Signings, Suggestions & Rumours Discussion

[Guest]

Watching this Matheson Johns kid…..he's got something. He could be a good'n.

 

[Demps]

Watching this Matheson Johns kid…..he's got something. He could be a good'n.

Sign him up.

4 year deal.

 

[fair dinkum]

Watching this Matheson Johns kid…..he's got something. He could be a good'n.

Love his aggression.

 

[Demps]

Watching this Matheson Johns kid…..he's got something. He could be a good'n.

Love his aggression.

5 star

 

[Regan]

Nofo been on the wing for years scoring some great tries yet lets one or two tries in a game
excusesfor years it is the centres fault we change centres same thing he is a defensive liability
time to try new wingers we havent made semis for 9 years and nofo seems to be a constant in that period.


Missed the finals 9 years in a row and it’s the wingers fault. Good one.


nah, its also Brooks fault. Going into his 7th year of potential. He's only played 130 games, he'll come good in a few more years. ?

He already is good

by 'good' do you mean bog average?

Yawn, tell me something I haven’t heard the last 5 years. Be original.

"yawn" pretty much what the opposition does when Brooks gets the ball in attack.

Acknowledges years of garbage and still thinks Brooks is a good halfback. 0 and 6 seasons as a half back leading his team to finals footy. A real champion, any other team with any sort of standards and he'd have played 30 games at most. Pretty obvious when the 'big 4' were available, not a single club was looking at signing Brooks so he clung to the Tigers like dags on a sheep. Without a decent half back, Tigers will never make the finals.

#facts

Prince 05 finals
Johnny 'Cronk" Morris 07-09 nothing
Rob Lui 10' 11' finals
Miller/Moltzen/Anasta 12' 13' - putrid
Brooks 14-20 garbage

WRONG, WRONG, WRONG!

When the 'Big 4' fiasco was happening.... Melbourne made Brooks and offer and wanted him to join the Storm.

You are just making things fit your "Anti Brooks" agenda.

Say what you like about Brooks but keep to the facts at least.

Citation needed

..........and no, a random twitter account doesnt count.

Mate! I am not going back a couple of years searching for information.

It was fact at the time. Guarantee it. I am sure others on here would or could back this fact up.

So i guess we will just take your word for it. however, I do remember Brooks said that he never ever wanted to leave the Tigers because he knew he was a bog average first grade half back and couldnt get a better deal anywhere else. Guarantee it. I am not going back a couple of years searching for information. It was fact at the time.

That's tripe. Brooks has never said that.

context
/ˈkɒntɛkst/
noun
the circumstances that form the setting for an event, statement, or idea, and in terms of which it can be fully understood.

When you have no facts this is what you resort to. Bravo.

no facts? i gave you what the word context means. Maybe reply to something after you have read and understood why it was written.

I know what the word means Stryker. You've got your axe to grind with Brooks and no one here really expects to hear anything different from you.

Is Dink Stryker?
Well I'll be damned...

No, its what the less fortunate resort to when they cant retort anything of intelligence. Ive been on here since 2004, longer then all whos calling me Stryker. Ive had the same username, just hadnt rejoined for years until last year.

You rejoined because you were previously banned.

hahaha, yeah sure, i havent been on here for at least 5 years. Ive lived in China for years used a VPN to get access, only been back in Australia a little bit.

So this was always your user name?
Willow is a fed.

something like fair dinkum and it goes back to 2004. maybe had some dashes or dots. Cant remember the exact name, email or password, so i signed up last year again.

Ah true.
No beef from me.

Just always wondered where stryker went.

I remember the name, cant remember anything about the user.

Stryker had The Big Leboski meme one of my all time favourite films

 

[Demps]

Nofo been on the wing for years scoring some great tries yet lets one or two tries in a game
excusesfor years it is the centres fault we change centres same thing he is a defensive liability
time to try new wingers we havent made semis for 9 years and nofo seems to be a constant in that period.


Missed the finals 9 years in a row and it’s the wingers fault. Good one.


nah, its also Brooks fault. Going into his 7th year of potential. He's only played 130 games, he'll come good in a few more years. ?

He already is good

by 'good' do you mean bog average?

Yawn, tell me something I haven’t heard the last 5 years. Be original.

"yawn" pretty much what the opposition does when Brooks gets the ball in attack.

