Winston Churchill
Well-known member
I attempted to have an honest conversation with you, but at this stage im really not sure if you are genuine or playing a character.
Here’s the problem with your rant: it’s a blender full of real scandals, half truths, and fan fiction presented as evidence.
Iran Contra
Yes, Iran Contra “rings a bell” because it happened. The Reagan administration secretly sold arms to Iran and diverted proceeds to the Contras, skirting U.S. law and oversight. That’s the scandal.
But calling the right as “aiding their installation” is historically sloppy. The Iranian regime wasn’t “installed” by Reagan-era U.S. politicians; it emerged from under the 'Democrat' Carter era of the 1979 revolution and the post-revolution power struggle inside Iran. Iran Contra was mid 1980s, long after the regime existed.
“Reagan made a deal to keep hostages to win an election”
Hostages were released on January 20, 1981, minutes after Reagan was sworn in that timing is real.
But the “Reagan campaign cut a secret deal to delay release” claim (the “October Surprise” theory) has been investigated, and a U.S. House task force concluded there was no credible evidence supporting it. You can believe it emotionally, you can’t declare it settled fact.
Tdog, Russia, 2020, and “overthrowing democracy”
Russia interfered in 2016 — broadly accepted as all foreign powers interfere in all foreign elections, to what extend beyond those gullible to Facebook ads?
What’s not established is your confident “deity and/or his family and agents were involved with Russia to get him elected.” The Mueller investigation did not establish that Tdog campaign members conspired/coordinated with the Russian government’s election interference.
He did not win in 2020. The election result was certified and he left office. Saying he “won” is just denial dressed up as certainty and an easy barb used to make the left unhinged.
Attempted to overturn the result? There’s substantial public record of efforts to challenge/pressure outcomes but if you want to argue that, all elections past and future need to be scrutinised in the same manner. There is numerous easily obtained video of Democrats trying to overturn the 2016 election, stick to documented actions instead of stacking extra conspiracies on top.
“Criminal sex offender” / “raped children with Epstein”
You’re mixing legal findings with internet allegations. A jury found Tdog liable for sexual abuse (civil standard) and defamation in the E. Jean Carroll case and explicitly did not find rape proven under NY’s narrow legal definition used at trial.
And “raped children with Epstein” is an extremely serious accusation there is no court finding establishing that as fact. If you care about truth and not slop, stop treating rumour and your personal hatred of a man as evidence.
“Biggest cover-up in history”
That’s not an argument; it’s a dramatic closing line.
You’re doing that thing where you sprinkle in one real scandal (Iran Contra) from 40 years ago and then expect everyone to swallow the rest without chewing.
If you want to be taken seriously, argue from verifiable facts, not conspiracy confetti.
edit notes- edited to take out the childish auto text put on here when you mention the Presidents name. Grow up.
Last edited:
