BAGNF05
Well-known member
@fade-to-black said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1479005) said:@bagnf05 said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1478993) said:@fade-to-black said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1478987) said:@goanna57 said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1478388) said:@fade-to-black said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1478380) said:@jayt said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1478205) said:@tigerwest said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1478132) said:So just wondering, if we still can’t get any big signings to come, are we still blaming Madge or will it be Sheens?
I think the chance for big signings are over, we missed them all, there isn't anyone exciting left available as far as I understand?
Or do you mean 2023
I think the only big signing that was missed was Matt Burton, he has a big future ahead of him. And he reportedly only went to Dogs to follow Barrett. Not to many others signed up for other clubs this year that would be considered big signings that would've justified their huge salaries IMO.
I have asked you the question in one of your other posts but I’ll ask again just who is good enough for WTs
Not a question of who is good enough from my end, it was a statement saying a 4year deal for Finucane is too long IMO so was happy our club didn't get railroaded into offering him that. Ditto for JAC, time will tell if he is a $700k a year player who influences results once he is taken from the comfort of a top-notch roster and continual top 4 team. I'd be willing to bet he flounders at Canterbury, same as he would at WT.
So in answer to your question, there are PLENTY of players who are good enough to represent our club and I wouldn't say no to many of them (just like I never said Finucane or JAC aren't good enough to play for WT). Whether or not they would provide good value if they were on exorbitant money or length of contract is another matter entirely.
What you are essentially saying as that players lower their performance to the standards that exist at our club. Which I can’t disagree with. Answer why and you get Pascoe’s job.
Well it is basically common knowledge that you can come here as a player, underperform massively, yet still get picked every week. Our club is the pushover club where players run the show regardless of who the coach is or who is involved in the front office.
Can’t disagree as it seems that way. This is why I am happy we didn’t sack Madge. Send a message that we expect the players to get the club out of this mess. If they’re not up for it, on your bike.