) said:
we are not a very well run club and can’t even get our offers in smoothly. If it was not true then people like Woodford would not mention it and we have seen it with tpj and finucane.

You don't know any of this to be true. You can have your opinions, fine, but stop asserting that things are true because someone made a comment in the paper.

What does Simon Woolford know about anything? When is the last time someone went to Simon Woolford to ask his opinion? Next they'll start asking Alan Tongue, but at least Alan Tongue is respectable.

you are always pro the club the club can do no wrong
we made an offer at the death to Dale finucane, woolford is just giving his opinion he is allowed to state what has happened to him
you do not know it is not true

You do realise it’s not uncommon for an 11th hour bid right?

In recent cases I recall.

Korisou all but signed by Dogs.
DWZ all but signed by Tigers.
Rudolf all but signed by the Warriors (retainer by sharks)
Johnson all but signed by the Dogs.

… so in considering the above which clubs should have their club slung through the media in failing to get the deal done?

so the club IS doing a good job with negotiations ok thanks for letting us all know
guys no need to worry our recruitment department is going great
The tpj offer of on again off again for a start

We're the benchmark for NRL recruitment.
 
@jedi_tiger said in [Rothfield’s weekly dribble](/post/1426820) said:
@needaname said in [Rothfield’s weekly dribble](/post/1426806) said:
@jedi_tiger said in [Rothfield’s weekly dribble](/post/1426373) said:
@jirskyr said in [Rothfield’s weekly dribble](/post/1426356) said:
@jedi_tiger said in [Rothfield’s weekly dribble](/post/1426353) said:
we are not a very well run club and can’t even get our offers in smoothly. If it was not true then people like Woodford would not mention it and we have seen it with tpj and finucane.

You don't know any of this to be true. You can have your opinions, fine, but stop asserting that things are true because someone made a comment in the paper.

What does Simon Woolford know about anything? When is the last time someone went to Simon Woolford to ask his opinion? Next they'll start asking Alan Tongue, but at least Alan Tongue is respectable.

you are always pro the club the club can do no wrong
we made an offer at the death to Dale finucane, woolford is just giving his opinion he is allowed to state what has happened to him
you do not know it is not true

You do realise it’s not uncommon for an 11th hour bid right?

In recent cases I recall.

Korisou all but signed by Dogs.
DWZ all but signed by Tigers.
Rudolf all but signed by the Warriors (retainer by sharks)
Johnson all but signed by the Dogs.

… so in considering the above which clubs should have their club slung through the media in failing to get the deal done?

so the club IS doing a good job with negotiations ok thanks for letting us all know
guys no need to worry our recruitment department is going great
The tpj offer of on again off again for a start

Change your agenda then. That’s fine.
 
@needaname said in [Rothfield’s weekly dribble](/post/1426838) said:
@tigertuff said in [Rothfield’s weekly dribble](/post/1426444) said:
@truetiger said in [Rothfield’s weekly dribble](/post/1426325) said:
@tigertuff said in [Rothfield’s weekly dribble](/post/1426267) said:
@twentyforty said in [Rothfield’s weekly dribble](/post/1426223) said:
@pawsandclaws1 said in [Rothfield’s weekly dribble](/post/1426217) said:
@tyga said in [Rothfield’s weekly dribble](/post/1426195) said:
The game plan is clear posted it a few times re Flanagan. There are a few sympathising with Madge as there is more to the story. What I’ve heard from people with a good idea is we are asleep at the wheel with scouting and showing up to get deals done with players. Somethings up and it’s not all the coach.

As soon as Maguire comes under the microscope the mantra "look over there" emanates. He is accountable for the atrocious defence and must go.


We had one player miss 11 of the 48 missed tackles against Manly. We have an inexperienced roster not playing as a team, because they not only don’t know each other, but they are still learning to play . I honestly believe this is a true reflection of the entire organisation, and if that’s the case, sacking the coach will not fix it.