Acknowledges years of garbage and still thinks Brooks is a good halfback. 0 and 6 seasons as a half back leading his team to finals footy. A real champion, any other team with any sort of standards and he'd have played 30 games at most. Pretty obvious when the 'big 4' were available, not a single club was looking at signing Brooks so he clung to the Tigers like dags on a sheep. Without a decent half back, Tigers will never make the finals.

#facts

Prince 05 finals
Johnny 'Cronk" Morris 07-09 nothing
Rob Lui 10' 11' finals
Miller/Moltzen/Anasta 12' 13' - putrid
Brooks 14-20 garbage

WRONG, WRONG, WRONG!

When the 'Big 4' fiasco was happening.... Melbourne made Brooks and offer and wanted him to join the Storm.

You are just making things fit your "Anti Brooks" agenda.

Say what you like about Brooks but keep to the facts at least.

Citation needed

..........and no, a random twitter account doesnt count.

Mate! I am not going back a couple of years searching for information.

It was fact at the time. Guarantee it. I am sure others on here would or could back this fact up.

So i guess we will just take your word for it. however, I do remember Brooks said that he never ever wanted to leave the Tigers because he knew he was a bog average first grade half back and couldnt get a better deal anywhere else. Guarantee it. I am not going back a couple of years searching for information. It was fact at the time.

That's tripe. Brooks has never said that.

context
/ˈkɒntɛkst/
noun
the circumstances that form the setting for an event, statement, or idea, and in terms of which it can be fully understood.

When you have no facts this is what you resort to. Bravo.

no facts? i gave you what the word context means. Maybe reply to something after you have read and understood why it was written.

I know what the word means Stryker. You've got your axe to grind with Brooks and no one here really expects to hear anything different from you.

Is Dink Stryker?
Well I'll be damned...

No, its what the less fortunate resort to when they cant retort anything of intelligence. Ive been on here since 2004, longer then all whos calling me Stryker. Ive had the same username, just hadnt rejoined for years until last year.

You rejoined because you were previously banned.

hahaha, yeah sure, i havent been on here for at least 5 years. Ive lived in China for years used a VPN to get access, only been back in Australia a little bit.

So this was always your user name?
Willow is a fed.

something like fair dinkum and it goes back to 2004. maybe had some dashes or dots. Cant remember the exact name, email or password, so i signed up last year again.

Ah true.
No beef from me.

Just always wondered where stryker went.

I remember the name, cant remember anything about the user.


Stryker had The Big Leboski meme one of my all time favourite films

Sure did.
Awful movie.
Haha.

 

[Harvey]

Johns, Musgrove & Hoffman were positives.

Reynolds was awful.

Some of the other gun youngstars (Seyfarth, Dillon, Cini, Madden) do not look like they are anywhere near ready for first grade.

Next week will be interesting, hopefully it will be a much better performance than this

 

[Regan]

Nofo been on the wing for years scoring some great tries yet lets one or two tries in a game
excusesfor years it is the centres fault we change centres same thing he is a defensive liability
time to try new wingers we havent made semis for 9 years and nofo seems to be a constant in that period.


Missed the finals 9 years in a row and it’s the wingers fault. Good one.


nah, its also Brooks fault. Going into his 7th year of potential. He's only played 130 games, he'll come good in a few more years. ?

He already is good

by 'good' do you mean bog average?

Yawn, tell me something I haven’t heard the last 5 years. Be original.

"yawn" pretty much what the opposition does when Brooks gets the ball in attack.

Acknowledges years of garbage and still thinks Brooks is a good halfback. 0 and 6 seasons as a half back leading his team to finals footy. A real champion, any other team with any sort of standards and he'd have played 30 games at most. Pretty obvious when the 'big 4' were available, not a single club was looking at signing Brooks so he clung to the Tigers like dags on a sheep. Without a decent half back, Tigers will never make the finals.

#facts

Prince 05 finals
Johnny 'Cronk" Morris 07-09 nothing
Rob Lui 10' 11' finals
Miller/Moltzen/Anasta 12' 13' - putrid
Brooks 14-20 garbage

WRONG, WRONG, WRONG!

When the 'Big 4' fiasco was happening.... Melbourne made Brooks and offer and wanted him to join the Storm.

You are just making things fit your "Anti Brooks" agenda.

Say what you like about Brooks but keep to the facts at least.

Citation needed

..........and no, a random twitter account doesnt count.

Mate! I am not going back a couple of years searching for information.

