cochise
Well-known member
@happy_tiger said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1110170) said:@wokesmoke said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1110168) said:@happy_tiger said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1110165) said:@wokesmoke said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1110163) said:@Tiger5150 said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1110153) said:@wokesmoke said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1110127) said:@Tiger5150 said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1110123) said:@wokesmoke said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1110117) said:If Reynolds sacked or stood down will be more
How can we get cap relief if his court case is this year? If he gets off, he gets paid.
If the NRL stands him down should be able to get cap relief to replace him in the top 30. If he is sacked tigers aren’t obliged to pay him a thing even if found not guilty.
if the NRL stands him down on "no fault" and he is cleared he will get paid in full. how can we get cap relief, spend it on someone else and then double pay it when we pay Reynolds. I cant see how this can work and I cant see us getting cap relief for him if he is "Stood down".
I also cant see how we could sack him with the whole "innocent until proven guilty" thing.
Just the fact he’s been charged by police is enough. And then the video. Conduct detriment to the profitability of the club is in every contract. Guilt or innocence isn’t a factor.
I thought the crime had to have a sentence of 12 years plus ....
And if we sack him we wear the cost unless we can prove he has breached his contract
I can’t be bothered with this. Honestly.
Just asking the question Woke ....they said the other night that assaulting an officer wasn't a 12 year plus sentence so the NRL can't invoke the no fault policy against Curtis Scott
Greenburg has discretion for crimes that fall under the 11 year limit, especially in cases involving women. That is why Dylan Walker was stood down under the policy!