Defence is one thing. How do you explain the pedestrian looking attack that we play with each week. My under 10s footy side used to pass the ball out the back line like they do. They cant even draw and pass (Talau). That stuff should be second nature to these guys. We badly need a footy coach not a motivator.

We have a footy coach ......we need a coachable roster that understand the basics of the game,you know,tackle,support,linespeed and hold the ball.....

So these guys are first grade players and they dont know the basics. That will do me. How did they get there then. All our players offer something to this team in my view but the coach needs to find that balance across the team and coach them to their strengths. He is just throwing anyone in there in the hope they will look good. I will put money on it Big Steph would not have started last week if he wasnt picked in the origin camp. He did it because Freddy can see something in him and gives him belief. Thats what most of our guys need.
I think we all agree as supporters we can cop a loss as long as they guys are having a crack. We are not getting better as a team and most individuals are not also. That comes back to the coach.

Isn’t it easy to see, that it’s taken at least 100- 150 first grade games for our current longest serving player to play with the mentality to compete in the NRL.
How can you expect players with less than 50 games to have caught up? We have about 15 of them rotating through our squad.

At a club with a history of performing more consistently and a culture of competivness the improvement of those players may be a bit quicker if they are surrounded by rep players of 200-250 games.

I use Brooks as a real example. So much so that everyone is saying, keep him: sack him: coach him better: let him play his own way etc. but through 5 coaches all of varrying strategies we’ve only seen him lay it all on the line for the club over the last 50 games of his career.
It was only a couple years back that you would question his genuine interest in being a first grader.

And yeah you expect half of our squad to get up to speed to that level without having a history of a competitive culture?

So are you saying guys like Tamou and Mbye who are our rep players should be the ones making our young ones better. I would argue they are making them look worse.
 
I acknowledge that poor Phil is somewhat challenged, but be that as it may. (as an old boss once told me, you'll always need someone to clean up the elephant shit at the Circus)

This is the issue that I have with his poster boy Shane. And its a huge issue in terms of a duty of care to your employees. The fact that he condoned his players being experimented on (with Peptides) completely blows my mind (and happy to be corrected on this but I think there are a couple of ex-Cronulla players suing).

Think about this for a minute. You're trying to recruit a young man or woman and talking about what you're going to do for him/her in terms of developing them into a great player (hopefully) but just as importantly a valuable member of society. You're talking to his parents or their manager. "We'll look after little Johnny or Sally" (we're going to inject them with Christ knows what and we're not sure what the outcome will be?),

They'll be in safe hands!

I mean Shane should have suffered the same level of disgust and public outcry that James Hird suffered in Melbourne. Sorry James you won't be allowed near AFL anytime in the foreseeable future and we're going to ban the players for 12 months!

But Todd was in charge then - and well it was Todd!

Getting off the soapbox, and I want to win as much as the next person but I don't want to do it at the expense of the health and well-being those you're entrusted to look after.


And I certainly don't want the stench of Shane around the Tigers!
 
@needaname said in [Rothfield’s weekly dribble](/post/1426881) said:
@jedi_tiger said in [Rothfield’s weekly dribble](/post/1426820) said:
@needaname said in [Rothfield’s weekly dribble](/post/1426806) said:
@jedi_tiger said in [Rothfield’s weekly dribble](/post/1426373) said:
@jirskyr said in [Rothfield’s weekly dribble](/post/1426356) said:
@jedi_tiger said in [Rothfield’s weekly dribble](/post/1426353) said:
we are not a very well run club and can’t even get our offers in smoothly. If it was not true then people like Woodford would not mention it and we have seen it with tpj and finucane.

You don't know any of this to be true. You can have your opinions, fine, but stop asserting that things are true because someone made a comment in the paper.

What does Simon Woolford know about anything? When is the last time someone went to Simon Woolford to ask his opinion? Next they'll start asking Alan Tongue, but at least Alan Tongue is respectable.

you are always pro the club the club can do no wrong
we made an offer at the death to Dale finucane, woolford is just giving his opinion he is allowed to state what has happened to him
you do not know it is not true

You do realise it’s not uncommon for an 11th hour bid right?