It was fact at the time. Guarantee it. I am sure others on here would or could back this fact up.

So i guess we will just take your word for it. however, I do remember Brooks said that he never ever wanted to leave the Tigers because he knew he was a bog average first grade half back and couldnt get a better deal anywhere else. Guarantee it. I am not going back a couple of years searching for information. It was fact at the time.

That's tripe. Brooks has never said that.

context
/ˈkɒntɛkst/
noun
the circumstances that form the setting for an event, statement, or idea, and in terms of which it can be fully understood.

When you have no facts this is what you resort to. Bravo.

no facts? i gave you what the word context means. Maybe reply to something after you have read and understood why it was written.

I know what the word means Stryker. You've got your axe to grind with Brooks and no one here really expects to hear anything different from you.

Is Dink Stryker?
Well I'll be damned...

No, its what the less fortunate resort to when they cant retort anything of intelligence. Ive been on here since 2004, longer then all whos calling me Stryker. Ive had the same username, just hadnt rejoined for years until last year.

You rejoined because you were previously banned.

hahaha, yeah sure, i havent been on here for at least 5 years. Ive lived in China for years used a VPN to get access, only been back in Australia a little bit.

So this was always your user name?
Willow is a fed.

something like fair dinkum and it goes back to 2004. maybe had some dashes or dots. Cant remember the exact name, email or password, so i signed up last year again.

Ah true.
No beef from me.

Just always wondered where stryker went.

I remember the name, cant remember anything about the user.


Stryker had The Big Leboski meme one of my all time favourite films

Sure did.
Awful movie.
Haha.

Watch it again its awesome

 

[Demps]

Nofo been on the wing for years scoring some great tries yet lets one or two tries in a game
excusesfor years it is the centres fault we change centres same thing he is a defensive liability
time to try new wingers we havent made semis for 9 years and nofo seems to be a constant in that period.


Missed the finals 9 years in a row and it’s the wingers fault. Good one.


nah, its also Brooks fault. Going into his 7th year of potential. He's only played 130 games, he'll come good in a few more years. ?

He already is good

by 'good' do you mean bog average?

Yawn, tell me something I haven’t heard the last 5 years. Be original.

"yawn" pretty much what the opposition does when Brooks gets the ball in attack.

Acknowledges years of garbage and still thinks Brooks is a good halfback. 0 and 6 seasons as a half back leading his team to finals footy. A real champion, any other team with any sort of standards and he'd have played 30 games at most. Pretty obvious when the 'big 4' were available, not a single club was looking at signing Brooks so he clung to the Tigers like dags on a sheep. Without a decent half back, Tigers will never make the finals.

#facts

Prince 05 finals
Johnny 'Cronk" Morris 07-09 nothing
Rob Lui 10' 11' finals
Miller/Moltzen/Anasta 12' 13' - putrid
Brooks 14-20 garbage

WRONG, WRONG, WRONG!

When the 'Big 4' fiasco was happening.... Melbourne made Brooks and offer and wanted him to join the Storm.

You are just making things fit your "Anti Brooks" agenda.

Say what you like about Brooks but keep to the facts at least.

Citation needed

..........and no, a random twitter account doesnt count.

Mate! I am not going back a couple of years searching for information.

It was fact at the time. Guarantee it. I am sure others on here would or could back this fact up.

So i guess we will just take your word for it. however, I do remember Brooks said that he never ever wanted to leave the Tigers because he knew he was a bog average first grade half back and couldnt get a better deal anywhere else. Guarantee it. I am not going back a couple of years searching for information. It was fact at the time.

That's tripe. Brooks has never said that.

context
/ˈkɒntɛkst/
noun
the circumstances that form the setting for an event, statement, or idea, and in terms of which it can be fully understood.

When you have no facts this is what you resort to. Bravo.

no facts? i gave you what the word context means. Maybe reply to something after you have read and understood why it was written.

I know what the word means Stryker. You've got your axe to grind with Brooks and no one here really expects to hear anything different from you.

Is Dink Stryker?
Well I'll be damned...

No, its what the less fortunate resort to when they cant retort anything of intelligence. Ive been on here since 2004, longer then all whos calling me Stryker. Ive had the same username, just hadnt rejoined for years until last year.

You rejoined because you were previously banned.

hahaha, yeah sure, i havent been on here for at least 5 years. Ive lived in China for years used a VPN to get access, only been back in Australia a little bit.

