@Ed Reschs said:All read Roy masters article in the smh today. The truth is out there. Also a small point there is the comment about juniors for all those knockers who say there is no talent in MacArthur.
\
\
Posted using RoarFEED
You guys will get nowhere unless you can realise the difference between fact and opinion. I'm not saying what Roy Master wrote is wrong or incorrect but it was an opinion piece - his take on things. He makes claims and reflects on facts based in his interpretations. Take his comments on the amount of Wests Juniors in the Parra HM side. Looks bad on the surface, made me ask these questions:
1 - What is Roy's qualification for 'Wests Junior' (were they play for teams in the Wests are directly before being picked by Parra or is the link more tenuous? Families move all the time. Were some of these players Wests juniors several years before they got to HM age?
2 - What's wrong with Parramatta's juniors if they need to have so many ringers?
3 - Did Parramatta take our best juniors or was it a matter of there being so many decent Wests juniors that some didn't make the Wests HM side and went elsewhere?
4 - Did these "Wests Juniors" attend Parramatta open trials or were they targetted by Parra? If they went to the trials, what can be done to prevent this happening?
Roy's article looked like it was written by the protest organisers with a few additional thoughts from Roy himself. That was my impression anyway. I repeat again, I'm not saying he was wrong about everything but it was not hard to realise where his sympathies lie.
I'm not trying to start a fight over who is right or wrong, just pointing out the danger of accepting commentary as unbiased fact can be dangerous.