I believe that you are able to claim players that were formerly in the 30 (Olam, Klemmer, Galvin) as being part of the 30 and therefore there isn't a pressing need to upgrade before June 30 to satisfy NRL regulations.
I don't care what comes of it.
That isn't the reason I listed.
Correct.
Players weve let go such as Olam Klem and Galvout can count to this
I’m glad there are a few people such as yourself who recognise we need a couple of more players who have the ability to be a ping of difference and help us win games that we are currently losing.
It's not unwise, Richo is unarguable with on how to approach roster management.
Big deal. It was an opinion.
At the end of the day, you’ll never know.
It’s stupid conceding a point that will never be proven, either way.
😂 Haha, you just can't admit you may have been slightly wrong on any point can ya?
I tried to research this after reading it on here previously regarding the June 30 cut off.
www.sportingnews.com
Katoa is miles ahead of Galvin, both in current performance and potential. The kid gives me Andrew Johns vibes, his deception with ball in hand and kicking game are already tracking to Johns levels. Galvin is more a Yeo skillset and potential. The Galvin crap is next level, yes he will be a great player if he keeps developing, however there are other young players out there absolutely killing it and rarely get a mention. Gould knew there was blood in the water when the early release requests were made and went in for the kill by pumping team Galvins tyres up to the point where he was too great to play for a struggling team, he deserves to be in a top 4 side immediately and its a travesty that he isn't. Let's see how his playmaker skills develop at the dogs, I don't think sexton or Burton's skills have really developed, the way the dogs attack is purely based on effort in defence to rattle teams and win field position and second phase play in attack from offloads and breaking tackles. Burtons kicking game is a big plus yet that was always there. You rarely see the halves creating.
As opposed to you, who no matter you get into a disagreement with, you fixate on the other person wanting to admit you are right. You can’t just have a disagreement and leave it. You need to feel vindicated.
If a journalist comes out and asks, retrospectively, if they had a chat about it once Luai arrives in camp and one of them responds with 'yeh, we had a brief chat', would that qualify as 'being proven'?
He probably come to the realisation he would likely only be a back up player back in the NRL, so why change from being a star starting halfback in the UK Super League to a fringe player here.
You’re now claiming victory over a hypothetical?
I think Critta was being diplomatic and towing the company line he has been fed by Gus...the fact that they even asked Galvin for the truth is odd in itself don't you think? as if they would not already know before he joined, would he believe his "brother" Luai's version as well as the rest of the ex-panthers boys or some kid he met yesterday.
Incorrect.
Exactly! Plus Hull KR wanted an answer asap so they could make plans for next season if he left. We may have been interested but may not have been ready to offer anything just yet, especially if there is truth to the Reynolds stuff. May probably decided in his best interests to extend rather than wait for something that may not happen.
It's a balance isn't it.
