Jolls
Well-known member
I can see the point from both sides of the coin in the Api/TDS debate. I'm also not too sure that the TDS "threat" is real; probably more a bit of Sabre rattling to ensure that Richo knows where to put the decimal point on the next contract offer. There is a deal to be done where we keep both - but that deal can't throw the cap out and needs to provide flexibility for the club and for the players in order for it to be workable.
TDS would be well aware that he is not at the same level as Api yet and we don't know how long Api will remain at theat level. In additon we have another young hooker coming through the grades and the option to recruit a starter if need be. The key is to structure the contract offers with the right on and off roads to keep everyone interested.
At the end of the day if TDS wants to be a starter in 27 he has two options - unseat Api or find another club. If Api is playing better than him come 27 he keeps developing until whatever clause is activated for him to leave. If he is as good as he thinks he will be then there should be no issues. If he isn't - he moves on and we develop the next in line.
If we had the previous administration still in charge this whole saga would be front page click bait. As it is - we are negotiating behind closed doors. This is a good sign and I trust will allow us to keep both. If not we will have time to find the next man up - be that junior development or we buy someone in.
TDS would be well aware that he is not at the same level as Api yet and we don't know how long Api will remain at theat level. In additon we have another young hooker coming through the grades and the option to recruit a starter if need be. The key is to structure the contract offers with the right on and off roads to keep everyone interested.
At the end of the day if TDS wants to be a starter in 27 he has two options - unseat Api or find another club. If Api is playing better than him come 27 he keeps developing until whatever clause is activated for him to leave. If he is as good as he thinks he will be then there should be no issues. If he isn't - he moves on and we develop the next in line.
If we had the previous administration still in charge this whole saga would be front page click bait. As it is - we are negotiating behind closed doors. This is a good sign and I trust will allow us to keep both. If not we will have time to find the next man up - be that junior development or we buy someone in.