@2005magic said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1086426) said:
If any such thing happened and we did have extra funds within cap I'd pay out McQueen or Packer and use the remaining funds to get a young up and comer.
Why ? The forwards , especially the front row has no leader ! Just sit in Packer . He had a bad year . He was good last year and the years before .
McQueen’s in his last year so , who cares . How much are you gonna save 150k maybe ? How’s that worth it ?
Packer is on his last chance- if injured fair enough, if sulking- p*** him off. Send signal WT is not a retirement home. Yes, payout would have to be negotiated (also with McQueen too) but we would have some ground for reduced payout if proven he is sulking. McQueen has openly had an offer tabled from ESL for this season onwards- hopefully he can take up the offer and see a few more years out in England. I;m pretty sure no NRL club will offer new contract for him.
Perception- we wonder why big name players and managers regard WT as not a serious club. Bad player performance and attitude not acceptable in the big boy clubs.. Those guys are rapidly weeded out elsewhere- contract or no contract.