In recent cases I recall.

Korisou all but signed by Dogs.
DWZ all but signed by Tigers.
Rudolf all but signed by the Warriors (retainer by sharks)
Johnson all but signed by the Dogs.

… so in considering the above which clubs should have their club slung through the media in failing to get the deal done?

so the club IS doing a good job with negotiations ok thanks for letting us all know
guys no need to worry our recruitment department is going great
The tpj offer of on again off again for a start

Change your agenda then. That’s fine.

no agenda just facts
but thank you
how about you.change yours from club cheerleader
 
@jedi_tiger said in [Rothfield’s weekly dribble](/post/1427099) said:
@needaname said in [Rothfield’s weekly dribble](/post/1426881) said:
@jedi_tiger said in [Rothfield’s weekly dribble](/post/1426820) said:
@needaname said in [Rothfield’s weekly dribble](/post/1426806) said:
@jedi_tiger said in [Rothfield’s weekly dribble](/post/1426373) said:
@jirskyr said in [Rothfield’s weekly dribble](/post/1426356) said:
@jedi_tiger said in [Rothfield’s weekly dribble](/post/1426353) said:
we are not a very well run club and can’t even get our offers in smoothly. If it was not true then people like Woodford would not mention it and we have seen it with tpj and finucane.

You don't know any of this to be true. You can have your opinions, fine, but stop asserting that things are true because someone made a comment in the paper.

What does Simon Woolford know about anything? When is the last time someone went to Simon Woolford to ask his opinion? Next they'll start asking Alan Tongue, but at least Alan Tongue is respectable.

you are always pro the club the club can do no wrong
we made an offer at the death to Dale finucane, woolford is just giving his opinion he is allowed to state what has happened to him
you do not know it is not true

You do realise it’s not uncommon for an 11th hour bid right?

In recent cases I recall.

Korisou all but signed by Dogs.
DWZ all but signed by Tigers.
Rudolf all but signed by the Warriors (retainer by sharks)
Johnson all but signed by the Dogs.

… so in considering the above which clubs should have their club slung through the media in failing to get the deal done?

so the club IS doing a good job with negotiations ok thanks for letting us all know
guys no need to worry our recruitment department is going great
The tpj offer of on again off again for a start

Change your agenda then. That’s fine.

no agenda just facts
but thank you
how about you.change yours from club cheerleader

No I’m not a cheerleader of the club. Maybe a bit more patient then some given that I have sat through 3 quasi rebuilds knowing all to well that the club threw the plot out half way through them.
I have no inner workings off the club and recruitment team but would love to be a fly on the wall when they take place.
My feeling is we have a couple of corporates in that are too involved in player negotiations whom really shouldn’t have much weight on the decision unless it impacts the club from a commercial perspective. In saying that having Sheens replace Lee and Pascoe on the recruitment committee is a hope of mine and possibly a good start.
 
@tigertuff said in [Rothfield’s weekly dribble](/post/1426770) said:
@jirskyr said in [Rothfield’s weekly dribble](/post/1426692) said:
@tigertuff said in [Rothfield’s weekly dribble](/post/1426444) said:
He is just throwing anyone in there in the hope they will look good. I will put money on it Big Steph would not have started last week if he wasnt picked in the origin camp. He did it because Freddy can see something in him and gives him belief. Thats what most of our guys need.

You mean except the part where Madge already started Stefano in Rd 6-7, 2 months before Origin?

So from round 8 till last week he wasnt good enough but after origin camp he is. I reckon he is making it up as he goes with no clear direction.

It's called giving the kid a spell. Probably don't want to play your junior props in the starting front row every single week of their first full season.

But you'd know of course, being both a highly accredited coach and former rep-level prop.
 