So this was always your user name?
Willow is a fed.

something like fair dinkum and it goes back to 2004. maybe had some dashes or dots. Cant remember the exact name, email or password, so i signed up last year again.

Ah true.
No beef from me.

Just always wondered where stryker went.

I remember the name, cant remember anything about the user.


Stryker had The Big Leboski meme one of my all time favourite films

Sure did.
Awful movie.
Haha.



Watch it again its awesome

Seen it 100 times.
Hate it as much as I hate pulp fiction..

Weird arty hipster trash

 

[Tigerwould]

Johns, Musgrove & Hoffman were positives.

Reynolds was awful.

Some of the other gun youngstars (Seyfarth, Dillon, Cini, Madden) do not look like they are anywhere near ready for first grade.

Next week will be interesting, hopefully it will be a much better performance than this

Agree.except for Madden. If multiple injuries strike I'd have him in before Reynolds

 

[Demps]

Johns, Musgrove & Hoffman were positives.

Reynolds was awful.

Some of the other gun youngstars (Seyfarth, Dillon, Cini, Madden) do not look like they are anywhere near ready for first grade.

Next week will be interesting, hopefully it will be a much better performance than this

Agree.except for Madden. If multiple injuries strike I'd have him in before Reynolds

Logical option.
Madden > Grub

 

[Jimmy]

Honestly would have liked us to pick issac like up for a year....he’s still got it...glassy player. I used to be against it as he’s old but he’s impressed me this all stars match

 

[hobbo1]

Honestly would have liked us to pick issac like up for a year....he’s still got it...glassy player. I used to be against it as he’s old but he’s impressed me this all stars match

We should’ve gone after koroisau

 

[Tigerlily]

Nofo been on the wing for years scoring some great tries yet lets one or two tries in a game
excusesfor years it is the centres fault we change centres same thing he is a defensive liability
time to try new wingers we havent made semis for 9 years and nofo seems to be a constant in that period.


Missed the finals 9 years in a row and it’s the wingers fault. Good one.


nah, its also Brooks fault. Going into his 7th year of potential. He's only played 130 games, he'll come good in a few more years. ?

He already is good

by 'good' do you mean bog average?

Yawn, tell me something I haven’t heard the last 5 years. Be original.

"yawn" pretty much what the opposition does when Brooks gets the ball in attack.

Acknowledges years of garbage and still thinks Brooks is a good halfback. 0 and 6 seasons as a half back leading his team to finals footy. A real champion, any other team with any sort of standards and he'd have played 30 games at most. Pretty obvious when the 'big 4' were available, not a single club was looking at signing Brooks so he clung to the Tigers like dags on a sheep. Without a decent half back, Tigers will never make the finals.

#facts

Prince 05 finals
Johnny 'Cronk" Morris 07-09 nothing
Rob Lui 10' 11' finals
Miller/Moltzen/Anasta 12' 13' - putrid
Brooks 14-20 garbage

WRONG, WRONG, WRONG!

When the 'Big 4' fiasco was happening.... Melbourne made Brooks and offer and wanted him to join the Storm.

You are just making things fit your "Anti Brooks" agenda.

Say what you like about Brooks but keep to the facts at least.

Citation needed

..........and no, a random twitter account doesnt count.

Mate! I am not going back a couple of years searching for information.

It was fact at the time. Guarantee it. I am sure others on here would or could back this fact up.

So i guess we will just take your word for it. however, I do remember Brooks said that he never ever wanted to leave the Tigers because he knew he was a bog average first grade half back and couldnt get a better deal anywhere else. Guarantee it. I am not going back a couple of years searching for information. It was fact at the time.

That's tripe. Brooks has never said that.

context
/ˈkɒntɛkst/
noun
the circumstances that form the setting for an event, statement, or idea, and in terms of which it can be fully understood.

When you have no facts this is what you resort to. Bravo.

no facts? i gave you what the word context means. Maybe reply to something after you have read and understood why it was written.

I know what the word means Stryker. You've got your axe to grind with Brooks and no one here really expects to hear anything different from you.

Is Dink Stryker?
Well I'll be damned...

No, its what the less fortunate resort to when they cant retort anything of intelligence. Ive been on here since 2004, longer then all whos calling me Stryker. Ive had the same username, just hadnt rejoined for years until last year.

