This is misrepresenting what was said. No-one got called misogynistic for not following NRLW - the comment (which I don't actually agree with, as it happens) was about someone who claimed literally not to have ever heard the name of the Tigers' most famous women's player. Those are two different things.
As I said in another comment (which I note none of the anti-woke warriors have responded to): I personally don't follow NRLW, and no-one has ever or would ever call me a misogynist for that, even though I've never made a secret of it. I am, however, a Tigers fan and therefore having a vague awareness of who a couple of our women's players are seems to be around the same level of fandom as, say, knowing that they train at Concord. I guess it's possible to literally never have heard of any of the women's players but while I wouldn't say someone who hasn't is a misogynist it seems a bit performative at this stage.
It's interesting to me that the people who are most likely to talk about "virtue signalling" or "woke snowflakes" are also the ones who are most inclined to have an attack of the vapours and go down clutching their pearls whenever any faint criticism comes their way. No-one is forcing you to like women's football, mate. You're all good. Have a lie down and think about Blocker Roach.