@jedi_tiger said in [Rothfield’s weekly dribble](/post/1426820) said:
@needaname said in [Rothfield’s weekly dribble](/post/1426806) said:
@jedi_tiger said in [Rothfield’s weekly dribble](/post/1426373) said:
@jirskyr said in [Rothfield’s weekly dribble](/post/1426356) said:
@jedi_tiger said in [Rothfield’s weekly dribble](/post/1426353) said:
we are not a very well run club and can’t even get our offers in smoothly. If it was not true then people like Woodford would not mention it and we have seen it with tpj and finucane.

You don't know any of this to be true. You can have your opinions, fine, but stop asserting that things are true because someone made a comment in the paper.

What does Simon Woolford know about anything? When is the last time someone went to Simon Woolford to ask his opinion? Next they'll start asking Alan Tongue, but at least Alan Tongue is respectable.

you are always pro the club the club can do no wrong
we made an offer at the death to Dale finucane, woolford is just giving his opinion he is allowed to state what has happened to him
you do not know it is not true

You do realise it’s not uncommon for an 11th hour bid right?

In recent cases I recall.

Korisou all but signed by Dogs.
DWZ all but signed by Tigers.
Rudolf all but signed by the Warriors (retainer by sharks)
Johnson all but signed by the Dogs.

… so in considering the above which clubs should have their club slung through the media in failing to get the deal done?

so the club IS doing a good job with negotiations ok thanks for letting us all know
guys no need to worry our recruitment department is going great
The tpj offer of on again off again for a start

He/she is making an argument that 11th-hour offers are not uncommon and not necessarily an indicator of a mistake or bad practice.

Your comment is childish, to just respond to any counter-argument with "oh so I suppose everything is fine then".
 
@jirskyr said in [Rothfield’s weekly dribble](/post/1427153) said:
@jedi_tiger said in [Rothfield’s weekly dribble](/post/1426820) said:
@needaname said in [Rothfield’s weekly dribble](/post/1426806) said:
@jedi_tiger said in [Rothfield’s weekly dribble](/post/1426373) said:
@jirskyr said in [Rothfield’s weekly dribble](/post/1426356) said:
@jedi_tiger said in [Rothfield’s weekly dribble](/post/1426353) said:
we are not a very well run club and can’t even get our offers in smoothly. If it was not true then people like Woodford would not mention it and we have seen it with tpj and finucane.

You don't know any of this to be true. You can have your opinions, fine, but stop asserting that things are true because someone made a comment in the paper.

What does Simon Woolford know about anything? When is the last time someone went to Simon Woolford to ask his opinion? Next they'll start asking Alan Tongue, but at least Alan Tongue is respectable.

you are always pro the club the club can do no wrong
we made an offer at the death to Dale finucane, woolford is just giving his opinion he is allowed to state what has happened to him
you do not know it is not true

You do realise it’s not uncommon for an 11th hour bid right?

In recent cases I recall.

Korisou all but signed by Dogs.
DWZ all but signed by Tigers.
Rudolf all but signed by the Warriors (retainer by sharks)
Johnson all but signed by the Dogs.

… so in considering the above which clubs should have their club slung through the media in failing to get the deal done?

so the club IS doing a good job with negotiations ok thanks for letting us all know
guys no need to worry our recruitment department is going great
The tpj offer of on again off again for a start

He/she is making an argument that 11th-hour offers are not uncommon and not necessarily an indicator of a mistake or bad practice.

Your comment is childish, to just respond to any counter-argument with "oh so I suppose everything is fine then".

Thanks.
He BTW
 
@jirskyr said in [Rothfield’s weekly dribble](/post/1427153) said:
@jedi_tiger said in [Rothfield’s weekly dribble](/post/1426820) said:
@needaname said in [Rothfield’s weekly dribble](/post/1426806) said:
@jedi_tiger said in [Rothfield’s weekly dribble](/post/1426373) said:
@jirskyr said in [Rothfield’s weekly dribble](/post/1426356) said:
@jedi_tiger said in [Rothfield’s weekly dribble](/post/1426353) said:
we are not a very well run club and can’t even get our offers in smoothly. If it was not true then people like Woodford would not mention it and we have seen it with tpj and finucane.

You don't know any of this to be true. You can have your opinions, fine, but stop asserting that things are true because someone made a comment in the paper.