You rejoined because you were previously banned.

hahaha, yeah sure, i havent been on here for at least 5 years. Ive lived in China for years used a VPN to get access, only been back in Australia a little bit.

So this was always your user name?
Willow is a fed.

something like fair dinkum and it goes back to 2004. maybe had some dashes or dots. Cant remember the exact name, email or password, so i signed up last year again.

Ah true.
No beef from me.

Just always wondered where stryker went.

I remember the name, cant remember anything about the user.


Stryker had The Big Leboski meme one of my all time favourite films

Sure did.
Awful movie.
Haha.



Watch it again its awesome

Seen it 100 times.
Hate it as much as I hate pulp fiction..

Weird arty hipster trash

Geez! That’s a bit harsh Demps Pulp Fiction was a good flick for it’s day.

 

[Geo]

Nofo been on the wing for years scoring some great tries yet lets one or two tries in a game
excusesfor years it is the centres fault we change centres same thing he is a defensive liability
time to try new wingers we havent made semis for 9 years and nofo seems to be a constant in that period.


Missed the finals 9 years in a row and it’s the wingers fault. Good one.


nah, its also Brooks fault. Going into his 7th year of potential. He's only played 130 games, he'll come good in a few more years. ?

He already is good

by 'good' do you mean bog average?

Yawn, tell me something I haven’t heard the last 5 years. Be original.

"yawn" pretty much what the opposition does when Brooks gets the ball in attack.

Acknowledges years of garbage and still thinks Brooks is a good halfback. 0 and 6 seasons as a half back leading his team to finals footy. A real champion, any other team with any sort of standards and he'd have played 30 games at most. Pretty obvious when the 'big 4' were available, not a single club was looking at signing Brooks so he clung to the Tigers like dags on a sheep. Without a decent half back, Tigers will never make the finals.

#facts

Prince 05 finals
Johnny 'Cronk" Morris 07-09 nothing
Rob Lui 10' 11' finals
Miller/Moltzen/Anasta 12' 13' - putrid
Brooks 14-20 garbage

WRONG, WRONG, WRONG!

When the 'Big 4' fiasco was happening.... Melbourne made Brooks and offer and wanted him to join the Storm.

You are just making things fit your "Anti Brooks" agenda.

Say what you like about Brooks but keep to the facts at least.

Citation needed

..........and no, a random twitter account doesnt count.

Mate! I am not going back a couple of years searching for information.

It was fact at the time. Guarantee it. I am sure others on here would or could back this fact up.

So i guess we will just take your word for it. however, I do remember Brooks said that he never ever wanted to leave the Tigers because he knew he was a bog average first grade half back and couldnt get a better deal anywhere else. Guarantee it. I am not going back a couple of years searching for information. It was fact at the time.

That's tripe. Brooks has never said that.

context
/ˈkɒntɛkst/
noun
the circumstances that form the setting for an event, statement, or idea, and in terms of which it can be fully understood.

When you have no facts this is what you resort to. Bravo.

no facts? i gave you what the word context means. Maybe reply to something after you have read and understood why it was written.

I know what the word means Stryker. You've got your axe to grind with Brooks and no one here really expects to hear anything different from you.

Is Dink Stryker?
Well I'll be damned...

No, its what the less fortunate resort to when they cant retort anything of intelligence. Ive been on here since 2004, longer then all whos calling me Stryker. Ive had the same username, just hadnt rejoined for years until last year.

You rejoined because you were previously banned.

hahaha, yeah sure, i havent been on here for at least 5 years. Ive lived in China for years used a VPN to get access, only been back in Australia a little bit.

So this was always your user name?
Willow is a fed.

something like fair dinkum and it goes back to 2004. maybe had some dashes or dots. Cant remember the exact name, email or password, so i signed up last year again.

Ah true.
No beef from me.

Just always wondered where stryker went.

I remember the name, cant remember anything about the user.


Stryker had The Big Leboski meme one of my all time favourite films

Sure did.
Awful movie.
Haha.



Watch it again its awesome

Seen it 100 times.
Hate it as much as I hate pulp fiction..

Weird arty hipster trash

Geez! That’s a bit harsh Demps Pulp Fiction was a good flick for it’s day.

Did you like J.Travolta Lilly?

More Samuel J and Eric Stolz for me...From memory pulp fiction kick started Travolta’s career again.

Can any of them kick goals..

