GNR4LIFE
Well-known member
Maybe a certain club with been tangled up with lately that has just told their grub of a hooker to piss up a rope.I don't see where he could possibly start? Maybe cowboys or Souths?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Maybe a certain club with been tangled up with lately that has just told their grub of a hooker to piss up a rope.I don't see where he could possibly start? Maybe cowboys or Souths?
These third-party deals are a murky area of the game, the NRL should've made this more transparent decades ago.Wait, so when Richo mentioned on the pod that the 1mil deal for LG was comprised from deals with multiple parties (never mentioned the word 3rd party).
Is that legal?
If it is to be arranged at arms length; is it the manager that’s supposed to get the 3rd party deal to bump up the contract for his client.
The reason I ask is because Richo would of put that deal together without any of the managers input.
I’m still unclear as to how and when a 3rd party deal gets included into a complete deal for a player.
Wahs?tupou homesick supposedly
Cobbo 🙏 🙏🙏maybe we didn’t want Taylan because we have signed staggs 👀👀
Then I woke up.
Yeah that’s my point.These third-party deals are a murky area of the game, the NRL should've made this more transparent decades ago.
"The reports surrounding Votano's future come as his younger brother Cooper Votano - a standout in the Harold Matthews Cup competition this year for the Knights - has been linked with a switch to the Melbourne Storm.
you dont think a billionaire who sponsers said club doesnt have influence over any other potential business to help get the deal across the line, yes laundy hotels cant provide third party payementsI don't believe this at all. Laundy isn't allowed to offer 3rd party payments. Do I think every club, including the Dogs in this very deal breach the cap in some way? Probably. But I also think it is entirely reasonable for someone to take a pay cut to get out of a work environment in which they are not happy. And at 750k a season he isn't going to be struggling financially doing so.
Well, Your initial post was that Laundy hotels was making the payments.you dont think a billionaire who sponsers said club doesnt have influence over any other potential business to help get the deal across the line, yes laundy hotels cant provide third party payements
Used and abused by someone else, Papz maybe.Our ex girlfriends are some of the best in the game
From players to coaching staff / coaches.
We've populated the entire NRL with former employees / "ex girlfriends"
Your welcome NRL.
From Teddy to Papz, Moses, Addo Car, Coaches Ivan / Webster / Payten.
I'd take heaps of em back 😬😆
Kade ,, do you have any clue why the hell we have not signed Taylan May ? Didn’t he do Rehab at our request? Just seeing him run out in a Souths Jersey would be freaking insulting with all the rest of the dramas at the moment . The bloke wants to be here yet we an all we ever hear about is players that are leaving .. it’s beyond a jokeyou dont think a billionaire who sponsers said club doesnt have influence over any other potential business to help get the deal across the line, yes laundy hotels cant provide third party payements
Tavana reminds me of Bula. Lean, super athletic outside back who needed a couple of years in Flegg to develop properly before making the jump to grade.I know the feeling but I see some special traits in Tavana & Taotua that suggest NRL potential, they just got to stay injury free & have that inner determination to progress.
He is from Canberra lolWahs?
TDS maybe could also start at Knights and ParraI don't see where he could possibly start? Maybe cowboys or Souths?
That is my understanding as well, named sponsors are not able to provide "arms length" 3rd party deals to players. Anything they would pay a player would come straight off the salary cap. I know Galvin likes playing golf...laundy may be a really bad golf player that likes to back himself with a wager or two against some of the players who might have signed for love not money.I don't believe this at all. Laundy isn't allowed to offer 3rd party payments. Do I think every club, including the Dogs in this very deal breach the cap in some way? Probably. But I also think it is entirely reasonable for someone to take a pay cut to get out of a work environment in which they are not happy. And at 750k a season he isn't going to be struggling financially doing so.
LOL this is some world class coping.No new information from our club.
But please, dont believe the media beat up around Galvin taking less money from us
Our contract was a proposal of a package, it was a 5 year 6 million dollar agreement that factored in 3rd party payments, it was never ever going to take up 1.1 million in salary cap every year.
Galvin has taken 750k for this year at the dogs which goes up 25% over the the length of the deal
throw in the third party payments from laundy hotels.
he is earning more than he would have received at the tigers.
From memory it was Justin and the club denied it was ever accepted however the outcome was:Robbie or Justin did. In an interview, something about coming back to a job at the Tigers after Rabbits contract.
The Laundy family has a net worth of approx 1.5billion. do you think he is concerned with commercial/business sense throwing say 250k a year at Galvin to top up his contract? Gould would be coming to him and telling him who to top up with 3rd parties and he wouldnt give it a 2nd thoughtWell, Your initial post was that Laundy hotels was making the payments.
Do I think he potentially could be influencing other businesses to do so? Potentially, yes.
Do I think he really would be? Not really. Those businesses would have to be a obviously not connected to his. So I don't think he can really use his business sway to do so. Plus it doesn't make much commercial sense, at a business level to throw any significant money at Galvin. Nor would it reflect particularly well on him as businessman or as a bloke if he were leaning on other businesses to do so.
I think it more likely he would potentially use his billionaire mates to invest in a player. Kind of like bros going in together on a race horse. But I don't see Galvin as a big enough get to warrant getting the mates involved.
Again I see it far more likely that Gould seen a decent young player, unhappy at his current club and started moves to bring that player to the Dogs. I think it was a 12months process but he got his man.