What does Simon Woolford know about anything? When is the last time someone went to Simon Woolford to ask his opinion? Next they'll start asking Alan Tongue, but at least Alan Tongue is respectable.

you are always pro the club the club can do no wrong
we made an offer at the death to Dale finucane, woolford is just giving his opinion he is allowed to state what has happened to him
you do not know it is not true

You do realise it’s not uncommon for an 11th hour bid right?

In recent cases I recall.

Korisou all but signed by Dogs.
DWZ all but signed by Tigers.
Rudolf all but signed by the Warriors (retainer by sharks)
Johnson all but signed by the Dogs.

… so in considering the above which clubs should have their club slung through the media in failing to get the deal done?

so the club IS doing a good job with negotiations ok thanks for letting us all know
guys no need to worry our recruitment department is going great
The tpj offer of on again off again for a start

He/she is making an argument that 11th-hour offers are not uncommon and not necessarily an indicator of a mistake or bad practice.

Your comment is childish, to just respond to any counter-argument with "oh so I suppose everything is fine then".

so you think no mistakes were made and our recruitment is good ??? please
 
@jirskyr said in [Rothfield’s weekly dribble](/post/1427151) said:
@tigertuff said in [Rothfield’s weekly dribble](/post/1426770) said:
@jirskyr said in [Rothfield’s weekly dribble](/post/1426692) said:
@tigertuff said in [Rothfield’s weekly dribble](/post/1426444) said:
He is just throwing anyone in there in the hope they will look good. I will put money on it Big Steph would not have started last week if he wasnt picked in the origin camp. He did it because Freddy can see something in him and gives him belief. Thats what most of our guys need.

You mean except the part where Madge already started Stefano in Rd 6-7, 2 months before Origin?

So from round 8 till last week he wasnt good enough but after origin camp he is. I reckon he is making it up as he goes with no clear direction.

It's called giving the kid a spell. Probably don't want to play your junior props in the starting front row every single week of their first full season.

But you'd know of course, being both a highly accredited coach and former rep-level prop.

Sorry for having an opinion mate, i forgot i was on a forum there for a minute. I agree the kid needs a spell every now then. Not disputing that. I just find it funny that he gets picked to start after origin camp. Cant remember what he did in the weeks previous weeks to warrant a starting spot apart from getting picked in the camp. Personally i would be picking him before Tamou every week.
 
@tigertuff said in [Rothfield’s weekly dribble](/post/1427220) said:
@jirskyr said in [Rothfield’s weekly dribble](/post/1427151) said:
@tigertuff said in [Rothfield’s weekly dribble](/post/1426770) said:
@jirskyr said in [Rothfield’s weekly dribble](/post/1426692) said:
@tigertuff said in [Rothfield’s weekly dribble](/post/1426444) said:
He is just throwing anyone in there in the hope they will look good. I will put money on it Big Steph would not have started last week if he wasnt picked in the origin camp. He did it because Freddy can see something in him and gives him belief. Thats what most of our guys need.

You mean except the part where Madge already started Stefano in Rd 6-7, 2 months before Origin?

So from round 8 till last week he wasnt good enough but after origin camp he is. I reckon he is making it up as he goes with no clear direction.

It's called giving the kid a spell. Probably don't want to play your junior props in the starting front row every single week of their first full season.

But you'd know of course, being both a highly accredited coach and former rep-level prop.

Sorry for having an opinion mate, i forgot i was on a forum there for a minute. I agree the kid needs a spell every now then. Not disputing that. I just find it funny that he gets picked to start after origin camp. Cant remember what he did in the weeks previous weeks to warrant a starting spot apart from getting picked in the camp. Personally i would be picking him before Tamou every week.

Sorry might have been a bit harsh there in an attempt to be sarcastic.
 
Last Night on NRL 3760 He was ridiculed by the panel for his opinion and insights

He and Hooper openly sponsoring their mate Flannagan.

I am boycotting his Podcasts and articles moving forward.
 
Back
Top