 

[pawsandclaws1]

Johns, Musgrove & Hoffman were positives.

Reynolds was awful.

Some of the other gun youngstars (Seyfarth, Dillon, Cini, Madden) do not look like they are anywhere near ready for first grade.

Next week will be interesting, hopefully it will be a much better performance than this

Agree.except for Madden. If multiple injuries strike I'd have him in before Reynolds

Top four halves are Brooks, Marshall, Walters and Madden.

Seyfarth will be in the NRL soon.

 

[Dyloh]

Wouldn't mind signing someone to give ol Ivan a floggin.

 

[GNR4LIFE]

Nofo been on the wing for years scoring some great tries yet lets one or two tries in a game
excusesfor years it is the centres fault we change centres same thing he is a defensive liability
time to try new wingers we havent made semis for 9 years and nofo seems to be a constant in that period.


Missed the finals 9 years in a row and it’s the wingers fault. Good one.


nah, its also Brooks fault. Going into his 7th year of potential. He's only played 130 games, he'll come good in a few more years. ?

He already is good

by 'good' do you mean bog average?

Yawn, tell me something I haven’t heard the last 5 years. Be original.

"yawn" pretty much what the opposition does when Brooks gets the ball in attack.

Acknowledges years of garbage and still thinks Brooks is a good halfback. 0 and 6 seasons as a half back leading his team to finals footy. A real champion, any other team with any sort of standards and he'd have played 30 games at most. Pretty obvious when the 'big 4' were available, not a single club was looking at signing Brooks so he clung to the Tigers like dags on a sheep. Without a decent half back, Tigers will never make the finals.

#facts

Prince 05 finals
Johnny 'Cronk" Morris 07-09 nothing
Rob Lui 10' 11' finals
Miller/Moltzen/Anasta 12' 13' - putrid
Brooks 14-20 garbage

WRONG, WRONG, WRONG!

When the 'Big 4' fiasco was happening.... Melbourne made Brooks and offer and wanted him to join the Storm.

You are just making things fit your "Anti Brooks" agenda.

Say what you like about Brooks but keep to the facts at least.

Citation needed

..........and no, a random twitter account doesnt count.

Mate! I am not going back a couple of years searching for information.

It was fact at the time. Guarantee it. I am sure others on here would or could back this fact up.

So i guess we will just take your word for it. however, I do remember Brooks said that he never ever wanted to leave the Tigers because he knew he was a bog average first grade half back and couldnt get a better deal anywhere else. Guarantee it. I am not going back a couple of years searching for information. It was fact at the time.

That's tripe. Brooks has never said that.

context
/ˈkɒntɛkst/
noun
the circumstances that form the setting for an event, statement, or idea, and in terms of which it can be fully understood.

When you have no facts this is what you resort to. Bravo.

no facts? i gave you what the word context means. Maybe reply to something after you have read and understood why it was written.

I know what the word means Stryker. You've got your axe to grind with Brooks and no one here really expects to hear anything different from you.

Is Dink Stryker?
Well I'll be damned...

No, its what the less fortunate resort to when they cant retort anything of intelligence. Ive been on here since 2004, longer then all whos calling me Stryker. Ive had the same username, just hadnt rejoined for years until last year.

You rejoined because you were previously banned.

hahaha, yeah sure, i havent been on here for at least 5 years. Ive lived in China for years used a VPN to get access, only been back in Australia a little bit.

So this was always your user name?
Willow is a fed.

something like fair dinkum and it goes back to 2004. maybe had some dashes or dots. Cant remember the exact name, email or password, so i signed up last year again.

Ah true.
No beef from me.

Just always wondered where stryker went.

I remember the name, cant remember anything about the user.


Stryker had The Big Leboski meme one of my all time favourite films

Sure did.
Awful movie.
Haha.



Watch it again its awesome

Seen it 100 times.
Hate it as much as I hate pulp fiction..

Weird arty hipster trash

Geez! That’s a bit harsh Demps Pulp Fiction was a good flick for it’s day.

Did you like J.Travolta Lilly?

More Samuel J and Eric Stolz for me...From memory pulp fiction kick started Travolta’s career again.

Can any of them kick goals..

Travolta can shoot, based off that film.

 

[Jedi_Tiger]

looking at the roosters grand final review how sickening listening to cordner and robinson and tedesco what a turd

 

[TheDaBoss]

If grant is rated higher than b smith......
Holy moly he must be good