The lurker is saying we'll re-sign 3 of our big 4 with Brooks likely to miss out. Which can only mean we've actually re-signed Brooksy for 3 years.
Does he actually use the phrase "miss out"?
"Miss out" suggests that Brooks wants to stay, same as the others, but the other 3 will take up the available funds. It suggests that Tigers are calling all the shots and Brooks will be pushed out to find another club.
I don't have faith in The Lurker but I don't mind going on record to say I really thought Brooks was going to be a pillar of our future team. Maybe he still will be, but the noise is pretty consistent at least, even if he stays, that he's not at the top of the pecking order.
I've usually been pretty spot on about this, not a unique talent amongst supporters, but I've seen some boys play their first 1 or 2 games and I knew they'd be special and important to our team long-term. The Benji one was obvious when he zig-zagged through Brisbane, same with Chris Lawrence when he burned Shaun Berrigan. But I picked Farah even from his first game off the bench, and he only played 7 games in the first two seasons until his involvement in 2005\. I called out Aaron Woods from his Foundation Cup match in 2011 when I only really knew him as that shaggy kid from the NYC, but he made such an impact against what was a quality Roosters pack. Tedesco even though he busted his knee in game 1, you could see he was a special talent.
I felt the same way about Brooks. Not just that famous St George game which could have been a fluke, but watching him go around in 20s and then his next FG games. I definitely felt Brooks was a future leader and was not convinced about Moses, but actually they've swung around so far now.